scholarly journals PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK- PAIR-SHARE DAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION BERBANTUAN GEOGEBRA PADA MATERI TRANSFORMASI DI KELAS XI SMA NEGERI 7 MEDAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Febry . Sirait ◽  
Pargaulan . Siagian

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi eksperiman. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa yang diajar dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think-Pair-Share (TPS) berbantuan Geogebra lebih baik daripada siswa yang diajar dengan kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) berbantuan Geogebra pada materi Transformasi.. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 7 Medan semester genap, yang terdiri dari 9 kelas pararel. Sedangkan yang menjadi sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa sebanyak dua kelas, yaitu kelas XI IPA 4 sebagai kelas eksperimen A sebanyak 39 orang dan kelas XI IPA 6 sebagai kelas eksperimen B sebanyak 39 orang. Kelas eksperimen A menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think-Pair-Share (TPS) dan kelas eksperimen B menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD). Untuk memperoleh data yang diperlukan dalam penelitian ini digunakan essay test sebanyak 5 soal dan telah dinyatakan valid oleh tim ahli. Hasil Uji validitas dengan rtabel = 0,316 diperoleh bahwa soal tersebut valid dari 5 soal. Dan hasil uji reliabilitas pada soal yang diberikan diperoleh sebesar 0,81. Sebelum pengujian hipotesis, terlebih dahulu diuji normalitas dan homogenitas data. Dari pengujian ini diperoleh bahwa sampel berasal dari populasi yang berdistribusi normal dan memiliki varians yang homogen. Dari analisis data pada kelas eksperimen A diperoleh nilai rata-rata pre test 43,33 dan simpangan baku pre test 8,66 sedangkan nilai rata-rata post test 83,13 dan simpangan baku post test 10,35. Pada kelas eksperimen B diperoleh nilai rata-rata pre test 40,97 dan simpangan baku pre test 8,84 sedangkan nilai rata-rata post test 75,33 dan simpangan baku post test 11,64. Dari analisis data post test dengan menggunakan uji-t pada taraf = 0,05 diperoleh thitung = 3,13 dan  ttabel = 1,662 yang ternyata thitung > ttabel yaitu, 3,13 > 1,662 maka H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa yang diajar dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think-Pair-Share (TPS) berbantuan Geogebra lebih baik daripada siswa yang diajar dengan kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) berbantuan Geogebra pada materi Transformasi. Kata Kunci: kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah matematik, pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dan STAD ABSTRACTThis research is a quasi experimental research. This study aims to determine whether the problem solving ability of mathematical students who are taught by applying cooperative learning model type Think-Pair-Share (TPS) with Geogebra is better than students who are taught cooperatively by Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) with Geogebra on Transformation material. The population in this study is all students of class XI SMA Negeri 7 Medan even semester, which consists of 9 parallel classes. While the sample in this study is the students as much as two classes, namely class XI IPA 4 as a class of experiments A as many as 39 people and class XI IPA 6 as a class experiment B as many as 39 people. The experimental class A uses the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) model of cooperative learning and experimental class B using the Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) cooperative learning model. To obtain the necessary data in this study used the essay test of 5 questions and has been declared valid by a team of experts. Result of validity test with rtabel = 0,316 obtained that matter is valid from 5 problem. And reliability test result on given problem is obtained equal to 0,81. Before testing the hypothesis, first tested the normality and homogeneity of the data. From this test it is found that the sample comes from a population that is normally distributed and has a homogeneous variance. From the data analysis in experiment class A obtained the average value of pre test 43,33 and standard deviation of pre test 8,66 while the average value of post test 83,13 and standard deviation post test 10.35. In the experimental class B obtained the average value of pre test 40.97 and standard deviation of pre test 8.84 while the average post test value of 75.33 and standard deviation post test 11.64. From the analysis of post test data by using t-test at the level = 0.05 obtained tcount = 3.13 and ttable = 1.662 which turns thitung> ttable ie, 3.13> 1.662 then H0 rejected and Ha accepted. Then it can be concluded that students' mathematical problem solving skills that are taught by applying cooperative learning model of Think-Pair-Share type (TPS) with Geogebra is better than students who are taught cooperatively by Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) with Geogebra on Transformation materials. Keywords: mathematical problem solving ability, cooperative learning type TPS and STAD

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Faizah Ibrahim Bakoban ◽  
Zul . Amry

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Teams Games Tournaments pada materi persamaan linear dua variabel. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII Semester II SMP N 35 Medan  yang terdiri dari 8 kelas dengan jumlah keseluruhan siswa 318 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara simple random sampling dengan mengambil 2 kelas dari 8 kelas secara acak yaitu kelas eksperimen 1 yang berjumlah 36 orang dan kelas eksperimen 2 yang berjumlah 36 orang. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa adalah tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang telah divalidasi dalam bentuk uraian. Dari hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dengan selisih data pretest post test dari kelas eksperimen 1 dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TGT diperoleh nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen 1 sebesar 27,61 dan nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen 2 sebesar 20,083. Hasil uji t  pihak kanan dengan dk = 70 dan a = 0,05, diperoleh thitung = 2,935 dan ttabel = 1,668 sehingga thitung > ttabel yaitu 2,935 > 1,668 maka Ha diterima, dengan demikian  diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa hasil akhir penelitian menunjukkan bahwa STAD lebih efektif untuk matematika dibandingkan dengan TGT .Karena penyediaan untuk keterlibatan belajar yang lebih tinggi, ini terbukti menjadi strategi pembelajaran aktif. Kata Kunci : Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) dan Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Pemecahan Masalah Matematika ABSTRACTThis study aims to see that students' mathematical problem solving ability using cooperative learning model of Student Teams Achievement Division is better than cooperative learning model of Teams Games Tournaments on two variable linear equations. This type of research is a quasi experiment. The population in this study is all students of class VIII Semester II SMP N 35 Medan consisting of 8 classes with total students 318 people. Sampling was done by simple random sampling by taking 2 classes from 8 classes at random that is experiment class 1 which amounted to 36 people and experiment class 2 which amounted to 36 people. The instrument used to determine students' mathematical problem solving abilities is a validated problem-solving test in the form of a description. The result of this research shows that with the difference of pretest post test data from experimental class 1 with STAD type cooperative learning model and experiment 2 class with cooperative learning model type TGT obtained average value of experiment class 1 is 27,61 and experiment class average value 2 by 20,083. The result of right side t test with dk = 70 and (= 0,05, obtained thitung = 2,935 and ttable = 1,668 so thitung> t table that is 2,935> 1,668 Ha accepted, thus obtained conclusion that end result of research indicate that STAD is more effective for math than TGT. Because of the provision for higher learning engagement, this proves to be an active learning strategy. Keywords: Cooperative learning model of Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Mathematical Problem Solving 


GANEC SWARA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 874
Author(s):  
NURUL AULIA DEWI ◽  
MUHAMMAD IRHAM ◽  
SARWO EDY WIBOWO

      This study aims to determine the effect of the Type STAD Cooperative Learning model on mathematical problem solving abilities. The data collection technique was obtained by means of a test in the form of description questions and documentation in the form of a list of student names. The research instrument used was 3 pre-test and post-test questions. The data analysis technique used is the normality test, homogeneity, t test with the technique of paired samples t-test and independent t-test.      The results showed that, the paired sample t-test on the problem solving ability before and after treatment with STAD obtained an average value of 50.29 to 83.71 with a significance of 0.000 <0.05. This means that the students' scores before and after STAD learning have differences in the average mathematical problem solving abilities. Based on the results of the paired sample t-test on the ability to solve mathematical problems before and after treatment using conventional learning models, the average value was 44.57 to 75.79 with a significance of 0.000 <0.05. This means that there is a significant increase before and after conventional learning. Based on the results of the independent samples t-test, the mean values were 83.71 and 75.79 with a significance value of 0.009 <0.05. This means that there is a difference in the average problem-solving ability of students in STAD learning with students in conventional learning. It can be concluded that the STAD type of cooperative learning model has an effect on students' problem solving abilities in mathematics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Ika Rosenta Purba

This study aims to determine student learning outcomes using the cooperative learning model type TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) on ecosystem material in SMA Negeri 6 Pematangsiantar. This research was conducted on February-March 2019 in class X (1st) SMA Negeri 6 Pematangsiantar. The population in this study was class X SMA Negeri 6 Pematangsiantar with 9 classes. The sampling method is Cluster Random Sampling, and get class X-1 as an experimental class and class X-5 as a control. The results of the analysis of the mean value of the pre-test of the control class = 38.38, the experimental class = 52.66 and the average value of the post-test of the control class = 59.75, the experimental class = 79.66. The results of the standard deviation analysis of the control class pretest = 13,886, the experimental class = 9,468 and the posttest standard deviation of the control class = 14,458, the experimental class = 6,454. The results of the hypothesis analysis (t test) were obtained t-count = 6.985 and t-table =1.99. Based on the results of research and analysis it can be concluded that the cooperative learning model of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) type is better for improving learning outcomes compared to conventional learning on ecosystem material in class X SMA Negeri 6 Pematangsiantar


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramadhani .Siregar . ◽  
Syafari . .

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran TTW lebih tinggi daripada model pembelajaran TPS pada materi Bangun Datar di kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Tanjung Morawa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII yang terdiri dari 7 kelas dengan jumlah keseluruhan siswa 201 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara cluster random sampling dengan mengambil 2 kelas dari 7 kelas secara acak yaitu kelas eksperimen A yang berjumlah 25 orang dan kelas eksperimen 2 yang berjumlah 26 orang. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa adalah tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang telah divalidasi dalam bentuk uraian. Dari hasil penelitian yang diberikan perlakuan yang berbeda, kelas eksperimen A dengan model pembelajaran TTW dan kelas eksperimen B dengan model pembelajaran TPS diperoleh nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen A sebesar 28,20 dan nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen B sebesar 25,27. Hasil uji t  pihak kanan dengan dk = 49 dan a = 0,05, diperoleh thitung = 3,66 dan ttabel = 1,6655 sehingga thitung > ttabel yaitu 3,66 > 1,6655 maka Ha diterima, dengan demikian  diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran TTW lebih tinggi dari model pembelajaran TPS pada materi bangun datar.Kata Kunci : Model pembelajaran Think Talk Write dan Think Pair Share, Pemecahan Masalah Matematika ABSTRACTThis study aims to see that the ability to solve mathematical problems using the TTW learning model is higher than the model of TPS learning in Building materials in Class VII SMP Negeri 1 Tanjung Morawa. This type of research is a quasi experiment. The population in this study is all students of class VII  consisting of 7 classes with total students 201 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling by taking 2 classes from 7 classes randomly that is experiment class A which amounted to 25 people and experiment class 2 which amounted to 26 people. The instrument used to determine students' mathematical problem solving abilities is a validated problem-solving test in the form of a description. From the result of the research given different treatment, experiment class A with TTW learning model and experiment class B with TPS learning model obtained the average value of experiment class A of 28.20 and the average value of experimental class B is 25.27. The result of right side t test with dk = 49 and  = 0,05, obtained tcount = 3,66 and ttable = 1,6655 so thitung> table that is 3,66> 1,6655 then Ha accepted, thus obtained conclusion that ability Mathematical problem solving using TTW learning model is higher than the model of TPS learning in flat matter.Keywords: Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share Learning Model, Mathematical Problem Solving 


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Tanti Jumaisyaroh Siregar

<p class="Afiliasi" align="left"><strong>Abstrak:</strong></p><p>Adapun tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis perbedaam peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan keterampilan sosial siswa yang diajarkan dengan pembelajaran  kooperatif tipe STADdengan siswa yang diberi pembelajaran langsung. Penelitian ini merupakan salah satu jenis penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan model kuasi eksperimen dengan desain kelompok <em>pre test-post test control group design</em>. Populasi dalam penelitian ini meliputi seluruh siswa dari salah satu SMP swasta yang berada di Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan. Sampel dalam penelitian ini melibatkan siswa kelas VIII sebanyak 30 orang pada kelas eksperimen dan 30 orang pada kelas kontrol yang diambil secara acak menggunakan <em>cluster random sampling</em>. Jenis data dalam penelitian ini adalah data kuantitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk memperoleh data dalam penelitian ini adalah tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis yang berbentuk <em>essay test</em> dan angket keterampilan sosial siswa dalam skala likert pada mata pelajaran matematika. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan statistik inferensial menggunakan uji-t. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data diperoleh nilai sig   = 0.00001 &lt;  α = 0,05 sehingga H<sub>o</sub> ditolak dan H<sub>a</sub> diterima yang berarti terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan sikap keterampilan sosial yang diperoleh siswa antara pembelajaran kooperatif tipeSTAD dengan pembelajaran langsung. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa rata-rata kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan sikap keterampilan sosial siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran kooperatif tipeSTAD lebih tinggi secara signifikan dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran langsung.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Kata Kunci : </strong><strong></strong></p><p>Pemecahan Masalah Matematis, Keterampilan Sosial, Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe <em>STAD</em><strong></strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong><em>Abstract:</em></strong><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><em>The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in the increase in problem-solving abilities and social skills of students who are taught by cooperative learning type STAD with students who are given direct learning. This research is a type of quantitative research using a quasi-experimental model with a pre-test-post-test control group design. The population in this study included all students from one of private junior high school in Percut Sei Tuan. The sample in this study involved 30 class VIII students in the experimental class and 30 people in the control class who were taken randomly using cluster random sampling. The type of data in this research is quantitative data. The instruments used to obtain the data in this study were a test of mathematical problem-solving abilities in the form of an essay test and a questionnaire for students' social skills on a Likert scale in mathematics. Data were analyzed using inferential statistics using t-test. Based on the results of data analysis, the value of sig = 0.00001 &lt;α = 0.05 so that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means that there is a significant difference in the increase in mathematical problem-solving abilities and attitudes of social skills obtained by students between cooperative learning type STAD and direct learning. Therefore, it can be concluded that the average mathematical problem-solving ability and the attitude of social skills of students who get STAD type cooperative learning is significantly higher than students who receive direct learning. </em><em></em></p><p><em>               </em><em></em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>:</em></p><p><em>Mathematical Problem Solving, Social Skills</em><em>, </em><em>Cooperative Learning Type STAD</em><em></em></p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayana Lafadilla Purba ◽  
Ella Andhany

This study aims to determine whether there is a difference in the ability of students' mathematical creative thinking that is taught by cooperative learning Think Pair Share (TPS) and cooperative Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) on math learning at Private MTs Umar Bin Khattab. This research is a quantitative research with experimental research approach. The population is a student of class VII of Private MTs Umar Bin Khattab of the academic year 2017/2018 consisting of 2 classes. Of the 2 classes taken entirely; VII-1 class of 29 students as experiment class A with Think Pair Share (TPS) and VII-2 cooperative learning as many as 30 students as experimental class B with Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) learning, where the two classes are sampled in research. Data collection techniques are observation and description test. Before this test is established as a data collection tool, it is first tested in class VIII Private MTs Umar Bin Khattab to see the validity, reliability, difficulty and differentiation of the problem. Data analysis consists of two parts: descriptive analysis and inferential analysis. The average value of post experimental class A test result is 87,414 and the average value of post-test of experiment class B is 80,167 and the difference of post-test result value between experimental class A and B is 7,247. From result of data analysis post-test experiment class A obtained Lcount≤Ltable that is 0,096 ≤ 0,163, and data post-test experiment class B obtained Lcount≤Ltablethat is 0,148≤0,161. So the post-test data of both experimental classes is Normal distributed. From the homogeneity test of post-test data both samples are homogeneous, where C2count&lt; C2table is 0.001 &lt;3.841. After hypothesis testing using t-test found that tcount&gt;ttable is 1.703&gt; 1.676 then Ho is rejected and Ha accepted. Thus it can be concluded that there are differences in the ability of students' mathematical creative thinking that is taught by cooperative learning Think Pair Share (TPS) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on math learning at Private MTs Umar Bin Khattab.


Author(s):  
Intan Iklima ◽  
Jefri Marzal ◽  
Damris M.

Mathematical problem-solving skills in learning physics is important. According to the preliminary study conducted at MTsN Jambi, it is known that the mathematical problem solving ability of students in learning physics still low. This study aims to improve the mathematical problem solving capability by applying the team assisted individualization and self-efficacy cooperative learning model. This study was experimental research by using questionnaire self-efficacy instrument and essay test. The population of this study was seventh grade students MTsN Jambi. Data analysis was performed by using two ways-ANOVA and Tukey test. The results shows that: (1) cooperative learning model of TAI influences to students’ physical problem solving capability, (2) SE influences the students’  physical problem solving capability, (3) there are differences in high SE students’  physical problem solving capability by using cooperative learning model type TAI from those who using conventional learning models, (4) there are differences in low SE students’  physical problem solving capability by using cooperative learning model TAI type than those using conventional learning model, (5) there is no interaction between the cooperative learning model of TAI and SE of students in MTsN Jambi.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-110
Author(s):  
Fitri Nurlaili ◽  
Idmi Idmi ◽  
Haslinda Haslinda

The purpose of this research were to improve the learning outcomes and their activities in accounting learning with cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievment Division (STAD) in grade  XI AK  students at SMK Madinatul Hadid Cilegon.This research used Classroom Action Research (CAR) consists of two cycles. Each cycle consisted of four stages: planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The research subjects were the students in XI AK in SMK Madinatul Hadid Cilegon with 21 students and the teacher as the collaborator team.The result of this research showed that the application of  STAD learning model could improve the  student activity from cycle I was 39% up to 45%, there was increasing 6%. While in cycle II, the activity became 66% in first meeting and increased to 82% in second meeting, there was increasing 16%. In cognitive aspect, the average scores of pretest was 57. In cycle I, after post test  the score 72. In the second cycle, the average value increased to 85. Students, who had score above the KKM was 47% in first cycle  while in the second cycle 100% of student could reach the KKM.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novia Fadilah ◽  
Edy Surya

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah kemampuan pemecahan masalahmatematis siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran MEAs lebihtinggi daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang belajar denganmenggunakan model pembelajaran PBL di SMP Negeri 38 Medan. Jenis penelitian iniadalah penelitian eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelasVIII SMP Negeri 38 Medan semester genap, yang terdiri dari 5 kelas. Sampel dalampenelitian ini adalah dua kelas yang dipilih berdasarkan kelas-kelas atau kelompok yangsudah ada, dimana kelas VIII-4 sebagai kelas eksperimen MEAs dengan jumlah sampel38 orang dan kelas VIII-5 sebagai kelas eksperimen PBL dengan jumlah sampel 39orang. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua jenis instrument yaitu pre-test dan post-testdalam bentuk uraian. Dari hasil penelitian yang diberikan, diperoleh nilai rata-rataposttest kelas eksperimen MEAS 79,6842 dan kelas eksperimen PBL memperoleh nilairata-rata 71,9487. Dari hasil uji hipotesis post-test diperoleh hitung t (1,9044) > tabel t(1,6675) dengan demikian diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kemampuan pemecahanmasalah matematis siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran MEAslebih tinggi daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang belajardengan menggunakan model pembelajaran PBL di SMP Negeri 38 Medan T.A2016/2017Kata kunci: Pemecahan Masalah Matematis, MEAs, PBLABSTRACTThis research aims to find out whether a mathematical problem solving abilities studentslearning by using learning model MEAs is higher than the ability of mathematicalproblem solving of students who learn by using the learning model PBL in SMP Negeri38 Medan. This type of research is research experiments. The population in this researchis the whole grade VIII SMP Negeri Medan 38 semester even, consisting of 5 classes. Thesample in this study were selected based on two classes of classes or groups that alreadyexist, where the class VIII-4 experimental MEAs as a class with the number of samples of38 people and class VIII-experimental class 5 as PBL with a number of samples of 39 people. This study uses two types of instrument, namely pre-test and post-test in the form of descriptions. Of research results are given, obtained average value of experimentalclass posttest MEAS 79,6842 experimental class and PBL gained an average rating of 71,9487. Hypothesis test results from post-test is obtained (1.9044) > (1.6675) thus obtained conclusions that the ability of mathematical problem solving of students learning by using learning model of the MEAs is higher than the ability of mathematical problem solving of students who learn by using the learning model PBL in SMP Negeri 38 Medan 2016/2017.Keywords: Mathematical problem solving, MEAs, PBL


Author(s):  
Four Marito Marbun

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the cooperative Student Teams Achievement Devision (STAD) learning model on the ability to understand students 'mathematical concepts and students' responses to the STAD cooperative learning model type. This research method is a quasi experimental method. This research was conducted in State 2 Junior High School of Sorkam at the even semester of the 2016/2017 Academic Year. The sample of this study was class VIIIA as the experimental class and VIIIB as the control class. From the research data obtained a regression equation Y = 74,857 + 8.857X (there is a positive effect). The average value of students' understanding of mathematical concepts learned by the STAD cooperative learning model is 83,714, while the conventional learning model is 74,857. The coefficient of determination is 21.6%, meaning that 21.6% of the influence of the STAD type cooperative learning model on the ability to understand students' mathematical concepts. The results of the analysis of student responses were obtained (1) by 98.2% stating they were interested and the rest not; (2) amounting to 95.05% stating that there are benefits obtained and the rest not; (3) amounting to 86.78% stated that there were no obstacles experienced during the learning process and the rest stated there were; (4) 94.04% hoped the STAD type cooperative learning model was used in the learning process and the rest did not expect. So, it can be concluded that the student response is very positive because the average percentage of student approval responses to the STAD type cooperative learning model is ≥ 85%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document