scholarly journals The Polemic on Imposing Castration Sanctions against Pedophiles Perpetrators Based on the Human Right’s Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
Rakhmat Ubaidillah Ahror
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Law System ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Government

Sexual violence is a crime against humanity. Because, it is, closely related to human rights Cases of sexual violence caused the government to issue the idea of castration for perpetrators of sexual violence. However, this raises pros and cons in the community. The problem of this research is, how is the imposition of castration sanctions on pedophiles from a human rights perspective, and what are the supporting and inhibiting factors for implementing castration sanctions against pedophiles? The study uses a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach carried out on theoretical matters of legal principles. In contrast, the empirical approach is carried out to study the law in reality through behavioural assessments. The study results stated that the perspective of imposing castration sanctions on pedophile perpetrators also reaped the pros and cons in its implementation. Some thought that castration sanctions were quite effective if applied to perpetrators of sexual crimes to immediately provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators and break the chain of sexual crimes that developed in the community. Opinions against the castration sanction are also criticised by various groups, including human rights activists, because castration is considered a cruel punishment for perpetrators, and cruel punishments aim to torture the perpetrators of the crime, but this is undoubtedly related to human rights. Supporting and inhibiting factors for the implementation of castration sanctions against pedophile perpetrators. Supporting factors for the discourse of castration sanctions on perpetrators of sexual crimes against children are caused by the high number of sexual crimes in Indonesia, which has entered a dangerous stage. It was passed into Law Number 17 of 2016. The inhibiting factor is that castration sanctions are not allowed in the national criminal law system. The purpose of punishment, castration is a violation of human rights, seen from the facilities or facilities. Furthermore, there are obstacles from the executor of the castration crime, namely doctors, because it contradicts the code of ethics (KODEKI). Suggestions in this study should be in imposing criminal acts of sexual violence against children to pay attention to humane punishments without degrading and provide benefits, namely a deterrent effect.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PIDANA KEBIRI KIMIA DALAM KASUS KEKERASAN SEKSUAL PADA ANAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF YURIDIS DAN KEDOKTERAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-63
Author(s):  
Debora Anggie Noviana ◽  
Bambang Waluyo ◽  
Rosalia Dika Agustanti
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Chemical Castration ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Violence Against Children ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Many

 AbstrakPelaksanaan Kebiri Kimia merupakan hukuman yang baru di Indonesia, terjadi pro kontra terkait pelaksanaan tindakan tersebut, dari salah satu sisi pelaksanaan pidana kebiri diharapkan mampu memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku kekerasan seksual pada anak dan juga menjadi salah satu bentuk pencegahan agar tidak kembali terjadi kasus yang sama, serta diharapkan agar dapat mengurangi tingkat kejahatan seksual terhadap anak. Penelitian ini hendak mengkaji pelaksanaan kebiri kimia dilihat dari perspektif yuridis dan kedokteran. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Pendekatan masalah dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, sumber utama berasal dari literatur serta menggunakan sumber data sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Dengan masih banyaknya pro kontra yang terjadi terkait penerapan eksekusi kebiri kimia yang dikarenakan Ikatan Dokter Indonesia (IDI) menolak untuk melakukan eksekusi karena alasan kemanusiaan. Perlu adanya peraturan yang mengatur mengenai pelaksanaan eksekusi kebiri kimia agar dapat memberikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan baik bagi korban dan juga pelaku pelecehan seksual pada anak, dan juga  memberikan dasar hukum yang sah bagi eksekutor kebiri kimia yaitu dokter untuk melakukan eksekusi kebiri kimia tersebut tanpa harus bertentangan dengan kode etik kedokteran sehingga pidana kebiri kimia dapat segera diberlakukan secara lebih efektif sesuai dengan tujuannya yaitu menggurangi angka kasus kekerasan seksual pada anak di Indonesia. Kata Kunci : Kebiri Kimia, Perlindungan anak, Pidana AbstractThe implementation of castration chemistry is a new punishment in Indonesia, there are pros and cons related to the implementation of these actions, from one side of the implementation of castration criminal is expected to be able to provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of sexual violence against children and also be a form of prevention so as not to re-occur the same case , and is expected to be able to reduce the level of sexual crimes against children. This study wants to examine the implementation of chemical castration from a juridical and medical perspective. The research method used is normative juridical. Approach the problem by using the legislative approach and case approach, the main source comes from the literature and uses secondary data sources that are analyzed qualitatively. With the many pros and cons that occur related to the implementation of chemical castration execution due to the Indonesian Doctors Association (IDI) refused to carry out executions due to humanitarian reasons. There is a need for regulations governing the implementation of chemical castration execution in order to provide legal certainty and justice for both victims and also perpetrators of sexual abuse on children, and also provide a legal basis for chemical castration executors namely doctors to carry out chemical castration execution without having to contradict with a code of ethics in medicine so that the chemical castration crime can be immediately applied more effectively in accordance with its goal of reducing the number of cases of sexual violence against children in Indonesia.Keywords: Chemical castration, child protection, criminal

scholarly journals PENERAPAN HUKUMAN TINDAKAN KEBIRI KIMIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Messy Rachel Mariana Hutapea
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Chemical Castration ◽  
Violence Against Children ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Government

Children are still victims of sexual violence by perpetrators who are stronger than victims. Children who are victims of sexual violence have a negative impact on the psychic and mental, so that children will have trauma that is difficult to be eliminated or even prolonged trauma. So that the government established the Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection into Law. In the laws and regulations, it has been regulated regarding the castration penalty of chemistry. Indonesia is a country that still upholds all human rights possessed by every community in Indonesia without discrimination. This chemical castration execution raises the pros and cons in people's lives. So this chemical castration is considered to have violated the Human Rights of perpetrators of sexual violence against children. This research wants to dig deeper about the use of chemical castration punishment in perpetrators of recurrent crimes in the human rights perspective. This study uses normative research methods with conceptual and legislative approaches. Chemical castration has not been one of the effective penalties and provides a deterrent for perpetrators of sexual violence, so the laws governing chemical castration punishment need to be reviewed.Anak masih menjadi korban kekerasan seksual yang dilakukan oleh para pelaku yang lebih kuat dari korban. Anak yang menjadi korban kekerasan seksual mendapatkan dampak yang negatif terhadap psikis dan batinnya, sehingga anak akan memiliki trauma yang susah untuk dihilangkan atau bahkan trauma tersebut berkepanjangan. Sehingga pemerintah membentuk peraturan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 tahun 2016 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-undang Nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak menjadi Undang-Undang. Didalam peraturan perundang-undangan tersebut, telah diatur tentang hukuman kebiri kimia. Indonesia adalah negara yang masih menjunjung setiap Hak Asasi Manusia yang dimiliki oleh setiap masyarakat di Indonesia tanpa adanya diskriminasi. Eksekusi kebiri kimia ini menimbulkan pro dan kontra didalam kehidupan masyarakat. Sehingga kebiri kimia ini dianggap telah melanggar Hak Asasi Manusia dari pelaku kekerasan seksual terhadap anak. Penelitian ini ingin menggali lebih dalam tentang penggunaan hukuman kebiri kimia pada pelaku kejahatan berulang dalam persektif hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normative dengan endekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Kebiri kimia belum menjadi salah satu hukuman yang efektif dan membuat jera untuk pelaku kekerasan seksual, Sehingga undang-undang yang mengatur tentang hukuman kebiri kimia perlu dikaji ulang.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NARAPIDANA LGBT DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN MENURUT KONSEPSI HAK ASASI MANUSIA

2021 ◽  
pp. 1385
Author(s):  
Dianita Halim ◽  
Tundjung Herning Sitabuana
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Early 19Th Century ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Government

The debate about the pros and cons of supporting, protecting, and recognizing LGBT rights has existed since the early 19th century. In 2011, the United Nations declared a human rights resolution dedicated to sexual orientation and gender identity. The United Nations statement reaps many pros and cons from the countries that are members of it. Indonesia is one of those who disagree with this. In everyday life, LGBT people in Indonesia often face discrimination, harassment, and sexual violence even though law in Indonesia does not criminalize LGBT. The lives of LGBT who hold prisoner status are made more difficult because they often face discrimination, harassment, and sexual violence, both from other inmates and prison officials, but there is no positive law that supports the protection of LGBT. Therefore, this study aims to understand the form of legal protection for LGBT prisoners. The research method used is normative juridical research with a conceptual approach. The characteristic of human rights is universal and automatically attached to an individual because the individual is a human being. Human rights create an obligation for other individuals not to violate the rights of others and the obligation of the government to protect these rights. Indonesia is a rule of law. Through the concept of human rights and the rule of law, LGBT prisoners actually still have to be given legal protection against acts of discrimination committed by heterosexual prisoners and the need for law enforcement for acts of sexual violence. The government can actually apply several United Nations principles in the “Born Free and Equal” campaign to provide legal protection for LGBT prisoners who experienced discrimination, harassment, and sexual violence.NaskahPerdebatan mengenai pro dan kontra dalam mendukung, melindungi, dan mengakui hak LGBT sudah ada sejak awal ke-19. Pada 2011, PBB menyatakan resolusi hak asasi manusia yang didedikasikan untuk orientasi seksual dan identitas gender. Pernyataan PBB menuai banyak pro dan kontra dari negara-negara yang tergabung di dalamnya. Indonesia adalah salah satu yang tidak sependapat dengan hal tersebut. Dalam kehidupan sehari-hari, kaum LGBT di Indonesia kerap mendapat diskriminasi, pelecehan, dan kekerasan seksual meski hukum di Indonesia tidak mengkriminalisasi LGBT. Kehidupan kaum LGBT yang menyandang status narapidana menjadi lebih berat karena sering mendapatkan diskriminasi, pelecehan, dan kekerasan seksual, baik dari narapidana lain maupun petugas lembaga pemasyarakatan, tetapi tidak ada hukum positif yang mendukung perlindungan kaum LGBT. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini ditujukan untuk memahami bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi narapidana kaum LGBT. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hak asasi manusia adalah hak yang bersifat universal dan melekat secara otomatis kepada seseorang individu karena individu tersebut adalah manusia. Hak asasi manusia menimbulkan kewajiban bagi individu lain untuk tidak melanggar hak orang lain dan kewajiban pemerintah serta negara untuk melindungi hak-hak tersebut. Indonesia merupakan negara hukum. Melalui konsep hak asasi manusia dan negara hukum, maka narapidana kaum LGBT sebenarnya tetap harus diberi perlindungan hukum terhadap tindakan diskriminasi yang dilakukan oleh narapidana heteroseksual dan perlunya penegakan hukum atas tindak kekerasan seksual. Pemerintah sebenarnya dapat menerapkan beberapa prinsip PBB dalam kampanye “Born Free and Equal” untuk melakukan perlindungan hukum bagi narapidana kaum LGBT yang mengalami diskriminasi, pelecehan, dan kekerasan seksual.

ANALISIS PENERAPAN PENJATUHAN SANKSI TINDAKAN KEBIRI KIMIA TERHADAP PELAKU KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL ANAK DITINJAU DARI SUDUT HAK ASASI MANUSIA PELAKU DAN KORBAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 769
Author(s):  
Kevin Setiawan ◽  
Aji Wibowo
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Chemical Castration ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Sexual Crime ◽  
The Government

Sexual crime is happening in various countries, especially in Indonesia. In general, sexual crimes, especially against children, are a concern by the government because when a child becomes a victim of sexual crimes it can cause life-long trauma and at worst, death. Therefore, the preventive ways has been arranged by the Governement in Law of Republic Indonesia Number 17 of 2016 concerning Determination of Substitute Government Regulations in Law of Republic Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning the second amandement of Law number 23 of 2002 Regarding Child Protection where there are sanctions for chemical castration against perpetrators who commit sexual crimes against children, in order to provide a punishment that can make a deterrent effect on someone who commits sexual crimes against children. However, in the determination of sanctions for the act of chemical castration, the community and various parties have contradictions where it must be seen in terms of the human rights of the perpetrator and the effectiveness of the sanctions.

scholarly journals PEMIDANAAN KEBIRI TERHADAP PELAKU KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL KEPADA ANAK PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN HUKUM ISLAM

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-208
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jamaludin ◽  
Sayid Mohammad Rifqi Noval
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Child Victims ◽  
Chemical Castration ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Government

Sexual crimes in Indonesia have become increasingly worrying, especially against children, efforts to protect child victims by the government with Perpu No.1 of 2016 which has been passed into Law Number 17 of 2017 concerning child protection. This Perpu provides for additional regulations with castration for sexual crimes against children. The making of this policy was tinged with pros and cons because it was not in accordance with the objectives of punishment and Islamic law. The research method used is normative juridical with quantitative analysis. The purpose of this research is to see the view of the purpose of the punishment of chemical castration which is released to perpetrators of sexual crimes and to see and explain the Islamic legal views of the act of castration. The results of this study are First, the implementation of castration is an act of violence and contrary to the 1945 Constitution, namely Article 28 G paragraph 2 and Article 33 paragraph 1 of Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. Both Islamic Laws do not speak in writing about castration. The castration penalty stipulated in Law 17 of 2016 is a prohibition which is categorized as a punishment for takzir, because it is made by the state or leaders to overcome sexual crimes against children. The conclusion of this research is that first, castration punishment is a punishment that can violate human rights. Second, castration punishment in Islam is categorized as takzir punishment.

scholarly journals GOOD GOVERNANCE PERSPEKTIF MAQAASID ASY-SYAARI’AH KONTEMPORER

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Muhammad Iqbal Juliansyahzen
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Business Sector ◽  
Good Communication ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Government

AbstractGood governance is a concept for governance that should be run. Theoretically, the discourse of good governance reaps its pros and cons since it had been firstly introduced. However, as a concept and a strategic offer it deserves to be appreciated and re-examined. There are principles in good governance that are compatible with Islam such as accountability, transparency, deliberation, and others. Good governance will be achieved when it involves a good communication among the government, civil society, and the business sector. The author uses the perspective of contemporary maqaasid asy-shari'ah to view the discourse with more emphasis on development and right. The perspective is different from the old maqasid which emphasizes more on the protection and preservation. The result of the study shows that good governace needs  harmonious relationship among the followers of religion, social justice, organized and equitable education, human rights protection, and the development of civilized law.Keywords : Good Governance, Maqâsid asy-Syaari’ah, DevelopmentAbstrakGood governance merupakan sebuah konsep tata kelola pemerintahan yang seharusnya dijalankan. Secara teoritis, diskursus good governace menuai pro-kontra sejak awal kemunculannya. Meskipun demikian, sebagai sebuah konsep dan tawaran strategis patut untuk diapresiasi dan dikaji kembali. Terdapat prinsip-prinsip dalam good governance yang berkesesuaian dengan Islam diantaranya akuntabilitas, transparansi, musyawarah, dan lainnya. Upaya mewujudkannya tidak hanya dilakukan oleh satu pihak saja, tetapi komunikasi antara pemerintah (goverment), masyarakat sipil, dan sektor dunia usaha. Dalam melihat diskursus ini, penulis menggunakan perspektif maqaasid asy-Syaari’ah kontemporer dengan lebih menekankan pada development (pembangunan; pengembangan) dan right (hak-hak). Berbeda dengan maqasid lama lebih pada protection (perlindungan) dan preservation (penjagaan; pelestarian). Berdasarkan hasil kajian tersebut bahwa dalam mewujudkan good governace diperlukan pembangunan dalam berbagai aspek seperti membangun hubungan harmonis antar pemeluk agama, mewujudkan keadilan sosial, penyelenggaran dan pemerataan pendidikan, perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia, pembangunan hukum berkeadaban.. Kata kunci: Good Governance, Maqaasid asy-Syaari’ah, dan Pembangunan

scholarly journals THE ATTITUDINAL MEANING BUILT BY KONDE.CO REGARDING THE RATIFICATION OF CHEMICAL CASTRATION PENALTY

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-381
Author(s):  
Hidayatul Mahmudah ◽  
Harni Kartika Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Negative Attitude ◽  
Appraisal Theory ◽  
Chemical Castration ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Women And Children ◽  
The Government ◽  
Negative Impacts

The rise of sexual violence against women and children encourages the government to establish Government Regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah) hereafter (PP) number 70 of 2020, which contains the application of the chemical castration penalty for the offenders of sexual violence. This regulation causes pros and cons from the various parties, including women and children's observer community, selected in this case Konde.co. This study aims to discuss the attitude or position built by Konde.co toward the Government Regulation (PP) ratification concerning the chemical castration penalty for the sexual violence offenders. This research uses a qualitative approach, especially discourse analysis. The discourse analysis in this research uses the appraisal theory, which studies the attitudesystem explicitly The result of this research shows that the attitude that appears in the text is generally negative. Furthermore, the attitude aspect with the highest frequency is negative judgement.The negative attitude refers to the incompatibility and inability of the chemical castration penalty in overcoming the sexual violence problem in Indonesia. The chemical castration penalty has negative impacts, such as exacerbating sexual violence in Indonesia in the future, disturbing, like an inclement regulation, and violating human rights. The positive attitude refers to the PP’s capacity for the chemical castration penalty of the sexual violence offenders in upholding the rights of the underprivileged. Other priorities that Konde.co considers more critical in overcoming the sexual violence problem are the recovery of the victims and the immediate ratification of the Bill on the Elimination of Sexual Violence. 

scholarly journals TINDAKAN KEBIRI BAGI PELAKU KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK (Kajian Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desy Maryani
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Violence Against Children ◽  
Men 2 ◽  
The Government

The government needs to re-examine the provision of additional punishment that is considered a violation of human rights violated human rights and not in accordance with Islamic Shari'a. The results of the study show that (1) the punishment of the noble violates the Shari'a of Islam so it is forbidden with three reasons: a) Islamic shari'ah has unlawfully prohibited the human being, without any dissenting opinion (khilafiyah) among fuqaha, b) Islamic shariah has set penalties for pedophile who commit acts of immorality and rape according to the details of the facts of his deeds, so that it may not (haram) carry out any kind of punishment outside the provisions of Islamic Sharia, c) in the case of the method of using a chemical injection method, namely injected estrogen hormone, from the other side, because it resulted in castrated men having physical characteristics such as women. Yet Islam has forbidden men to resemble women or vice versa women resemble men. (2) In the regulation of legal policy for perpetrators of sexual violence against children is contained in the Criminal Code and the issuance of Law no. Law No. 23 of 2002, Law no. 35 of 2014 until the issuance of Law no. 1 Year 2016 on Child Protection

scholarly journals Penerapan Penjatuhan Hukuman Kebiri Kimia Serta Tata Cara Eksekusinya pada Pelaku Kejahatan Pelecehan Seksual terhadap Anak

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Nashru Nazar Rosyidi ◽  
Oci Senjaya
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Sexual Abuse ◽  
Child Sexual Abuse ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
District Court ◽  
Chemical Castration ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Nowadays, there are more and more crimes of child sexual abuse in Indonesia. Children should be protected by the government in order to become the nation's next generation. In 2019, the Mojokerto District Court sentenced the defendant Aris (20) who was convicted of a crime of sexual abuse against a child and this verdict was the first verdict in Indonesia to impose chemical castration on perpetrators of crimes of sexual abuse against children. This writing uses the juridical-normative method which looks at empirical data as a reference for writing this journal. For some parties, chemical castration punishment is considered effective in punishing perpetrators of crimes of child sexual abuse so that it becomes a frightening thing for other perpetrators of sexual abuse crimes. This is included in the category of the theory of the purpose of punishment in order to create order and order in society. Perppu Number 1 of 2016 is the legal basis for the application of chemical castration punishment. However, there are many pros and cons to castration. One of the things that has created contra is contrary to the ratification of human rights. Considering that Indonesia is a state based on the rule of law, which is obliged to protect human rights guarantees as stated in Article 28 I of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

scholarly journals The Prisoners' Rights Protection in Indonesia Law System of Justice

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-78
Author(s):  
Haidan Haidan ◽  
Edi Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Person ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
International Level ◽  
Public Attention ◽  
Law System ◽  
Rights Protection ◽  
The Government ◽  
Rights Issues ◽  
Technical Regulations

The aim of the paper is to examine the provision of the prisoner’s rights protection in Indonesia law system of justice and its relation to the exemption conditional (EC) in correctional institution. As an important issue, here is if the defendant override rules associated with the controversial issue in society, they will both at national and international level, such as human rights issues. The case was appeared recently, especially in the connection with the cases of exemption conditional, i.e. Pollycarpus Budihari Priyanto’s case. The case has become the center of public attention, especially after release of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, who has been freeing the prisoners that related to the homicides Human Rights Activists (HRA) i.e Munir Said Thalib. In the community, this decision raises the pro and contra. This paper concludes that all persons deprived of their liberty will be treated with humanity and guaranteed them with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person to be in accordance with the existing rules. In this case, the government of Indonesia has given the rights of prisoners through the stages of development of the inmates according to the stage of the penal process that refers to laws and regulations and implementation of technical regulations. The paper also recommends that the need for the government to deliver data either traditionally or electronically linked plan of exemption conditional.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document