scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PENEMUAN (DISCOVERY LEARNING) TERHADAPKESADARAN METAKOGNISI DAN PENGUASAAN KONSEP LARUTAN PENYANGGA PADA PESERTA DIDIKKELAS XI IPA SMAS MAKASSAR RAYA

2018 ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Nasrah Suryany ◽  
Muhammad Anwar ◽  
Muhammad Danial

ABSTRAKJenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Penemuan (Discovery Learning) terhadap Kesadaran Metakognisi dan Penguasaan Konsep Larutan Penyangga pada Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA SMAS Makassar Raya. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh peserta didik kelas XI SMAS Makassar Raya tahun pelajaran 2017/2018. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik random sampling dan kelas yang terpilih adalah kelas XI IPA1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI IPA2 sebagai kelas kontrol. Pengumpulan data penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan angket untuk mengukur kesadaran metakognisi dan tes essay untuk mengukur pengusaan konsep peserta didik pada materi larutan penyangga. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan inferensial dengan bantuan SPSS 20. Kesadaran metakognisi peserta didik yang dibelajarkan dengan model discovery learning memiliki rata-rata 80,05 dan standard deviasi 4,36 dan yang dibelajarkan dengan pembelajaran langsung memiliki rata-rata 75,69 dan standard deviasi 5,30. Penguasaan konsep peserta didik yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran discovey learning memiliki rata-rata sebesar 62,22 dan standard deviasi sebesar 13,09 dan penguasaan konsep peserta didik yang dibelajarkan dengan pembelajaran langsung memiliki rata-rata sebesar 42,43 dan standard deviasi sebesar 13,25. Hasil analisis inferensial secara umum bahwa untuk uji hipoteis yang dilakukan menunjukkan H0 diterima dan hipotesis H1 ditolak karena nilai sig 0,880 > 0,05. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) Model pembelajaran discovery learning berpengaruh terhadap kesadaran metakognisi peserta didik. (2) Model pembelajaran discovery learning berpengaruh terhadap penguasaan konsep larutan penyangga. (3) Tidak ada hubungan antara kesadaran metakognisi dengan penguasaan konsep peserta didik pada materi larutan penyangga. Kata kunci : Pembelajaran Penemuan, Metakognisi, Penguasaan Konsep. ABSTRACTThis type of research is a quasi-experimental study. This study aims to determine the influence of Discovery Learning Model on Metacognition Awareness and Mastery of Concept of Buffer Solution on Class XI Students of IPA SMAS Makassar Raya. The population of this study were all students of class XI SMAS Makassar Raya in the lesson year 2017/2018. Sampling was done by random sampling technique and the selected classes were class XI IPA1 as experimental class and class XI IPA2 as control class. The data were collected using questionnaires to measure metacognition awareness and essay tests to measure the concept of learners' learners on buffer solution materials. The data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially with the help of SPSS 20. Awareness of the metacognition of learners who were taught by the discovery learning model had an average of 80.05 and standard deviation of 4.36 and which was taught by direct learning had an average of 75.69 and standard deviation of 5, 30. Mastery of learners concept which is taught by discovey learning learning model has an average of 62,22 and standard deviation of 13,09 and mastery of learners concept which taught by direct learning have an average of 42,43 and standard deviation of 13, 25. The result of inferential analysis in general is that for hypothesis test performed H0 is accepted and hypothesis H1 is rejected because sig value is 0,880> 0,05. The results of this study indicate that (1) Learning discovery learning model affect the awareness of metacognition of learners. (2) Learning discovery learning model has an effect on the concept of buffer solution. (3) There is no correlation between metacognition awareness and mastery of learners' concepts on buffer solution materials. Keywords: Discovery Learning, Metacognition, Mastery of Concepts.

Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Budiyono Budiyono ◽  
Dewi Retno Sari S

<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>:  <em>Jigsaw</em>, NHT, interpersonal intelligence</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Siti Fitriyani Sartika ◽  
Ana Setiani ◽  
Novi Andri Nurcahyono

This study was aims to determine the differences in students mathematical understanding abilities with using snowball throwing learning model compared to direct learning model, and to determine the effect of snowball throwing learning model on improving students' mathematical understanding abilities. The benefit of this study is to provide information about how big the effect of snowball throwing learning model on students' mathematical comprehension abilities. This study used a quasi-experimental method. The Population used in this study was class VIII students of MTs-Al-Musthofa with a total sample 60 people taken by random sampling technique. The instrument that used in this reseacrh is test intrument mathematical comprehension ability consisting of 5 items essays. The results of the study showed that: 1) the ability of students' mathematical understanding using the snowball throwing learning model was better than the direct learning model. 2) There was an increase in the students' mathematical understanding ability using the snowball throwing learning model.


2017 ◽  
pp. 84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fandi Ahmad

The study aimed at examining (1) the difference between learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar taught by using Think-Pair-Share (TPS) learning model and the ones using direct learning on Hydrolisis of Salt, (2) the diffrence between learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar with high initial ability on Hydrolysis of Salt, (3) the interaction betwen learning model and initial ability in influenching learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar on hydrolysis of Salt. The Study was a quasi-experiment research which employed factorial 2x2 design.The population of the study was all grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar of academic year 2012/2013 with 7 classes. The samples were two classes, namely grade XI IPA1 and grade XI IPA3 selected using random sampling technique. Hypothesis test was conducted by employing two-way analysis of variant of GLM univariat supported by SPSS 16.0 program. The results of the study revealed that (1) therewas a difference between learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar taught by using TPS learning model and the ones using direct learning on Hydrolysis of salt, (2) there was a difference between learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar with high initial ability and low initial ability on Hydrolysis of Salt, (3) there was interaction between learning model and initial ability in influenching learning outcomes of grade XI IPA students at SMAN 4 Makassar on Hydrolysis of Salt. The average of students’ learning outcomes taught by using TPS learning model was higher than taught by using direct learning model, and learning outcomes of students who have high initial ability was higher than students with low initial ability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Arlisa Arlisa ◽  
Dewi Fajar Saputri ◽  
Boisandi Boisandi

This study aims to obtain an objective clarity regarding the application of discovery learning models to students' science process skills in dynamic electrical material for class IX students of SMP Negeri 7 Sungai Raya. This research method uses the Quasi Experiment Design method with the research design is Posttest-Only Nonequivalent Groups. Data collection techniques are essay tests to measure students' science process skills. The population in this study were all grade IX students of SMP Negeri 7 Sungai Raya consisting of 4 classes. The sample in this study were students of SMP Negeri 7 Sungai Raya in class IX B and class IX C in the odd semester of the 2019/2020 school year, taken by cluster random sampling. Analysis of the data description using the average equation (mean), analysis of the hypothesis test using the U Maan Whitney test. The results of this study indicate that 1) the students' science process skills after applying the direct learning model to the dynamic electrical material of class IX students of SMP Negeri 7 Sungai Raya is classified as not good at 62.67; 2) students' science process skills after the discovery learning model applied to the dynamic electrical material of class IX students of SMP Negeri 7 Sungai Raya is classified as good, amounting to 81.07; 3) there are differences in the science process skills of students who are taught using discovery learning models and students who are taught using direct learning models on dynamic electrical material for class IX students of SMP Negeri 7 Sungai Raya.Keywords: Student Science Process Skills, Discovery Learning


Aksioma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
Siti Hadijah ◽  
Sutji Rochaminah ◽  
Maxinus Jaeng

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di Kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. Hipotesis penelitian ini adalah pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan pembelajaran konvensional. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Desain penelitian ini adalah pre-post test control design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu dengan teknik pengambilan sampel cluster random sampling. Nilai rata-rata siswa kelas eksperimen 47 dan standar deviasi 17,04 sedangkan nilai rata-rata siswa kelas kontrol 40 dan standar deviasi 13,40. Data yang diperoleh berdistribusi normal dan homogen, maka pengujian hipotesis menggunakan teknis statistik parametris yaitu uji t. Hasil pengujian hipotesis diperoleh bahwa nilai ????tabel = 1,67 dan ????hitung = 2,96 sehingga H1 diterima dan H0 ditolak. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik daripada pemahaman konsep matematika siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di kelas IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Kata Kunci:   Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw, Model Pembelajaran Konvensional,  dan Pemahaman Konsep   Abstract: This research purposed to determine is mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu. The hypothesis is that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model better than students who learn by using conventional learning model. The type of research is a quasi experiment. Design of research is pre-post control design. The population of this research is all students of class IX  MTs Negeri 1 Kota Palu with samples taken by cluster random sampling technique. The average score of the experiment class students is 47 and standard deviation is 17.04 and the average score of the control class students is 40 and standard deviation is 13.40. The data is normal distribution and homogen, hypothesis test using t test. Results of hypothesis test obtained value ????table = 1.67 and ????count = 2.96 it means H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. This indicated that mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using jigsaw cooperative learning model have better than mathematics concept understanding students who learn by using conventional learning model in class IX MTsN 1 Kota Palu. Keywords:  Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model, Conventional Learning Model, and Concept Understanding


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Maskuroh Maskuroh

The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group  (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used  T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi ◽  
Siswanto Siswanto

This research aims to 1) which learning model that supports students’ creative thinking ability whether discovery, CORE, or conventional learning model, 2) which model that supports creative thinking ability the most to high, moderate, and low level students, 3) know if there is interaction between learning model and students’ logical mathematical intelligence, and creative thinking ability. This is a quasi-experimental research with the population of eighth graders of junior high schools in Madiun Regency. The research design used a group pretest-posttest control design. The sample was determined using stratified cluster random sampling. This research uses two-way unequal ANOVA. This research concluded that 1) students’ creative thinking skill is developed better using Discovery than CORE and conventional learning model, 2) students with high logical mathematical intelligence have higher creative thinking ability than those with moderate and low logical mathematical intelligence,3) there is no interaction between learning model and logical mathematical intelligence with creative thinking ability.Keywords: Creative Thinking; Learning Model; Logical Mathematical Intelligence. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitan ini untuk mengetahui 1) model pembelajaran manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih  antara model pembelajaran discovery learning, CORE atau konvensional, 2) manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih baik siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi, sedang, atau rendah, 3) apakah terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan keceredasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian adalah eksperimen semu, dengan populasi siswa kelas VIII SMP N Se-Kabupaten Madiun. Desain penelitian menggunakan group pretest-posttest control design Pemilihan sampel dengan menggunakan stratified cluster random sampling. Teknik analisis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Kesimpulan pada penelitian ini 1) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang kenai model discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran CORE dan konvensional, 2) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis sedang dan rendah, , 3) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif.Kata kunci: Berpikir kreatif; kecerdasan logis matematis; model pembelajaran.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-139
Author(s):  
Nadya Pratiwi ◽  
Yulkifli Yulkifli

Abstract: Lack of practical activities in schools can result in a decrease in the creativity of students. worksheets based on the discovery learning model in them trigger students to think creatively and critically. The sampling technique is cluster random sampling. The purpose of this study is to look at the improvement of skills competencies which are assisted by student worksheets based on the discovery learning model. The data analysis technique is testing hypotheses where there is a difference which means the use of this student worksheet. Hypothesis testing conditions are to carry out normality tests for skill scores from both sample classes and homogeneity tests to see the distribution of values from two sample classes that have homogeneous data. after treatment is obtained, the average value of the skills of the experimental class is 78.62 and for the control class is 70.10.Abstrak: Kurangnya kegiatan praktikum di sekolah dapat mengakibatkan penurunan kreativitas siswa. lembar kerja berbasis model discovery learning di dalamnya memicu siswa untuk berpikir kreatif dan kritis. Teknik pengambilan sampel adalah cluster random sampling. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat peningkatan kompetensi keterampilan yang dibantu oleh lembar kerja siswa berdasarkan pada model pembelajaran penemuan. Teknik analisis data menguji hipotesis di mana ada perbedaan yang berarti penggunaan lembar kerja siswa ini. syarat pengujian hipotesis adalah untuk melakukan tes normalitas untuk skor keterampilan dari kedua kelas sampel dan tes homogenitas untuk melihat distribusi nilai dari dua kelas sampel yang memiliki data homogen. setelah perawatan diperoleh, nilai rata-rata keterampilan dari kelas eksperimen adalah 78,62 dan untuk kelas kontrol adalah 70,10.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Beni Junedi ◽  
Ade Susanti

The research aims to find out the students' mathematical understanding using situation-based learning model students of class X IPA, the type of research used is quasi-experimental design research, taking class X IPA 3 as an experimental class and class X IPA 2 as a control class. The technique used in this sampling is cluster random sampling. Research instruments in the form of tests to determine the level of mathematical understanding of students. The data obtained will be analyzed with the hypothesis test t-test. Hypothesis test results obtained a significant value <0.05 which is 0.049 <0.05. Based on these results it was concluded to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means the average student's mathematical understanding ability using the Situation-Based Learning model is better than the average student's mathematical understanding ability using conventional learning.


Intersections ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
Aji Permana Putra

The objectives of this research were to find out on  the topic of Sequences and Series: (1) which had better learning achievement among cooperative learning Group Jigsaw II or a direct learning; (2) which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students; (3) at each personality types, which had better learning achievement among Jigsaw II or direct learning, and (4) at each learning models, which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students. This research was a quasi-experimental with 2×4 factorial design. The population was all students of SMK  Muhammadiyah 3 Klaten Utara on Academic Years 2019/2020. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample was 85 students. Statistical tests using the method Lilliefors test for normality, homogeniety of the Bartlett method, anava test with F test (Fisher) and post hoc test using the Scheffe’ method. The significance level was 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it could  be concluded as follows: (1) Jigsaw II  had better learning achievement than direct learning,; (2) there were no any differences in the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types; (3) in each personality types, the cooperative learning model Jigsaw II  had better than direct learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types have the same learning achievement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document