scholarly journals THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE OF ENERGY SPENT ON PROCESS AND OF STEP OF TIME

Author(s):  
Emil V. Veitsman

It was formulated the physical principle of the equivalence of the energy expense during the process of the Universe spreading and of the step of time. It was also shown that physical time is a material quantity connected with expending our Universe at constant velocity. A parallel was carried out between the increase of the size of the drops and bubbles and the expending of the Universe. The above principle is in full agreement with SR and GTR. It was shown as well that physical time could quantize.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Kuyukov

Modern general theory of relativity considers gravity as the curvature of space-time. The theory is based on the principle of equivalence. All bodies fall with the same acceleration in the gravitational field, which is equivalent to locally accelerated reference systems. In this article, we will affirm the concept of gravity as the curvature of the relative wave function of the Universe. That is, a change in the phase of the universal wave function of the Universe near a massive body leads to a change in all other wave functions of bodies. The main task is to find the form of the relative wave function of the Universe, as well as a new equation of gravity for connecting the curvature of the wave function and the density of matter.


Author(s):  
P. J. E. Peebles

This chapter discusses the development of physical sciences in seemingly chaotic ways, by paths that are at best dimly seen at the time. It refers to the history of ideas as an important part of any science, and particularly worth examining in cosmology, where the subject has evolved over several generations. It also examines the puzzle of inertia, which traces the connection to Albert Einstein's bold idea that the universe is homogeneous in the large-scale average called “cosmological principle.” The chapter cites Newtonian mechanics that defines a set of preferred motions in space, the inertial reference frames, by the condition that a freely moving body has a constant velocity. It talks about Ernst Mach, who argued that inertial frames are determined relative to the motion of the rest of the matter in the universe.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 155-160
Author(s):  
Amrit Srecko Sorli

Cosmology should be built on falsifiability, bijectivity, and experimental data. Speculations are not allowed. NASA has measured universal space has Euclidean shape, which means universal space is infinite in the volume. Einstein’s vision on time as the sequential order of events running in space has bijective correspondence with the physical reality and means that the universe does not run in some physical time; it runs only in space, which is time-invariant. In this timeless universe, there is no singularity of the beginning, there is no singularity inside of black holes. The energy of the universe is non-created, its transformation is eternal without the beginning and without the end.


Metaphysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 34-49
Author(s):  
A. G Zhilkin

The paper discusses the principle of complete absorption, which plays the same role in relational theory as the principle of equivalence in general relativity and the principle of waveparticle duality in quantum theory. The physical essence of this principle boils down to the fact that a sufficiently large number of particles must be present in the Universe so that complete absorption of radiation from any source is possible. This implies complete equivalence, from the experimental point of view, of direct interparticle interaction and the interaction carried by a local field in spacetime. It is noted that in its classical interpretation the Fokker variational principle, on which the theory of direct interparticle interaction is based, contains a dilemma caused by two mutually contradictory necessary properties of the interaction action. One of the options for overcoming this dilemma is proposed.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 1099-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. COLEY ◽  
S. HERVIK ◽  
J. LATTA

The Observed Perlmutter-Riess Acceleration (OPRA) implies that the expansion of the Universe is currently increasing and is motivation for the so-called phantom energy models. We consider the dynamics of phantom scalar field models. An important physical time constraint, which can be used to rule out many cosmological models, is obtained from the condition that all forms of energy density, including the field causing OPRA (e.g., the phantom field), must be non-negligible for an extended period, which is conservatively estimated to be of the order of a few Gyr. We find that this physical time constraint cannot be satisfied in conventional phantom cosmological models.


Universe ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Sergio Miguel-Tomé ◽  
Ángel L. Sánchez-Lázaro ◽  
Luis Alonso-Romero

The central goal of this manuscript is to survey the relationships between fundamental physics and computer science. We begin by providing a short historical review of how different concepts of computer science have entered the field of fundamental physics, highlighting the claim that the universe is a computer. Following the review, we explain why computational concepts have been embraced to interpret and describe physical phenomena. We then discuss seven arguments against the claim that the universe is a computational system and show that those arguments are wrong because of a misunderstanding of the extension of the concept of computation. Afterwards, we address a proposal to solve Hempel’s dilemma using the computability theory but conclude that it is incorrect. After that, we discuss the relationship between the proposals that the universe is a computational system and that our minds are a simulation. Analysing these issues leads us to proposing a new physical principle, called the principle of computability, which claims that the universe is a computational system (not restricted to digital computers) and that computational power and the computational complexity hierarchy are two fundamental physical constants. On the basis of this new principle, a scientific paradigm emerges to develop fundamental theories of physics: the computer-theoretic framework (CTF). The CTF brings to light different ideas already implicit in the work of several researchers and provides a new view on the universe based on computer theoretic concepts that expands the current view. We address different issues regarding the development of fundamental theories of physics in the new paradigm. Additionally, we discuss how the CTF brings new perspectives to different issues, such as the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics and the foundations of cognitive science.


2020 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 2050011
Author(s):  
Germano D’Abramo

In the present paper, we propose a heuristic and intuitive approach to visualize how force fields “move” when their source moves at a constant velocity [Formula: see text] or accelerates with acceleration [Formula: see text] relative to a stationary observer. Our approach is based on the application of the principle of relativity and the principle of equivalence and holds regardless of the nature of the force field. The results presented here have been derived in the nonrelativistic approximation ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] being the interval of time within which we observe the field). We shall show that in both cases of uniform and accelerated motion of the source, the field moves rigidly with the source. Namely, for every observer, however distant from the source, the field is always directed away from (or points towards) the present, instantaneous position of the source. We also show that these results are in agreement with what we know from experimental evidence and full-fledged physical theories (of electromagnetism and gravitation) beyond the nonrelativistic approximation. The proposed approach may be considered as a tool to facilitate students in graduate and undergraduate courses to familiarize themselves with (and self convince of) such a counter-intuitive feature of the force fields.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naftali Tsitverblit

Forced to be flat when nonsingularly described by the equationsof general relativity in a synchronous frame, a region outsidematter sources is recognized to fail in defining space-time curvature consistently with the material nature of the \mbox{Lorentz} transformation.The curvature then extends to such a region only when there is a continuousbackground medium there. Arising from vacuum decay in the universe, as any matter, this medium is thus capable of avoiding the singularity of gravitational collapseas well. The theory of general relativity is then suggested to stem from sucha formulation of the generalized postulate of relativity as also includes thecovariance of energy-momentum conservation for a macroscopically continuousmaterial system, namely the universe. Implying identity between gravitation andinertia, this formulation does not need the principle of equivalence as aseparate postulate. The \mbox{Einstein} tensor is thus interpretable asstanding for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field. In termsof the background medium, its small-amplitude approximation underlainby matter dynamics and phase transitions also describes what isviewable as gravitational waves. In the framework of such amacroscopic interpretation, gravitation ought to beirrelevant to purely microscopic interactions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 5185-5192
Author(s):  
Sydney Baldwin Self

21st Century View – Abstract • In 1905 it was generally believed that the universe had always existed. The exact age of Earth was not known. Life on Earth did not start until many years after Earth came into existence.• During the 20th century our understanding of the universe was greatly expanded. The assumptions used in this article follow.o Two mathematical equations, and three experiments are used to develop the ideas presented in this article. o The Universe came into existence about 13.8 billion years ago, Earth came into existence about 4.5 billion years ago, observers probably appeared less than a billion years ago, so time existed without observers for about 3.5 billion years.o This article consists of the application of logic to the above assumptions.• Physical time vs observed time.o The time that existed before observers appeared is termed ‘physical time’. After observers appeared, physical time continued to exist and ‘observed time’ came into being.• The characteristics of physical time are:o Absolute timeo Physical eventso Physical ‘now’o Physical frame of reference• Physical time dilationo Objects that move through space experience time dilation; but they do not observe it.o The Lorentz Transformation describes the computation of time dilation but does not describe physically how it occurs.o The Time Distance Diagram illustrates physically what occurs when a particle experiences time.o The diagram is based on the proposed concept that when a particle experiences time it either moves a tick through time or a Planck time through space; it cannot do both. o Which it does is based on its speed expressed as the probability v/c derived from the Lorentz transformation. • Absolute timeo Photons — and the resulting time — came into existence with the big bang. Photons have been moving through space continuously since the big bang — one Planck length, one Planck time (or tick) at a time.o The movement of photons thru spacetime constitutes absolute time. • Physical Eventso Without events, nothing happens.o Every event has a frame of reference.• Physical ‘Now’o ‘Now’ can occur in both physical time and observed time.o A physical event always results in a physical ‘now’.• Physical Frame of Referenceo Every event must have a frame of reference.o The frame of reference for a physical event has components that cannot be observed, so the frame of reference must be universal.• The characteristics of observed time are:o Observed events.o Observed ‘now’.o Observed frame of reference.• Observed Evento To an observer, his/her observation of an event is unique and is not necessarily the same as the actual event itself or the observation of another observer.• Observed Nowo If an event is observed, each observer has his/her own observed ‘now’ which occurs in observer’s frame of reference.o The ‘now’ experienced by observers is not the same ‘now’ as physical ‘now’ or the ‘now’ experienced by another observer.• Observed Frame of Referenceo Each observer has her/his own frame of reference and his/her own personal clock. • Time Dilationo The current definition of time dilation is no longer relevant. Time dilation must have existed in the period before observers appeared on earth, so time dilation must be an aspect of physical time, not of observed time. • Lorentz Transformationo The Lorentz transformation factor ‘γ’ is computed by dividing ‘v2’ which is a vector by ‘c2’ which is scalar. Both terms should be scalar.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document