scholarly journals Membongkar Wacana Sertifikasi Dai Menangkal Radikalisme dalam Program Televisi

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Abd Munib
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Religious Knowledge ◽  
Broadcast Media ◽  
The Republic

This scientific work was written to reveal the discourse on dai certification that has been being discussed since 2017. Many media, both print and broadcast-based, have highlighted this discourse. The broadcast media also discussed the discourse so it was natural because the public's consideration saw certification as something important in the midst of the rise of preachers on the pulpit armed with doubtful and doubtful knowledge and conveying religious messages intolerantly and then understanding radicalism. The object of this research is the Prime Talk program which aired on Metro Tv on 19 November 2019 with the title Dai Certification, Counteracting Radicalization using qualitative methods with critical discourse analysis by Van Dijk's model. The author's important notes from the diaphragm presented in this program also serve as data in revealing the discourse Based on the analysis of Van Dijk's model of critical discourse, it shows that the 19 Nomvember 2019 edition of Prime Talk entitled Dai Certification, Warding Radicalization builds five discourses: (1) recently religious messages are often conveyed by speakers whose religious knowledge is shallow so they tend to be extreme; (2) standardization of dai to print frendly dai against the Republic of Indonesia; (3) important dai certification applied throughout Indonesia; (4) Indonesia has been slow in certifying dai; and (5) the security apparatus must be responsive to reduce intolerant conditions.

scholarly journals Discourse Analysis on the Statement of tMinister of Religious Affairs Concerning "Good-Looking Radicalism” against State Civil Apparatus

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 290-299
Author(s):  
Fania Zakiyah Ulfa ◽  
Ida Fitria Cahyani ◽  
Rozaqul Arif
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Microstructure Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Religious Knowledge ◽  
The Public ◽  
Radical Ideology

This study aims to describe the discourse of the Minister of Religion's statement regarding good-looking radicalism among the State Civil Apparatus. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method with van Djik's critical discourse analysis. The data collection uses documentary techniques from Youtube video webinars and a number of journals. The macrostructure shows that there are strategies that can be done to ward off the entry of radical ideology in ASN. The superstructure shows the process of radicalism agents entering through educational institutions and houses of worship with an attractive appearance to deceive the public. The microstructure analysis shows that this statement of good-looking radicalism has generated polemic in society because it is subjective, that is, it cannot be generalized based on one case. The result of this study shows that some people think that the Minister of Religion agrees with the good-looking radicalism movement. The communicator is the Minister, namely as a messenger to ward off radicalism agents by being careful in selecting ASN. The Minister has access to convey messages to the public to be aware of the entry of radical-minded people into mosques, which usually starts from people who are good-looking, speak Arabic well, and have sufficient religious knowledge.

scholarly journals PRAKTEK PRODUKSI HEGEMONI MILITER MELALUI FILM “JENDERAL SOEDIRMAN”

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cosmas Gatot Haryono
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Text Structure ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Public ◽  
Historical Film ◽  
National Media ◽  
The Republic

<p>As a mass media, Film seldom unrecognized as a media disseminator for messages and discourse. This condition is used by filmmakers and some interested parties as “arena” to disseminate or conduct hegemony to the public. Film General Soedirman is one example of a film that we can felt the hegemony agenda. As a historical film, the film try to build its story or narrative centrally on the figure of the Great Commander General Soedirman. Interestingly, the protrusion of General Soedirman figure is felt too much. On the contrary, the civil politicians are discribed ugly. This led to controversy and debate that is quite exciting in the national media. There is a suspicion of a large discourse, that is being rolled out by the filmmakers for the sake of a certain position within the larger narrative of the republic.<br />This article is a report of qualitative research and use critical discourse analysis of Van Dijk. The research try to dismantle the structure of the text, either micro, macro, and it‟s superstructure, thus unfolding discourse developed through the production of this film.<br />Keywords: Critical Discourse, Text Structure, and Hegemony</p>

scholarly journals Media dan Kekerasan: Analisis Norman Fairclough Terhadap Pemberitaan Tarung Gladiator

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Akhirul Annas ◽  
Rana Akbari Fitriawan
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Social Phenomenon ◽  
Cultural Aspects ◽  
Text Production ◽  
On Line ◽  
Production Practices

AbstrakLine Today merupakan fitur agregator berita yang terdapat dalam aplikasi Line Messenger. Salah satu berita yang dijadikan Line Today sebagai highlights pada bulan September 2017 lalu adalah kasus tarung gladiator di kalangan pelajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana wacana kekerasan dikemas dalam pemberitaan tarung gladiator pada Line Today dengan menggunakan analisis wacana kritis Norman Fairclough untuk menganalisis teks, praktik produksi teks, dan praktik sosial budaya. Dalam penelitian ini digunakan metode kualitatif yang memusatkan perhatian pada prinsip-prinsip umum yang mendasari perwujudan sebuah makna dari gejala-gejala sosial di dalam masyarakat dengan menggunakan paradigma kritis. Paradigma ini memandang bahwa bahasa tidak hanya sebagai alat untuk memahami realitas objektif belaka, tetapi perlu melihat maksud-maksud dari wacana tertentu. Paradigma kritis jauh lebih meneliti aspek sosial, sejarah, dan budaya dari wacana tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Line Today memilih enam berita dari media Kumparan.com, Liputan6.com, dan Okezone.com untuk merekonstruksi kekerasan dalam kasus tarung gladiator di kalangan pelajar. Bahasa yang digunakan dalam teks berita dikemas secara ringan, singkat, dan mudah dipahami oleh generasi milenial.Kata Kunci: Kekerasan, Line Today, Media, Norman Fairclough AbstractLine Today is a news aggregator feature contained in the Line Messenger app. One of the news that Line Today made as highlights in September 2017 was the gladiator fight case among teenage students. This study aims to find out how the discourse of violence is packed in the news gladiator fight on Line Today by using critical discourse analysis Norman Fairclough to analyze text, text production practices, and socio-cultural practices. It used qualitative methods to analyze the meaning of social phenomenon based on critical paradigm. The paradigm noted that language is not only a tool for understanding reality, but it is necessary to look at the intentions of a particular discourse. It used to explore social, historical, and cultural aspects of the discourse. The research shows that Line Today chose six news from media Kumparan.com, Liputan6.com, and Okezone.com to reconstruct the violence in the case of ‘tarung gladiator’ among teenage students. The language used in the news text is lightly packed, short, and easily understood by millennials generation.Keywords: Line Today, Media, Norman Fairclough, Violence 

scholarly journals Analisis Wacana Kritis Konsepsi Relasi Agama dan Negara Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mufatihatul Islam ◽  
Sudono Syueb
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Text Analysis ◽  
Mass Communication ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Communication Media ◽  
The Political ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religion And State

One of the political religious organizations whose influence is strong enough is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia with Islamic Political Discourse Khilafah Islamiyah. The political discourse adopted by Hizb ut-Tahrir certainly reap the controversy in Indonesia whose status is the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which is based on the ideology of Pancasila. Various efforts were made by Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia to enforce its political discourse to penetrate mass communication media such as magazines, tabloids and weekly bulletins. The construction of news in such a way is also always in the sequence as interesting and sepersuasif possible as to influence its readers.Critical discourse analysis is a model of media text analysis that will construct how a medium writes its message, through critical discourse analysis to know the purpose of writing the news. In this study, researchers will construct news content on Al Wa'ie magazine Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia especially on the news "Religion Religion and State" in Rubric Afkar.Keywords: Discourse Analysis, Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, Politic

scholarly journals Representasi Ketidaksetaraan Gender pada Serial Drama 13 Reasons Why (Analisis Wacana Kritis Van Dijk)

Koneksi ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
Reginald Gusli ◽  
Wulan Purnama Sari
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Gender Inequality ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Careful Study ◽  
Original Series ◽  
Analysis Techniques

This study is a careful study to find out that there is a message of gender inequality in social reality on the Netflix Original Series entitled 13 Reasons Why. The research method that I use here is to use qualitative methods. Research techniques are using Van Djik's critical discourse analysis techniques. Data collection techniques using observation techniques. Observations were made with observations by the author of 13 Reasons Why and watched the series in detail to capture any events related to the topic of analysis. From the observations made by the author, the narration of events and scene footage clearly shows the elements of gender inequality and is also supported by gender theory which is associated with the characteristics of Van Djik's discourse analysis, so that the research conducted has results that strengthen the hypothesis of the author. Penelitian ini penulis teliti bertujuan untuk mengetahui bahwa adanya pesan ketidaksetaraan gender dalam realitas sosial pada Netflix Original Series berjudul 13 Reasons Why. Metode penelitian yang penulis pakai disini adalah dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif. Teknik penelitian memakai teknik analisis wacana kritis Van Dijk. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan yaitu teknik observasi. Observasi dilakukan dengan kegiatan pengamatan yang penulis lakukan terhadap 1 Reasons Why dan menyaksikan serial tersebut secara detail untuk menangkap peristiwa yang terkait dengan topik analisis. Dari hasil pengamatan yang penulis lakukan, narasi peristiwa dan cuplikan adegan memperlihatkan jelas mengenai unsur ketidaksetaraan gender tersebut dan juga didukung oleh teori gender yang dikaitkan dengan karakteristik dari analisis wacana Van Dijk, sehingga penelitian yang dilakukan memiliki hasil yang memperkuat hipotesis dari penulis.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS INSURANCE ADVERTISING IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING LEARNING FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Rusdhianti Wuryaningrum
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
University Students ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Argumentative Writing ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative

This study aims to describe the application through the Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) model on insurance advertising and its effectiveness in argumentative writing learning. The research method is a mixing qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative methods are applied by using the Fairclough's CDA model that applies micro, meso, and macro dimensions. Quantitative methods are used to measure the effectiveness of Fairclough CDA modelon argumentative writing learning. The results showed the use of language, connectivity, and hegemony with future concerns caused by lifestyle and social demands, and calamity with phrases as a form of the claim that needs to be made a counterclaim. This strongly supports the argumentation content.  The Mann Whitney U test shows significance value of 0,000 is ≤0.005. Thus, it can be concluded that Fairclough CDA modelapplication of learning with CDA is effective for improving learning outcomes in argumentative writing.

scholarly journals Critical discourse-analysis as an effective method of the qualitative analysis of scientific and educational texts

nauka.me ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Ksenia Guseynova
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Methods ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Data Array ◽  
Scientific Texts ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Methodological Errors ◽  
Humanities Students

The article provides the results of applying of a critical discourse analysis’ methods developed by Norman Fairclough. The data array consisting of abstracts of candidates of sociological sciences’ theses on discipline 22.00.08 «sociology of management» is analyzed. It is claimed that by means of qualitative methods it is possible not only to explore the problem field of the designated discipline, but also to reveal and typify the main methodological errors of scientific texts. The article is of interest to Humanities students.

scholarly journals PIDATO JOKO WIDODO SETELAH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: REPRESENTASI IDEOLOGI DAN KEKUASAAN (JOKO WIDODO’S SPEECH FOLLOWING THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF INDONESIA JUDGEMENT: THE REPRESENTATION OF IDEOLOGY AND POWER)

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Pujiningtyas Pujiningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
The People ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Data Source ◽  
The Republic

Joko Widodo as the elected president delivered his political speech following the judgement of The Constitutional Court of Indonesia regarding the lawsuit of the election of the president and vice president of the Republic of Indonesia for the 2019-2024 period. In the judgement, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia affirmed to reject the lawsuit and decided Joko Widodo and Ma’ruf Amin as the elected President and Vice President of the Republic of Indonesia. Thus, such political speech cannot be considered as independent. In his speech, Joko Widodo conveyed statement and ideology through language. Therefore, Joko Widodo’s speech was analyzed using the Huckin model for critical discourse analysis approach which was carried out using qualitative descriptive methods. The data source was Joko Widodo’s speech after the judgement of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia broadcasted nationwide. The analysis was carried out to look for genre, framing, foregrounding or backgrounding, presuppositions, and differences in topics, as well as analysis of sentences and words. The result shows that Joko Widodo used straightforward and explicit language and was presented in an argumentative and persuasive manner. The delivering of the speech used the language relations and power so that the ideology conveyed and was accepted by the people of Indonesia.AbstrakJoko Widodo sebagai presiden terpilih menyampaikan pidato politiknya usaiMahkamah Konstitusi memutuskan gugatan perkara hasil pemilihan presiden dan wakil presiden Republik Indonesia periode 2019--2024. Dalam putusan itu, Mahkamah Konstitusi menegaskan menolak gugatan yang diajukan oleh Tim Pemenangan Prabowo Subianto dan Sandiaga S. Uno dan memutuskan Joko Widodo dan Ma’ruf Amin sebagai Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia terpilih. Berkenaan dengan itu, pidato politik itu tidak dapat dipandang berdiri sendiri. Joko Widodo dalam pidatonya menyampaikan pernyataan dan ideologi melalui bahasa. Oleh karena itu, pidato Joko Widodo dianalisis dengan pendekatan analisiswacana kritis model Huckin. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Sumber data dalam penelitian adalah pidato Joko Widodo usai putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang disiarkan secara nasional oleh media massa. Analisis dilakukan untuk melihat genre, framing, foregrounding atau backgrounding, praanggapan, dan perbedaan topik, serta analisis kalimat dan kata. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa Joko Widodo menggunakan bahasa lugas dan eksplisit dan disampaikan secara argumentatif dan persuasif. Penyampaian itu menggunakan relasi bahasa dan kekuasaan sehingga ideologi yang disampaikan dapat diterima secara positif oleh rakyat Indonesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document