scholarly journals PENGUNDURAN DIRI SUKARELA SEBAGAI PENYELUNDUPAN HUKUM PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA SELAMA PANDEMI COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Wayan Gde Wiryawan

Abstract The Covid-19 pandemic has implications for the weakening of the global economy. Many companies cannot operate or cannot operate optimally. In making efficiency with company expenses, the company reduces the number of employees, and some even close the business permanently. To reduce costs incurred by companies in the mechanism of termination of employment, the company uses a voluntary resignation statement. This condition is certainly detrimental to workers. This research will discuss firstly the protection of workers during the Covid-19 pandemic and second, the comparison of legal consequences of termination of employment with voluntary resignation. Protection of workers during the Covid-19 pandemic is based on a philosophical basis where the state has a legal obligation to create welfare for its people through the concept of a welfare state. Therefore, the state issued a series of policies to protect workers from termination of employment. One form of employment termination created by the company is by asking workers to sign a letter of voluntary resignation. In the event of termination of employment, the employer is obliged to pay severance pay and/or compensation for years of service and compensation for entitlements that should be received, whereas if the worker resigns voluntarily, the employer does not pay all the components of the right.Keywords: company; resignation; work terminationAbstrakPandemi Covid-19 berimplikasi pada pelemahan ekonomi global. Banyak perusahaan yang tidak dapat beroperasi atau tidak dapat beroperasi secara optimal. Dalam melakukan efesien terhadap pengeluaran perusahaan, maka perusahaan mengurangi jumlah karyawan, bahkan ada yang menutup usaha secara permanen. Untuk mengurangi biaya yang perlu dikeluarkan oleh perusahaan dalam mekanisme pemutusan hubungan kerja, maka perusahaan menggunakan surat pernyataan pengunduran diri secara sukarela. Kondisi ini tentu merugikan pekerja. Dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas mengenai pertama perlindungan tenaga kerja pada masa pandemi Covid-19 dan kedua, perbandingan akibat hukum pemutusan hubungan kerja dengan pengunduran diri sukarela. Perlindungan tenaga kerja pada masa pandemi Covid-19 didasarkan pada dasar filosofi dimana negara memiliki kewajiban hukum untuk menciptakan kesejahteraan bagi rakyatnya melalui konsep welfare state. Oleh sebab itu, negara mengeluarkan serangkaian kebijakan untuk melindungi tenaga kerja dari pemutusan hubungan kerja. Salah satu bentuk pemutusan tenaga kerja yang diciptakan oleh perusahaan adalah dengan meminta pekerja untuk menandatangangi surat pernyataan pengunduran diri secara sukarela. Dalam hal terjadi pemutusan hubungan kerja pengusaha diwajibkan membayar uang pesangon dan atau uang penghargaan masa kerja dan uang penggantian hak yang seharusnya diterima, sedangkan apabila pekerja mengundurkan diri secara sukarela maka pengusaha tidak membayarkan seluruh komponen hak tersebut.

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Keun Song

Globalization pressured a rebirth of the state in Korea, but in an unexpected direction. Whereas the welfare state retrenched in Western Europe under pressures of the borderless global economy, the Korean state reinvented itself into the guardian of public welfare. That regime shift occurred when the “Asian crisis” struck in 1997 to end the developmental state's way of growth. Previously, the state channeled subsidized bank loans to the chaebol firms (monopolistic conglomerates in strategic industries) and the chaebol company welfare to its workforce in order to secure industrial peace in strategic growth sectors. This de facto class bargain, partly forced by the developmental state and chaebol firms and partly prodded by organized labor, crumbled with the Asian crisis. No longer too big to fail, the chaebol firms plunged into downsizing and restructuring in order to raise profitability, thus precipitating a profound social crisis. The rules and norms of lifetime employment and promotion by seniority gestated during Park Chung Hee's authoritarian rule (1961–1979), and labor's acquiescence—if not consent—to the chaebol-led hypergrowth strategy collapsed as the crisis damaged a third of Korea's top thirty business conglomerates in 1997 and 1998.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-103
Author(s):  
Komang Sukaniasa

International agreements are agreements between international subjects that give rise to binding obligations in international rights, which can be bilateral or multilateral. Based on these opinions, an understanding can be taken that international treaties are agreements or agreements entered into by two or more countries as subjects of international law that aim to cause certain legal consequences. International agreements, whether ratified or through approval or acceptance or accession, or other methods that are permitted, have the same binding force as ratified international treaties established in the Ratification Law of International Treaties. Once again, it is equally valid and binding on the state. Therefore, the authors consider that the position of international treaties are not made in the form of the Ratification Act of the International Agreement but are binding and apply to Indonesia. Then Damos Dumoli Agusman argues that ratification originates from the conception of international treaty law which is interpreted as an act of confirmation from a country of the legal acts of its envoys or representatives who have signed an agreement as a sign of agreement to be bound by the agreement.


Author(s):  
Jordanna Bailkin

This chapter asks how refugee camps transformed people as well as spaces, altering the identities of the individuals and communities who lived in and near them. It considers how camps forged and fractured economic, religious, and ethnic identities, constructing different kinds of unity and disunity. Camps had unpredictable effects on how refugees and Britons thought of themselves, and how they saw their relationship to upward and downward mobility. As the impoverished Briton emerged more clearly in the imagination of the welfare state, the refugee was his constant companion and critic. The state struggled to determine whether refugees required the same care as the poor, or if they warranted their own structures of aid.


2021 ◽  

This volume examines Arnold Gehlen’s theory of the state from his philosophy of the state in the 1920s via his political and cultural anthropology to his impressive critique of the post-war welfare state. The systematic analyses the book contains by leading scholars in the social sciences and the humanities examine the interplay between the theory and history of the state with reference to the broader context of the history of ideas. Students and researchers as well as other readers interested in this subject will find this book offers an informative overview of how one of the most wide-ranging and profound thinkers of the twentieth century understands the state. With contributions by Oliver Agard, Heike Delitz, Joachim Fischer, Andreas Höntsch, Tim Huyeng, Rastko Jovanov, Frank Kannetzky, Christine Magerski, Zeljko Radinkovic, Karl-Siegbert Rehberg and Christian Steuerwald.


Author(s):  
Hannah Lambie-Mumford

Chapter 7 looks at the role of the state and examines the changing nature of the UK welfare state and the impact these changes are having on the need for and shape of emergency food provision. The chapter argues that social security and on-going reforms to it are impacting on need for emergency food in two key ways: through changes to the levels of entitlement; and problematic administrative processes. Furthermore, the consequences of welfare reforms are impacting on the nature of these systems. As the level of need is driven up, projects are re-considering their operations, contemplating logistics and means of protecting projects’ access to food. At a local level, particular reforms appear to be embedding local welfare systems which increasingly incorporate local food projects.The question of the state as duty bearer is discussed. By right to food standards the welfare state can be considered a vital aspect to both fulfilling and protecting people’s right; but the state’s role is much broader, encompassing action in relation to labour markets, commercial food markets and other spheres where it could exercise influence to respect and protect people’s human right.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-284
Author(s):  
Olga Nikolic ◽  
Igor Cvejic

The aim of this paper is to show, contra the right-libertarian critique of social justice, that there are good reasons for defending policies of social justice within a free society. In the first part of the paper, we will present two influential right-libertarian critiques of social justice, found in Friedrich Hayek?s Law, Legislation and Liberty and Robert Nozick?s Anarchy, State and Utopia. Based on their approach, policies of social justice are seen as an unjustified infringement on freedoms of individual members of a society. In response to this critique, we will introduce the distincion between formal and factual freedom and argue that the formal principle of freedom defended by Hayek and Nozick does not suffice for the protection of factual freedom of members of a society, because it does not recognize (1) the moral obligation to help those who, without their fault, lack factual freedom to a significant degree, and (2) the legal obligation of the state to protect civic dignity of all members of a society. In the second part of the paper, we offer an interpretation of Kant?s argument on taxation, according to which civic dignity presupposes factual freedom, in order to argue that Kant?s justification of taxation offers good reasons for claiming that the state has the legal obligation to protect factual freedom via the policies of social justice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-70
Author(s):  
Ardini Octaviarini

BUMN are private corporate entities so that the laws governing Manpower are applicable to Law 13 of 2003. Therefore, the normative rights set forth in Law No. 13 of 2003 must be met by companies for their workers. These normative rights are, among others, when the Bankrupt Company, ie, a one time severance pay under the provisions of Article 156 Paragraph 2, severance pay for a one-time stipulation of Article 156 paragraph 3 and compensation pay pursuant to paragraph 156 4. Where there is labor rights is not fulfilled by a state-owned enterprise, workers may file for bankruptcy in the company, in its qualification as a Preferen creditor. Based on the research, the state-owned enterprises should be clearly stated in a company to protect the company's existing components in case of Bankruptcy, if the State participates, there must be at least 51% of the shares therein, so that the control, regulation and controlling functions performed the government is clear that the company's goals are achieved. It is necessary to have the same meaning / meaning as the state-owned enterprise which is engaged in public interest. Because of Article 2 paragraph 5 of Law No. 37 of 2004 with the explanation is not in line. Article 2 paragraph 5 of the Law on Bankruptcy refers to state-owned enterprises in the field of public interest, while in the explanation states that state-owned all state-owned capital and not divided into shares. Between the contents of the article and the explanation is not synchronized, then the provisions should be mentioned directly Perum, in order to achieve legal certainty.  


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Winda Roselina Effendi

Walfare State concept born in the era of the 20th century as a correction of the development of the concept of the country as night watchman, the phenomenon of economic capitalism that gradually leads to lameness in the distribution of sources of prosperity. In the Walfare State concept, the state is required to extend its responsibility to the socio-economic problems facing the people. The functions of the state also include activities that were previously beyond the scope of state functions, such as extending the provision of social services to individuals and families in specific matters, such as social security. The role of the state can not be separated with Welfare State because the state that plays a role in managing the economy which includes the responsibility of the state to ensure the availability of basic welfare services in certain levels. Welfare State does not reject the existence of a capitalist market economy system but believes that there are elements in the public order that are more important than market objectives and can only be achieved by controlling and limiting the operation of such market mechanisms.Keywords: walfare state, country, economic systemKonsep Walfare State yang lahir di era abad ke-20 sebagai koreksi berkembangnya konsep negara sebagai penjaga malam, gejala kapitalisme perekonomian yang secara perlahan-lahan menyebabkan terjadinya kepincangan dalam pembagian sumber-sumber kemakmuran bersarma. Dalam konsep Walfare State, negara dituntut untuk memperluas tanggung jawabnya kepada masalah-masalah sosial ekonomi yang dihadapi rakyat. Fungsi negara juga meliputi kegiatan-kegiatan yang sebelumnya berada diluar jangkauan fungsi negara, seperti memperluas ketentuan pelayanan sosial kepada individu dan keluarga dalam hal-hal khusus, seperti social security, kesehatan.  Peran negara tidak bisa dipisahkan dengan Welfare State karena negara yang berperan dalam mengelola perekonomian yang yang di dalamnya mencakup tanggung jawab negara untuk menjamin ketersediaan pelayanan kesejahteraan dasar dalam tingkat tertentu. Welfare State tidak menolak keberadaan sistem ekonomi pasar kapitalis tetapi meyakini bahwa ada elemen-elemen dalam tatanan masyarakat yang lebih penting dari tujuan-tujuan pasar dan hanya dapat dicapai dengan mengendalikan dan membatasi bekerjanya mekanisme pasar tersebut. Kata Kunci: walfare state, negara,sistem ekonomi 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document