scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEJABAT PEMERINTAHAN DARI ANCAMAN PIDANA DALAM PENGGUNAAN DISKRESI

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-182
Author(s):  
Moudy Raul Ghozali ◽  
Syofyan Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Public Services ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
To Receive

The purpose of the study was to determine the form of legal protection for officials from criminal threats in using discretion. Using pure legal research. There are two forms of legal protection in the use of discretionary authority, namely preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. The first preventive legal protection is contained in Article 67 of Law no. 5-2009 or also known as the principle of praesumptio iustae causa, namely decisions issued by government officials are always considered valid until there is an annulment. The second preventive legal protection is that the policy principle cannot be criminalized. Government policies cannot be criminalized if there are no elements of harming state finances and benefiting themselves or other parties. As well as the implementation of these policies for public services. While the repressive legal protection is contained in Article 21 paragraph (1) of Law no. 30-2014 and Perma No. 4-2015, which determines that the Administrative Court has the authority to receive, examine, and decide whether or not there is an element of abuse of authority committed by government officials.Keywords: discretion; officials; legal protectionAbstrakTujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pejabat dari ancaman pidana dalam menggunakan diskresi. Menggunakan peneltiian hukum murni. Terdapat dua bentuk perlindungan hukum dalam penggunaan wewenang diskresi, yakni perlindungan hukum preventif dan perlindungan hukum represif. Perlindungan hukum preventif yang pertama tertuang dalam Pasal 67 UU No. 5-2009atau dikenal juga dengan asas praesumptio iustae causa yakni keputusan yang dikeluarkan oleh pejabat pemerintahan selalu dianggap absah hingga ada pembatalannya. Perlindungan hukum preventif yang kedua adalah prinsip kebijakan tidak dapat di pidana. Kebijakan pemerintah tidak dapat di pidana apabila tidak ada unsur merugikan keuangan negara dan menguntungkan diri sendiri ataupun pihak lain. Serta pelaksanaan kebijakan tersebut untuk pelayanan publik. Sedangkan perlindungan hukum represif tertuang pada Pasal 21 ayat (1) UU No. 30-2014 dan Perma No. 4-2015, yang menentukan bahwa PTUN berwenang untuk menerima, memeriksa, dan memutus ada atau tidak unsur penyalahgunaan wewenang yang dilakukan oleh pejabat pemerintahan.

PERSINGGUNGAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PENYALAHGUNAAN DISKRESI ANTARA PENGADILAN TUN DAN PENGADILAN TIPIKOR / INTERCEPTION OF JUSTICE AUTHORITY OF DISCRETION ABUSE BETWEEN ADMINISTRATION COURT AND CORRUPTION COURTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Budi Suhariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
State Finance ◽  
The Law ◽  
To Receive

Diskresi sebagai wewenang bebas, keberadaannya rentan akan disalahgunakan. Penyalahgunaan diskresi yang berimplikasi merugikan keuangan negara dapat dituntutkan pertanggungjawabannya secara hukum administrasi maupun hukum pidana. Mengingat selama ini peraturan perundang-undangan tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi tidak merumuskan secara rinci yang dimaksudkan unsur menyalahgunakan kewenangan maka para hakim menggunakan konsep penyalahgunaan wewenang dari hukum administrasi. Problema muncul saat diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 dimana telah memicu persinggungan dalam hal kewenangan mengadili penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) antara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dengan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pada perkembangannya, persinggungan kewenangan mengadili tersebut ditegaskan oleh Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 bahwa PTUN berwenang menerima, memeriksa, dan memutus permohonan penilaian ada atau tidak ada penyalahgunaan wewenang (termasuk diskresi) dalam Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan Pejabat Pemerintahan sebelum adanya proses pidana. Sehubungan tidak dijelaskan tentang definisi dan batasan proses pidana yang dimaksud, maka timbul penafsiran yang berbeda. Perlu diadakan kesepakatan bersama dan dituangkan dalam regulasi tentang tapal batas persinggungan yang jelas tanpa meniadakan kewenangan pengujian penyalahgunaan wewenang diskresi pada Pengadilan TUN.Discretion as free authority is vulnerable to being misused. The abuse of discretion implicating the state finance may be prosecuted by both administrative and criminal law. In view of the fact that the law on corruption eradication does not formulate in detail the intended element of authority abuse, the judges use the concept of authority abuse from administrative law. Problems arise when the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 triggered an interception in terms of justice/ adjudicate authority on authority abuse (including discretion) between the Administrative Court and Corruption Court. In its development, the interception of justice authority is affirmed by Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2015 that the Administrative Court has the authority to receive, examine and decide upon the appeal there is or there is no misuse of authority in the Decision and / or Action of Government Officials prior to the criminal process. That is, shortly before the commencement of the criminal process then that's when the authority of PTUN decides to judge the misuse of authority over the case. In this context, Perma No. 4 of 2015 has imposed restrictions on the authority of the TUN Court in prosecuting the abuse of discretionary authority.

Legal Review of Medical Emergency that Happened after a Failed Abortion Attempt

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Elfan Winoto
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Doctor Who ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Offender ◽  
Standard Operating ◽  
Medical Emergencies ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Consequences

<p>Abortion is the fifth highest cause of maternal mortality. Legal abortions are called <em>abortus provocatus medicinalis</em> and those that are illegal are called <em>abortus provocatus criminalis</em>. Indonesian law prohibits abortion except indications of medical emergencies and the consequences of rape. This study aims to determine the legal consequences of someone who failed an abortion and the legal protection of the doctor who treated her.</p><p>This legal research uses a juridical normative with a conceptual and legislative approach.</p><p>The results of the perpetrators and those who helped the abortion that caused medical emergencies to be threatened with Criminal Code Article 53. They cannot be convicted if in accordance with professional standards and standard operating procedures.</p><p>The conclusion and suggestion are the doctor cannot be convicted as a criminal offender or as an assistant to an abortion crime if it can be proven that an abortion is carried out in emergency condition to save mother or fetus and prevent disability. The government needs to make laws that regulate who will carry out safe, qualitative and responsible abortions.</p><p> </p><p>Abortion is the fifth highest cause of maternal mortality. Legal abortions are called <em>abortus provocatus medicinalis</em> and those that are illegal are called <em>abortus provocatus criminalis</em>. Indonesian law prohibits abortion except indications of medical emergencies and the consequences of rape. This study aims to determine the legal consequences of someone who failed an abortion and the legal protection of the doctor who treated her.</p><p>This legal research uses a juridical normative with a conceptual and legislative approach.</p><p>The results of the perpetrators and those who helped the abortion that caused medical emergencies to be threatened with Criminal Code Article 53. They cannot be convicted if in accordance with professional standards and standard operating procedures.</p><p>The conclusion and suggestion are the doctor cannot be convicted as a criminal offender or as an assistant to an abortion crime if it can be proven that an abortion is carried out in emergency condition to save mother or fetus and prevent disability. The government needs to make laws that regulate who will carry out safe, qualitative and responsible abortions.</p>

The Arthur Crawford Scandal

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Metelits
Keyword(s):  
Retirement Age ◽  
House Of Commons ◽  
Government Service ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Modus Operandi ◽  
High Court ◽  
Secretary Of State ◽  
The Press ◽  
The Government ◽  
To Receive

The Arthur Crawford Scandal explores how nineteenth century Bombay tried a British official for corruption. The presidency government persuaded Indians, government officials, to testify against the very person who controlled their career by offering immunity from legal action and career punishment. A criminal conviction of Crawford’s henchman established the modus operandi of a bribery network. Subsequent efforts to intimidate Indian witnesses led to litigation at the high court level, resulting in a political pressure campaign in London based on biased press reports from India. These reports evoked questions in the House of Commons; questions became demands that Indians witnesses against Crawford be fired from government service. The secretary of state for India and the Bombay government negotiated about the fate of the Indian witnesses. At first, the secretary of state accepted the Bombay government’s proposals. But the press campaign against the Indian witnesses eventually led him to order the Government of India, in consultation with the Government of Bombay, to pass a law ordering those officials who paid Crawford willingly, to be fired. Those whom the Bombay government determined to be extorted were not to be fired. Both groups retained immunity from further actions at law. Thus, Bombay won a victory that almost saved its original guarantee of immunity: those who were fired were to receive their salary (along with periodic step increases) until they reached retirement age, at which time they would receive a pension. However, this ‘solution’ did little to overcome the stigma and suffering of the fired officials.

LEGAL PROTECTION FOR ILLEGAL INDONESIAN WORKER IN MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asnu Fayakun Arohmi
Keyword(s):  
Migrant Workers ◽  
Migrant Worker ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Indonesian Government ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
The Law

This research examines the legal protection provided for illegal Indonesian workers in Malaysia and the obstacles to perform it. Malaysia are the largest number compared to another country in Asia in receiving migrant workers from Indonesia. In total there are 73.178 migrant workers. A large number of Indonesian migrant workers is caused by the lack of jobs vacancy in the country, so citizens look for a job abroad. The requirements to become Indonesian migrant workers are not easy, therefore many of them went abroad illegally. Illegal Indonesian workers often get inhuman treatment. Indonesian goverment should protect every citizen, even though they are illegal workers, since they are still Indonesian citizen. This paper is based on normative-empirical legal research with the data obtained from interviews, as well as from secondary sources provided in laws governing these matters, journals or from trusted sites of internet. The results of this study show that: first, the Law No. 18 of 2017 on Protection of Migrant Worker does not differentiate the protection for illegal and legal Indonesian migrant workers. Second, there are two obstacles faced by the Indonesian government: lack of data regarding the illegal Indonesian workers and lack of state budget to handle the protection of illegal Indonesian workers.

scholarly journals Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap Oleh Notaris Pada Minuta Akta

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 436
Author(s):  
Wulan Wiryantari Dewi ◽  
Ibrahim R
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The People ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Legal Consequences

The notary's role is to provide legal protection to the people who use his services. The presence of a Notary is indispensable for the community concerned to hold a legal relationship with other individuals so that the Notary may also be liable. In the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter c of the Amendment Law, it is stipulated that in carrying out his position, the Notary is required to attach fingerprints on the minutes of the deed, giving rise to various polemics, because the said provisions do not stipulate further if in this case the smoker suffers from finger defects or events that result in damage to fingerprints which makes the investigator unable to put his fingerprint. The purpose of this research is to find out how the efforts that can be done by a notary against those who are unable to put fingerprints and the legal consequences of the absence of fingerprints against the strength of the deed. This research is a type of normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that efforts can be made by a notary if there are those who suffer from finger defects or experience events that cause fingerprint damage so that they cannot attach their fingerprints to the minutes of the deed, the relevant Notary can explain the matter at the end of the deed. he made it because the fingerprints attached to the address are an act that is required to a notary that can lead to administrative sanctions as contained in the Amendment Law. Due to the legal absence of fingerprints attached to the strength of the deed that is the deed made by the relevant Notary Public remains an authentic deed even though the fingerprints of the tappers are not attached based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code and the deed is valid and legally binding as long as the provisions contained in Article 1320 are fulfilled Civil Code.

scholarly journals Akses Karya Cipta Audiobook Bagi Disabilitas Netra : Perspektif HAM

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Bagus Gede Ari Rama Bagus Gede Ari Rama ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Blind People ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research

Audiobook access for people with disabilities is very important. Access is the convenience that people get from a service. This study aims to analyze the legal certainty and legal protection of audiobook copyright access for blind people with disabilities. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and comparative approach. This research found that access to audiobooks' works has been regulated in the Marrakech Treaty, Copyright Act Number 28 of 2014 and Government Regulation Number 27 of 2019. Akses karya cipta audiobook bagi disabilitas sangat penting. Aksesibilitas merupakan kemudahan yang didapat oleh orang terhadap suatu layanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum akses karya cipta audiobook bagi disabilitas tuna netra. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan komparatif. Dalam penelitian ini menemukan bahwa akses karya cipta audiobook telah diatur dalam Traktat Marrakesh, UUHC 2014 serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 2019.

scholarly journals Authority of Regional Governments in Developing Investment in the Regional Investment

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Salle Salle ◽  
Lusiana Lusiana ◽  
La Ode Husen
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Foreign Investors ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Regional Investment ◽  
Regional Governments

This research conducted with the aim of 1) To find and analyze the arrangements for the entry of foreign investors in investment in Indonesia, and 2) To find, analyze and develop the authority of the Regional Government in developing investments in regional investment. Legal research is a scientific activity, which is based on certain methods, systematics and thoughts that aim to learn something or some symptoms of a particular law, by analyzing it. In this case the research conducted by the author is research on legal protection of foreign investors in investment according to the Indonesian system.

scholarly journals Konflik Antar Negara Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-172
Author(s):  
Vera Yanti Artega ◽  
Adwani Adwani ◽  
Sanusi Bintang
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Peaceful Settlement ◽  
Cross Country ◽  
Inter State

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan perlindungan hukum internasional terhadap negara yang disadap secara melawan hukum oleh negara lain dan menjelaskan metode penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan Indonesia dalam  menyelesaikan konflik antar negara akibat penyadapan yang dilakukan Australia terhadap Indonesia Tahun 2013. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum internasional belum memberikan perlindungan yang cukup kepada negara yang disadap oleh negara lain. Adapun metode penyelesaian sengketa yang digunakan Indonesia dalam menyelesaikan kasus penyadapan dengan Australia adalah penyelesaian sengketa internasional secara damai melalui cara negosiasi. Oleh karena itu, peraturan mengenai penyadapan lintas negara harus segera dibentuk, sehingga perlindungan hukum terhadap negara yang disadap bisa dilakukan. Serta kedua negara harus membentuk code of conduct. Inter-State Conflict Under International Law International relation between two countries at some time could evoke problems which are caused by the cheating action of one party, such as interception resulting in conflict between them. This study aims to explain the protection of international law against countries that are illegally intercepted by other countries and explain the method of dispute settlement conducted by Indonesia in resolving inter-state conflicts resulting from Australian interception to Indonesia in 2013. This study uses a normative-juridical legal research method, by using legislation, case study , and conceptual approach with library data sources. The result shows that international law has not provided sufficient protection to countries intercepted or tapped by other countries. The method of dispute resolution used by Indonesia in solving wiretapping case with Australia is the peaceful settlement of international disputes through negotiation. Therefore, regulations concerning cross-country intercepting must be established immediately, thus legal protection of the tapped countries could be proceeded, and the two countries must establish a code of conduct.

scholarly journals Issue to the Legal Protection of the Use of the State Budget to Handling Covid-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1168-1177
Author(s):  
Soesi Idayanti
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Economic Sectors ◽  
Financial Policies ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Government Grants ◽  
The Government ◽  
Precarious Situation

The Covid-19 pandemic, which impacted the health, social, and economic sectors as a non-natural disaster, led the President to make efforts to handle it with state financial policies by stipulating Perpu Number 1 of 2020. Budget misuse during the Covid-19 pandemic should be punishable by the death penalty because carried out when the state is facing a precarious situation; however, in Perpu No.1/2020, the Government grants immunity rights state budget managers. This legal immunity needs to be studied as a standard-issue regarding the state budget to overcome the Covid-19 pandemic. This study aims to examine the pandemic's impact on state finances and how Government policies are in dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic. This study used a normative juridical approach with data obtained from the literature, and the results were analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in the Government changing the output of the use of the state budget aimed at dealing with the pandemic and restoring the country's economic condition due to the pandemic; the legal solution is to stipulate Perpu Number 1 of 2020, which was then approved by the DPR and became Law Number 2 2020. At the technical, operational level, the Government has also issued various policy regulations as a follow-up to Law Number 2 of 2020, which is used as an effort to deal with precarious situations as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, such as fiscal policy stimulus, taxes, social assistance, and policies. Adjustment of regional finances. The problem that was considered urgent due to the Covid-19 pandemic led the Government to stimulate immunity in Law Number 2 of 2020. However, this immunity is given following the principle of good faith for users of state finances

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGATURAN ABORTUS PROVOKATUS TERHADAP KORBAN PEMERKOSAAN DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-263
Author(s):  
Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah ◽  
Elza Syarief ◽  
Lu Sudirman ◽  
Tedy Surya
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Rape Victims ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Rule Based

Abortion or abortus provokatus constitutes a termination of pregnancy before the time of delivery. The objective of the study is to ascertain if the Abortion-related Health Law is a realistic rule based on the health aspects, as well as to analyze how long it should be allowed by the Health Law to perform an abortion according to medical criteria. The study uses a method of normative legal research. It concludes that the Health Law pertaining abortion is a realistic rule based on health aspects. Yet, it  is necessary to revise the abortion rules due to rape incidents. The rules permits the abortion if the gestational age is 6 (six) weeks or 40 (forty) days. It is calculated from the first day of the last period. It suggests that the gestational age should be 12 (twelve) weeks or 3 (three) months from the first day of the last period.   Keywords: Abortus Provocatus, Legal Protection, Rape Victims

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document