scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN KRIMINAL TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA POLIGAMI DIKAITKAN DENGAN SISTEM HUKUM PERKAWINAN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ateng Sudibyo
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Polygamous Marriage ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Government ◽  
Polygynous Marriage

Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage basically adhere to the principle of monogamy. Although not essential to the principle of monogamy, there is still a polygamist who often take shortcuts to legalize polygynous marriage. Polygamous marriage act is a violation of Law No. 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, and Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 on implementation of Law No. 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, although the threat of criminal sanction only published in the Government Regulation. Another case in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the sanction of polygamy as criminal action regulated in Article 279. Is the threat of criminal sanctions contained in the Criminal Code and Regulation No. 9 of 1975 in line with the values and ideals of community law in Indonesia? The purpose of this study is to determine the applicative policy for polygamy as criminal offense in marriages in Indonesia’s legal system and to formulate the concept of criminalisation policy for polygamous marriage act as criminal offense in the Indonesia’s legal system of marriage for the future. This is due to criminal sanctions in Article 279 of the Criminal Code and Law No. 1 of 1974 and Article 45 of Government Regulation Number 9 Year 1975, there is still a legal synchrony. The concept of future criminal polygamy criminal policies should apply the principle of ultimum remedium otherwise known as the “last drug”. Whatever the reason for the imposition of criminal punishment will still have a negative effect on the perpetrator and his family and will cause sociological and psychological implications if criminal sanctions are applied. In the legal state of Pancasila especially for the Muslims, the concept of marriage is a worship then it must be fostered, if there are deviations should not be destroyed by a criminal threat. Therefore, to overcome the criminal act of polygamy the need of a non penal criminal policy means, that is prevention without punishment.

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Akibat Berlakunya UU No. 11 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengampunan Pajak Terhadap Sanksi Pidana Perpajakan

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-235
Author(s):  
Hadzil Hadzil ◽  
Mahdi Syahbandir ◽  
Syarifuddin Hasyim
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
The Poor ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Terdapat cukup banyak masyarakat yang dengan sengaja melakukan kecurangan-kecurangan dan melalaikan kewajibannya dalam melaksanakan pembayaran pajak yang telah ditetapkan sehingga menyebabkan timbulnya tunggakan pajak. Menyikapi hal tersebut, Pemerintah mengesahkan Undang-undang Tax Amnesty Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengampunan Pajak. Salah satu jenis pengampunan yang ditawarkan adalah memberikan penghapusan tindak pidana bagi Wajib Pajak (WP) yang melanggar undang-undang. Oleh sebab itu, hal ini menjadi menarik untuk diteliti karena dapat dianggap sebagai bentuk pengkhianatan terhadap rakyat miskin atau WP yang taat pajak. Masalah pokok dalam penelitian ini adalah apakah penghapusan sanksi pidana terkait pengampunan pajak (tax amnesty) sudah sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip pemidanaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan penghapusan sanksi pidana telah sesuai atau tidak dengan prinsip-prinsip pemidanaan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan tujuan mengkaji asas-asas dan kaidah-kaidah yang terdapat dalam ilmu hukum. Data yang digunakan terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam hal penghapusan sanksi pidana dalam tax amnesty tidaklah sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip penghapusan pidana dalam konsep KUHP, yaitu alasan pembenar dan alasan pemaaf karena apabila harta tersebut berasal dari hasil korupsi, hal tersebut bukanlah merupakan perbuatan yang patut dan benar untuk dimaafkan. Disarankan kebijakan dalam pengampunan pajak (tax amnesty) sebaiknya tidak diberlakukan penghapusan pada unsur tindak pidana, apalagi dalam tindak pidana tersebut terdapat unsur yang merugikan negara.There are enough people who deliberately commit fraud and neglect their obligations in carrying out the payment of taxes that have been set so as to cause the arrears of taxes. In response, the Government passed the Tax Amnesty Act Number 11 Year 2016 About Tax Amnesty. One type of amnesty offered is to provide the abolition of a criminal offense for a Taxpayer (WP) that violates the law. Therefore, it is interesting to investigate because it can be considered as a form of betrayal of the poor or WP who are tax-conscious. The main problem in this research is whether the abolition of criminal sanctions related to tax amnesty is in line with the principles of punishment. This study aims to determine and explain the elimination of criminal sanctions are appropriate or not with the principles of punishment. This study is a normative juridical research with the aim of studying the principles and rules contained in the science of law. The data used consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results indicate that of the abolition of criminal sanctions in the tax amnesty is not in accordance with the principles of criminal abolition in the concept of the Criminal Code, namely the justification and reasons for forgiveness because if the property is derived from the corruption, it is not a proper and proper act to be forgiven. It is recommended that the tax amnesty should not be abolished on the element of criminal acts, morever in the criminal act there are elements that harm the state.

scholarly journals PERKEMBANGAN KEJAHATAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (CYBER CRIME) DAN ANTISIPASINYA DENGAN PENAL POLICY

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supanto ,
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Policy Information ◽  
The Law ◽  
No Innovation

<p>Abstract<br />The research conducted to inventory of the various laws (the legislative products) relating to the regulating in the field of information technology crime, to identify its adjustment in globalization, to describe the conduct proscribed as a crime of the Information and Electronic Transaction, as well as reviewing the formulation of criminal sanctions. Studies based on the idea that regulation Law Number 11 of 2008 is aimed at setting the utilization of information technology, particularly the information and electronic transactions, in order to be implemented properly and maintain the safety and benefit of humanity. However, their use potentially criminal, which must be addressed, including the use of criminal law, therefore there is a provision in the law of criminal sanctions, in this case defined the prohibited acts and penalties specified criminal, offense. Conclusions obtained, In line with an information technology and The Law of Infromation and Transaction of electronic (The Law No. 11 of 2008/UU ITE), inventoried some legislation which can be understood as an attempt arrangement of information technology, especially as a crime, as in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Law on Telecommunications, the Law on Copyright / patent, the law of terrorism . The adjustment of The Law Number 11 of 2008 on the Information and Electronic Transactions with global regulation and a comparative assessment of the demands that must be met in order to harmony especially on the cyber crime law. In addition, the formulation of a threatened criminal sanctions in offenses under the Act remain as types of criminal sanctions prescribed in the Penal Code,<br />which is a kind of imprisonment sanction fines and criminal sanctions, but not formulated an additional  criminal sanction. Therefore, its system is no innovation typical types of criminal sanctions for offenses in the field of information and electronic transactions.<br /><em>Keywords: Cyber crime, criminal policy,information technology</em></p><p><br />Abstrak<br />Penelitian yang dilakukan bertujuan untuk menginventarisasi berbagai undang-undang (produk legislatif) yang berkaitan dengan bidang kejahatan teknologi informasi, untuk mengidentifikasi penyesuaian dalam era globalisasi, untuk menggambarkan perilaku terlarang sebagai kejahatan Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik , serta meninjau perumusan sanksi pidana. Studi didasarkan pada gagasan bahwa UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 bertujuan untuk pengaturan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, khususnya informasi dan transaksi elektronik, agar dapat dilaksanakan dengan baik dan menjaga keamanan dan kepentingan kemanusiaan, namun penggunaannya berpotensi pidana, termasuk penggunaan hukum pidana, karena ada ketentuan dalam hukum sanksi pidana, dalam hal ini didefinisikan tindakan yang dilarang dan hukuman yang ditentukan pidana. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh, Perlu penyesuaian UU Nomor 11 Tahun</p><p>2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dengan regulasi bersifat global dan penilaian komparatif dari tuntutan yang harus dipenuhi untuk keharmonisan terutama pada hukum kejahatan cyber. Dalam UU ITE, terhadap perbuatan yang dilarang diancam sanksi pidana. Adapun jenis sanksi pidananya adalah sanksi pidana penjara dan sanksi pidana denda. Jenis sanksi ini sudah dikenal dalam Pasal 10 KUHP,   dan tidak ditentukan jenis pidana tambahan. Dengandemikian tidak ada pengembangan mengenai jenis pidana khusus yang ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana di bidang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.<br /><em>Kata Kunci: Kejahatan Dunia Maya, Hukum Pidana,Teknologi Informasi</em></p>

scholarly journals PERKEMBANGAN KEJAHATAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (CYBER CRIME) DAN ANTISIPASINYA DENGAN PENAL POLICY

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supanto
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Policy Information ◽  
The Law ◽  
No Innovation

<div class="WordSection1"><p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Th</em><em>e research conducted to inventory of the various laws (the legislative products) relating to the regulating in the field of information technology crime, to identify  its adjustment   in globalization, to describe the conduct proscribed as a crime of the Information and Electronic Transaction, as well as reviewing the formulation of criminal sanctions. Studies based on the idea that regulation Law Number 11 of  2008 is aimed at setting the utilization of information technology, particularly the information and electronic transactions, in order to be implemented properly and maintain the safety and benefit of humanity. However, their use potentially criminal, which must be addressed, including the use of criminal law, therefore there is a provision in the law of criminal sanctions, in this case defined the prohibited acts and penalties specified criminal, offense. Conclusions obtained, In line with an information technology and The Law of Infromation and  Transaction  of electronic (The Law No. 11 of 2008/UU ITE), inventoried some legislation which can be understood as an attempt arrangement of information technology, especially as a crime, as in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Law on Telecommunications, the Law on Copyright / patent, the law of terrorism . The adjustment of The Law Number 11 of 2008 on the Information and Electronic Transactions with global regulation and a comparative assessment of the demands that must be met in order to harmony especially on the cyber crime law. In addition, the formulation of a threatened criminal sanctions in offenses under the Act remain as types of criminal sanctions prescribed in the Penal Code, which is a kind of imprisonment sanction fines and criminal sanctions, but not formulated an additional criminal sanction. Therefore, its system is no innovation typical types of criminal sanctions for offenses in the field of information and electronic transactions.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Cyber crime, criminal policy,information technology</em></p><p> </p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian yang dilakukan bertujuan untuk menginventarisasi berbagai undang-undang (produk legislatif) yang berkaitan dengan bidang kejahatan teknologi informasi, untuk mengidentifikasi penyesuaian dalam era globalisasi, untuk menggambarkan perilaku terlarang sebagai kejahatan Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik , serta meninjau perumusan sanksi pidana. Studi didasarkan pada gagasan bahwa UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 bertujuan untuk pengaturan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, khususnya informasi dan transaksi elektronik, agar dapat dilaksanakan dengan baik dan menjaga keamanan dan kepentingan kemanusiaan, namun penggunaannya berpotensi pidana, termasuk penggunaan hukum pidana, karena ada ketentuan dalam hukum sanksi pidana, dalam hal ini didefinisikan tindakan yang dilarang dan hukuman yang ditentukan pidana. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh, Perlu penyesuaian UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dengan regulasi bersifat global dan penilaian komparatif dari tuntutan yang harus dipenuhi untuk keharmonisan terutama pada hukum kejahatan <em>cyber</em>. Dalam UU ITE, terhadap perbuatan yang dilarang diancam sanksi pidana. Adapun jenis sanksi pidananya adalah sanksi pidana penjara dan sanksi pidana denda. Jenis sanksi ini sudah dikenal dalam Pasal 10 KUHP, dan tidak ditentukan jenis pidana tambahan. Dengan demikian tidak ada pengembangan mengenai jenis pidana khusus yang ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana  di bidang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci:  </strong>Kejahatan Dunia Maya<em>,  </em>Hukum Pidana<em>,</em>Teknologi Informasi</p></div>

scholarly journals URGENSI PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM KASUS KEJAHATAN KESUSILAAN: KAJIAN TENTANG SANKSI PIDANA BAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN KESUSILAAN PADA ANAK

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Subaidah Ratna Juita
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Child Victims ◽  
Sexual Crimes ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
Penal Law

<p>Penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak di Indonesia belum seimbang dengan dampak yang ditimbulkannya. Adapun anak sebagai korban dari kejahatan kesusilaan tentu mengalami trauma yang berkepanjangan hingga dewasa bahkan seumur hidupnya. Salah satu upaya yang dapat ditempuh dalam menghadapi problematika penegakan hukum adalah dengan cara pembenahan sistem hukum. Oleh karna itu perlu adanya pembaharuan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan sebagai bagian dari sistem hukum. Pembaharuan ini perlu dilakukan karena sanksi pidana yang ada saat ini tidak memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku. Upaya pembaruan hukum pidana yang berkaitan dengan sanksi pidana dalam kasus kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak dapat ditelusuri berdasarkan perumusan sanksi pidana berdasarkan KUHP, UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan pertama atas UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu) No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Dengan demikian tulisan ini secara fokus mengkaji urgensi pembaharuan hukum pidana, khususnya hukum pidana materiil tentang sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan seksual dalam rangka untuk memberikan perlindungan pada anak korban kejahatan seksual.</p><p><em>The imposition of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of morality in children in Indonesia has not been balanced by its impact. As for the child as a victim of crime decency certainly traumatized prolonged until adulthood even a lifetime. One effort that can be taken in dealing with the problem of law enforcement is to reform the legal system. By because it is necessary to reform criminal sanctions for the perpetrators of decency as part of the legal system. These reforms need to be done because there is a criminal sanction which does not currently provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators. Efforts to reform the criminal law relating to criminal sanctions in cases of crimes of morality in children can be traced by the formulation of criminal sanctions under the penal law, Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, Law No. 35 of 2014 on the First Amendment of Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, and Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) Number 1 Year 2016 Concerning Second Amendment Act No. 23 of 2002 about Child Protection. So this paper examines the urgency updates operating focus criminal law, especially criminal law substantive about criminal sanctions for dader of sexual crimes in order to provide protection for child victims of sexual crimes.</em></p><p> </p>

scholarly journals Abortion by Rape Victim: A Dilemma in the Drat of Penal Code and Indonesian Health Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-640
Author(s):  
Fikri Ariyad ◽  
Ali Masyhar
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Women Victims ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Psychological Trauma ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Rape Victims ◽  
Medical Emergencies ◽  
The Government

In this present time, the debate about abortion in Indonesia is increasingly crowded. Abortion is also carried out by women - victims of rape to reduce the burden they suffered. The regulation on abortion in Indonesia has been regulated in the statutory regulations, namely the Criminal Code, especially in Article 346, Article 347, Article 348, and Article 349. In the RKUHP (Draft of Criminal Code), abortion regulation is regulated in two chapters namely, Chapter XIV Article 501 and Chapter XIX Articles 589, 590, 591, 592. In addition, the government has also issued several regulations governing abortion such as Government Regulation No. 61 of 2014 concerning Reproductive Health and also Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning health. However, the various regulations that exist between the Criminal Code, RKUHP, PP and the Act actually contradict to each other. There is no synchronization between the regulations regarding abortion by women rape victims. The KUHP and RKUHP clearly do not allow abortion in Indonesia and do not legalize it without any exception, including abortion carried out by women victims of rape. Whereas in Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning health, abortion can be carried out on an indication of medical emergencies and pregnancy due to rape that causes psychological trauma, so abortionists cannot be prosecuted as criminal.

scholarly journals Efficiency of Judiciary and Penalty Policy of Courts in Serbia for Criminal Work Violence in Family // Efikasnost pravosuđa i kaznena politika sudova u Srbiji za krivično delo nasilje u porodici

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Dragan Jovašević
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Family

Under the influence of international standards, in the first place of the Istanbul Convention, in Serbia at the beginning of this century, there were several statutory texts such as the Criminal Law (2002), the Family Law (2005), the Criminal Code (2005) and the Law on the Prevention of Violence in the family (2016) determined the concept, elements, characteristics and forms of manifestation of the criminal act of domestic violence, as well as a system of preventive and punitive measures in order to prevent and suppress it. However, there is a greater or lesser disparity between legislative solutions and judicial practice, which also affects the efficiency of the functioning of the judiciary, and therefore the rule of law in general. To a large extent they contribute to the results of the policy of criminal prosecution, ie the criminal policy of the courts for the criminal offense of domestic violence in the last decade in Serbia whose results are presented in this paper.

scholarly journals PENGGUNAAN KATA TABU DI MEDIA SOSIAL: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Nadhifa Indana Zulfa Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Media Communication ◽  
Taboo Words ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Active Communication ◽  
Equivalent Method

The freedom in social media communication have not been responded wisely by the citizen of the net (netizen). Sometimes while expressing themselves in the social media, netizens used the taboo words which potentially break the law. The problems chosen in this research is a type of taboo words used by the netizen and also whether these expressed words have a potential to violate the law. The method to collect the data is “Simak bebas libat cakap“(SBLC), it is a method where there is no active communication between interviewer and interviewee but it is only taken the data from internet, then to transcribe the taken data. The following step is analyzing data which used referential equivalent method, then the results of the analysis were presented informally. The findings showed that taboo words used in social media consisted of: (1) obscene words, (2) vulgar language, and (3) nick name and insult. These taboo words potentially violate the government regulation of the Republic Indonesia number 11 of 2008 concerning electronic information and transactions article 27 paragraph (3) and article 45 paragraph (1) as well as article 310 section (1) and article 311 section (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code concerning defamation. Therefore, netizens must be careful in the way how communicate. Criminal Code, defamation, forensic linguistics, ITE Law, netizen, social media, taboo 

scholarly journals Sanksi Pidana terhadap Siswa yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Kepada Guru

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
KOMANG DEVI TRIVENI ◽  
Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Knowledge And Skills ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Main Thing

Education is the main thing that will sustain the progress of a nation. Teachers are professionals who have the task of teaching to educate and train. The teacher's task is to teach students to have knowledge and skills in each subject area. In carrying out its obligations, Teachers are protected by Article 39 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers and is strengthened by the issuance of Government Regulation Number 74 of 2008. In implementation, Teachers often get unpleasant treatment such as maltreatment committed by their  students  until causing death to the teacher and criminal sanctions which can be imposed on the student referred  to  Article  338 regarding  Murder where the persecution intentionally  takes the lives of others. The formulation of the problem (1) How are the criminal acts of maltreatment committed by students to teachers?  (2) What about criminal sanctions for students who commit acts of mistreatment to teachers?  This study uses normative legal methods and analysis of legal interpretation and exposure. In the Criminal Code Chapter XX concerning persecution. In addition, the Criminal Code has compiled several articles on maltreatment and also various types of maltreatment that already have different criminal threats.

scholarly journals Unregistered Polygamous Marriage of Civil Servants and its Implication for Wives’ Financial Problem, Social Fate and Loss of Children’s Welfare

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-318
Author(s):  
Novita Dewi Masyithoh ◽  
Sut eki ◽  
Yuna nto ◽  
Briliyan Ernawati ◽  
Nur Hidayati
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Civil Servant ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
Financial Problem ◽  
Economic Problems ◽  
Main Requirement ◽  
Polygamous Marriage ◽  
The Government ◽  
Depth Interviews

Unregistered polygamous marriage carried out by civil servants has serious implication for wives’ financial problem, social fate and loss of children’s welfare. The Marriage Law allows polygamy with very strict requirements. In the Government Regulation governing civil servant polygamy, justice is the main requirement in polygamy, because it really determines welfare in polygamy families. Based on the results of in-depth interviews and participant observation by using the constructivism paradigm and socio-legal approaches, it was found that unregistered polygamous marriages carried out by civil servants have implication for the disciplinary punishment of employees, so the polygamists got the sack. This implies their family economic problems, because there is not enough income to meet the needs of family life. Finally, neglect and divorce occur. Wives and children will be victims. Hence, it is necessary for the government to regulate particular policies for the polygamists of civil servants, to save their wives and children’s life. Firing the polygamists is not such a solution, but will instead create more complicated problems for their families.

scholarly journals Ratio legis of special minimum limit regulation in narcotics law

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 423-431
Author(s):  
Indra Kusuma Haryanto ◽  
Sudarsono Sudarsono ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
Abdul Rachmad Budiono
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Form Of Life ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Policy Systems ◽  
Maximum Minimum

Narcotics crime in society (especially in Indonesia) shows an increasing trend both quantitatively and qualitatively with widespread victims, especially among children, adolescents, and the younger generation in general. Based on this, the government must increase efforts to prevent and eradicate narcotics crimes by any means, whether reforming the Narcotics Law, imposing strict sanctions and so on. The purpose of this research is to find out how the legal ratio of the Special Minimum Limit Regulation in the Law on Narcotics. This research is normative legal research with a conceptual approach and a philosophical approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary with the technique of analyzing legal materials using the interpretation method. The results of the study indicate that the Ratio legis regulation specific minimum criminal provisions in the three laws studied, namely: the Narcotics Law and the Supreme Court Circular Number 03 of 2015, is intended to prevent disparities in the sentencing of crimes by judges. The regulation of types of criminal sanctions in legislation is one of the functions of the State to protect legal interests, in the form of life, property and dignity. The regulation of criminal sanctions is one of the criminal policy systems that can be seen from several aspects, namely the criminal system, namely: types of sanctions, alternative and cumulative forms of sanctions and their duration, namely the maximum-minimum of the punishment threatened.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document