scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 85/PUUXI/ 2013 TENTANG PENGUJIAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG SUMBER DAYA AIR

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Marwan Hsb ◽  
Hisar P. Butar Butar
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Resources Management ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Consequences

Constitutional Court’s authority under Article 24C section (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in terms of review the legislation only to review the legislation against the Constitution. However, the decision No. 85/PUU-XI/2013 on Review of Law Number 7 of 2004 on Water Resources, the Constitutional Court declared some of the implementing regulations of these laws do not fulfill the basic principles of water resources management restrictions. So it will be seen how the legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Number 85/PUU-XI/2013 and how to apply the power of the implementing regulations of Law Number 7 of 2004 on Water Resources. Whereas under Article 57 of Law of the Constitutional Court stated that the ruling of the Constitutional Court stated that the substance of sections, articles and/or parts of laws contrary to the constitution. So that the implementing regulations of Law Number 7 of 2004 on Water Resources remains in effect throughout has been no decision or rule that states no longer valid. To avoid government regulation promulgated after the Constitutional Court ruling to overturn legislation that became the legal basis for the government to promulgate regulations, to be made the rule that when the Constitutional Court to investigate and adjudicate a law, then the process of formation of the implementing regulations on enactment legislation being tested is to be suspended until there is a decision of the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM SISTEM PENYELENGGARAAN PENGAWASAN KODE ETIK HAKIM PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO 43/PUU-XIII/2015

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Heru Nuswanto ◽  
Amri P. Sihotang,
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Constitutional System ◽  
Sense Of Justice

<p>Kedudukan komisi yudisial sebagai pengawas system peradilan di Indonesia di rasa sangat penting untuk menjadikan system peradilan di Indonesia professional dan berintegritas. Persoalan kemudian hadir pasca putusan <a href="http://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/kegiatan/1181-putusan-mk-no-43-puu-xiii-2015-proses-seleksi-hakim-tingkat-pertama-tidak-perlu-melibatkan-ky">MK No 43/PUU-XIII/2015</a> dimana dalam putusan menjadikan Komisi Yudisial tidak lagi sebagai pihak yang ikut serta mengawasi perekrutan hakim tingkat pertama. Padahal dalam system ketatanegaraan jika lembaga komisi yudisial peran dan fungsinya dibatasi akan menjadikan mahkamah agung sebagai lembaga absolute dalam kekuasaan yudikatif.</p><p>.</p><p>Pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi <a href="http://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/kegiatan/1181-putusan-mk-no-43-puu-xiii-2015-proses-seleksi-hakim-tingkat-pertama-tidak-perlu-melibatkan-ky"> No 43/PUU-XIII/2015</a> tidaklah menjadi penghambat Komisi Yudisial dalam melakukan penegakan kode etik. Bahkan pada sisi lain Komisi Yudisial harus mampu melakukan penerobosan penafsiran bahwa putusan tersebut semata-mata memberikan ruang dan kedudukan Komisi Yudisial untuk merespon upaya kemerdekaan kekuasaan kehakiman yang secara mandiri dan merdeka akan tetapi harus sesuai real nilai-nilai pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia dengan menempatkan Komisi Yudisial yang nantinya akan menguji idependensi hakim-hakim yang merupakan hasil seleksi dari Mahkamah Agung secara ketat dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip dasar kode etik yang telah telah dicanangkan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.</p><p>Status of the Judicial Commission as the regulatory system in the sense of justice in Indonesia Sangat system makes for a review of integrity and professional judiciary in Indonesia. Present Problems then after the Constitutional Court ruling No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015 Where hearts Judicial Commission Decision making is NOT Again as parties Yang Participate oversee the recruitment of judges of first instance. Whereas hearts constitutional system if Institution Role and functions of the Judicial Commission shall be limited to make the Supreme Court as the Institute for Judicial power absolute hearts.</p><p>Post a Constitutional Court decision No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015 does not become an obstacle to the Judicial Commission in enforcing the code of conduct. Even on the other side of the Judicial Commission should be able to make a breakthrough interpretation that the decision merely provides the space and the position of the Judicial Commission to respond to the efforts of the independence of judiciary is independent and free but must be corresponding real values of Pancasila and the Constitution of the Republic Indonesia by placing the Judicial Commission which will examine idependensi judges were selected from the Supreme Court strictly in performing their duties and functions in accordance with the basic principles of the code of conduct that has been implemented in accordance with the legislation in force.</p>

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENGADILI PERKARA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH (SUATU KAJIAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 97/PUU-XI/2013 JO. PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 072-073/PUU-II/2004)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Hardy Salim ◽  
Cut Memi
Keyword(s):  
Vice President ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
The Republic

Acccording to the Arrticle 24C paragaaph (1) the Constttution of thr Republic of Indonesia of 1945, the Constitutional Court of thr Republic of Indonesia have thr power to decide upon disputes over the results of general election. The general election referred to here is elections to elect members of the legislature, regional representative councils, regional legislatures, president amd vice president. Both of thr provisions have been limitative, so there will no be any other elections that included. However, in its development, the Constittutional Court of the Republc of Indonesia is given the power to decide upon disputes ovrr the results of regional hed elections with a legal basis of the Constittutional Court Ruling Number 072-073/PUU-II/2004. However, a litle later the Constttution Court of the Republic of Indonesia issued a Consttttuional Court Ruling Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 which said tht the Constitusional Court of the Republic of Indonesia can’t have the power to decide upon disputes over the resuls of regional hed elections. This reaises problems regarding whether regional head elections are included in thr general election regime? And whether the Constitutional Court of the Republic Indonesia has thr authorty to decide upon disputes over the results of regional hed elections? Thr Author examined the issue by normative method. The results of thr resrarch show tht thr regional hesd elections is not a part of the general electiins regime and the Constututional Corrt of the Republic Indonesia can’t have thr power to decide upon disputes ovrr thr resulls of the regional hesd elections.

scholarly journals Fenomena Two in One Pengujian Perppu

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
Iskandar Muda
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Procedure ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legislative Review ◽  
Legal Procedures

Dua lembaga negara sama-sama berwenang menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu); Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) “berwenang” berdasarkan Pasal 22 ayat (2) dan ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, sedangkan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) berdasarkan putusannya No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 menyatakan “berwenang pula.” Dengan adanya dua lembaga negara yang mempunyai kewenangan yang sama tersebut maka (dapat) terjadi fenomena. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada tiga bentuk fenomena Two in One Pengujian Perppu yang (dapat) terjadi. Pertama, “judicial examination for constitutionality to Perppu pre-legislative review.” Kedua, “judicial examination for constitutionality to Perppu post-legislative review.” Ketiga, jika terjadi judicial review Perppu di MK baik dalam keadaan bentuk fenomena pertama atau fenomena kedua tetapi dalam waktu yang berlarut-larut DPR tidak memberikan keputusan tidak menyetujui atau menyetujui Perppu menjadi undang-undang. Prosedur hukum untuk bentuk fenomena kedua tidak jauh berbeda dengan prosedur hukum fenomena bentuk pertama; prosedur hukum serta yang dijadikan dasar pertimbangannya mempunyai kesamaan. Sedangkan prosedur hukum untuk bentuk fenomena ketiga perlu pula dikaji lebih lanjut secara mendalam untuk mencapai titik temu oleh dua pihak (DPR dan MK) yang berwenang menguji Perppu. Bentuk fenomena dan prosedur hukum pertama dan kedua bisa dikatakan sebagai jenis kewenangan yang bersifat pasif. Sedangkan bentuk fenomena dan prosedur hukum yang ketiga bisa dikatakan sebagai jenis kewenangan yang bersifat aktif.Two state institutions are equally authorized to test the Government Regulation in Lieu of Laws (Perppu); The House of Representatives (DPR) is “authorized” based on Article 22 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, while the Constitutional Court (MK) based on its verdict No. 138/PUU-VII/2009 declared “authorized as well.” With the existence of two state institutions that have the same authority, then the phenomena (can) happen. This research is a legal research using normative approach. The results of the study showed that there are three forms of phenomena of Two in One Perppu review which (can) happened. First, “judicial examination for the constitutionality to Perppu pre-legislative review.” Second, “judicial examination for the constitutionality to Perppu post-legislative review.” Third, in the case of Perppu judicial review in the Constitutional Court, either in the form of the first phenomenon or the second phenomenon, yet in the long period the DPR does not give a decision whether to approve the Perppu or not into the law. The legal procedure for the form of the second phenomenon is not much different from the legal procedure of the first form phenomenon; legal procedures and the basis of their considerations are merely the same. While the legal procedure for the third form of the phenomenon should also be studied further in depth to reach the final point by two parties (DPR and MK) authorized to review the Perppu. The first and the second forms of the phenomena and legal procedures can be regarded as a kind of passive authority. While the third form of the phenomena and legal procedures can be regarded as a type of active authority.

scholarly journals Strategi Penguatan Pengelolaan Bersama Minyak dan Gas Bumi di Wilayah Laut

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Cut Asmaul Husna TR
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Geological Structure ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Joint Management ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Kondisi tatanan tektonik dan geologi Aceh memiliki prospek untuk dilakukan eksplorasi dan pengembangan serta produksi Minyak dan Gas Bumi, baik di Wilayah Darat maupun di Wilayah Laut. Penemuan cadangan Minyak dan Gas baru di Aceh diharapkan dapat meningkatkan Penerimaan Negara dan Penerimaan Pemerintah Aceh dalam membangun infrastruktur dan Ketahanan Energi Aceh untuk melahirkan kembali industri-industri skala internasional. Ketentuan dalam Pasal 3 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pengelolaan Bersama Sumber Daya Alam Minyak dan Gas Bumi di Aceh, kewenangan pengelolaan Migas pada Wilayah Laut 12 (dua belas) sampai dengan 200 (dua ratus) mil laut yang merupakan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE) dikelola dan dilaksanakan Pemerintah Pusat dengan mengikutsertakan Pemerintah Aceh. Tafsir dalam 3 (tiga) Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 002/PUU-I/2003, 20/PUU-V/2007 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 36/PUU-X/2012 tentang Uji Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 bahwa penguasaan negara terhadap sumber daya alam dan cabang-cabang produksi yang penting bagi negara dan menguasai hajat hidup orang banyak dimaknai sebagai mandat yang harus dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah untuk mengadakan kebijakan (beleid), pengurusan (bestuursdaad), pengaturan (regelendaad), pengelolaan (beheersdaad), dan pengawasan (toezichthoudensdaad) untuk tujuan sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat.Conditions of tectonic and geological structure in Aceh prospect for explorating and producing Oil and Natural Gas, either in onshore or offshore. The discovery of Oil and Gas news reserved in Aceh is expected to increase the Central Government Take and Aceh Government Take to build infrastructure and Aceh’s Energy Security to regenerate industries on an international scale. The provisions in Article 3 of the Government Regulation Number 23 Year 2015 concerning Joint Management of Natural Resources Oil and Gas in Aceh, the joint management authority of Oil and Gas in Offshore 12 (twelve) to 200 (two hundreds) nautical miles of an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is managed and held by the Central Government to include the Government Aceh. Commentary within 3 (three) Decision of Constitutional Court Number 002/PUU-I/2003, 20/PUU-V/2007 and Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 36/PUU-X/2012 of Judicial Review of Law Number 22 Year 2001 concerning Oil and Gas (Oil and Gas Law) Against the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia the meaning of “controlled by the state” must be comprehended to include the meaning of a wide-ranging state occupation, as a result of the people’s sovereignty concept. The people, collectively constructed by the 1945 Constitution, provide a mandate to the state to conduct policy (beleid) and functions of administration (bestuurdaad), regulation (regelendaad), management (beheersdaad) and supervision (toezichthoudensdaad) for the greatest prosperity of the people.

scholarly journals PENGEMBANGAN DATABASE PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA AIR UNTUK WILAYAH KABUPATEN PANDEGLANG

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satmoko Yudo
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Water Resources Management ◽  
Irrigation Water ◽  
Sustainable Management ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Resources Management ◽  
Other Information ◽  
The Government

In order to support the Government Regulation Number 42 of 2008 on the sustainable management of water resources, it is one of the responsibilities of government and the local government to carry out the management of water resources information system. Kabupaten Pandeglang is one area in Indonesia with the availability of water resources is quite large, so as to support the management of water resources need to built Database Information System for Water Resources Management (SISDA). SISDA is an application program based database created to facilitate the data management of water resources. This program has been applied in the Office Bappeda Pandeglang and information shown include the River Basin Unit (SWS), the Regional Jetting River (DPS), Creeks, Lakes, Swamps, Beaches, Ponds, Dams, Irrigation, Water Monitoring Station, Rain Station, and other information. Keywords : Water resource of Kabupaten Pandeglang, database, Information System for Water Resources Management.

scholarly journals PEMBUBARAN ORMAS “RADIKAL” DALAM PERSEPEKTIF PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN (Kajian Khusus Perppu No. 02 Tahun 2017)

Nuansa ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imam Mahdi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Organization ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

The Government Regulation on Law Enforcement (Perppu), has the same  legal force as the law, but is tem- porary because it must  obtain approval by the Parliament. Exit of Perppu No. 2 Year 2017 on Amendment to Law no. 17Year 2003 on Public  Organization. The legal basis  of the President to issue  the Perppu is stipulated in Article 22 of the1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, essentially the Perppu is issued because of the urgency of the matter, meaning that  if not issued by the Perppu, the government can not take legal action for the interest of the State. In fact, this Perppu is used to dissolve community organizations, especially Hizbur Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) which is considered by the government to deviate from Pancasila ideology and endanger the integrity of NKRI. As a result, there are pros and cons against Perppu No. 2 Year 2017. .

scholarly journals Fungsi Badan Pertanahan Nasional Dalam Pengawasan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Masriyani Masriyani
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Empirical Research ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

In the national land Agency Chief Regulation No.1 Year 2006 as modified by regulation the head of BPN number 23-year 2009 on implementation of the provisions of the Government Regulation Number 37 Year 1998, head of the Office of land do coaching and surveillance against a land deed official (PPAT). Starting on the dotted the legal basis and see the development as well as the needs of the ground then for the validity of the ownership of the land, should be are published through the certificate of property rights. For it is necessary supervision against the authorized officials as a PPAT in the deed of the land pembuatak. As for the problems in this research is how the functions of the national land Agency in the construction and supervision of land deed official Tanjung Jabung Barat region. The type of research that is in use is the empirical research. Data on use is the primary data and the data of skunder. Data collection was done through the research library and field research. The research describes the construction and supervision on Land against the head of the Office to do the task in Tanjung Jabung PPAT West, running as it should be in accordance with article 65 of the regulation of the Republic of Indonesia head of BPN No. 1 year 2006 regarding the implementation of the provisions of REGULATION No. 37 Year 1998 Of Regulations Office of the PPAT in coaching and supervision is quite optimal. It can be seen that for the year 2016 year 2017 until the violations perpetrated PPAT decreased. Surveillance against PPAT performed by the Head Office of land is to provide direction to all stakeholders associated with the PPAT's, conducting surveillance over the organisation of the profession of PPAT to keep running in accordance with the direction and the goal, run other actions deemed necessary to ensure the service of PPAT continue to run properly and to conduct surveillance against a PPAT and PPAT in order to run the code of ethics of the profession, the PPAT Tanjung Jabung West land in cooperation with the relevant parties especially the IPPAT code of ethics watchdogs and PPAT.

scholarly journals Judicial Review On The Authority Of National Institution In The Disbanding Of Community Organization Who Are Contradicting The 1945 Constitution Of The Republic Of Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Theo Negoro ◽  
Demson Tiopan ◽  
Haykal Hassanain
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Temporary Suspension ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

A community organization who contradicts the constitution will obviously disturb the common order and also disturb the system of Indonesian people and the nation itself, especially if such organization aims to change the Indonesian constitution. In Chapter XVII of Law Number 17 of 2013 regarding Community Organization, later known as the Community Organization Law, it is stated that the disbanding of community organization must go through a procedure which consist of a warning, temporary suspension and then the disbanding by the court of law. In the Community Organization Law, the disbanding of an organization is done by a Judicative Institution which is through the decision of a judicial board. However, the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2017 regarding the Amendment on Law Number 17 of 2013 regarding Community Organization, later known as the Government Regulation in Lieu of Community Organization Law states that the disbanding of a Community Organization contradicting the constitution only goes through the administrative admonition, temporary suspension of activity, and later the revocation of listed certification or the revocation of lawful institution status by the Government. The purpose of this research is to discover the authority of National Institution in disbanding Community Organization that contradicts the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and also the authoritative obstacle faced by the national institution in dissolving such organizations. This research is a normative one which researched existing secondary data as a literary data supported by empirical data acquired from interview processes. Result of the research shows that the governmental institution which in this case are the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and Judicative Institution which in this case the Supreme Court has authority to disband Community Organizations that contradicts the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia based on normative terms. However, in order to establish justice on said organization, the disbanding must be done by Judicative Institution so that it is more objective, but not by the Supreme Court, but by the Constitutional Court, due to the existence of Public Organizations being closely related to the Constitutional Right the way it is for the Political Parties. This research suggests that the disbanding of Community Organizations that contradicts the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia should be done by the Constitutional Court, preceded by material check on the applicable positive law.   Keywords: Authority; National Institution; Community Organization; Constitution

scholarly journals Legal Protection for Creditors in Money Loans Agreement Lending with Constitutional Court's Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Daniel Hendrawan ◽  
Christian Andersen ◽  
Theodora Novia Tjasa
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Bad Faith ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Consequences

In Indonesia, the Marriage Agreement has long been valid and regulated in the legislation in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. Marriage Agreement regulates marriage property. In Article 29 paragraph (1) Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage stipulates that marriage agreements must be made before the marriage takes place, but in 2015 the Constitutional Court issued Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 concerning changes to Article 29 paragraph (1), paragraph (3), and paragraph (4) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage which states that the Marriage Agreement can be made before, at the time of, and after the marriage takes place. The Constitutional Court ruling raises questions from various parties about how the legal consequences of the Marriage Agreement made after the marriage took place and what legal protection can be given to third parties on the Marriage Agreement which was made after the marriage took place. This study uses a normative juridical research method that is descriptive analytical based on the merging of primary, secondary and tertiary data acquisition. The results of this study indicate that the legal consequences of the Marriage Agreement made after the marriage took place will have legal consequences for the parties themselves, assets, and also for third parties. Legal protection that can be given to creditors is to pay attention to the element of good faith in each loan agreement making so that creditors will be protected by themselves, if one of the parties making the loan agreement has bad faith, the loan agreement will automatically be canceled law because it does not meet the objective requirements. The author&#39;s hope for this research is that the government can provide further regulation regarding the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 so that the public gets legal certainty in the implementation of the Decision and for the community the writer recommends restraint in carrying out the Decision until the regulation further from the government. Finally, the authors hope that this research can benefit the world of legal development in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Passing Off yang Dilakukan Oleh Pihak yang Beritikad Tidak Baik Melalui Pemakaian Nama Perseroan Terbatas

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 100-118
Author(s):  
Kimham Pentakosta ◽  
Elly Hernawati
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Bad Faith ◽  
Passing Off ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Administration

This paper focuses on the similarity of functions between Trademarks and Limited Liability Company Name, namely quality assurance function, which enables both to provide a guarantee on the reputation of goods and/or services offered to the consumer. Such similarity of functions between those two different legal terminology opens a loophole for any party, based on bad faith, to conduct passing off towards a registered trademarks owned by another party through the use of a limited liability company name. This paper shows the urgency of a harmonization and integration between the mechanism of applying for Trademark registration and the submission of the name of a limited liability company in Indonesia. Therefore, this paper will examine and criticize the laws and regulations relating to the two terminology above, inter alia the Law Number 20 of 2016 regarding Trademarks and Geographical Indications and the Government Regulation Number 43 of 2011 regarding Procedures for Filing and Use of Limited Liability Company Name. This paper concludes that the government of the Republic of Indonesia must immediately amend the regulation on the requirements for submitting the name of a limited liability company, by requiring the Directorate General of General Legal Administration to reject the name of a limited liability company that uses a name that has been registered as a brand by another party.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document