scholarly journals POLA PENGUASAAN TANAH DAN DISTRIBUSI KESEJAHTERAAN RUMAH TANGGA DI PEDESAAN JAWA TIMUR

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Versanudin Hekmatyar ◽  
Fentiny Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Livelihood Diversification ◽  
Production Factors ◽  
The Social ◽  
Land Cultivation ◽  
The Rich ◽  
Labor System ◽  
High Level

Abstract: The objective of this study is to describe the pattern of land tenure and forms of livelihood diversification in rural area. By using qualitative approach, data was collected and presented descriptively. The results are as follows, first, land is an important production factors as capital and labor. Land in Kedungprimpen village is still closely linked to the livelihoods of its inhabitants. High level of dependence of the population on agricultural land is also closely related to the local community's view that underlies the social differentiation of the rich, ample and poor. Second, this fact further encourages households todeal with the crisis, undertake series of livelihood activities to meet their basic needs. The selection of diversified forms of livelihood is mainly based on rational reasons related to the types of resources that can be optimized. Generally, livelihood diversification in Kedungprimpen Village is on agricultural andnon-agricultural sectors. Agricultural sector includes land cultivation, sharecrop, rent, mortgage, and labor system. Non-agricultural sector includes trade, handicrafts production, stockbreeding, and carpentry.Keywords: pattern of land tenure, land tenure, land diversification, peasant

scholarly journals POLA PENGUASAAN TANAH DAN DISTRIBUSI KESEJAHTERAAN RUMAH TANGGA DI PEDESAAN JAWA TIMUR

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Versanudin Hekmatyar ◽  
Fentiny Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Livelihood Diversification ◽  
Production Factors ◽  
The Social ◽  
Land Cultivation ◽  
The Rich ◽  
Labor System ◽  
High Level

Abstract: The objective of this study is to describe the pattern of land tenure and forms of livelihood diversification in rural area. By using qualitative approach, data was collected and presented descriptively. The results are as follows, first, land is an important production factors as capital and labor. Land in Kedungprimpen village is still closely linked to the livelihoods of its inhabitants. High level of dependence of the population on agricultural land is also closely related to the local community's view that underlies the social differentiation of the rich, ample and poor. Second, this fact further encourages households to deal with the crisis, undertake series of livelihood activities to meet their basic needs. The selection of diversified forms of livelihood is mainly based on rational reasons related to the types of resources that can be optimized. Generally, livelihood diversification in Kedungprimpen Village is on agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. Agricultural sector includes land cultivation, sharecrop, rent, mortgage, and labor system. Non-agricultural sector includes trade, handicrafts production, stockbreeding, and carpentry. Intisari: Penelitian ini bertujuan menguraikan pola penguasaan tanah di pedesaan, dan mendeskripsikan bentuk-bentuk diversifikasi nafkah. Data dikumpulkan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama, tanah merupakan salah satu faktor produksi yang penting sebagaimana modal dan tenaga kerja. Tanah di Desa Kedungprimpen masih terkait erat dengan sumber nafkah penduduknya. Tingginya tingkat ketergantungan penduduk pada tanah pertanian juga terkait erat dengan pandangan masyarakat setempat yang melatarbelakangi diferensiasi sosial tentang orang kaya, cukup, dan miskin. Kedua, fakta ini, selanjutnya mendorong rumah tangga dalam menghadapi krisis untuk melakukan serangkaian aktivitas nafkah dengan tujuan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan pokoknya. Pemilihan bentuk diversifikasi nafkah terutama didasari alasan rasional terkait dengan jenis sumberdaya yang dapat dioptimalkan. Secara umum, diversifikasi nafkah di Desa Kedungprimpen dilakukan pada sektor pertanian dan sektor nonpertanian. Sektor pertanian mencakup pengusahaan lahan milik, bagi hasil, sewa, gadai, dan sistem perburuhan. Sedangkan sektor nonpertanian meliputi perdagangan, kerajinan, peternakan, dan pertukangan.

scholarly journals POLA PENGUASAN TANAH DAN DISTRIBUSI KESEJAHTERAAN RUMAH TANGGA DI PEDESAAN JAWA TIMUR

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Versanudin Hekmatyar ◽  
Fentiny Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Production Factors ◽  
The Social ◽  
Land Cultivation ◽  
The Rich ◽  
Labor System ◽  
High Level ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract: The objective of this study is to describe the pattern of land tenure and forms of livelihood diversifcation in rural area. By using qualitative approach, data was collected and presented descriptively. The results are as follows, frst, land is an important production factors as capital and labor. Land inKedungprimpen village is still closely linked to the livelihoods of its inhabitants. High level of dependence of the population on agricultural land is also closely related to the local community's view that underlies the social differentiation of the rich, ample and poor. Second, this fact further encourages households todeal with the crisis, undertake series of livelihood activities to meet their basic needs. The selection of diversifed forms of livelihood is mainly based on rational reasons related to the types of resources that can be optimized. Generally, livelihood diversifcation in Kedungprimpen Village is on agricultural andnon-agricultural sectors. Agricultural sector includes land cultivation, sharecrop, rent, mortgage, and labor system. Non-agricultural sector includes trade, handicrafts production, stockbreeding, and carpentry.Intisari: Penelitian ini bertujuan menguraikan pola penguasaan tanah di pedesaan, dan mendeskripsikan bentuk-bentuk diversifkasi nafah. Data dikumpulkan dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama, tanah merupakan salah satu faktor produksi yang pentingsebagaimana modal dan tenaga kerja. Tanah di Desa Kedungprimpen masih terkait erat dengan sumber nafah penduduknya. Tingginya tingkat ketergantungan penduduk pada tanah pertanian juga terkait erat dengan pandangan masyarakat setempat yang melatarbelakangi diferensiasi sosial tentang orang kaya,cukup, dan miskin. Kedua, fakta ini, selanjutnya mendorong rumah tangga dalam menghadapi krisis untuk melakukan serangkaian aktivitas nafah dengan tujuan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan pokoknya. Pemilihan bentuk diversifkasi nafah terutama didasari alasan rasional terkait dengan jenis sumberdaya yang dapatdioptimalkan. Secara umum, diversifkasi nafah di Desa Kedungprimpen dilakukan pada sektor pertanian dan sektor nonpertanian. Sektor pertanian mencakup pengusahaan lahan milik, bagi hasil, sewa, gadai, dan sistem perburuhan. Sedangkan sektor nonpertanian meliputi perdagangan, kerajinan, peternakan, dan pertukangan.

scholarly journals Zambian farm blocks: A vehicle for increased private sector investments

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 817-825
Author(s):  
Susanna L. Middelberg ◽  
Pieter van der Zwan ◽  
Cobus Oberholster
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Labour Productivity ◽  
Land Development ◽  
Policy Uncertainty ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Private Sector Investment

AbstractThe Zambian government has introduced the farm block development programme (FBDP) to facilitate agricultural land and rural development and encourage private sector investment. This study assessed whether the FBDP achieves these goals. Key obstacles and possible opportunities were also identified and, where appropriate, specific corrective actions were recommended. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted in Lusaka with various stakeholders of the FBDP. The FBDP is designed to facilitate agricultural land development and encourage private sector investment. However, the programme falls far short in terms of implementation, amidst policy uncertainty and lack of support. This is evident by the insecurity of land tenure which negatively affects small- and medium-scale producers’ access to financing, lack of infrastructure development of these farm blocks, and constraints in the agricultural sector such as low labour productivity and poor access to service expertise. It is recommended that innovative policy interventions should be created to support agricultural development. This can be achieved by following a multistakeholder approach through involving private, public and non-profit sectors such as non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and donors.

Land moratorium: threats and prospects

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 152-156
Author(s):  
Liliya Mezhevska
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Land Resources ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Access To Credit ◽  
The Social ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Village

Currently, there are a number of negative consequences of the moratorium that need to be addressed immediately, amendments to existing legislation because the moratorium hinders rural development and agriculture, prevents the redistribution of land resources to more efficient owners and producers, reduces rent and owners' incomes, and limits access to credit resources. Under such conditions, there is no land market, farmers and small landowners have no incentive to invest. As a result, a significant part of land plots is leased by large companies, which have a significant impact on the social structure of the village. Land productivity is far from Ukraine's potential, as long-term investments are needed to improve it. Foreign investors, companies with the necessary knowledge and equipment, are reluctant to invest in Ukraine due to imperfect legal guarantees. A favorable legal climate is needed to improve the agricultural sector. In turn, lifting the moratorium could lead to economic growth. But it should be remembered that lifting the moratorium on land is largely not an economic but a political decision, as there is a risk of mass purchase of Ukrainian lands by foreigners, resulting in the complete loss of ownership and control of their territory. Thus, analyzing the current legislation of Ukraine, scientific publications of famous scientists, economists, politicians, lawyers, given their positive and negative statements about the moratorium on the sale of agricultural land, we can conclude that there are both threats and prospects for a land moratorium.

scholarly journals Accounting for the Social Benefits and Costs of Development Rights Purchase Programs

1977 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry C. Field ◽  
Richard A. Barclay
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Social Benefits ◽  
Value Assessment ◽  
Public Programs ◽  
The Social ◽  
Development Rights ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Agricultural Preservation ◽  
Benefits And Costs

Public programs of agricultural preservation continue to be of interest in many states of the urbanized Northeast. Farmers themselves, of course, have always been concerned with this issue, and in recent years they have found effective allies among public planners, for whom the agricultural sector has become a chief source of scenic and cultural amenities as well as insurance against unforeseen disruptions in future supplies of food and fiber. Programs of use-value assessment have been enacted by almost all of the northeastern states, as well as by those in many other parts of the country. Partly as a result of the fact that the effectiveness of this approach has been in doubt, attention in some states is turning to programs in which the development rights are purchased from agricultural land in order to alleviate development pressure on these areas. New Jersey has recently undertaken a program of development rights purchase, Massachusetts is currently shaping legislation for such a program, and many other states have shown interest.

scholarly journals MANAGEMENT OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN THE QUALITY OF ORGANIZATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (Suppl.1) ◽  
pp. 310-313
Author(s):  
Valeri Velkovski
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Management ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
External Environment ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Modern Theory ◽  
Agrarian Sector ◽  
The Hierarchical Structure ◽  
Structural Configurations ◽  
High Level

The structure of an organization, including the agrarian sector, is manifested andrealized through hierarchical and hierarchical forms, the hierarchical structure being associated with a pyramidal and multi-level construction, and non-hierarchical forms can be realized through structural configurations. In the modern theory of organization, organizations are also considered from the positions of another characteristic-internal differentiation, which at the same time reinforces their characterization as a system. The level of achievement of the organization's goals is directly related to its achieved level of effectiveness, and effectiveness is one of the conditions for sustainability and sustainable development of the organization. The sustainability of each organization is directly dependent on another very important feature of its adaptability. In general, adaptability is a measure of the organization's response to changes in its internal and external environments. The adaptability of an organization is an indicator of its skill / ability to adapt to the requirements of the two environments - external and internal. This is defined as the property of the organization, demonstrating the need to balance the external environment as a condition for survival, development and effective activity, especially valid for the agrarian sector. How could such a balance be achieved? A necessary tool in this case is the strategic management that gives the specific strategic alternatives for the development and functioning of the agrarian sector. Strategic alternatives, in order to fulfill their important role, must be consistent with changes in the external environment. For the agrarian sector, given its dependence on the external environment (nature-climatic factor, elements of the nature-geographic complex, etc.), maintaining a high level of adaptability is particularly necessary, especially since the low level of adaptability, constitutes a danger to its completeness as such. The organization's adaptation to the state of the external environment may have the nature of a passive adaptation to the external environment or the nature of an active influence on the external environment. The agricultural land developments, a product of the agrarian policy, respectively of the agrarian development policy, are, by their very nature, an example, namely for an active impact on the external environment. The organization's active impact on the external environment is seen as a result of a rational and deliberate impact of the organization's strategic core on the external environment in order to reduce its dependence on it. The existence of each organization is motivated by two key elements of mission and goals. The implementation of both the mission and the objectives of each organization are directly related to the implementation of the strategic management tool. The main goal of strategic management is the organic and consistent adaptation of the organization to the changing environment in the external environment, as already mentioned.

scholarly journals  The position of agriculture in the Russian Federation – the last two decades development overview

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (No. 11) ◽  
pp. 489-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Svatoš ◽  
L. Smutka ◽  
N. Ishchukova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Vegetables And Fruits ◽  
High Level ◽  
Foreign Trade Turnover

The paper provides an analysis of the last two decades Russian agricultural sector development. The main objective of the paper is to highlight the main changes which occurred. The paper is also identifying the role of agriculture in the Russian economy and society development. On the basis of the results coming from the paper, it is possible to characterize the Russian agriculture as follows. After a significant decline in the early 90s and the long process of transformation, the Russian economy including agricultural sector is starting to recover and it is stabilizing. The slowdown of the Russian agricultural performance was stopped (the millstone is the year 2000). At present, the Russian agrarian sector is under the process of recovery especially because of the massive state support (market protection and subsidies coming into agriculture). Agriculture is an important part of the Russian economy. Russia is characterized by large areas of agricultural land, one third of its population lives in the rural areas. The Russian Federation produces many of agricultural products and foodstuffs. However, the country is not self-sufficient in many products. The highest level of the import dependence is observed for meat, vegetables and fruits. Primary products dominate in the structure of Russian exports. Food and agricultural products amount for about only 2% of the Russian total export. The share of agricultural products in the Russian import is more significant and it amounts to 14%. However, in 2000s, there is a significant growth of the foreign trade turnover due to the expansion of both imports and exports. Currently, Russia is seeking not only to achieve a high level of self-sufficiency in basic agricultural products, but also it is trying to be a significant driver in the area of the international trade in agricultural products and foodstuffs.  

Land Regulations, Tenure, and Land Use of Sri Lanka

2021 ◽  
pp. 139-161
Author(s):  
Jeevika Weerahewa ◽  
Dilini Hemachandra ◽  
Gamini Pushpakumara
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
The Social ◽  
History Of ◽  
Efficient Allocations ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Present land use and tenure of a country is a result of the social norms and regulations. Land use manifests a country's priorities with implications on the economic development. Land tenure has implications on the investment decisions on land and hence efficient allocations of land. Sri Lanka, a country with a history of king's reign, colonial rule and then an elected government has its unique journey in the evolution of laws and regulations and institutions governing land and the resultant land use. This chapter chronicles the evolution of laws and regulations and institutions governing agricultural land and the resultant land use and tenure arrangements. At present, the governance of agricultural land is complex as it involves many regulations and many competing institutions.

scholarly journals TOWARDS A NEW CONCEPT FOR THE AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE PLANNING IN THE NEW SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN BULGARIA

AGROFOR ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena Moteva ◽  
Velibor Spalević
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Market Economy ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Land Use Planning ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Structure Design ◽  
Economic Conditions ◽  
Agricultural Land Use ◽  
Land Cultivation

The goal of this paper is to present a new concept for Agricultural Land-UsePlanning as a land-administration activity in today’s market economy. Theplanning process consists of preparing projects for land use in the agriculturalterritories. Agricultural Land-Use Planning is developed for the purpose ofmaterializing and stabilizing land tenure, for environmental protection and forensuring efficient farm economy. The current market economy conditions are newto the country. So far, land management has served the principles of the centralizedplanned economy under the totalitarian governance of the land. The maindeficiencies of that governance are connected with the alienation of land ownersfrom their properties and the liquidation of their interest in land stewardship.Another problem has been the occurrence of soil degradation processes as aconsequence of extreme soil exhaustion. The cooperative land cultivation in thepast prevented land-use planning from addressing the issues of land tenure.The socio-economic conditions of today’s market economy pose new challenges tothe Agricultural Land-Use Planning due to differing and compliance the interests inthe public and private sectors. The strategy has to be constructed in such a way thatit simultaneously secures land-tenure, environmental protection, and the farms’economic prosperity. This brings together a number of activities such as researchand assessment of soil quality, agricultural cadaster, appraisal of land property, soilprotection and soil fertility, environmental and landscapes protection, agriculturalland structure design, etc. Based on a survey conducted among professionals andfarmers, and on the authors’ critical approach, a new concept for the AgriculturalLand-Use Planning as a socio-economic activity has been developed. A number ofdesign activities in the dynamic market environment are included, as well. Thepaper is written in the form of a comparison between the two socio-economicsystems (centrally planned land-use and cooperative land cultivation systems) andcontains the main highlights of the new concept.

scholarly journals CURRENT ASPECTS OF LAND RELATIONS IN UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 06 (04(01)) ◽  
pp. 54-59
Author(s):  
Olena Mykhailovska Olena Mykhailovska ◽  
Olga Kokhan Olga Kokhan ◽  
Wojciech Slomka Wojciech Slomka
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Land Management ◽  
Land Tenure ◽  
Public Management ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Effective System ◽  
Land Relations ◽  
Environmental Measures ◽  
The Relationship

The article examines the current components of land relations in Ukraine. Land legal relations are public land relations that arise in the field of interaction of society with the environment and are governed by the rules of land and agricultural law. The importance of using the potential of sustainable development is emphasized. It is established that land management (a set of socio-economic and environmental measures) is an important tool for regulating land relations. The main factors of reducing soil fertility and their depletion are identified. The relationship between the agricultural sector, society and the environment is presented. The connection between different levels of public management on the way to sustainable development of the agricultural sector is outlined. The main directions of formation of effective land relations are characterized. It is stated that an effective system of land management is a real mechanism for resolving pressing issues and bringing agricultural land tenure and land use to an orderly state. Keywords: land relations, sustainable development, land management, potential.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document