scholarly journals Stipulation of Rights in the Practice of Nikah Al-Khitbah According to the Fuqaha’ and the Islamic Family Law in Malaysia (Penetapan Syarat di dalam amalan Nikah Khitbah menurut Fuqaha’ dan Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam di Malaysia)

Author(s):  
Miszairi Sitiris ◽  
Mustafa bin Mat Jubri @ Shamsuddin ◽  
Mohd Afandi Bin Awang Hamat

Nikahal-khitbah or popularly known as nikah gantung became a choice of a handful of teenagers especially among university students in Malaysia due to financial constraints and educational reason. Such type of wedding practice raises a number of questions related to juristic issues. This is because the practice of Nikahal-khitbah involves establishing some limitation of rights that violate the purpose or intent of marriage. Among others, the spouses agree to defer some of their rights such as declining the right of nafaqah and the right of sexual intercourse which are against the original purpose (muqtada aqd) of marriage contract. This paper aims to study the opinions of jurists (FuqahÉ’) regarding such limitation or agreement in marriage contract and their validity according to the Islamic Family Law in Malaysia. This paper relies on analytical study in discussing the opinions of the Fuqaha’ and understanding the legal texts of the law related to the matter. This study found that marriage practice through nikah al-khitbah is valid according to the majority views of FuqahÉ’. Islamic family laws in Malaysia do not deny the validity of such marriage practices although there are some legal effects on the limitation of marriage rights.           Keywords: Agreement in marriage contract, nikah al-khitbah, permission by the wali, Islamic Family Law in Malaysia. Abstrak Nikah al-khitbah atau lebih dikenali dengan nikah gantung menjadi pilihan segelintir remaja terutamanya di kalangan pelajar universiti di Malaysia atas faktor kekangan kewangan serta pelajaran. Amalan pernikahan ini menimbulkan beberapa pertanyaan berkaitan hukum fiqh. Ini adalah kerana di dalam amalan pernikahan secara nikah al-khitbah melibatkan penetapan beberapa syarat tertentu yang menyalahi maksud serta tujuan pernikahan. Antaranya, pasangan suami isteri bersetuju untuk melepaskan hak mereka terhadap pasangan mereka, iaitu hak mendapat nafaqah dan hak melakukan hubungan kelamin, yang mana ianya bercanggah dengan matlamat asal atau muqtada akad nikah. Objektif kertas kerja ini adalah untuk mengkaji pandangan para Fuqaha’ terhadap pensyaratan atau perjanjian sebegitu di dalam akad nikah dan keterikatannya menurut Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam di Malaysia. Kertas kerja ini menggunakan kaedah analis di dalam membincangkan pandangan Fuqaha’ dan di dalam memahami peruntukan undang-undang berkaitan dengan perkara tersebut. Kajian ini mendapati bahawa amalan perkahwinan secara nikah al-khitbah adalah sah menurut pandangan majoriti FuqahÉ’. Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam di Malaysia tidak menafikan kesahan amalan pernikahan tersebut walaupun terdapat beberapa kesan undang-undang terhadap syarat yang ditetapkan.            Kata Kunci: Pensyaratan di dalam akad nikah, nikah al-khitbah, izin wali, Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam di Malaysia.  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-504
Author(s):  
Aisha Mohamed Ismail Elamin

This study aims to determine the tort responsibility of the journalist in case of violating the rights of individuals and the extent of the possibility to avoid the tort responsibility of the journalist. This can happen through the decisions of the competent committees to consider violations of the provisions of the Saudi Press and Publication Law, based on the reasoning of its decisions on Article (9) of the Saudi Press and Publication Law. In the research, the analytical approach is used to the relevant texts from the Saudi Press and Publication System and the applied approach, which is based on strengthening legal and legal positions with judicial positions. In this study, the author addresses the pillars of the tort responsibility of the journalist by highlighting the pillars of Tort and damage, with the possibility of pushing the journalist to tort responsibility through satisfaction with the publication and the right to objective criticism. The study recommended: reorganizing the journalist’s tort responsibility through the inclusion of legal texts in the publications and publishing system due to the absence of legalization of financial transactions, which shows the general rules of responsibility, and publishing the decisions of the competent committees to consider violations of the provisions of the Saudi Press and Publication Law as a result of the absence of legalization of civil transactions.Keywords: Journalist Tort; Human Dignity; Privacy; Moral Damage; Objective Criticism Tanggung Jawab Kerugian Wartawan dan Cara Menghindarinya Berdasarkan Sistem Publikasi dan Pers Saudi: Sebuah Studi Analitis Abstrak:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tanggung jawab gugatan wartawan dalam kasus pelanggaran hak-hak individu dan sejauh mana kemungkinan untuk menghindari tanggung jawab gugatan wartawan. Hal ini dapat terjadi melalui keputusan komite yang berwenang untuk mempertimbangkan pelanggaran ketentuan Undang-Undang Pers dan Publikasi Saudi, berdasarkan pertimbangan keputusannya pada Pasal (9) Undang-Undang Pers dan Publikasi Saudi. Dalam penelitian ini, pendekatan analitis digunakan pada teks-teks yang relevan dari Saudi Press and Publication System dan pendekatan terapan, yang didasarkan pada penguatan posisi hukum dan hukum dengan posisi yudisial. Dalam studi ini, penulis membahas pilar-pilar tanggung jawab kerugian jurnalis dengan menyoroti pilar-pilar kerugian dan kerugian, dengan kemungkinan mendorong jurnalis untuk melakukan tanggung jawab kerugian melalui kepuasan terhadap publikasi dan hak atas kritik yang objektif. Kajian ini merekomendasikan: menata kembali tanggung jawab wanprestasi jurnalis melalui pencantuman teks hukum dalam sistem penerbitan dan penerbitan karena tidak adanya legalisasi transaksi keuangan, yang menunjukkan aturan umum pertanggungjawaban, dan mempublikasikan keputusan komite yang berwenang untuk mempertimbangkan pelanggaran. ketentuan Hukum Pers dan Publikasi Saudi sebagai akibat tidak adanya legalisasi transaksi perdata.Kata Kunci: Gugatan Wartawan; Harga diri manusia; Pribadi; Kerusakan Moral; Kritik Objektif Деликатная ответственность журналиста и способы ее избежать в свете саудовской прессы и системы публикаций: аналитическое исследованиеАбстрактный:Это исследование направлено на определение деликтной ответственности журналиста в случае нарушения прав человека и степени возможности избежать деликтной ответственности журналиста. Это может произойти в результате решений компетентных комитетов о рассмотрении нарушений положений Закона Саудовской Аравии о печати и публикациях на основании обоснования своих решений по статье (9) Закона Саудовской Аравии о печати и публикациях. В исследовании используется аналитический подход к релевантным текстам из Саудовской системы печати и публикаций и прикладной подход, который основан на усилении юридических и юридических позиций с помощью судебных позиций. В этом исследовании автор обращается к столпам деликтной ответственности журналиста, выделяя столпы деликта и ущерба, с возможностью подтолкнуть журналиста к деликтной ответственности через удовлетворение публикацией и право на объективную критику. В исследовании рекомендовалось: реорганизовать деликтную ответственность журналиста путем включения юридических текстов в системы публикаций и публикации в связи с отсутствием легализации финансовых операций, которая показывает общие правила ответственности, и опубликовать решения компетентных комитетов по рассмотрению нарушений. положений Закона о печати и публикациях Саудовской Аравии в результате отсутствия легализации гражданских сделок.Ключевые слова: журналист Tort; Человеческое достоинство; Конфиденциальность; Моральный урон; Объективная критика


2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 514-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raihana Abdullah

Islamic Family Law is one of the most studied fields in Malaysian law. This is because it affects the personal life of Muslims, and because many issues have arisen as a result of the implementation of the Islamic Family Law Enactment which governs Muslims in Malaysia. Scholarship in this area has expanded with the development of the Enactment itself. Several approaches have been used to analyze the implementation of the lawinter alia,legal, socio-legal, comparative, and anthropological and sociological perspecitves. It cannot be denied that research and scholarly publications in the field of Islamic Family Law have contributed to further strengthening the administration of justice and the implementation of the law. As such, this paper is intended to describe the trends in the area of Islamic Family Law. Doing so will assist in ascertaining the direction of this field in the future.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zaenal Fanani

Abstract: The one of the crucial issues in the Islamic family law in Indonesia is the issue of gender equity including tug of love. It is caused by historical and empirical of Islamic family law which still put unequal status and unequal roles between men and women. That Islamic family law is law that has become the positive law or has become law and regulation in Indonesia. This article will discuss about the provision of tug of love dispute in Islamic family law in Indonesia, and the renewal of provision of tug of love dispute from a gender justice perspective. Based on the review and analysis can be concluded that the provision of tug of love dispute in Islamic family law in Indonesia (particularly Article 105 and 156 KHI) is not gender equitable and should be revised by adding the aspect of morality, aspect of health, the ability to educate and the ability to take care of children as the main parameter in determining the right parent who will possess the custody of the children.Abstrak: Salah satu persoalan krusial dalam hukum keluarga di Indonesia yang perlu mendapat pembaharuan dewasa ini adalah persoalan keadilan jender dalam hukum keluarga, termasuk hak asuh anak. Hal ini dikarenakan kenyataan historis-empiris hukum keluarga masih menempatkan status dan peran yang tidak setara antara laki-laki dan perempuan. Hukum keluarga yang dimaksud adalah hukum keluarga yang sudah menjadi hukum positif atau menjadi peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Artikel ini akan membahas tentang bagaimana ketentuan sengketa hak asuh anak dalam hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia, serta bagaimana pembaruan ketentuan sengketa hak asuh anak dalam perspektif keadilan jender. Berdasarkan kajian artikel ini, dapat disimpulkan; Pertama, ketentuan hukum tentang sengketa hak asuh anak yang diatur dalam pasal 105 dan 156 KHI tidak responsif jender. Kedua, aspek moralitas, kesehatan dan kemampuan mendidik dan memelihara anak tidak bisa dimonopoli oleh jenis kelamin tertentu akan tetapi semua aspek tersebut sama-sama bisa dimiliki baik oleh kaum perempuan (ibu) maupun oleh kaum laki-laki (bapak).


ICR Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-274
Author(s):  
Mohamed Azam Mohamed Adil

Child custody refers to the upbringing of a child, including the parental responsibility to provide protection, love, care, education, shelter and management. Generally, in determining who will be the legal custodian of a child, a court will first and foremost ensure that the child’s welfare is well-protected.  In Malaysia, child custody is governed by two separate laws, one for non- Muslims and one for Muslims. For non-Muslims, the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act of 1976 (Act 164) holds sway, while for Muslims it is either the Islamic Family Law Enactments of the respective states or the Islamic Family Law Act of the Federal Territories that are relevant. While the Malaysian civil court operates over the non-Muslim laws, the Syariah court operates over the Muslim ones.  


Author(s):  
Mashood A. Baderin

‘Family law’ focuses on Islamic family law, the two main aspects of which are: marriage and the dissolution of marriage. Marriage by mutual contract (al-nikāh) is the only lawful type of marriage under Islamic law, with rules regulating its validity and consequences. The two main categories of requirements for the validity of an Islamic marriage are: prerequisites and essential components of the marriage contract. The questions of maintenance, polygamy, and stipulations are vital topics for family law. Under classical Islamic law, a marriage may be dissolved either through (i) unilateral dissolution initiated by the husband (talāq), (ii) dissolution initiated by the wife (khulʻ), (iii) dissolution by mutual agreement (mubāraʻah), or (iv) judicial dissolution (faskh).


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trusto Subekti

Legal certainty is an indicator for a legal into good legal category, the fact about  the validity of marriage has led a multi interpretation among the experts and the society, especially among Muslims. This is shown in the society members statement that "the secret marriage" as a valid marriage according to religious even it is not listed. " Arranged marriage in a society is intended to solve problems within the scope of family law and marriage, not to create new problems in society. the problem is how the legitimacy of the marriage law seen from the viewpoint of the agreement, with expectations  to obtain certainty about the right interpretation of the validity of marriage, so the confusion about the validity of a marriage can be resolved. Seen from the viewpoint of the legal agreements, Marriage included in family laws agreements and according to the provisions this agreements are categorized as a formal agreements, it means that the agreement was born and legally binding if the requirements and procedures (formality) of marriage according Act No. 1 Year 1974 jo. No PP. 9 Year 1975 fulfilled. Afterwards, from the binding aspect, the function of marriage records juridically is a requirement in order to obtain recognition and protection from the state and binding the third party: (others). According to the regulatory aspects the procedure and the registration of marriages reflect a legal certainty, as the result the existence of marriage proved by  a marriage certificate.As a further consequence, in the law viewpoint a marriage is invalid if the marriage did not comply the procedure and registration of marriage.Keyword: Validity of marriages, Law Agreement


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-83
Author(s):  
Machae Rohanee ◽  
◽  
Mohamad Abdul Basir ◽  
Khareng Mutsalim ◽  
◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Nency Dela Oktora

Marriage is one of the laws that apply to all the creatures of Allah are dead. Sirit is carry off a woman by force, deceit sense, even violence to marry. Problematic is that Sirit is not in accordance with the concept of marriage in Islam is that her marriage was valid if it meets the requirements of marriage is one of the conditions is the willingness between two potential partner, which may mean that that marriage should not be forced to either party. The formulation of the problem are (1) the factors behind the occurrence of Sirit?, (2) How is the operational / implementation and impact Sirit ?, and (3) How Sirit Lampung ethnic communities in the Perspective of Islamic Family Law. Objective: (1) Knowing the factors that cause Sirit in Lampung ethnic society, (2) Explain the operational/ implementation Sirit and the impact Sirit, (3) Analyze Sirit Lampung ethnic society in the perspective of the Islamic Family Law.  Data collection methods used was interviews and documentation. Data analysis method used is qualitative method. Based on the analysisof, it was concluded that the factors that caused the most dominant Sirit is a lack of awareness of self or less of its sturdywalls of faith to comply with religious law and customary law, economic factors, and self-controlfactor(liver). Sirit is done by means of deceit, coercion and even violence and some aresexually abused. Sirit can not be justified because Islam does not teachsuch things, as explained in Firman of Allah and the Hadis is the Hadis is more concerned with the right of a woman to decide a case which is about the marriage of their own. If viewed from the eyes of urf' the tradition Sirit is customary imperfect, that is not in accordance with the texts of Personality 'so that this tradition must be rejected or abandoned. Perkawinan merupakan salah satu sunnatullah yang berlaku untuk semua makhluk Allah SWT yang bernyawa.  Sirit adalah membawa lari perempuan dengan cara paksa, akal tipu daya, bahkan kekerasan untuk dinikahi.  Problematika nya, bahwa sirit tidak sesuai dengan konsep perkawinan dalam Islam menyebutkan sahnya pernikahan jika memenuhi syarat-syarat perkawinan yaitu adanya kerelaan antara dua calon pasangan. Permasalahan yang dibahas yaitu tradisi sirit masyarakat suku Lampung Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam. Tujuan (1) Mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan terjadinya sirit  masyarakat suku Lampung, (2) Menjelaskan operasional/pelaksanaan sirit dan dampak sirit, (3)Menganalisis  sirit masyarakat suku Lampung dalam perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam.  Metode pengumpulan data berupa wawancara dan dokumentasi.  Metode analisis data menggunakan metode kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis disimpulkan Faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan terjadinya sirit yaitu kurangnya kesadaran diri atau kurang kokoh nya tembok keimanan  untuk mentaati hukum agama dan hukum adat, faktor ekonomi, dan faktor pengendalian diri (hati).  Sirit  dilakukan dengan cara tipu daya, paksaan bahkan dengan kekerasan serta ada juga yang mengalami pelecehan seksual.  Sirit tidak dibenarkan dalam Islam, sebagaimana diterangkan dalam Firman Allah SWT dan hadis yaitu dalam hadis lebih mementingkan hak seorang perempuan dalam memutuskan sesuatu yaitu mengenai pernikahan mereka sendiri.  Jika dilihat dari urf’, tradisi sirit merupakan adat yang fasid, tidak sesuai dengan nash-nash syara’ sehingga tradisi ini wajib ditolak atau ditinggalkan.


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-130
Author(s):  
Miszairi Sitiris ◽  
◽  
Mustafa Mat Jubri @ Shamsuddin ◽  
Mohamad Sabri Zakaria ◽  
Mohd Na'im Mokhtar ◽  
...  

This article studies the hidden wisdom behind the pronouncement of conditional divorce, the rules and conditions prescribed by the jurists, as well as the forms and types of ta’līq in shariah law. This article also seeks to look at the practice of ta’līq in Malaysia as well as provisions under Islamic family law in Malaysia, as well as the practice direction issued by the Department of Syariah Judiciary Malaysia. The study employed library research to expound the opinions of earlier jurists from various schools of Islamic jurisprudence, and textual studies on the provisions of law related to the issue concerned. The study found that the wording of the official pronouncements of ta’līq varies from state to state, hence the consequences can also differ. The researcher is of the view that the practice of pronouncing ta’līq after the solemnization of a marriage contract should be reviewed. It needs to be said that the validation of a divorce by ta’līq is a more complicated process than an ordinary divorce.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document