EXPERIENCE OF ADVANCED COUNTRIES IN APPLICATION OF PRE-TRIAL SETTLEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 99-110
Author(s):  
Oleksandra Anatoliivna Marusheva
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
System Reform ◽  
Theoretical Approaches ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Resolution Model ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

The paper highlights the practice of pre-trial settlements in the sphere of construction in advanced countries of the world. Specific features of scientific theoretical approaches to dispute settlement in construction works have been substantiated. The international experience of advanced countries in application of the mechanisms for alternative dispute resolution has been analyzed, and a comprehensive research into international legal acts has been conducted. The vector of priority directions and ways to introduce the alternative mechanisms in the conditions of the Ukrainian state are determined. It is proposed to achieve the desired results by applying the discussed forms under administrative system reform. It is noted that today the Ukrainian state is only at the stage of creating an alternative dispute resolution model in construction. It is noted that the idea of introducing this practice in the domestic legal system is supported by a wide range of specialists. Such an interest corresponds to the desire of Ukraine to harmonize national legislation. It is grounded that the definition of priority directions and ways of introducing alternative mechanisms in the field of construction in Ukraine is to apply foreign experience in the context of reforming the modern political system, namely decentralization. It is the application of the proposed model that should be implemented at the state, regional and local levels, legally consolidate it and solve urgent problems. Such a systematization, in my opinion, will lead to a more objective and perfect settlement of disputes over a short period of time. It is noted that nowadays there is a considerable scientific interest in this issue, the expediency of using alternative mechanisms in the Ukrainian state is solved. However, this is a rather controversial issue, so there is a need for a comprehensive study of experience in foreign countries and the identification of priority areas and ways of applying experience in modern conditions in Ukraine.

scholarly journals THE FORMATION OF A SYSTEM OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS IN SERBIA

2016 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Валерий Шрам ◽  
Valeriy Shram
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
The State ◽  
Settlement Agreement ◽  
Minor Children ◽  
Rights And Interests ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
State Rights

The article is devoted to the analysis of the formation of a system of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in Serbia as one of the instruments stimulating the development of entrepreneurship and combating corruption. The author considers such nonjudicial legitimate methods of dispute resolution as negotiations of the parties, mediation, arbitration (binding arbitration) and the court of honor at the Economic chamber of Serbia, as well as other conciliation procedures. One of the main characteristic by which non-judicial methods of dispute resolution can be classified is the participation in them of third parties. The Serbian law relates to them participation of mediators in the reconciliation procedures, ombudsmen, state rights activists (authorized to protect the rights and interests of the state), judges, lawyers. Special attention is paid to mediation as a set of voluntary modes of settlement of the conflicting parties with the participation of third parties. The mediation is conducted on the good will of the conflicting parties by the mediator who seeks to resolve disputes through a settlement agreement. Under the law mediation can be realized by mediators, ombudsmen, state rights activists (authorized to protect the rights and interests of the state) who are trained by judges and lawyers. The article discusses the mechanism of pre-trial dispute settlement between the conflicting parties. Special attention is paid to the analysis of pre-trial settlement of disputes between parents of minor children decided to divorce. In Serbia an important role in the formation of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms of economic entities plays a chamber of Commerce of Serbia under which exists the court of honor and court of arbitration. Their competence includes the resolution of disputes through mediation.

Investor-State Conciliation and Mediation

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Present System ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Substantive Content ◽  
International Dispute ◽  
Settlement Agreement ◽  
Definition Of

Conciliation and mediation have great potential to resolve investor-State disputes. Nonetheless, arbitration has significantly overshadowed these two forms of amicable dispute settlement processes. This disparity is slowly changing, and, in recent times, interest has grown in conciliation and mediation, particularly given the duration, complexity, and cost of investor-State arbitrations, as well as concerns as to the substantive content of investor-State arbitral decisions. No clear consensus has emerged regarding the precise definition of either conciliation or mediation. Given the substantial overlap between the two processes, they have often been referred to as functionally equivalent and interchangeable. The best way to identify conciliation or mediation is through close examination of the particular set of rules and practices at issue. But the two dispute settlement mechanisms are generally distinguishable. At its core, conciliation involves a sole conciliator or conciliation commission considering the respective positions of the disputing parties and making nonbinding recommendations for settlement. Conciliation rules typically have flexibility to accommodate other mediation techniques that share the same purpose and may require a conciliator or conciliation commission to produce a written evaluation of the parties’ respective legal positions. In comparison, mediation is a process in which a mediator (1) assists the parties to focus on their real interests rather than legal rights, (2) generally avoids making any merits-based evaluation of parties’ positions, and (3) facilitates a meaningful dialogue between the parties to reach an amicable settlement. Unlike arbitration, in which the disputing parties have no certainty over the arbitrators’ binding decisions, the success of both conciliation and mediation depends on the willingness and cooperation of the parties to reach a voluntary and agreed settlement. A settlement agreement resulting from a mediation or conciliation process may potentially be enforced under domestic laws or in states that have ratified the Singapore Convention on Mediation, an innovation in international dispute resolution that may increase interest in investor-State conciliation and mediation. The UNCITRAL Working Group III is presently considering whether and how to promote conciliation, mediation, and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms in reforms to the present system of investor-State dispute settlement.

Neutrality in 2020: A Reply to 1981 Stulberg

2021 ◽  
pp. 141-144
Author(s):  
Sharon Press ◽  
Bobbi McAdoo
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Significant Contribution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Critical Element ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Dispute Settlement Procedure ◽  
Common Understanding

Joseph (Josh) Stulberg published The Theory and Practice of Mediation: A Reply to Professor Susskind in 1981. His thesis was direct and simple: a mediator’s commitment to neutrality is the critical element which “permits mediation to be an effective, principled dispute settlement procedure” (p. 86). Stulberg articulated for all of us—then and now—the centrality of neutrality and impartiality to the very definition of mediation. This articulation continues to be a significant contribution to the dispute resolution field; indeed, the Stulberg article deserves to be labeled “foundational.” We question, however, whether the 1981 commitment to neutrality Stulberg articulated is understood by mediator practitioners today in the same way he intended, given the wide range of disputes now subject to mediation. Stulberg wrote in 1981, “[p]aradoxically, while the use of mediation has expanded, a common understanding as to what constitutes mediation has weakened” (p. 85). Ironically, despite Stulberg’s very clear thesis, his article contained the seeds that contribute to confusion in the definition of mediation itself....

scholarly journals TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKU USAHA TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM HAL TERJADINYA SHORTWEIGHTING DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG RI NO 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 521
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Ayu Nira Relies Rianti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Actual Weight ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Sales Practice

Shortweighting is one of the selling practices of goods that harm consumers. Where the actual weight of the item is less than the weight indicated on the goods packaging label. Clearly, consumers are severely disadvantaged as a result of changes in the goods made by businessmen. With The result that consumers get goods that are not in accordance with the conditions and the promised warranty or stated in the label. The legal issues in this writing is 1. How is the liability of businessmen to consumers in the case of shortweighting reviewed by Law No. 8 of 1999? and 2. What kind of dispute settlement efforts that can be taken by the consumer in case of shortweighting? This research is normative legal research. The conclusion of this study is that the businessmen is to be responsible if proven to occur sales practice shortweighting. It is contained in Article 19 of Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. The legal efforts to resolve disputes that can be reached by consumers can be through 2 (two) ways of settling disputes, outside the court or alternative dispute resolution and settlement of litigation. The settlement of disputes outside the court can be through the settlement of disputes solved by deliberation by the parties and could be through the Indonesia Consumer Dispute Settlement Institution (BPSK). Shortweighting adalah salah satu praktek penjualan barang yang merugikan konsumen. Dimana berat barang yang sebenarnya adalah lebih kecil dari berat yang tertera pada label kemasan barang. Jelas sekali bahwa konsumen sangat dirugikan akibat adanya perubahan barang tersebut yang dilakukan oleh pelaku usaha. Sehingga konsumen mendapatkan barang yang tidak sesuai dengan kondisi dan jaminan yang dijanjikan atau yang dinyatakan dalam label. Rumusan masalah dalam penulisan ini adalah 1. Bagaimanakah tanggungjawab pelaku usaha terhadap konsumen dalam hal terjadinya shortweighting ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999? dan 2. Apakah upaya penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat ditempuh oleh konsumen bila terjadi shortweighting? Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Kesimpulan dari hasil penulisan penelitian ini  bahwa pelaku usaha bertanggung jawab apabila terbukti terjadi praktik penjualan shortweighting. Hal tersebut tertuang dalam Pasal 19 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Upaya penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat ditempuh konsumen dapat melalui 2 (dua) cara yaitu penyelesaian sengketa diluar pengadilan dan penyelesaian litigasi. Penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan yaitu bisa melalui penyelesaian sengketa secara damai oleh pahak pihak sendiri dan bisa melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK).

scholarly journals Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Asuransi Pasca Keluarnya Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Nomor 1/POJK.07/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Wisnu Kumala ◽  
Yaswirman Yaswirman ◽  
Ulfanora Ulfanora
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Legal Consequences

There is a tug of authority in resolving insurance disputes outside the court between the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) based on Law Nomor 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection with Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions (LAPS) based on Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014. This encourages the author to conduct legal research in order to determine the authority of BPSK in resolving insurance disputes as well as the legal consequences of the decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014 using the statutory approach. This legal research results in the finding that BPSK is still authorized to settle insurance disputes following the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014, this is based on the provisions of the Lex superior derogat legi inferiori principle. Then there is no legal effect on the BPSK decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation. This is because BPSK's decision has been based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, whose position is higher than the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority. So there is no need for BPSK to follow the provisions of the regulations whose hierarchy of legislation is lower than the Consumer Protection Act. Therefore BPSK's decision is "final and binding" as explained in Article 54 paragraph 3 of the Consumer Protection Act.

scholarly journals International Legal and Economic Aspects of Dispute Resolution within the WTO in the Context of International Integration

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-71
Author(s):  
V. P. Kirilenko ◽  
Yu. V. Mishalchenko ◽  
A. N. Shchepova
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The World ◽  
System Functioning ◽  
Dispute Settlement System ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

The article discusses issues related to the settlement of disputes within the framework of the World Trade Organization, as well as assesses the advantages and disadvantages of this system. The specific problems of the dispute settlement system functioning today are considered, and options for optimizing the dispute resolution mechanism and various ways to improve the effectiveness of legal remedies in cases of non-compliance with decisions are proposed. Special attention is paid to the latest topical disputes involving the Russian Federation, the European Union, Ukraine, China and USA resolved within the framework of the World Tr ade Organization, as well as to the crisis faced by the organization due to the absence of a permanent appeals body.

scholarly journals Złożenie skargi przez konsumenta za pośrednictwem ODR (Online Dispute Resolution) – internetowego systemu rozstrzygania sporów

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-194
Author(s):  
Anna Rogacka-Łukasik
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
The Other ◽  
Online Dispute Resolution ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Resolution System ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Technical Innovations ◽  
Modern Form ◽  
Dispute Resolution System

ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution), as a non-judicial resolution of disputes, is a wide range of mechanisms that aim to put an end to a conflict without the need of conducting a trial before the court. On the other hand, the modern form of ADR is ODR (Online Dispute Resolution) – an online dispute resolution system that is the expression of the newest means of communication and technical innovations in order to help in non-judicial dispute resolving. The goal of this publication is to present the ODR platform and, in particular, to describe the process of filing a complaint by the consumer by means of it.

scholarly journals Analisa Dan Pengaruh Metode Hubungan Industrial Terhadap Penyelesaian Perselisihan Di Serikat Pekerja Sektoral Kota Cilegon Tahun 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Udi Iswadi ◽  
Mahfudoh Haerani
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Trade Unions ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Mutual Influence ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Internal And External Factors ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The City

Abstrak - Hubungan merupakan tindakan yang saling mempengaruhi antar pihak, saling memberi manfaat guna mencapai tujuan, hubungan dapat dikatakan pula sebuah representasi kegiatan yang dilandasi keinginan untuk saling memberi dan memenuhi keperluan masing-masing pihak. Keselarasan akan timbal balik pada sebuah hubungan yang sesuai menghasilkan kedekatan dan kenyamanan antar pihak. Konsep sebuah hubungan didasari oleh faktor internal dan eksternal organisasi atau perusahaan. Sedangkan hubungan yang terjadi dalam perusahaan yaitu hubungan Industrial, dimaknai sebuah metode dalam menyelesaikan persoalan yang timbul di antara pengusaha dan pekerjanya. Hal yang diselesaikan sudah barang tentu adalah perselisihan. Pelaksanaan metode penelitian dalam pengumpulan data berupa kuesioner. Jumlah populasi yang digunakan yaitu 35 serikat pekerja atau dengan jumlah pekerja sebanyak 5.860 pekerja sebagai populasi dari serikat pekerja sektoral yang tergabung dengan Federasi Serikat Pekerja Sektoral Kimia di kota Cilegon. Untuk mengetahui bagaimana metode hubungan Industrial yang efektif dipakai maka harus ditentukan jenis perselisihannya terlebih dahulu, dalam penelitian ini ditemukan perselisihan kepentingan kecenderungannya akan diselesaikan ditingkat hubungan Industrial bipatride. Adapun perselisihan yang banyak diselesaikan peneliti melihat waktu kejadiannya seperti perselisihan upah maka akan banyak muncul di awal tahun. Sedangkan untuk melihat seberapa kuat korelasi yang didapat antara Variabel Metode Hubungan Industrial terhadap Penyelesaian Perselisihan, maka hasil perhitungan Uji Korelasi Product Moment r hitung 0,920, dapat dikatakan bahwa pengaruhnya Sangat Kuat. Hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa variabel Metode Hubungan Industrial mempengaruhi variabel Penyelesaian Perselisihan sebesar 84,6% sedangkan sisanya dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor lainnya. Nilai Sig. 0,000 < 0,05, diartikan bahwa pengaruh Variabel Metode Hubungan Industrial (X) terhadap Penyelesaian Perselisihan (Y) signifikan. Dari perhitungan ttabel diperoleh nilai 1,987. Berdasarkan kriteria pengujian hipotesis terhadap nol (Ho), yaitu Ho ditolak jika thitung > ttabel. Diperoleh thitung  5,458 > ttabel 1,987 maka Hipotesis nol (Ho) di tolak, dan menerima Hipotesis alternatif (Ha). Dalam penelitian ini dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa “Terdapat Pengaruh Metode Hubungan Industrial terhadap Penyelesaian Perselisihan di Serikat Pekerja Sektoral Kimia Kota Cilegon Tahun 2019”. Dengan regresi sebagai berikut : Ÿ = 20,710 + 1,010 X.      Abstract - Relationship is an act of mutual influence between parties, mutually beneficial to achieve goals, the relationship can also be said to be a representation of activities based on the desire to give and meet the needs of each party. Alignment of reciprocity in an appropriate relationship results in closeness and comfort between parties. The concept of a relationship is based on internal and external factors of the organization or company. While the relationships that occur within a company that is industrial relations, is interpreted as a method of solving problems that arise between employers and their workers. The matter that was resolved was naturally a dispute. The implementation of research methods in collecting data in the form of a questionnaire. The population used is 35 trade unions or with a total of 5,860 workers as a population of sectoral trade unions that are members of the Federation of Chemical Sector Trade Unions in the city of Cilegon. For know, how effective industrial relations methods are used, the type of dispute must be determined first. In this study, it was found that disputes over the interests of fraud will be resolved at the bipartite industrial relations level. As for the disputes that many researchers have resolved, seeing when it occurs, such as wage disputes, many will appear at the beginning of the year. To see how strong the correlation obtained between the Industrial Relations Method Variables on Dispute Resolution, the results of the Product Moment Correlation Test r count of 0.920, it can be said that the effect is very Strong. This shows that the Industrial Relations Method variable affected 84.6% Dispute Resolution while the rest was influenced by other factors. The Sig. 0,000 <0.05, which means that the effect of the Industrial Relations Method Variable (X) on Dispute Settlement (Y) is significant. From the ttable calculation, the value is 1.987. Based on the hypothesis testing criteria for zero (Ho), i.e. Ho is rejected if tcount> ttable. Obtained tcount 5.458> t table 1.987 then the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected, and accepted the alternative hypothesis (Ha). In this study, it can be concluded that "There is an Effect of the Industrial Relations Method on the Settlement of Disputes in the Chemical Sectoral Trade Unions of Cilegon City in 2019". With the regression as follows: Ÿ = 20,710 + 1,010 X.

scholarly journals СУТНІСТЬ ТА ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ДОСУДОВОГО ВРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНО-ПРАВОВИХ СПОРІВ

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
C. В. Ківалов
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The Relationship

У статті проаналізовано поняття, сутність та особливості досудового урегулювання адміністративно-правових спорів. Особливу увагу приділено співвідношенню понять «спо­соби, альтернативні правосуддю» й «альтернативне вирішення спорів». Здійснено поділ до­судових способів за такими критеріями: 1) за суб'єктом, що здійснює процедуру вирішення спору: а) державні процедури врегулювання спору; б) недержавні процедури врегулювання спору; 2) за методом врегулювання спору: а) примирювальні (компромісні) процедури; б) правовїдновлювальні процедури; в) змішані процедури. Визначено, що найбільш поши­реними методами досудового вирішення спорів с переговори, посередництво, арбітраж.   The paper analyzes the concept, essence, and characteristics of pre-trial settlement of administrative legal disputes. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between the concepts "methods alternative to justice" and "alternative dispute resolution". The author carries out the classification of pre-trial methods according to the following criteria: 1) by the entity that carries out the procedure for dispute settlement: a) state dispute settlement procedures; b) non-state dispute settlement procedures; 2) by the method of settlement of the dispute: a) conciliation (compromise) procedures; b) procedures for restoration of rights; c) mixed procedures. It is determined that the most common methods of pre-trial dispute resolution are: negotiation, mediation, arbitration.

13. Justice in the Modern Administrative State

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Webley ◽  
Harriet Samuels
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Administrative State ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Complete Series ◽  
Explanatory Text ◽  
Primary Materials

Titles in the Complete series combine extracts from a wide range of primary materials with clear explanatory text to provide readers with a complete introductory resource. This chapter discusses the role of a range of accountability methods to scrutinize the executive’s use of power. This includes the work of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, who is now also known as the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the role of tribunals in contrast to courts, of public inquiries and of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms too. It also examines the limitations of each of these methods, and how they may complement each other to provide different forms of scrutiny.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document