DO INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS INFLUENCE THE FIRM VALUE? (CASE STUDY IN TRADE, SERVICE, AND INVESTMENT SECTOR IN INDONESIA)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-209
Author(s):  
Giovanni Giovanni ◽  
Setyarini Santosa

The objective of this research is to examine the influence of intellectual capital and intangible assets toward firm value. The use of intellectual capital and intangible assets in this research is very interesting because they represent the similar idea, the ability to generate future benefit. However, intellectual capital is not represented in the presentation of financial statement directly, while the intangible asset is presented in the financial statement. The samples are taken from the trade, service, and investment companies classification which are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in from 2015 until 2018. Using the purposive sampling, there are 27 companies put as data for the multiple linear regression. The result of the research shows intellectual capital has positive significant relationship toward firm value, meanwhileintangible assets have negative significant relationship toward firm value. It means the lower intangible assets, the higher firm value is. This might be happened if the company cannot utilize the intangible asset optimally.

Kybernetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalin Ionita ◽  
Elena Dinu

PurposeThe present study investigates the connection between company investments in intellectual capital (IC) and how they translate into financial value. The aim is to test the impact of intangible assets on the firm value and its sustainable growth.Design/methodology/approachThe research employs computation models to determine the sustainable growth rate (SGR) and the firm value (FV), and by using the ordinary least squares (OLS) model through a linear regression assesses the relationship between the dependent variables and expenditures on intangibles like R&D, IT programs and patents. A sample of 42 companies has been selected out of the 78 listed at Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE), based on the appropriateness of the information disclosed in the financial reports for the period 2016–2019.FindingsThe results show that intangibles classified as innovative competences (R&D and Patents) do not have a positive impact on SGR and FV in listed companies from Romania. Moreover, R&D has a negative and significant effect on FV, while IT Programs have a positive and significant impact on FV, but not on the SGR. Variables categorised as economic competencies (Brands, Shares held in associates and jointly controlled entities) and firm structure-specific variables (Leverage, Firm Performance) seem to have a significant effect on SGR and FV. Shares held in associates and jointly controlled entities is the variable that can have the biggest impact when it comes to FV for companies listed at BSE.Research limitations/implicationsDue to non-disclosure of specific information by some companies, or lack of investments in intangibles the sample had to be reduced and does not cover all listed companies.Practical implicationsCompanies listed on the Regulated Market from the Bucharest Stock Exchange should maintain their scale of liabilities at a reasonable level when financing intangible assets in order to ensure corporate long-term and sustainable development. Also, these companies should maintain awareness about the importance of intangible assets and invest more in specific sub-components, in order to sustain competitive advantage. Recognizing the roles of intangibles, managers need to develop strategies to invest in profitable intangibles by reasonably allocating their limited resources, in order to achieve sustainable growth and increase company success.Originality/valueStudies concerning the relation between investments in intangibles and sustainable growth rate and firm value of listed Romanian companies are very scarce. This paper reveals new research, never before undertaken, concerning expenditures on intangibles by Romanian companies and the valuation of such investments on Bucharest Stock Exchange.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Sutandar ◽  
Prima Apriwenni

<p><em>Nowadays, intellectual capital become a very valuable asset on business. Intellectual Capital is an intangible asset that can create value added and competitive advatage for the company. The value added and competitive advatage will increase investors trust that can cause the raising value of the firm. Intellectual capital was measured by Vallue Added Intellectual Capital that consist of human capital, structural capital, and customer capital. The increasing profit was measured by return on asset (ROA). ROA indicates the company abilities to generate earnings (profitability). The firm value was measured by Tobin’s Q. The population in this research using a manufacturing company, especially infrastructure, utility, and transportation listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2013-2015. Based on purposive sampling method, 19 samples were obtained, so there are 57 of observation data. The analysis techniques use are multiple linear regresion and path analysis. The result of this research showed that: (1)</em><em> Intellectual capital has a positive and significant influence toward return on assets. (2) Intellectual capital has a positive and significant influence toward firm value. (3) Return on assets has a positive and significant influance on firm value. (4) Intellectual capital has a positive and significant influence toward firm value through return on assets.</em><em></em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><strong><em>Keyword</em></strong><em> : </em><em>Intellectual Capital, Return on Asset, Firm Value, Tobin’s Q</em></p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eka Wulandari ◽  
Risal Rinofah ◽  
Mujino Mujino

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis (1) Pengaruh Aset Tidak Berwujud terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. (2) Pengaruh Rasio Hutang terhadap Ekuitas terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. (3) Pengaruh Pengembalian Aset terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (4) dan pengaruh Aset Tidak Berwujud, Rasio Hutang Terhadap Ekuitas, dan Pengembalian Aset Secara Bersamaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan di Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2014-2018. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel 15 perusahaan yang dipilih berdasarkan kriteria, termasuk perusahaan yang menggunakan aturan sistem syariah dan mengalami keuntungan dalam periode yang telah ditentukan. Analisis tanggal yang digunakan adalah teknik purposive sampling menggunakan uji regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap variabel aset tidak berwujud pada nilai perusahaan, variabel rasio utang terhadap ekuitas berpengaruh negatif dan tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan, pengembalian aset memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan, dan yang terakhir adalah aset tidak berwu Kata Kunci:    Aktiva Tidak Berwujud, Rasio Hutang terhadap Ekuitas, Pengembalian Aktiva, dan Nilai PerusahaanAbstractThis study aims to analyze (1) The Effect of Intangible Assets on Firm Value. (2) The Effect of Debt to Equity Ratio on Firm Value. (3) The Effect of Return on Assets on Firm Value (4) and the effect of Intangible Asset, Debt to Equity Ratio, and Return on Assets Simultaneously Against the Firm Value in Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2014-2018. This study uses a sample of 15 companies selected based on criteria, including companies that use the rules of the sharia system and experience profits in a predetermined period. Date analysis used was purposive sampling technique using multiple linear regression tests. The results of this study are positive and significant influences on the intangible asset variable on firm value, the variable debt to equity ratio has a negative and not significant effect on firm value, return on assets has a positive and significant effect on firm value, and the last is  intangible assets, debt to equity ratio and return on assset influence jointly or simultaneously on the company's value.Keywords :  Intangible Asset, Debt to Equity Ratio, Return on Assets, and Firm Valuebstract


Author(s):  
Cătălin Gabriel Ioniţă

AbstractIn recent years, companies have begun to promote an economy based on knowledge and information, characterized by rapid economic changes, so the production of tangible goods has no longer been the main source of value, this being replaced by the creation and management of intangible assets, which are often not reflected in the accounting documents at the real market value because of the restrictive criteria for accounting valuation and recognition. Nowadays, the economy is based mainly on intangible assets and therefore they must be recognized in the financial statements of the companies, so that the shareholders and the investors have a clearer picture of company value. This paper aims to propose a model that can analyze the effects of intellectual capital and subcomponents of intangible assets on company value and the sustainable growth of firms listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Until now, it is unknown which kind of sub-components of intangible assets make firms listed at Bucharest Stock Exchange to have sustainable growth or are more useful to enhance firm value. The proposed model includes data referring to intellectual capital, computerized information, innovative property, economic competences and VEKTOR index, which was developed by the Romanian Investor Relations Association so that the shareholders and the investors have a clearer picture of company when it comes to Relationship with Investors, Corporate Governance, Proactive Approach in IR, Interactive IR Instruments, Coverage by Financial Analysts and Sustainability.


Author(s):  
Eka Wulandari ◽  
Risal Rinofah ◽  
Mujino Mujino

This study aims to analyze (1) The Effect of Intangible Assets on Firm Value. (2) The Effect of Debt to Equity Ratio on Firm Value. (3) The Effect of Return on Assets on Firm Value (4) and the effect of Intangible Asset, Debt to Equity Ratio, and Return on Assets Simultaneously Against the Firm Value in Manufacturing Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2014-2018. This study uses a sample of 15 companies selected based on criteria, including companies that use the rules of the sharia system and experience profits in a predetermined period. Date analysis used was purposive sampling technique using multiple linear regression tests. The results of this study are positive and significant influences on the intangible asset variable on firm value, the variable debt to equity ratio has a negative and not significant effect on firm value, return on assets has a positive and significant effect on firm value, and the last is intangible assets, debt to equity ratio and return on assset influence jointly or simultaneously on the company’s value.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohanes Indrayono

<p>This study contributes to the on-going studies on behavioral finance by providing a case study on underreaction and overreaction of firm stocks to firm valuation. We use the Model of Investor Sentiment (Barberis et al., 2005) to evaluate underreaction and overreaction behavior and reflect on specific findings in the Indonesian market. The result of the study is most of the stocks in the Indonesian Stock Exchange are more overreaction to the news of firm financial statements. Firms on the industry with more intangible assets measure more overreaction than firms on industries with more tangible assets. For stocks with overreaction, the stock firm value is positively affected by a change in the total assets and profitability, but not by change of book value. The result concretized no evidence that firm stocks overreacted to the news more than underreacting. In stock industrial sectors, the financial institutions and wholesale industry stocks demonstrated remarkable overreactions. Nonetheless, automotive, building construction, food and beverage as well as cement evidenced more underreaction. For better return in financial markets, investors may buy stocks of the firm on industry with more tangible assets when there is no good news about the increasing firm profitability and sales; nonetheless, they should buy stocks of the firm on industry with more intangible assets when there is no lousy news about the increasing firm profitability and sales. </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Haryani Chandra ◽  
Hamfri Djajadikerta

Go public companies have main purpose to increase firm value consistently. Increased firm value can reflect the increase in the prosperity of shareholders. The purpose of this research is to determine whether intellectual capital, profitability, and leverage have an influence on firm value. This research is expected to help companies to determine the focus on managing the factors those have an influence towards firm value and help investors and potential investors to make investment decisions. This research is conducted on firms listed in property, real estate, and building construction sector in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2010 until 2015. Samples are selected by simple random sampling method. The research method used is the regression analysis. Intellectual capital is measured by value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC), profitability is measured by return on assets (ROA), leverage is measured by debt- to-equity ratio (DER), and firm value is measured by the year-end closing stock price. The results showed that intellectual capital, profitability, and leverage have partially a significant positive influence on firm value. In addition, intellectual capital, profitability, and leverage have significant influence simultaneously on firm value. Keywords: firm value, intellectual capital, leverage, profitability


2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Setyo Budi Hartono ◽  
◽  
Wahab Zaenuri ◽  
Fania Mutiara Savitri ◽  
Dessy Noor Farida ◽  
...  

Abstrak: Penelitian ini ditujukan pada anggaran dalam bentuk intangible asset (sumber daya manusia) dan tangible asset (aset tetap dan persediaan) yang diprediksi dapat mempengaruhi intellectual capital, kinerja keuangan sekarang dan mendatang, serta indikator kinerja utama. Alokasi anggaran sebagai baromater prioritas dalam mengembangkan intellectual capital ditujukan untuk memenuhi performa keuangan bagi indikator kinerja utama organisasi. Populasi yang juga menjadi sampel yaitu unit dan fakultas pada UIN Walisongo Semarang sebanyak 30 unit. Metode pengambilan sampling menggunakan teknik sampel jenuh yang mengambil seluruh populasi. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa laporan tahunan dan laporan pencapaian indikator kinerja utama tahun 2019-2020. Analisis data menggunakan path analysis. Hasil penelitian ini adalah alokasi APBN tahun 2019 UIN Walisongo hanya terfokus pada tangible asset sebesar 82%, sementara 18% dialokasikan untuk intangible asset. Intangible asset tidak berpengaruh secara terhadap semua hubungan, hanya tangible asset saja yang dapat mempengaruhi intellectual capital secara langsung dan kinerja keuangan sekarang secara tidak langsung. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan perlu dilakukan audit sumber daya manusia sehingga dapat ditetapkan alokasi kebutuhan anggaran bagi intangible asset-nya. Abstract: This research is aimed at the budget in the form of intangible assets (human resources) and fixed assets and inventories that are predicted to affect intellectual capital, current and future financial performance, as well as key performance indicators. Budget allocation as a priority barometer in developing intellectual capital is aimed at meeting financial performance for the organization's main performance indicators. The population that is also a sample is 30 units and architecture at UIN Walisongo Semarang. The sampling method uses a saturated sample technique that takes the entire population. The data used is secondary data in the form of annual reports and performance indicator reports for 2019-2020. Data analysis using path analysis. The results of this study were that the 2019 State Budget allocation of UIN Walisongo only focused on tangible assets by 82%, while 18% was allocated for intangible assets. Intangible assets do not affect all relationships, only tangible assets can directly affect intellectual capital and current financial performance indirectly. Results Based on this research, it is necessary to conduct an audit of human resources so that they can determine the allocation of budget requirements for intangible assets.


Author(s):  
I Nyoman Wijana Asmara Putra ◽  
Ni Made Dwi Ratnadi

Intangible assets, such as information, are becoming increasingly essential to companies. Intellectual capital is another term for knowledge assets. The aim of this study is to find empirical evidence of the influence of intellectual capital and intellectual capital disclosure on firm valuation, as well as to identify the types of disclosures made by the banking industry listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2015-2019. The data used in the analysis were secondary data from annual reports. A six-way numerical coding scheme determines the disclosure item index. With 36 disclosure objects, the disclosure categories are divided into three categories: structural capital, human capital, and external capital. Content analysis and multiple linear regression are two data analysis methods. The results of the analysis show that an average of 49.91 percent is expressed in the form of a narrative, 16.44 percent is in the form of a combination of qualitative and quantitative, 7.53 percent is in the form of numbers and 1.44 items are expressed in the form of monetary units (rupiah). Meanwhile, an average of 24.33 percent of items of disclosure were not disclosed. Intellectual capital disclosure has a positive impact on firm value, while intellectual capital has no impact. According to research, investors in the banking industry consider intellectual capital disclosure when making investments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Desi Elviani ◽  
Syahril Ali ◽  
Rahmat Kurniawan

This study aims to examine how the influence of fraudulent financial reporting on firm value is viewed from the perspective of a pentagon fraud with a sample of 71 companies from the infrastructure, utilities and transportation sectors in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2018. The sample selection used was purposive sampling method. Company value is measured by price book value, financial statement fraud is measured by fraud-score models. There are two variables that have a positive and significant influence, namely the opportunity and arrogance variables, the two variables present two of the five elements of pentagon fraud, where as the three variables, pressure, rasionalization, competence, do not affect the fraudulent financial reporting. The results of this study have proven that fraudulent financial reporting has a negative effect on firm value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document