scholarly journals KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENERAPAN PASAL 21 AYAT 1 KITAB UNDANG UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA (KUHAP) TENTANG PENAHANAN ATAU PENAHANAN LANJUTAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Karyoto Karyoto ◽  
Oktabilla Ayu Lestari
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Subjective Feeling ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Evidence Collection ◽  
Anxiety Condition

because suspects or defendants are particularly vulnerable to violations of their human rights, especially in the context of law enforcement. The suspect or defendant is in the position of the examination object in the process. All series of processes, whether in the examination phase of witnesses, expert examinations, evidence collection, and other evidence collection, are directed to a suspect or defendant, either to convict or not to be guilty The aims of this study are: (1) To know the meaning of the obscurity of the norm in the sentence "in the case of a concerning circumstance" contained in Article 21 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code on detention or continued detention. (2). To know and to learn the racial / basic establishment in the provisions of Article 21 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code which contains "anxiety condition" in the case of further detention or detention. This research method uses conceptual approach, statute approach and historical approach. The results of the study are: Arrangement of continued detention and detention in the Criminal Procedure Code is highly subjective and tends to have a very wide and unlimited interpretation. This is a blatant disregard for the legal norms governing the detention and continued detention. Detention refers to the provisions of Article 21 of the Criminal Procedure Code requiring a further detention or detention order be made against a suspect or defendant allegedly committing a crime on the basis of sufficient evidence and escape concerns, removing evidence or reprising his crime. In the provisions of that article is contained subjective opportunities for resistance to a person. Worry obviously depends on the subjective feeling of the investigator, prosecutor or judge. The absence of the parameters in the phrase "circumstances of concern" that are not explicitly regulated, both within the Criminal Procedure Code itself and in its implementing rules, are particularly vulnerable to human rights violations, especially to suspects or defendants held without filled first in circumstances that cause concern in advance.

scholarly journals Peranan Dan Fungsi Praperadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Polda Jateng

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dodik Hartono ◽  
Maryanto Maryanto
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Active Role ◽  
District Court ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law

ABSTRAK�Penelitian dengan judul Peranan Dan Fungsi Praperadilan Dalam Menegakkan Hukum Pidana di Polda Jateng. Berdasarkan uraian dalam Tesis ini, permasalahan yang akan yang akan di teliti adalah: 1) Bagaimanakah fungsi dan peran praperadilan dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku? 2) Apa hambatan dalam pelaksanaan fungsi dan peran pra peradilan dalam penegakan hukum di Polda Jateng? 3) Bagaimanakah solusi dari hambatan dalam pelaksanaan fungsi dan peran pra peradilan dalam penegakan hukum di Polda Jateng?Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa : 1) Maksud dan tujuan utama yang hendak ditegakkan dan dilindungi, dalam proses praperadilan yaitu tegaknya hukum dan perlindungan hak asasi tersangka dalam tingkat pemeriksaan penyidikan dan penuntutan. Pasal 1 butir 10 KUHAP dipertegas dalam Pasal 77 KUHAP yang menyebutkan Pengadilan Negeri berwenang untuk memeriksa dan memutus, sesuai dengan ketentuan yang diatur dalam undang-undang. Wewenang pengadilan untuk mengadili dalam praperadilan dijelaskan dalam Pasal 95 KUHAP. 2) Hambatan dalam pelaksanaan fungsi dan peran praperadilan dalam penegakan hukum di Polda Jateng meliputi : a. hakim lebih banyak memperhatikan perihal dipenuhi atau tidaknya syarat-syarat formil penangkapan dan penahanan, atau ada tidaknya perintah penahanan dan sama sekali tidak menguji dan menilai syarat materilnya. b. setiap pelaksanaan upaya paksa selalu ada perenggutan HAM. c. pemeriksaan untuk melakukan penahanan, masih ada penyalahgunaan dalam tahap penyidikan oleh Polisi dan penuntutan oleh jaksa. d. selain luasnya kewenangan penyidikan dalam menentukan bukti permulaan yang cukup, pengawasan terhadap kewenangan tersebut juga lemah. 3) Solusi dari hambatan dalam pelaksanaan fungsi dan peran praperadilan dalam penegakan hukum di Polda Jateng meliputi : ����������� a. Diperlukan upaya kontrol terhadap setiap aparat penegak hukum pada lembaganya masing-masing secara vertikal. b. KUHAP perlu direvisi khususnya mengenai mekanisme saling mengawasi antara penegak hukum dan lembaga dalam subsistem peradilan. c. diperlukan peran aktif hakim dalam menggunakan kewenangannya pada saat pemeriksaan pokok perkara untuk mempertimbangkan penyidikan atau penuntutan yang tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum acara atau yang melawan hukum guna menghindari penyalahgunaan HAM. d. dalam tahap ajudikasi, hakim seharusnya berkonsentrasi untuk menentukan hasil pembuktian di persidangan dan dalam tahap ini, hakim dapat menilai apa yang terjadi dalam tahap praajudikasi.Kata Kunci : Peranan dan Fungsi, Praperadilan, Penegakan Hukum Pidana�ABSTRACT�Research with the title Role And Practice Function In Enforcing Criminal Law in Central Java Regional Police. Based on the description in this Thesis, the issues that will be examined are: 1) How is the function and role of pretrial in law enforcement in Indonesia based on the prevailing laws and regulations? 2) What are the obstacles in the implementation of pre-justice functions and roles in law enforcement in the Central Java Regional Police? 3) How is the solution of the obstacles in the implementation of functions and the role of pre-judiciary in law enforcement in Central Java Regional Police?The results of the study conclude that: 1) The main purpose and objectives to be upheld and protected, in the pre-trial process, namely the enforcement of the law and the protection of human rights of suspects in the level of investigation and prosecution investigation. Article 1 point 10 of the Criminal Procedure Code is affirmed in Article 77 of KUHAP stating that the District Court has the authority to examine and decide upon, in accordance with the provisions stipulated in law. The jurisdiction of the courts to adjudicate in pre-trial is described in Article 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 2) Obstacles in the implementation of functions and the role of pretrial in law enforcement in Central Java Police include: a. judges pay more attention to whether or not the formal conditions for arrest and detention, or whether there is a detention order and not test and judge material requirements at all. b. every execution of forced efforts is always a rush of human rights. c. checks for detention, there is still abuse in the investigation stage by the Police and prosecution by the prosecutor. d. besides the extent of investigative authority in determining sufficient preliminary evidence, the oversight of the authority is also weak. 3) Solutions from obstacles in the implementation of functions and pretrial roles in law enforcement in Central Java Police include: a. Control of each law enforcement apparatus is required on each institution vertically. b. The Criminal Procedure Code needs to be revised, especially regarding the mechanism of mutual supervision between law enforcement and institutions within the judicial system. c. an active role of the judge in the use of authority at the time of examination of the principal matter to consider investigations or prosecutions that are not in accordance with the provisions of procedural law or against the law in order to avoid abuse of human rights. d. in the stage of adjudication, the judge should concentrate on determining the results of the evidence in the hearing and in this stage the judge can judge what happened in the pre-certification stage.Keywords: Roles and Functions, Pretrial, Criminal Law Enforcement

scholarly journals Pre-Trial in the Criminal Justice System in Military Criminal Judges in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Sugeng Sutrisno
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Court System ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Military

Law enforcement in the Military Court System in the settlement of criminal cases committed by TNI soldiers is seen as not yet fully guaranteeing legal protection for the rights of suspects, this is due to the absence of a control agency that oversees the actions of law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties and authorities as is the case in the system. General Court. This condition should not drag on indefinitely, because it will affect the law enforcement process and harm the suspect to fight for his rights to obtain justice which results in human rights violations (TNI soldiers). The purpose of the establishment of the Pretrial Institution is as stated in the Elucidation of Article 80 of the Criminal Procedure Code which states that this article intends to uphold law, justice, and truth through horizontal supervision. Settlement of criminal cases in Indonesia in addition to the Code of Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) which applies to civil society, we also recognize the existence of the Military Criminal Procedure Code which is regulated in Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Courts, namely the law that regulates the procedure for resolving criminal cases. a criminal case committed by a TNI soldier. The Law on Military Courts includes the provisions of the litigation process (Military Criminal Procedure Law) starting from the investigation stage, submission of cases, the examination process at trial to the implementation of decisions. 31 of 1997 does not regulate pretrial. In several cases in the Military Court where a suspect was detained without a warrant for detention or was late in obtaining a warrant for detention, therefore such actions may conflict with the principles applicable in the provisions of criminal law so that they do not respect the position of the suspect as a creature created by God, even the act can lead to human rights violators. Therefore, in the military justice system in Indonesia, pretrial institutions are needed as a form of horizontal external supervision.

scholarly journals Praperadilan Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-103
Author(s):  
Claudia Permata Dinda ◽  
Usman Usman ◽  
Tri Imam Munandar
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Status ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

ABSTRAK Praperadilan yang diatur dalam KUHAP menjamin perlindungan HAM dan aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugas dan kewenangannya secara konsekwen. Lembaga praperadilan telah menciptakan mekanisme kontrol sebagai lembaga yang berwenang melakukan pengawasan terhadap kinerja aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugasnya guna tercipta proses peradilan pidana yang baik. Terkait dengan penegakan hukum dan pemberantasan korupsi, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi merupakan lembaga yang diamanatkan oleh undang-undang dengan wewenangnya untuk menetapkan status tersangka guna proses penyelidikan dan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan atas penetapan status tersangka terhadap KUHAP dan mengetahui akibat dari perluasan objek praperadilan terhadap penetapan status tersangka tindak pidana korupsi oleh KPK. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Sebelumnya, sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka oleh KPK bukan merupakan objek praperadilan, namun melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 praperadilan telah berwenang memeriksa sah atau tidaknya penetapan status tersangka. Hal ini menjadi sebuah pembaharuan dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. ABSTRACT Pretrial regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code guarantees the protection of human rights and law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties and authorities consistently. The pretrial institution has created a control mechanism as an institution authorized to supervise the performance of law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties in order to create a good criminal justice process.This study aims to determine the effects of the expansion of pretrial objects over the determination of the status of suspects against the Criminal Procedure Code and to determine the consequences of expanding pretrial objects to determine the status of suspected criminal acts of corruption by the KPK. The research method used in writing this thesis is a normative juridical research method through the conceptual approach, the statutory approach and the case approach. Previously, the KPK was not a pretrial object or not, but through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 the pretrial had the authority to examine whether or not the status of the suspect was determined. This has become a renewal in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code.

scholarly journals REFLECTION OF GLOBAL VALUES IN ANTI-TORTURE IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 141-121
Author(s):  
Ibnu Artadi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Human Rights Protection ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Convention Against Torture ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Law

In line with the identity of "rechstaat" and "the rule of law", the law must recognize and guarantee human rights in order to establish a just order, because justice goes hand in hand with the structure of human rights. The realization of the Criminal Procedure Code which functions to protect human rights comprehensively, in line with the demands of the Convention Against Torture, is a basic requirement towards the era of rule of law. So, the purpose of this article is to analyze the quality of the implementation of law enforcement that is not in accordance with the principles of law regarding the behavior of good law enforcement officials. The method used is qualitative with a sociolegal approach. The conclusion of this article is that one of the authority of legislation is its success in adapting to international conventions recognized by the affected people. The Criminal Procedure Code as an integral part of the national law of the Indonesian state law must be in line with Law No. 5 of 1998 concerning the Ratification of the Convention Against Torture. For this reason, looking at the weaknesses of the Criminal Procedure Code, both substantively and in practice, renovating the Criminal Procedure Code is urgent. The lack of perfection of the legal substance of the Criminal Procedure Code in providing human rights protection in a country that acts as a state of law is disastrous. In accordance with the rule of law, the law must recognize and guarantee human rights in order to establish a just order, because justice goes hand in hand with the structure of human rights.

scholarly journals MENINGKATKAN PARIWISATA BALI MELALUI KEPASTIAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM ATAS PELANGGARAN KAWASAN TANPA ROKOK DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH PROPINSI BALI NOMOR 10 TAHUN 2011

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gusti Agung Ngurah Iriandhika Prabhata
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Local Regulation ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Healthy Environment

To obtain a good and healthy environment is a part of human rights, as stated in the constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the global principles of human rights. Tourism in Indonesia held on the principle of upholding human rights, especially Bali which engaged in the tourism sector. In response to the Bali Provincial Government policies governing the protection of human rights to obtain a good and healthy environment, through the Bali Local Regulation No. 10 Year 2011 on No Smoking Area, but the policy can not work effectively due to the lack of certainty in terms of law enforcement that is set in the substance of the local regulation (vagueness of legal norms), as well as penalties for violations that have not been able to provide a deterrent effect. This research uses normative legal research with the rationality that this study will examine the substance of the local regulation of Bali Province perceived No Smoking Area considered as vagueness of legal norm. The approach used to solve the problem is through the statute approach, analitical legal and conceptual approach, as well as the comparative approach to do a comparison of the rules banning smoking in Singapore and Queensland Australia. The results showed that a good alternative No Smoking Area policy in Bali is reforming the Bali Local Regulation by inserting a clear formulation of the law enforcement authorities, as well as the formulation of assertive sanctions to provide a deterrent effect. Through law enforcement certainty No Smoking Area, it will be able to improve the quality of tourism in Bali, especially in terms of Cleanliness Personality and Comfort.

scholarly journals PROHIBITION ON REFUSAL OF THE ATTORNEY ON THE ADVOCATE PROTECTION ESTABLISHED BY PART 7 OF ARTICLE 49 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: PROBLEMS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 104-116
Author(s):  
V. V. Rudich
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Defense Counsel ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The article discusses the question of whether the norms of part 7 of Article 49 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation with an absolute prohibition on the refusal of the defender to defend the interests of the suspect, accused, defendant. The analysis of legal norms, which refutes the position of the absolute prohibition established by part 7 of Article 49 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. A number of exceptions are justified, in which the refusal of the defense counsel from the assumed defense is legitimate. The article draws conclusions and gives recommendations aimed at eliminating the unjustified bringing of lawyers to administrative responsibility by the chambers of law.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DALAM BEBERAPA TINDAK PIDANA DAN PENGADILAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-276
Author(s):  
Suhaimi Suhaimi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Personal Security ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Witness Statements ◽  
Court Proceedings

Abstract, Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code puts witness statements first among other evidence. Witnesses in giving their statements, both at the level of investigation, prosecution and court proceedings, sometimes experience pressure, harassment, threats, terror and even violence perpetrated by certain parties. That is why witnesses need to obtain legal protection, namely as regulated in Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims as amended by Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims. Several criminal acts that regulate the issue of witness protection include the crime of narcotics, the eradication of corruption, the crime of terrorism and the human rights court. Legal protection for witnesses, namely in the form of protection for the witness's personal security from physical and mental threats, so that the confidentiality and identity of the witnesses should be maintained. Witness protection is intended to be able to protect witnesses from interference, threats, terror and violence against witnesses. This will be the basis for legal certainty, law enforcement, justice and the creation of a feeling of security for witnesses.

scholarly journals Application of the principle of proportionality in judicial practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 302-306
Author(s):  
S.E. Fedik
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights

The modern concept of reforming procedural legislation in Ukraine has set before law enforcement and law enforcement agencies a number of tasks for a smooth transition from the normative-act to the precedent method of law enforcement. Moreover, such a position is directly enshrined in the procedural legislation of Ukraine, in particular in Part 4 of Art. 10 of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, which states: - "The Court applies in cases the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 and its protocols, approved by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights as a source of law." [1]. It is this article of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine that the legislator indirectly obliges the judicial authorities of Ukraine to use both norms of international law (represented by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950 and its protocols) and court decisions of the European Court. on human rights, which are expressed in the practice of this court in the consideration of cases by this international judicial institution. The very provision of the above-mentioned article of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine declares the actual transition from the rules of normative-legal procedure of law application to the principles of precedent legal system, where the source of law is not only normative-legal act but also court decision. An important condition for the correct application of a rule of law or a court decision is the correct interpretation of a legal norm, or a whole normative legal act, as well as judicial precedent. Interpretation of legal norms involves a combination of objective and subjective, and depending on the purposes of interpretation in this process, respectively, its two stages are correlated - clarification and explanation. And if the process of interpretation is aimed only at the interpreter's understanding of the content of the legal norm, then clarification is an independent process of cognition. When the goal is to bring the content of the legal norm to third parties, the clarification and explanation are stages (stages) of a single, inseparable process. This process is inherent in all types of legal activity - lawmaking, law enforcement, law enforcement, systematization and legal education, and in a legal society the interpretation of legal norms is a stabilizing factor in the process of regulating social relations, enhances legal norms, strengthens legality, protects human and civil rights [2, P. 5-6].

scholarly journals TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE CONCEPT «PROCEDURAL COSTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS»

Issues of Law ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
S.M. Darovskikh ◽  
◽  
Z.V Makarova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Procedural Costs ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Article 5

The article is devoted to the issues of formulating the definition of such a criminal procedural concept as «procedural costs». Emphasizing the importance both for science and for law enforcement of clarity and clarity when formulating the definition of criminal procedural concepts, the authors point out that the formulation of this concept present in the current Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation is far from being improved. Having studied the opinions on this issue of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, a number of procedural scholars, the authors propose their own version of the definition of the concept of «criminal procedural costs» with its allocation in a separate paragraph of Article 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals SUATU KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM KEJAHATAN CYBER DALAM SISTEM PENEGAKAN HUKUM

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-25
Author(s):  
Ni Made Trisna Dewi,Reido Lardiza Fahrial
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Electronic Evidence ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
Witness Statements ◽  
And Function

Abuse in the electronic transaction because it is formed from an electronic process, so the object changes, the goods become electronic data and the evidence is electronic.  Referring to the provisions of positive law in Indonesia, there are several laws and regulations that have set about electronic evidence as legal evidence before the court but there is still debate between the usefulness and function of the electronic evidence itself, from that background in  The following problems can be formulated, How do law enforcement from investigations, prosecutions to criminal case decisions in cybercrimes and How is the use of electronic evidence in criminal case investigations in cybercrimes This research uses normative research methods that are moving from the existence of norm conflicts between the Criminal Procedure Code and  ITE Law Number 19 Year 2016 in the use of evidence.  The law enforcement process of the investigator, the prosecution until the court's decision cannot run in accordance with the provisions of ITE Law Number 19 of 2016, because in interpreting the use of electronic evidence still refers to Article 184 paragraph (1) KUHAP of the Criminal Procedure Code stated that the evidence used  Legitimate are: witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions and statements of the accused so that the application of the ITE Law cannot be applied effectively The conclusion of this research is that law enforcement using electronic evidence in cyber crime cannot stand alone because the application of the Act  - ITE Law Number 19 Year 2016 still refers to the Criminal Code so that the evidence that is clear before the trial still refers to article 184 paragraph (1) KUHAP of the Criminal Procedure Code and the strength of proof of electronic evidence depends on the law enforcement agencies interpreting it because all electronic evidence is classified into  in evidence in the form of objects as  so there is a need for confidence from the legal apparatus in order to determine the position and truth of the electronic evidence.   Penyalahgunaan didalam transaksi elektronik tersebut karena terbentuk dari suatu proses elektronik, sehingga objeknya pun berubah, barang menjadi data elektronik dan alat buktinya pun bersifat elektronik. Mengacu pada ketentuan hukum positif di Indonesia, ada beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah mengatur mengenai alat bukti elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah di muka pengadilan tetapi tetap masih ada perdebatan antara kegunaan dan fungsi dari alat bukti elektronik itu sendiri, dari latar belakang tersebut di atas dapat dirumuskan masalah sebagai berikut, Bagaimana penegakkan hukum dari penyidikan, penuntutan sampai putusan perkara pidana dalam kejahatan cyber dan Bagaimanakah penggunaan bukti elektronik dalam pemeriksaan perkara pidana dalam kejahatan cyber Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yakni beranjak dari adanya konflik norma antara KUHAP dengan Undang-undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 dalam penggunaan alat bukti. Proses penegakkan hukum dari penyidik, penuntutan sampai pada putusan pengadilan tidak dapat berjalan sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016, karena dalam melakukan penafsiran terhadap penggunaan alat bukti Elektronik masih mengacu pada Pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP disebutkan bahwa alat bukti yang sah adalah: keterangan saksi, keterangan ahli, surat, petunjuk dan keterangan terdakwa. sehingga penerapan Undang-undang ITE tidak dapat diterapkan secara efektiv. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah penegakan hukum dengan menggunakan alat bukti elektronik dalam kejahatan cyber tidak bisa berdiri sendiri karena penerapan Undang-Undang ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tetap merujuk kepada KUHP sehingga alat bukti yang sah di muka persidangan tetap mengacu pada pasal 184 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti elektronik tersebut tergantung dari aparat hukum dalam menafsirkannya karena semua alat bukti elektronik tersebut digolongkan ke dalam alat bukti berupa benda sebagai petunjuk sehingga diperlukan juga keyakinan dari aparat hukum agar bisa menentukan posisi dan kebenaran dari alat bukti elektronik tersebut.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document