scholarly journals Pengaruh Nanofilled Resin Coating terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan Semen Ionomer Kaca

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Michael William Handoko ◽  
Rosalina Tjandrawinata
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Coating Application ◽  
Resin Coating ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Restorative Dental Materials ◽  
Ionomer Cement

One of the restorative dental materials that is continuously developed is Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The aim of this research is to know whether there is influence of nanofilled resin coating application on GIC to reduce surface roughness. In this study GIC type II (EQUIA Forte, GC, Japan) was used to be mechanically manipulated and inserted into a mold which produced a sample of 6.0±0.3 mm in diameter and 3.0±0.2 mm in height. GIC samples were divided into 2 groups namely 10 GIC samples were not coated with nanofilled resin coating as control group and 10 GIC samples were coated with nanofilled resin coating as treatment group. GIC samples were tested immediately and then immersed in sterile distilled water in a 37°C incubator. After 24 hours, GIC samples were surface roughness tested using a Surface Roughness Tester. Then all samples were brushed using a soft bristle mechanical tooth brush for 1 hour. After brushing, the sample is tested for final surface roughness. The results showed an increase in surface roughness in non-coated group/control (0.005 ± 0,328mm) and coated group (0.015±0.240 mm). Statistical data analysis using unpaired t test showed that there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the increasing of surface roughness between control group and treatment group. It can be concluded that application of nanofilled resin coating to GIC cannot reduce the roughness of GIC surface.

scholarly journals Effects of ionizing radiation on surface properties of current restorative dental materials

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Débora Michelle Gonçalves de Amorim ◽  
Aretha Heitor Veríssimo ◽  
Anne Kaline Claudino Ribeiro ◽  
Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e Souza ◽  
Isauremi Vieira de Assunção ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Surface Properties ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Post Radiation ◽  
Restorative Dental Materials ◽  
Ionomer Cement

AbstractTo investigate the impact of radiotherapy on surface properties of restorative dental materials. A conventional resin composite—CRC (Aura Enamel), a bulk-fill resin composite—BFRC (Aura Bulk-fill), a conventional glass ionomer cement—CGIC (Riva self cure), and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement—RMGIC (Riva light cure) were tested. Forty disc-shaped samples from each material (8 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) (n = 10) were produced according to manufacturer directions and then stored in water distilled for 24 h. Surface wettability (water contact angle), Vickers microhardness, and micromorphology through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after exposition to ionizing radiation (60 Gy) were obtained. The data were statistically evaluated using the two-way ANOVA and Tukey posthoc test (p < 0.05). Baseline and post-radiation values of contact angles were statistically similar for CRC, BFRC, and RMGIC, whilst post-radiation values of contact angles were statistically lower than baseline ones for CGIC. Exposition to ionizing radiation statistically increased the microhardness of CRC, and statistically decreased the microhardness of CGIC. The surface micromorphology of all materials was changed post-radiation. Exposure to ionizing radiation negatively affected the conventional glass ionomer tested, while did not alter or improved surface properties testing of the resin composites and the resin-modified glass ionomer cement tested.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Penambahan Hidroksiapatit dari Cangkang Telur Ayam Terhadap Kekerasan Permukaan GIC

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Putri Ajri Mawadara ◽  
Martha Mozartha ◽  
Trisnawaty K
Keyword(s):  
Dental Materials ◽  
Surface Hardness ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
System A ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Calcium Source ◽  
Chicken Eggshell ◽  
Restorative Dental Materials ◽  
Experimental Group

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a bioceramic with excellentbiocompatible properties, and composition and crystal structure similar to apatite in the human dental structure and skeletal system. A number of researchers have attempted to evaluate the effect of the addition of HA powders to increasemechanical properties of restorative dental materials. In this study, HA was synthesized using chicken eggshell as calcium source for synthesizing HA by using precipitation technique. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of incorporation of eggshell-derived HA on the surface  hardness GIC (Fuji IX GP). Specimens were divided into two groups: group GIC without incorporation of HA as control group (n = 16) and group GIC with incorporation of 5% HA as experimental group (n = 16). Total of specimens were 32 cylinders 5mm diameter and 2mm height. Surface hardness GIC was measured with vickers microhardness tester. Data wasanalyzed by unpaired T-test. The mean of surface hardness for GIC control group was 51.37 ± 1,63VHN and the experimental group was 56.60 ± 1,22HVN. The results T-test showed a significant difference between groups (p<0.05). It can be concluded thatincorporation of eggshell-derivedHA could increasesurface hardness of GIC.

In Vitro Effect of Simulated Tooth Brushing and Children’s Mouth Rinses on Physical Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-347
Author(s):  
Natyla ML Silva ◽  
Victor G Costa ◽  
Letícia M Gonçalves ◽  
Isabella A Gomes ◽  
Marco Aurélio B Paschoal
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Tooth Brushing ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Vitro Effect ◽  
Dependent Samples ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objective: The present study investigated the erosive potential of children’s mouthrinses on glass ionomer cement (GIC) samples after simulated toothbrushing. Study design: Forty round-shaped samples of GIC were divided into 3 groups: G1- cetylpyridinium chloride, G2- xylitol and triclosan and G3–Malva sylvestris and xylitol and G4–distilled water as a control group. Prior to the main tests, the samples were submitted to the surface roughness measurement (Ra) and weight analysis (W). Afterward, they were brushed twice day (2× / day) for 15 days and immersed in mouthrinses after the last daily brushing. The final surface roughness (R2) and weight (W2) were determined after completing the tooth brushing-mouth rinsing cycles and the real increase in roughness (ΔRa) and real weight loss (ΔW) were calculated. In addition, stereoscopic images taken at 30× magnification. The data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey-test post hoc tests for intergroup comparison and the T-test for dependent samples (α = 0.05). Results: Only group G2 showed increased in roughness ΔRa (1.53 ± 0.94) whereas ΔW values were not significant. However, evident cracks and voids were verified for all tested children’s rinses. Conclusion: Thus, children’s mouthrinse containing xylitol / triclosan increased the GIC roughness, especially when associated with brushing.

Antibacterial Activity of Triclosan Incorporated Glass Ionomer Cements – An in vitro Pilot Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajad Sainulabdeen ◽  
Prasanna Neelakantan ◽  
Sindhu Ramesh ◽  
CV Subbarao
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Activity ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cement impregnated with different concentrations (0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5%) of a non releasing bactericide –Triclosan (TC) against two common cariogenic bacteria – Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus mutans; and to compare Triclosan incorporated GIC with chlorhexidine (CHX) incorporated GIC (2.5%)in terms of antibacterial activity. Methods: Chlorhexidine or Triclosan were added to glass ionomer cement powder to achieve 2.5% CHX – GIC (positive control – Group II), 0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5% TC-GIC (experimental groups III, IV and V respectively) formulations. Restorative glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GC –Group I) served as negative control. The powder and liquid were mixed and inserted into the wells punched in agar plates (10mm × 4mm). The agar diffusion method was used to determine the antibacterial activity of the cements after 1, 7 and 30 days. Mean values were compared between different study groups using One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD procedure at a significance level of 5%. Results: Triclosan incorporated GIC was more effective against L.acidophilus and S.mutans than Chlorhexidine incorporated GIC. Triclosan at a concentration of 2.5% was more effective than at lower concentrations. At all time periods studied, the maximum zone of inhibition against L.acidophilus was produced by Group V. Against S.mutans, on days 1,7 and 30, there was no significant difference between Groups II and IV (p&gt;0.05), while the other groups showed significant differences. Conclusion: The use of triclosan as an antibacterial additive in GIC holds promise and further clinical research is needed in this direction.

scholarly journals Mechanical resistance of restored teeth with extensive crown damage

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-77
Author(s):  
Ivan Sarcev ◽  
Branislava Petronijevic ◽  
Dubravka Markovic ◽  
Srecko Selakovic
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Dental Amalgam ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fracture Force ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maxillary Premolars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Introduction. Extensively damaged teeth can be restored by different core build-up materials. The aim of this study was to examine the mechanical properties of the restored maxillary premolars with composite resin, dental amalgam and glass ionomer cement (GIC) using compressive strength test. Materials and methods. Forty extracted intact human maxillary premolars were used in this study. Artificial defect in dentin was prepared using diamond bur up to the half of the anatomic crown of the tooth. After core build-up procedure, each tooth specimen was mounted in auto polymerizing acrylic resin blocks 2 mm below cement enamel junction and they were kept in distilled water at 37?C one day before testing. Then, they were placed in specially adapted devices at the angle of 183? to the longitudinal axis and subjected to a controlled load of 1 mm per minute. Results. Results showed that the best mechanical properties had samples restored with resin composite (492.5 N), then with amalgam (341.2 N) and glass ionomer cement (171.8 N). Comparing the fracture force using ANOVA, there was statistic significance between these groups (p<0.01). There were significant differences among control group and restored teeth with composite resin, amalgam and GIC. There was no significant difference in values of fracture forces between groups with composite resin and amalgam. The fracture force corresponding to the teeth restored with the GICs was significantly lower compared to the control group and the group with composite resin and amalgam. Conclusion. Satisfactory mechanical properties of restored premolars were obtained using composite resin and dental amalgam as a core build-up material.

scholarly journals Effect of Resin Coating on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of High Viscous Glass Ionomer Cements

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-221
Author(s):  
Lee Jian Sheng ◽  
Chan Wen Ni ◽  
Noor Azlin Yahya ◽  
Ros Anita Omar
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Citric Acid ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Water Solution ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Sem Analysis ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Coating Application ◽  
Resin Coating

High viscous glass ionomer cement (HVGIC) was recently developed for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). However, its moisture sensitivity remains a limitation thus protective coating application is recommended. This study investigated the effect of resin coating on the surface roughness and microhardness of two HVGICs (Riva Self Cure HVGIC [RV] and Equia® Forte Fil [EQ]) conditioned in food-simulating liquids (FSLs). Fifty standard disc-shaped samples were fabricated using customised stainless-steel mould (10 × 2 mm). Coating was applied on top surface of all samples and subsequently divided into five groups: air (control), distilled water, 0.02 N citric acid, heptane and 50% ethanol-water solution. The samples were conditioned in FSLs at 37°C for seven days. Subsequently, the surface roughness and microhardness of samples were measured using optical profilometry and microhardness tester, respectively. SEM analysis was done for qualitative observation of surface morphological changes. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and posthoc Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Interestingly, the results revealed that surface roughness was significantly influenced by FSLs immersion, presence of coating and the materials itself (p < 0.001). The lowest surface roughness was found on control coated samples: RV (50.98±4.25) nm and EQ (62.77±3.92) nm, while the highest values seen on uncoated surfaces in citric acid: RV (505.26±31.10) nm and EQ (350.33±15.36) nm. RV samples had the lowest microhardness of 54.97±2.48 Vickers hardness number (VHN) post-immersion in citric acid. In conclusion, with the exception of RV conditioned in heptane and ethanol, the uncoated HVGICs generally had higher surface roughness than the coated HVGICs. HVGICs conditioned in citric acid showed the most significant increase in surface roughness and reduction in microhardness.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Obat Kumur Beralkohol terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan Semen Ionomer Kaca Konvensional

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Astrid Yudith
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Dental Restoration ◽  
Initial Surface ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Roughness Measurements

Surface roughness is one of the important properties to determine the aesthetic and long-term durability of a dental restoration materials such as glass ionomer cements. In the oral cavity, the intervention of food, drink or other materials such as mouthwash can affect the properties of restorative materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of alcohol containing mouthwash to the surface roughness of conventional glass ionomer cement. This was an experimental laboratory study with time-series design. Samples were conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX, GC, Japan) in disk shaped with 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick. Totally 10 samples were made and measured the initial surface roughness. Then the samples were stored in the alcohol containing mouthwash (Listerine® Cool Mint, Johnson & Johnson, Indonesia) for 30 seconds and measured the surface roughness again. The treatment and surface roughness measurements of samples is repeated up to 2 times for data 60 and 90 seconds. Roughness measurements made using profilometer tester (Mitutoyo, Japan). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (p=0,05) post hoc LSD. The results showed the average value of surface roughness of glass ionomer cements early, after soaking 30, 60, and 90 seconds of 0.56 ± 0.11 µm, 0.71 µm ± 0.23, 0.96 ± 0.16 µm and 1.02 ± 0.13 µm. Data analysis shows the difference in surface roughness values   were significantly (p <0.05) between groups immersion and significant difference was found between groups of 30 seconds to 60 seconds and a group of 60 seconds to 90 seconds. The conclusion that there  is influence of alcoholic mouthwash to the surface roughness  of glass ionomer cement and the longer the soaking time with a mouthwash that contains alcohol, the surface roughness of glass ionomer cement will increase.

Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Surface Hardness after Addition of 5% Silica from Sea Sand

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
Pocut Aya Sofya ◽  
Liana Rahmayani ◽  
Apriliadi Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Surface Hardness ◽  
High Hardness ◽  
Silica Content ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Hardness Tester ◽  
Sea Sand ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is a restorative material that can release flour so as to prevent further caries, biocompatible, translucent, and anti-bacterial, low tensile strength, GIC has limitations that is short working time and cannot be used in areas of teeth that have large masticatory pressure, susceptible to fracture toughness. The addition of silica in GIC is one aspect that needs to be considered because silica has high hardness properties. The source of silica can be synthesized from sea sand which has a silica content of about 98%. This study aims to determine the difference in surface hardness from conventional GIC and GIC by the addition of 5% silica from sea sand. Cylinder-shaped specimens with a diameter of 5 mm and height of 2 mm, totaling 10 specimens, namely 5 conventional type II GIC specimens (control group) and 5 conventional GIC specimens with the addition of silica from sea sand (treatment group). Vickers Hardness Tester is used to measure the value of hardness. Data were analyzed using SPSS with unpaired t test. The results of the data show that there was no significant difference (p> 0.05) between the surface hardness of conventional GIC and GIC with the addition of silica from sea sand.

scholarly journals The effects of chitosan addition to glass ionomer cement on microhardness and surface roughness

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 228080002198970
Author(s):  
Koray Soygun ◽  
Arzu Soygun ◽  
Muharrem Cem Dogan
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Gastric Acid ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Optical Profilometer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the surface microhardness and roughness properties of a modified glass ionomer cement formed by adding different ratios of Chitosan, when exposed to saliva and acid erosive gastric acid cycle environments. Methods: Chitosan was added to conventional glass ionomer liquid at volumes of 5% and 10%. The chitosan-modified glass ionomer was used for the experimental group, and traditional glass ionomer formed the control group. All the groups were separated into two subgroups. One of these subgroups was subjected to a gastric acid erosive cycle. The other subgroup was immersed in artificial saliva. Microhardness, surface roughness with optical profilometer and AFM measurements of all the samples were taken. Qualitative surface topographic evaluations were made using a SEM. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U-test for pairwise comparisons of the groups at the 0.05 level of significance. Results: The addition of chitosan to GIC had a positive effect on the microhardness values. The gastric acid erosive cycle application negatively affected the microhardness and surface roughness properties of the sample groups. Conclusion: The chitosan-modified glass ionomer cement samples showed clinically acceptable surface roughness values. Although the results of the addition of the biopolymer, chitosan, to GIC are promising, there is a need for further in-vivo studies.

Effects of Audience Response Systems on Student Achievement and Long-Term Retention

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1431-1439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selcuk Karaman
Keyword(s):  
Academic Success ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Audience Response ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Audience Response Systems ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Response Systems

The effects of audience response systems (ARS) on students' academic success and their perceptions of ARS were examined in this study. Participants, comprising 44 undergraduate students, were randomly assigned to a control or treatment group. The course design was the same for both groups and the instructor prepared the multiple-choice questions in advance; students in the control group responded to these questions verbally whereas the treatment group used ARS. Two paper-based examinations were used to measure the learning of concepts and skills that were taught. Students' perceptions of ARS were collected via a questionnaire. Results showed that ARS usage has a significant learning achievement effect in the first 4 weeks but not at the end of the second 4 weeks. There was no significant difference in retention between either group. Students perceived the ARS tool positively, finding it very enjoyable and useful.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document