scholarly journals KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI PARA PIHAK PEMEGANG SURAT TANDA BUKTI ATAS TANAH BERUPA SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK DITINJAU DARI HUKUM AGRARIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 2028-2047
Author(s):  
Naufal Muhammad ◽  
Rio Armanda Agustian ◽  
Reko Dwi Salfutra

Verdict Sungailiat Court Number 03/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Sgt in the verdict has stated the defendant (Feng Jung) has committed acts againts the law by certifying a plot of land to a National Land Agency of Bangka Regency on the Right Certificate Number 2305 was issued by the National Land Agency if Bangka Regency in 2003, but was sued by the plaintiff (Tjong Ana) in 2012. The results of research, Paragraph 32 Sentence 2 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 have been fulfilled by defendant in conducting process of land registration of Certificate of Property Number 2305 so that this provision is absolutely to run and about absolute authority to run about absolute authority of judge, that a judge of a Public Court is not authorized to declare a Certificate of Property Number 2305 has no legal force, and certificate that is a powerful evidentiary tool has become an absolute if element of Paragraph 32 Sentence 2 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1977 has been fulfilled.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
Bambang Tri Wahyudi ◽  
Rachmad Safa’at

This study aimed to analyze the legal force, legal conflicts, and legal consequences of the provisions of Article 33 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 and the formulation that was appropriate with the regulations of the payment procedures for income tax (PPh) and acquisition duty of right on land and building (BPHTB). This study used a normative juridical method with a conceptual and statute approach. Based on academic juridical perspective, article 33 Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 had weak legal force, while from a formal juridical perspective the regulation remained valid before a decision to cancel its application from the Supreme Court. The provisions of Article 33 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 contradicted the provisions of Articles 3 and 7 of Government Regulation Number 34 of 2018 and Articles 90 and 91 of Law Number 28 of 2009. It caused legal consequences i.e. legal uncertainty, legal injustice, and did not fulfill the legal force of land rights certificates as a strong means of proof. The formulation of the right regulation regarding the procedure for paying income tax and fees for acquiring land and building rights was carried out by establishing and stipulating a ministerial regulation as a normative guideline for a complete systematic land registration program.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-163
Author(s):  
Fery Irwanda

Pasal 3 PP 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah menyebutkan pendaftaran tanah bertujuan untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang hak atas suatu bidang tanah. Terbitnya  sertifikat Hak Milik atas tanah Jailani Yusuf cs yang merupakan objek sengketa, telah diputus berdasarkan Putusan Kasasi No.633 K/Pdt/2006. Permohonan pendaftaran hak yang diajukan oleh Abdullah Ibrahim dan Cut Ben Ibrahim ke Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Aceh Besar tanpa memberitahukan adanya Putusan Kasasi, sehingga melahirkan sertifikat yang subjek hukumnya tidak sesuai dengan Putusan Kasasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan, mengetahui pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah yang melahirkan Sertifikat hak atas tanah yang subjek hukumnya tidak sesuai dengan Putusan Kasasi dan tanggung jawab Kantor Pertanahan atas  penerbitan sertifikat untuk atas pihak yang tidak berhak berdasarkan putusan pengadilan. Jenis Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan meneliti keberlakuan hukum itu dalam kenyataan atau dalam masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dalam pelaksanaan Pendaftaran tanah yang melahirkan Sertifikat No.11, 12 dan 21, 22, 23/2015 terdapat cacat hukum administratif yang disebabkan kesalahan subyek dan/atau obyek hak, karena di atas tanah yang diterbitkan sertifikat telah ada Putusan Kasasi. Akibatnya pihak yang mendaftarkan tanah bertanggung jawab secara hukum dan Kantor Pertanahan bertanggung jawab secara administratif.Article 3 of the Government Regulation Number 24, 1997 on Land Registration states that a land registration aiming to provide law certainty and law protection on land right holder over the land. The issuance on of the land certificate of Jailani Yusuf et.al is a dispute object; it has been decided based on Judicial Review Number 633 K/Pdt/2006. The application on the right registration that is proposed by Abdullah Ibrahim and Cut Ben Ibrahim to Land Authority Office of Aceh Besar without providing the review, hence it results in certificate issuance that the law subject is not based on the decision. This research aims to know the implementation of land registration in the making process of certificate that its legal subject is not based on the court decision, responsibility of land office of the change of certificate issuance for party that is no having right based on the court decision. This is juridical empirical research by exploring the law application into society. The research shows that in the implementation of land registration in making process of Certificates Numbers: 11, 12 and 21, 22, 23/2015 has administrative law lack caused by subject fault and/or object of right, as on the land certificate issued has been reviewed by the Supreme Court. The impact on parties registering their land is legally responsible and the Land Authority Office is administrative legally responsible.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmat Ramadhani

The product of the land registration process is a certificate of title granted to the right holder. The certificate according to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 is in the form of one sheet of documents containing information about the juridical data and physical data required on a parcel of registered land. Although the certificate of land rights is referred to as the strongest evidence but in reality the certificate of land rights has not fully guaranteed legal certainty. This is because the law still opens loopholes for other legal subjects to question it both personally and in groups within the judiciary. In order to ensure legal certainty of a right to land for the right holder, the certificate of land rights must be tested in three aspects: relating to; Legal Certainty of Object, Legal Certainty of Status of Rights and Legal Certainty on Subject.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-107
Author(s):  
Dwi Susiati ◽  
Sri Setiadji

Abrasion is a natural disaster that results in the owner of the right to land losing the right to control, use or take advantage of the land, because the land is lost in part or in whole due to erosion by water. Article 27 of the Law On Agraria determines that property rights over land are destroyed if the land is destroyed. In this study, the author will analyze the legal status of property of land affected by abrasion with the formulation of the problem What is the legal status of property rights on land affected by abrasion according to Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and how to guarantee the protection of affected land rights abrasion. The results of this study are that the status of land rights affected by abrasion is abolished, both in the provisions of the Law On Agraria and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration because it is no longer compatible with physical data or juridical data as a strong evidence. The government has an obligation to provide guarantees and protection of rights to land affected by abrasion and those that have been affected by abrasion in part or in whole. On the basis of the state's right to control Article 2 of the Law On Agraria the state has the right to regulate land use, inventory, and maintenance to prevent and reduce the impact of abrasion on its citizens. The government can also provide compensation as contained in Article Number 24 of 2007 concerning Disaster Management which determines that the Government and regional governments are responsible for the implementation of disaster management.Abrasi merupakan bencana alam yang mengakibatkan pemilik hak atas tanah kehilangan hak untuk menguasai, menggunakan, atau mengambil manfaat atas tanah, karena tanah tersebut hilang sebagian atau seluruhnya akibat pengikisan oleh air. Pasal 27 UUPA menentukan hak milik atas tanah hapus, apabila tanahnya musnah. Pada penelitian ini, penulis akan menganalisa tentang status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi dengan rumusan masalah Bagaimana status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi menurut PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah  dan bagaimana jaminan perlindungan hak-hak tanah yang terdampak abrasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa status hak atas tanah yang terkena abrasi adalah hapus, baik dalam ketentuan UUPA maupun PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah karena tidak sesuai lagi dengan data fisik maupun data yuridis sebagai alat bukti yang kuat. Pemerintah mempunyai kewajiban untuk memberikan jaminan dan perlindungan hak-hak atas tanah yang terdampak abrasi maupun yang sudah terkena abrasi baik sebagian maupun seluruh tanahnya. Atas dasar hak menguasai oleh negara Pasal 2 UUPA negara berhak mengatur peruntukan, penggunaan, persediaan,dan pemeliharaan tanah untuk mencegah dan mengurangi dampak abrasi bagi warga negaranya. Pemerintah juga dapat memberikan ganti kerugian sebagaimana yang ada di dalam UU No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana yang menentukan bahwa Pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah menjadi penanggung jawab dalam penyelenggaraan penang-gulangan bencana.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp


Rechtsidee ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hariansi Panimba Sampebulu

The position of women in legal construction in Indonesia today is still difficult to adjust to the circumstances that occur, especially in terms of equality issues. The abortion that has been a problem for so long time, being discussed because of the rules that are considered not in accordance with the existing rules, and the amount of pressure from various things. Law and Women are always placed in objects that are not neutral, especially in terms of discussing reproductive health. The government and legislation feel that they have a stake in integrating reproductive health owned by women. It is the position of women in the law that gives rise to many struggle movements and the diffusion of feminism in Indonesia. The rules of Article 31 paragraph 1 and 2 of Government Regulation Number 61 of 2014 which regulate safe abortion need to be more attention and safeguarded, so that a woman has the right to be based on herself. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-383
Author(s):  
I Komang Edy Susanto ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti

Basically, notaries also serve as Land Deed Making Official (hereafter called PPAT) after they carry out a test. Thus, in carrying out their role as PPAT, they are entitled to make deeds of transferring land rights. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the position of the notary and PPAT in transferring land rights and how legal protection for parties who transfer land through sale and purchase. The research method used in this research was a normative legal method. The results of this study indicated that the position of a notary in the transfer of land rights as an official deed maker is mentioned in article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 2/2014 concerning the Position of Notary, which states that a notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other Prevailing Laws. The position of the PPAT in essence has the task of carrying out land registration by making deeds as evidence and having carried out certain legal actions regarding land rights. Legal protection for parties transferring land through sale and purchase is stated in the 1945 Constitution, namely Article 27 paragraph (1) which states that each person has the right to recognition, guarantee, protection, and legal certainty that is just and equal treatment before the law.


Author(s):  
Hilman Hilman ◽  
Lalu Wira Pria Suhartana

The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of issuance of substitute certificates and legal implications. Factors influencing the issuance of the replacement certificate because the certificate was lost and because the certificate was damaged, and the certificate still used the old certificate and the legal implications of issuing a substitute certificate.The sources of data found in this study are from interviews with the Head of the Land Law Relations Section of the North Lombok National Land Agency Office, the Head of the Land Registration Subsection of the North Lombok Regency National Land Agency and the Ganges Sector Police of North Lombok Regency.The results showed that the issuance of the Substitute Certificate and Legal Implications consisted of three stages, namely, the preparation stage of the applicant, the registration stage, the implementation stage of the certificate of replacement by the Office of the North Lombok National Land Agency. Legal implications arising from the issuance of a replacement certificate in the event of a violation of land rights can carry out prosecution of the violator based on their rights in accordance with Article 32 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration that the certificate is a strong and legal certificate. but if there is another party who feels they have the right to the land, then they may submit a written objection to the holder of the certificate and the National Land Agency or submit a complaint to the Court regarding land ownership or issuance of the certificate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alur Anzarwati Sekoningtias ◽  
Nynda Fatmawati Octarina

Land is an important thing in the life of the Indonesian nation. One way to obtain land is through buying and selling. Sale and purchase of land rights as set forth in Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. the fulfillment of all requirements relating to the sale and purchase in the presence of a notary then found a legal breakthrough and up to now still be done in the practice of buying and selling land that is made with the deed of binding sale and purchase agreement (PPJB) although the contents have been set about the sale and purchase of land but the new format limited binding of sale and purchase is a form of agreement which is or can be regarded as preliminary agreement. This study is a type of normative legal research ie research where in which researchers review the study documents that use various secondary data such as judicial decision legislation, legal theory. Based on the results of research First Characteristics of land sale and purchase agreement with the status of petok D following the general provisions of the law of agreement as set forth in Article 1457 of the Civil Code. It's just that the object of sale and purchase of land with the status of petok D, then apply the procedure agreement by using provisions that are more specific that is based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on land registration. Second The effect of the law on the parties if one party has defaulted in the binding of the land sale and purchase agreement with the status of petok D according to the Civil Code is canceled so that it is made based on Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 due to the seller can not fulfill its obligation.  Keywords : Sale and purchase land of petok D, binding sale and purchase agreement.          ABSTRAK Tanah adalah hal yang penting dalam kehidupan bangsa Indonesia. Salah  satu cara memperoleh tanah adalah melalui jual beli. Jual beli hak atas tanah seperti yang telah diatur dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.pemenuhan terhadap semua persyaratan yang berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan jual beli di hadapan notaris maka ditemukan suatu terobosan hukum dan hingga kini masih dilakukan dalam praktek jual beli tanah yaitu dengan dibuatnya akta pengikatan perjanjian jual beli (PPJB) meskipun isinya sudah mengatur tentang jual beli tanah namun formatnya baru sebatas pengikatan jual beli yaitu suatu bentuk perjanjian yang merupakan atau dapat dikatakan sebagai perjanjian pendahuluan. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif yakni penelitian dimana didalamnya peneliti mengkaji studi dokumen yakni menggunakan berbagai data sekunder seperti perundang-undangan keputusan pengadilan, teori hukum. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian PertamaKarakteristik perjanjian jual beli tanah yang berstatus petok D mengikuti ketentuan umum hukum perjanjian sebagaimana yang telah diatur didalam Pasal 1457 KUHPerdata. Hanya saja obyek jual beli tanah berstatus petok D maka diberlakukan tata cara perjanjian dengan menggunakan ketentuan yang sifatnya lebih khusus yaitu berpedoman pada Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 tahun 1997 tentang pendaftaran tanah.Kedua Akibat hukum terhadap para pihak apabila salah satu pihak melakukan wanprestasi dalam pengikatan perjanjian jual beli tanah yang berstatus petok D menurut KUHPerdata dibatalkan sehingga yang dibuat berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 tahun 1997 akibat penjual tidak dapat memenuhi kewajibannya.Kata Kunci : Jual beli tanah petok D, Perjanjian Pengikatan jual beli.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Rafiqi Rafiqi

<h1>"Grant Sultan" land certificate is not the basis of rights. The certificate only explained that the land was Grant Sultan's previous right. The Sultan Grant Certificate is a guide for the National Land Agency to see the basis for land ownership. In accordance with the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) No. 5/1960, land that is certified by Grant Sultan will be converted to land, either direct or indirect conversion, further consideration and assessment needs to be done. From the background of this writing the problem is formulated How Legal Certainty Land Registration holders of Grant Sultan Land in Deli Malay Customary Community, how Grant Sultan Land in Deli Malay society is seen from Positivistic Theory The research method used in this writing is a regulatory approach and concept. Legal Certainty Land Registration of Grant Sultan Land holders in the Deli Malay Customary community if seen from the positivistic school of thought that Grant Sultan's land must be registered by Grant Sultan holders to ensure legal certainty. Grant Sultan's land in the Deli Malay community is seen from the Positivistic Theory. According to the Pound the law is a Social Engineering conflict with interests compared to the others. From positivistic theory Grant holders must immediately register Grant land in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.</h1>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document