Comparative Analysis of the Algorithm for Calculating the h-Index and Its Modifications

Introduction. The article presents a comparative analysis of existing algorithms for calculating the h-index and a number of its modifications that use the same basic idea or make use of its algorithm as the starting point. What makes the study relevant is the significant demand for a better approach to assessing the publication activity of researchers over the existing h-index algorithm. Methods. The study looks at the following 7 indexes that assess a researcher’s scientific output: h-index; g-index (by Leo Egghe); j-index (the Mikhailov index); gh-index; hp-index; ghp-index; w-index. The main method used in the study is analysis; other formal logic methods that were also used in the study include synthesis, classification, deduction, and induction. Results and Discussion. The quantitative and qualitative indicators proposed in the article were used to carry out the compar-ative analysis of the algorithms behind all of the aforementioned indexes. One common feature of all these algorithms is that they all rely on the basic h-index procedure, while the difference is the degree to which each index takes into account all the publications and citations of a specific researcher. It was established that only the algorithms used in the gh-, hp-, and ghp-indexes take into account the entire set of a given author’s publications. Meanwhile, the gh-index should best be regarded as an index of basic publications (it establishes the significance of the researcher’s publications), while the hp-index is best viewed as a measure of the intensity of the researcher’s work. As far as the ghp-index is concerned, it should only be used in situations in which the gh- or hp-indexes produce the same results. Amongst the algorithms for all the indexes reviewed in the article, the ones that best reflect a researcher’s achievements are the gh-, hp-, and ghp-indexes, but they are somewhat more complex than the h-, g- и j-indexes. Conclusion. The analysis we carried out should make it possible to select the best algorithm depending on the complexity of the distribution of citations of published papers in order to achieve the desired level of assessment of a researcher’s publications.

Download Full-text

Java GUI application for comparing the levels of biometric security: Fingerprint vs. Iris

Vojnotehnicki glasnik ◽

10.5937/vojtehg69-32007 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 69 (3) ◽

pp. 676-686

Author(s):

Komlen Lalović ◽

Mitko Bogdanoski

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

Iris Recognition ◽

Scientific Data ◽

Body Parts ◽

Main Method ◽

Software Application ◽

Java Programming ◽

Advantages And Disadvantages ◽

Iris Biometrics ◽

The Difference

Introduction/purpose: The main purpose of this paper is to present a novel Java GUI - based software application for a comparative analysis of fingerprint and iris biometrics. Methods: The first part of this work is realized in Java Programming language. in the GUI framework named swing while the rest of the paper shows in detail the advantages and disadvantages of both systems and gives scientific data on when fingerprint and iris recognition can be used to enable top level security. The main method here is a well known comparative analysis. Results: The results were obtained for both fingerprint and iris biometrics, showing the difference between the two. Conclusion: Different types of biometrics, based on body parts formed at different age, are given as well as the comparison of their security levels.

Download Full-text

International Records Management and Archives Terminology Systems Standardized by ISO and IEC

Atlanti ◽

10.33700/2670-451x.28.2.99-109(2018) ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 28 (2) ◽

pp. 99-109

Author(s):

Luidmila N. Varlamova

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

International Organizations ◽

International Standards ◽

Records Management ◽

Main Method ◽

Fully Integrated ◽

The Difference ◽

And Storage

Nowadays terminology issues are getting more and more important due to the introduction of informational technologies into all professional areas including records and archives management. But are the terminological systems used in records management, archives and IT well coordinated? There are international organizations on standardization (e.g. ISO and IEC) which are responsible for the compatibility of international terminology through developing international standards. This article presents the results of our research into the main ISO and IEC standards (e.g. ISO 5127-2017, ISO 15489-2016) used in records and archives management and IT in terms of compatibility of standardized international terminology in these spheres. The main method of our research was the comparative analysis of various definitions of the same terms given in international standards created for experts in the above mentioned areas. Understanding the difference between the «data», «document», «record» is very important for choosing the ways of the protection and storage of the actual objects denoted by these terms. The research has shown that it is too early to speak about the compatibility of terminological systems even used in such close areas as records management and archives. The same is actual for IT terminology when it penetrates these spheres. Yet their terminological systems do not seem fully integrated even in ISO and IEC standards elaborated for these professional areas. However, it will be practically impossible to develop these spheres without coordinating their terminological systems. ISO and IEC standards might be real tools for solving this problem but they are still not appropriately used.

Download Full-text

The Discourse of The Qur'anic Metaphors: The Embryo of Theological Sects Disputes in Comprehending the Holy Qur'an

ESENSIA Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin ◽

10.14421/esensia.v22i1.2705 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 45

Author(s):

Ahmad Atabik

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

Qualitative Approach ◽

Analysis Method ◽

Human Power ◽

Origin Of Language ◽

Library Research ◽

Starting Point ◽

Human Creativity ◽

The Difference ◽

Language Styles

This article aims to examine problems related to metaphors (majāz) found in the Qur’an which were debated by scholars of Arabic literatures during the classic times. Majāz, opposed to ḥaqīqah, is a part of the Qur'an language styles which triggers theological debates among its supporters. This article used a qualitative approach, through library research, with a comprehensive and comparative analysis method among supporters of theological sects in understanding the problems of majāz in the Qur'an. The results of this study indicated that the debates on the issue raises three opinions in theological sects; Firstly, the Ẓahirī and Salafi sects reject the existence of majāz in the Qur'an. They refuse the interpretations of things that are not standardized in the text of the Qur'an. Secondly, the Mu'tazilah sect is exaggerated in accepting majāz and attacking other theological sects that are inconsistent with their interpretations of the text. Thirdly, the Ash’arī sect which is more moderate in confirming majāz. The starting point of their debates over majāz in the Qur'an is the difference in analysis and conclusions about the origin of language. The Ẓahirī and Salafi groups conclude that language is solely a gift from God, so there should be no change in terms of meaning. The Mu'tazilah believes that language is an invention and human power, that’s why a word may have more than one meaning. Whilst, the Ash’arī argues that language is indeed a human creativity, but it cannot be denied that God also plays a role in giving human abilities, so there are other possible meanings of a word

Download Full-text

Comparative analysis of publication activity and citation of Russian scientists in the separate scientific fields of knowledge according to the Russian science citation index and WOS CC

Information and Innovations ◽

10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-1-22-27 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 22-27 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

V. V. Arutyunov ◽

◽

Valentina A. Tsvetkova ◽

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

Science Citation Index ◽

Citation Index ◽

Science Citation ◽

Publication Activity ◽

Russian Science ◽

Russian Science Citation Index ◽

Scientific Fields

Download Full-text

FINANCIAL CONTROLLING IN THE SYSTEM OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Knowledge International Journal ◽

10.35120/kij2801137y ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 28 (1) ◽

pp. 137-141

Author(s):

Petya Yordanova – Dinova

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

Financial Management ◽

Financial Stability ◽

Business Environment ◽

Innovative Approach ◽

Financial Sustainability ◽

The Common ◽

The Difference ◽

Effective Use ◽

And Control

This paper explores the comparative analysis of the financial controlling, who is a result from the common controlling concept and the financial management. In the specialized literature, financial controlling is seen as an innovative approach to financial management. It is often presented as the most promising instrument of financial diagnostics. Generally speaking, financial controlling is seen as a process of managing the company`s assets which are valued in monetary measures. The difference between the financial management and the financial controlling is that the second covers all functions of management, analysis and control of finances, aiming at maximizing their effective use and increasing the value of the enterprise. Financial controlling is often seen as a function of the common practice of financial management. Its objective is to preserve the financial stability and financial sustainability of enterprises operating in a highly aggressive business environment.

Download Full-text

Comparative Analysis of Kazakhstani and European Design Specifications: Raft Foundation, Pile Foundation, and Piled Raft Foundation

Applied Sciences ◽

10.3390/app11073099 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (7) ◽

pp. 3099

Author(s):

Assel Zhanabayeva ◽

Nazerke Sagidullina ◽

Jong Kim ◽

Alfrendo Satyanaga ◽

Deuckhang Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

International Standards ◽

Piled Raft ◽

Codes Of Practice ◽

Piled Raft Foundation ◽

Raft Foundation ◽

Eurocode 7 ◽

Elastic Settlement ◽

Geotechnical Design ◽

The Difference

The introduction of Eurocode in Kazakhstan allows for the application of modern technological innovations and the elimination of technical barriers for the realization of international projects. It is significant to study the international standards and design requirements provided in Eurocode. This study presents a comparative analysis of Kazakhstani and European approaches for the geotechnical design of foundations and provides the design methods in the considered codes of practice. Three different types of foundations (i.e., raft, pile, and piled raft foundations) were designed following SP RK 5.01-102-2013—Foundations of buildings and structures, SP RK 5.01-103-2013—Pile foundations, and Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design for the Nur-Sultan soil profile. For all three types of foundations, the calculated results of bearing resistance and elastic settlement showed the conservativeness of Eurocode over SNiP-based Kazakhstani building regulations, as the values of bearing resistance and elastic settlement adhering to Kazakhstani code exceeded the Eurocode values. The difference between the obtained results can be explained by the application of higher values of partial safety factors by Eurocode 7. Sensitivity analysis of the bearing resistance on foundation parameters (i.e., raft foundation width and pile length) for the Kazakhstani and European approaches was performed to support the conclusions of the study.

Download Full-text

Comparative Analysis of Different Local Anesthetic Solutions Available in Market: An In Vitro and Clinical Study

European Journal of Dentistry ◽

10.1055/s-0041-1727553 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Eisha Imran ◽

Faisal Moeen ◽

Beenish Abbas ◽

Bakhtawar Yaqoob ◽

Mehreen Wajahat ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Comparative Analysis ◽

Local Anesthetic ◽

Compositional Analysis ◽

Bacterial Activity ◽

Similar Composition ◽

Ph Values ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Mean ◽

The Difference

Abstract Objectives The study aimed to evaluate and compare various commercially available local anesthetic solutions. Materials and Methods A total of 150 commercially available local anesthetic cartridges of similar composition (2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000) were randomly collected and divided into 3 groups. The designations of groups were selected from their product names such that each group consisted of 60 cartridges. Group S (Septodont, France) Group M (Medicaine, Korea) and Group H (HD-Caine, Pakistan). The samples were divided into five sub-groups, each consisting of 10 cartridges from each group to investigate each parameter. Results The acquired data was statistically analyzed and compared (using SPSS version 12). Compositional analysis revealed a non-significant (P>0.05) difference when the three Groups were compared with standard lidocaine and epinephrine solutions. The mean pH values of samples from group S, M and H respectively fell within the range of pH values of commercially available solutions. Non-significant difference in EPT values of Group S and H was found when efficacy was compared (p = 0.3), however a significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed in contrast to Group M. Anti-bacterial activity was observed in all the group and a non-significant difference in cell viability values of Group S and M was found (p = 0.6), while the difference was significant in comparison to Group H. Conclusion Within the limitations of these investigations, it appears that the properties of different manufacturers fall within the recommended ranges as mentioned in literature and do not appear to be statistically different in the variables we have tested.

Download Full-text

Finite Pure Plane Strain Bending of Inhomogeneous Anisotropic Sheets

Symmetry ◽

10.3390/sym13010145 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 145

Author(s):

Sergei Alexandrov ◽

Elena Lyamina ◽

Yeong-Maw Hwang

Keyword(s):

Plane Strain ◽

Yield Criterion ◽

Large Strains ◽

Rigid Plastic ◽

Plastic Properties ◽

Elastic Plastic ◽

Starting Point ◽

The Difference ◽

Inside Radius ◽

Elastic Unloading

The present paper concerns the general solution for finite plane strain pure bending of incompressible, orthotropic sheets. In contrast to available solutions, the new solution is valid for inhomogeneous distributions of plastic properties. The solution is semi-analytic. A numerical treatment is only necessary for solving transcendent equations and evaluating ordinary integrals. The solution’s starting point is a transformation between Eulerian and Lagrangian coordinates that is valid for a wide class of constitutive equations. The symmetric distribution relative to the center line of the sheet is separately treated where it is advantageous. It is shown that this type of symmetry simplifies the solution. Hill’s quadratic yield criterion is adopted. Both elastic/plastic and rigid/plastic solutions are derived. Elastic unloading is also considered, and it is shown that reverse plastic yielding occurs at a relatively large inside radius. An illustrative example uses real experimental data. The distribution of plastic properties is symmetric in this example. It is shown that the difference between the elastic/plastic and rigid/plastic solutions is negligible, except at the very beginning of the process. However, the rigid/plastic solution is much simpler and, therefore, can be recommended for practical use at large strains, including calculating the residual stresses.

Download Full-text

Role of social networking services for scientists in promoting scientific output on example of Polish representatives of social communication and media sciences

Global Knowledge Memory and Communication ◽

10.1108/gkmc-12-2019-0147 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 69 (8/9) ◽

pp. 717-736

Author(s):

Małgorzata Kowalska-Chrzanowska ◽

Przemysław Krysiński

Keyword(s):

Social Networking ◽

Social Communication ◽

Scientific Communication ◽

Scientific Output ◽

Scientific Publications ◽

Social Networking Services ◽

Content Type ◽

Starting Point ◽

The Media ◽

Usage Level

Purpose This paper aims to answer the question of how the Polish representatives of social communication and media sciences communicate the most recent scientific findings in the media space, i.e. what types of publications are shared, what activities do they exemplify (sharing information about their own publications, leading discussions, formulating opinions), what is the form of the scientific communication created by them (publication of reference lists' descriptions, full papers, preprints and post prints) and what is the audience reception (number of downloads, displays, comments). Design/methodology/approach The authors present the results of analysis conducted on the presence of the most recent (2017–2019) publications by the Polish representatives of the widely understood social communication and media sciences in three selected social networking services for scientists: ResearchGate, Google Scholar and Academia.edu. The analyses covered 100 selected representatives of the scientific environment (selected in interval sampling), assigned, according to the OECD classification “Field of Science”, in the “Ludzie nauki” (Men of Science) database to the “media and communication” discipline. Findings The conducted analyses prove a low usage level of the potential of three analysed services for scientists by the Polish representatives of social communication and media sciences. Although 60% of them feature profiles in at least one of the services, the rest are not present there at all. From the total of 113 identified scientists' profiles, as little as 65 feature publications from 2017 to 2019. Small number of alternative metrics established in them, implies, in turn, that if these metrics were to play an important role in evaluation of the value and influence of scientific publications, then this evaluation for the researched Polish representatives of social communication and media sciences would be unfavourable. Originality/value The small presence of the Polish representatives of the communication and media sciences in three analysed services shows that these services may be – for the time being – only support the processes of managing own scientific output. Maybe this quite a pessimistic image of scientists' activities in the analysed services is conditioned by a simple lack of the need to be present in electronic channels of scientific communication or the lack of trust to the analysed services, which, in turn, should be linked to their shortcomings and flaws. However, unequivocal confirmation of these hypotheses might be brought by explorations covering a larger group of scientists, and complemented with survey studies. Thus, this research may constitute merely a starting point for further explorations, including elaboration of good practices with respect to usage of social media by scientists.

Download Full-text