scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS MODUL BASIC AIRWAY MANAGEMENT BERBASIS GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN MAHASISWA KEPERAWATAN

2021 ◽  
pp. 215-221
Author(s):  
Maria Wisnu kanita ◽  
Ika Subekti Wulandari ◽  
Gatot Suparmanto ◽  
Heni Nur Kusumawati
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Pembelajaran dalam praktik klinik merupakan komponen penting dalam pendidikan keperawatan mengingat keperawatan merupakan profesi berbasis praktik. Pembelajaran praktik klinik oleh mahasiswa keperawatan memerlukan adanya pengembangan metode yang dapat mempersiapkan mahasiswa untuk dapat mengasah keterampilannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektifitas modul basic airway management berbasis guided inquiry learning model terhadap keterampilan mahasiswa keperawatan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan quasi experimental dalam bentuk nonequivalent pretes-postest group design. 50 responden dipilih dengan teknik purposive sampling, 25 responden pada kelompok eksperimen, sedangkan 25 responden pada kelompok kontrol. Keterampilan sebelum perlakuan pada kelompok kontrol dinyatakan lulus sebanyak 3 responden (12%) dan kelompok intervensi sebanyak 6 responden (24%). Keterampilan setelah dilakukan perlakuan pada kelompok kontrol dinyatakan lulus sebanyak 11 responden (44%) dan kelompok intervensi sebanyak 15 responden (66%). Data dalam penelitian dianalisis dengan uji Mann-Whitney. Hasil uji menunjukkan nilai p = 0,000 dimana hasil ini menyatakan bahwa Modul Berbasis Guided Inquiry Learning Model cukup efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan mahasiswa. Learning in clinical practice is an important component in nursing education considering that it is a practice-based profession. Learning clinical practice by students requires the development of methods that can prepare students to hone their skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the basic airway management module based on the guided inquiry learning model on the skills of students. This study was a quantitative study with a quasi-experimental form of nonequivalent pretest-posttest group design. 50 respondents were selected by purposive sampling technique, 25 respondents were in the experimental group, while 25 respondents were in the control group. Before receiving the treatments, 3 respondents (12%) in the control group and 6 respondents (24%) were passed the skills. After receiving the treatment, as many as 11 respondents (44%) in the control group and 15 respondents (66%) the intervention group could pass the skills. The data in the study were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test. The test results showed the value of p = 0.000 which stated that the Guided Inquiry Learning Model-Based Module is quite effective for improving student skills.

scholarly journals The effect of the group investigation-guided inquiry (GI-GI) learning model to improve students’ collaboration and science process skills

2021 ◽  
Vol 2104 (1) ◽  
pp. 012027
Author(s):  
Indrawati ◽  
I K Mahardika ◽  
J Prihatin ◽  
Supeno ◽  
S Astutik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Schools ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstract The GI-GI learning model is a combination of the Group Investigation and the Guided Inquiry model. The research aimed to examine the effect of the GI-GI learning model on collaboration and students’ science process skills. The type of research carried out was Quasi-Experimental and used a post-test only control group design and purposive sampling covering four high schools in the Besuki Residency, two classes as the experimental class and the control class. The research instrument used tests, observations, and documentation. The results showed a significant effect of the GI-GI learning model on collaboration and students’ science process skills. This research implies that the GI-GI learning model can condition students to research in groups to interact actively with friends and educators to exchange opinions, knowledge, or experiences, find and solve problems, and hypothesize through investigation, exploration, and discussion outside or inside in class.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematis Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Aan Qonaah ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti ◽  
Abdul Fatah
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Generative Learning ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh pembelajaran generatif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi  matematis siswa berdasarkan kemampuan awal. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMAN 6 Pandeglang,  kelas XI yang berjumlah 9 kelas. Dengan teknik purposive sampling diperoleh kelas XI IPA 4 sebagai kelas kontrol dan kelas XI IPA 5 sebagai kelas eksperimen. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalahThe nonequivalentpretest-postest control group design. Selama penelitian berlangsung kelompok eksperimen diberi perlakuan model pembelajaran generatif sedangkan kelas kontrol menggunakan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Analisis data dilakukan terhadap rataan gain ternormalisasi antara dua kelompok sampel. Hasil penelitian ini adalah (1) Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa  yang  diberi  perlakuan model pembelajaran generatif  lebih tinggi  daripada siswa  yang mendapat model pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kemampuan awal matematis (KAM) terhadap peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa; (3) Terdapat peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis pada siswa dengan KAM tinggi; (4) Tidak terdapat peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis pada siswa dengan KAM sedang dan rendah. Kata kunci: kemampuan komunikasi matematis, pembelajaran generatif, kemampuan awal matematika   Abstract This study aims to look at the effect of generative learning to improve students' mathematical communication skills based on early mathematic abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were students of SMAN 6 Pandeglang, class XI which numbered 9 classes. The purposive sampling technique was obtained in class XI IPA 4 as the control class and class XI IPA 5 as the experimental class. The research design used was The Nonequivalent Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. During the research, the experimental group was treated with generative learning models while the control class used the expository learning model. Data analysis was performed on normalized gain average between two sample groups. The results of this study are (1) Increased mathematical communication skills of students who are treated with a generative learning model higher than students who get an expository learning model; (2) There is an interaction between the learning model and early mathematic abilities (EMA) on improving students' mathematical communication skills; (3) There is an increase in mathematical communication skills in students with high EMA; (4) There is no increase in mathematical communication skills in students with moderate and low EMA. Keywords:mathematical communication ability, generative learning, early mahthematics ability

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS PEMBENTUKAN KADER MALARIA DESA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PARTISIPASI KEPALA KELUARGA DALAM UPAYA PENGENDALIAN MALARIA DI RW I DAN RW III DESA HARGOROJO KABUPATEN PURWOREJO

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Erni Nur Faizah ◽  
Arulita Ika Fibriana
Keyword(s):  
Malaria Control ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Health Department ◽  
Control Group ◽  
District Health ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Equivalent Control

Pengendalian malaria akan berhasil apabila disertai partisipasi dari masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektifitas pembentukan kader malaria untuk meningkatkan partisipasi kepala keluarga dalam upaya pengendalian malaria di RW I dan RW III Desa Hargorojo Kabupaten Purworejo. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan non equivalent control group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah kepala keluarga di RW I dan RW III Desa Hargorojo. Pada penelitian ini digunakan purposive sampling. Jumlah sampel kelompok eksperimen adalah 20 dan kelompok kontrol 20. Analisis data dilakukan secara univariat dan bivariat (uji Mann Whitney). Dari hasil penelitian, didapatkan perbedaan yang bermakna antara posttest kelompok yang diberi intervensi pembentukan kader malaria dengan kelompok yang diberi intervensi hanya penyuluhan (p=0,000). Hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa pembentukan kader malaria desa efektif meningkatkan partisipasi kepala keluarga dalam upaya pengendalian malaria. Saran yang diajukan bagi dinas kesehatan Kabupaten Purworejo agar membentuk kader malaria di desa lain yang merupakan daerah endemis malaria.Malaria control will be successful if accompanied by the participation of the community. The purpose of this study was to found the effectiveness of the establishment of village malaria cadre to increase the participation of family’s head in malaria control efforts in RW I and RW III Hargorojo Village Purworejo District. This research used a quasi-experimental research design with non-equivalent control group design. The population of this research included the family’s head in RW I and RW III Hargorojo village. In this study used purposive sampling. The number of samples of the experimental group and the control group were 20 and ​​20. Data analysis was performed using univariate and bivariate (Mann Whitney test). From the research, found significant differences between the groups were given a posttest intervention the establishment of village malaria cadre with the intervention group given only health education (p = 0.000). This shows that the estabhlisment of a village malaria cadre effectively increase participation in the family's head of malaria control efforts. Suggestions for Purworejo district health department was they should to establishment of a village malaria cadre in another village that was a malaria endemic area.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JURISPRUDENTIAL INQUIRY TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI PESERTA DIDIK

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-120
Author(s):  
Hana Nahdiana ◽  
Tri Harjawati ◽  
Jakiatin Nisa
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Sample Test ◽  
Study Population

AbstractThis study aims to examine the effect of the application of the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model to students' ability to argue. The research approach uses a quantitative approach with the Quasi Experiment method with The Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The study population was all grade X students in SMA Dua May. The sample was students of class X IPS 1 and X IPS 2, each of which numbered 32, the samples were taken by purposive sampling. The data collected was analyzed using descriptive analysis and inferential statistics using the independent sample t-test. Based on the results of data analysis, there are significant differences in the ability to argue between groups of students who learn to use the Jurisprudential Inquiry Learning Model and groups of students who learn by using the Conventional Learning Model. Where is t-count> t-table (10,639> 1,697). Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model influences 23.14% in the experimental class on the ability to argue students. Thus the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model has a positive effect on students' ability to argue. Keywords: Learning Model, Jurisprudential Inquiry, Ability to Argue. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran yuriprudensi inquiry terhadap kemampuan berargumentasi peserta didik. Metode metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini. menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode Quasi Eksperimen. Desain quasi eksperimen adalah The Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh peserta didik kelas X di SMA Dua Mei. Sampelnya adalah peserta didik kelas X IPS 1 dan X IPS 2 yang masing-masing berjumlah 32, sampel diambil dengan cara purposive sampling. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan statistic inferensial menggunakan uji-t independent sample test. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, terdapat perbedaan kemampuan berargumentasi yang signifikan antara kelompok peserta didik yang belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran yurisprudensi inquiry dengan kelompok peserta didik yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Dimana thitung > t-tabel (10.639 > 1,697). Model pembelajaran yurisprudensi inquiry berpengaruh sebesar 23,14 % pada kelas eksperimen terhadap kemampuan berargumentasi peserta didik. Dengan demikian maka model pembelaran yurisprudensi inquiry berpengaruh positif terhadap kemampuan berargumentasi peserta didik.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI TERBIMBING TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP SAINS DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL SISWA

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susilawati ◽  
Susilawati ◽  
Nyoman Sridana
Keyword(s):  
Prior Knowledge ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Science Concept ◽  
Concept Mastery ◽  
8Th Grade ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This study aims to find out: (1) the differences in science concept mastery of students who take guided inquiry learning model with conventional learning, (2) the differences in science concept mastery of students that prior knowledge high and low prior knowledge. This method of research is an quasi-experimental with factorial 2x2 analysis design. The subject of this study was ten class of 8th grade student in SMP 10 Mataram 2014/2015. Two class was chosen as sample using cluster random sampling technique, one classes as experimental group and one classes of control group. The research instrument is science mastery concept made by teacher. Data were analyzed using ANCOVA to find the effect of learning model and prior knowledge to science concept mastery. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 20 for Windows. Based on the analysis can be concluded that: 1) There are differences in science concept mastery of students who take guided inquiry learning model compared to conventional learning. 2) There is no difference in concept science mastery of students who have high and low prior knowledge of students.

Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Berbasis Refleksi Kelompok pada Materi Reaksi Redoks

2018 ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Laily Rochmawati Listiyani
Keyword(s):  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Paper Test ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan mengimplementasikan model pembelajaran inkuiri berbasis refleksi kelompok untuk mengukur keefektifan pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar dan aktivitas siswa. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelas X-1 sebagai kelas eksperimen, mendapat pembelajaran dengan model inkuiri berbasis refleksi kelompok dan kelas X-2 sebagai kelas kontrol dengan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Penelitian ini menggunakan posttest only control group design. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan dokumentasi kemampuan awal siswa, lembar observasi, tes tertulis dan angket. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, rata-rata nilai posttest kelas eksperimen adalah 78,88 dan kelas kontrol 71,68. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri berbasis refleksi kelompok efektif terhadap hasil belajar dan aktivitas siswa. Kata kunci: model pembelajaran inkuiri, refleksi kelompok   THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL BASED ON TEAM REFLECTION ON REDOX REACTION TOPIC  Abstract This study aims to implement inquiry learning model based on team reflection to measure the effectiveness of learning achievement and student activities. This research is quasi experimental research. The samples in this research are X-1 students as an experiment class, got inquiry learning model based on team reflection and class X-2 as a control class with expository learning model. This research was used posttest only control group design. Data collection techniques were documentation for initial academic ability, observation sheet, paper test and questionnaire. Based on the result of research, the average of experimental class posttest value is 78.88 and control class 71.68. The results have shown that the implementation of inquiry learning model based on team effective to improves student learning achievement and activities. Keywords: inquiry learning model, team reflection

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROCESS ORIENTED GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING (POGIL) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA PADA MATERI HUKUM ARCHIMEDES

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-88
Author(s):  
Ediawati Kusuma Devi ◽  
Emi Sulistri ◽  
Haris Rosdianto
Keyword(s):  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Process Oriented

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi hukum Archimedes dan pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran POGIL terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi hukum Archimedes. Metode penelitian menggunakan quasy exsperiment dengan desain penelitian nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Singkawang. Teknik pengambilan sampel berupa teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes kemampuan berpikir kritis berjumlah 10 soal dalam bentuk pilihan ganda beralasan yang telah diuji validitasnya. Hasil data tersebut kemudian dianalisis menggunakan uji N-gain dan uji statistik. Hasil peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas eksperimen sebesar 0,60 dalam kategori sedang dan kelas kontrol sebesar 0,22 dalam kategori rendah. Sehingga data yang diperoleh berdistribusi normal dan homogen. Dari hasil perhitungan uji t dua sampel tidak berkorelasi didapatkan nilai t hitung > t tabel yaitu 6,797 > 2,045, maka Ha diterima dan H0 ditolak pada taraf signifikansi a = 0,05. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran POGIL terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi hukum Archimedes.

scholarly journals Kemampuan argumentasi siswa: Perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog Socrates

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Ekaputri Pitorini ◽  
Suciati Suciati ◽  
Joko Ariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Scientific Argumentation ◽  
Test Technique ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada atau tidaknya perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi experimental research dengan desain penelitian posttest only with nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri A Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas XI IPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dan kelas XI IPA 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik tes dan teknik non tes. Uji hipotesis yang digunakan adalah uji t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata argumentasi ilmiah tertulis kelas eksperimen 2 lebih tinggi yaitu 74,44 dibandingkan dengan kelas eksperimen 1 yaitu 65,99. Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa thitung>ttabel (4,675>1,99444), artinya terdapat perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa yang signifikan antara kelas eksperimen 1 dan kelas eksperimen 2. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah bahwa ada perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Students' argumentation skills: A comparison between the guided-inquiry learning model and the Socrates dialogue-integrated guided-inquiry learning model AbstractThe research aimed to determine whether there was a difference in students’ written scientific argumentation skills through Guided Inquiry learning model and Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socratic Dialogue. The research was quasi-experimental research. The research design used was posttest only with nonequivalent group design. The population in this research were all students of class XI IPA of SMA Negeri A Karanganyar academic year 2018/2019. The sampling technique used in this research was cluster random sampling. The sample in this study was class XI IPA 1 as the experimental class 1 with the Guided Inquiry learning model and class XI IPA 2 as the experimental class 2 with the Guided Inquiry learning model combined with Socrates Dialogue.  The data collection technique used was test technique and non-test technique. The hypothesis test used was t-test. The results of the research showed that the average scientific written argument for the experimental class 2 was higher at 74.44 compared to the experimental class 1 at 65.99. The t-test results show that tcount>ttable (4,675> 1,99444), meaning that there were significant differences in students' written scientific argumentation skills between the experimental class 1 and the experimental class 2. The conclusion of this study was that there was a difference in students' written scientific argumentation skills through the Guided Inquiry learning model with Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socrates Dialogue.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajara Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Simulasi PhET Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik SMAN 1 Tanjung Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 353
Author(s):  
Veza Aulia ◽  
Hairunisyah Sahidu ◽  
Gunawan Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Equivalent Control ◽  
Academic Year

This research is aimed to determine the effect of guided-inquiry learning model using PhET simulation on creativity at SMAN 1 Tanjung of academic year 2019/2020. This research is quasi-experimental with non-equivalent control group design. The population of this research is all student of grade XI SMAN 1 Tanjung of academic year 2019/2020, while the sampling technique used purposive sampling, while the sampling are the student of grade XI MIPA 2 as the experimental group and the student of grade XI MIPA 1 as control group. Creativity data be measured on creativity test which the type test used 7 essay. The research hypothesis was tested using t-test independent. The result of t-test show that tobtained>ttable. It means that there is the effect of guided-inquiry learning model using PhET simulation on creativity at SMAN 1 Tanjung of academic year 2019/2020.

scholarly journals The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning Model on Chemistry Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Siti Hasanah ◽  
Agus Abhi Purwoko ◽  
Aliefman Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Linear Relationship ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Chemistry Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Teachers and students still dominate the learning process at SMAN 1 Lingsar are even less active. This study aimed to determine the effect of the Guided Inquiry learning model on students' chemistry learning outcomes. This study used quasi-experimental research (quasi-experimental) with a nonequivalent control group design pre-test-post-test design. The population in this study were all Class XI IPA SMAN 1 Lingsar. The sampling technique used a quota sampling technique. The sample consisted of 2 classes, namely class XI MIA 1 as the experimental class and class XI MIA 4 as the control class. The instruments in this study were 3, namely: RPP, LKPD, and Tests. The test is carried out at the beginning of the meeting (pre-test) and the end of the session (posttest). The resulting data were tested using the ANCOVA test. The results showed differences in chemistry learning outcomes for students who took the guided inquiry learning model with those who took the conventional learning model. The results of statistical tests obtained a significance value of the learning model of 0.011. So because the amount of the Sig value is less than 0.05, H0 is rejected. It means a linear relationship between them with the average chemistry learning outcomes in the class that received the guided inquiry empowerment model higher than the control group. Furthermore, the covariance proved also to support the improvement of students' chemistry learning outcomes with a significance level of 0.000. It means that there is a linear relationship between the covariance and the dependent variable

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document