scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JURISPRUDENTIAL INQUIRY TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI PESERTA DIDIK

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-120
Author(s):  
Hana Nahdiana ◽  
Tri Harjawati ◽  
Jakiatin Nisa

AbstractThis study aims to examine the effect of the application of the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model to students' ability to argue. The research approach uses a quantitative approach with the Quasi Experiment method with The Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The study population was all grade X students in SMA Dua May. The sample was students of class X IPS 1 and X IPS 2, each of which numbered 32, the samples were taken by purposive sampling. The data collected was analyzed using descriptive analysis and inferential statistics using the independent sample t-test. Based on the results of data analysis, there are significant differences in the ability to argue between groups of students who learn to use the Jurisprudential Inquiry Learning Model and groups of students who learn by using the Conventional Learning Model. Where is t-count> t-table (10,639> 1,697). Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model influences 23.14% in the experimental class on the ability to argue students. Thus the Jurisprudential Inquiry learning model has a positive effect on students' ability to argue. Keywords: Learning Model, Jurisprudential Inquiry, Ability to Argue. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran yuriprudensi inquiry terhadap kemampuan berargumentasi peserta didik. Metode metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini. menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode Quasi Eksperimen. Desain quasi eksperimen adalah The Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh peserta didik kelas X di SMA Dua Mei. Sampelnya adalah peserta didik kelas X IPS 1 dan X IPS 2 yang masing-masing berjumlah 32, sampel diambil dengan cara purposive sampling. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan statistic inferensial menggunakan uji-t independent sample test. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, terdapat perbedaan kemampuan berargumentasi yang signifikan antara kelompok peserta didik yang belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran yurisprudensi inquiry dengan kelompok peserta didik yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Dimana thitung > t-tabel (10.639 > 1,697). Model pembelajaran yurisprudensi inquiry berpengaruh sebesar 23,14 % pada kelas eksperimen terhadap kemampuan berargumentasi peserta didik. Dengan demikian maka model pembelaran yurisprudensi inquiry berpengaruh positif terhadap kemampuan berargumentasi peserta didik.

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Fitri Kusuma Ningrum ◽  
Muhammad Nasir ◽  
Muhammad Rahmad

This research aimed to determine the improve in mastery of students' physics concepts through the application of an advanced organizer model on material momentum and impulses. The research method used was quasy experiment with pretest posttest control group design. The research population is all students of class X MIPA SMAN 1 Rumbio Jaya which is a sample of research with class X MIPA 1 as an experimental class totaling 23 students and class X MIPA 2 as a control class of 24 students. The research instrument used the concept mastery test questions. Data were analyzed descriptively by looking at absorption, learning effectiveness and the results of students' concept mastery scores and analyzed inferentially using the T-test. Descriptive analysis results obtained an average absorption of experimental class students by 81.61% with the effectiveness of learning categorized effectively. Furthermore, for the mastery of the concept of each experimental class indicator on the first and second indicators obtained very good categories, the third indicator obtained the medium category and the fourth indicator with a low category. The results of inferential analysis obtained a significant increase in the mastery of student concepts in the class applying the Advance Organizer learning model to the classroom with conventional learning. Based on the results of the research, the advanced organizer learning model can improve students' mastery of the concepts in the material momentum and impulses of class X SMAN 1 Rumbio Jaya.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-446
Author(s):  
Nur Asih ◽  
Sendi Ramdhani

AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari pada konvensional, untuk mengetahui sikap kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA), dan untuk mengetahui hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitiannya adalah eksperimen kuasi dan desain penelitiannya Nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas XI MIPA-3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA-1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, angket dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari konvensional. Hasil angket siswa kelas XI MIPA-3 memperoleh hasil hampir seluruhnya positif respon siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA).Kata Kunci: Kemandirian, MEA, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Increased Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence Using the Means-End Analysis Learning Model AbstractThe purpose of this research is to find out whether the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional learning, to determine the attitudes of students' learning independence towards mathematics learning using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model, and to find out the obstacles of students in solving problems mathematical problem solving abilities. The research method is a quasi-experiment and the research design is Nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON with a sample of two classes. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling technique. Class XI MIPA-3 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA-1 as a control class. The instruments were in the form of tests of mathematical problem-solving abilities, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional. The results of the XI MIPA-3 class questionnaire obtained almost entirely positive student responses to the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model.Keywords: Independence, MEA, Mathematical Problem Solving.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Aan Qonaah ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti ◽  
Abdul Fatah

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh pembelajaran generatif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi  matematis siswa berdasarkan kemampuan awal. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMAN 6 Pandeglang,  kelas XI yang berjumlah 9 kelas. Dengan teknik purposive sampling diperoleh kelas XI IPA 4 sebagai kelas kontrol dan kelas XI IPA 5 sebagai kelas eksperimen. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalahThe nonequivalentpretest-postest control group design. Selama penelitian berlangsung kelompok eksperimen diberi perlakuan model pembelajaran generatif sedangkan kelas kontrol menggunakan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Analisis data dilakukan terhadap rataan gain ternormalisasi antara dua kelompok sampel. Hasil penelitian ini adalah (1) Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa  yang  diberi  perlakuan model pembelajaran generatif  lebih tinggi  daripada siswa  yang mendapat model pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kemampuan awal matematis (KAM) terhadap peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa; (3) Terdapat peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis pada siswa dengan KAM tinggi; (4) Tidak terdapat peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis pada siswa dengan KAM sedang dan rendah. Kata kunci: kemampuan komunikasi matematis, pembelajaran generatif, kemampuan awal matematika   Abstract This study aims to look at the effect of generative learning to improve students' mathematical communication skills based on early mathematic abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were students of SMAN 6 Pandeglang, class XI which numbered 9 classes. The purposive sampling technique was obtained in class XI IPA 4 as the control class and class XI IPA 5 as the experimental class. The research design used was The Nonequivalent Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. During the research, the experimental group was treated with generative learning models while the control class used the expository learning model. Data analysis was performed on normalized gain average between two sample groups. The results of this study are (1) Increased mathematical communication skills of students who are treated with a generative learning model higher than students who get an expository learning model; (2) There is an interaction between the learning model and early mathematic abilities (EMA) on improving students' mathematical communication skills; (3) There is an increase in mathematical communication skills in students with high EMA; (4) There is no increase in mathematical communication skills in students with moderate and low EMA. Keywords:mathematical communication ability, generative learning, early mahthematics ability


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Yunita Yunita ◽  
Muhammad Zulfikar Syuaib ◽  
Muhammad Taufik

The experimental research is aimed to revealing the difference between science process through inquiry learning model and inquiry learning model with pictorial riddle method for students in SMP Negeri 1 Gunungsari academic year 2015/2016. The research designs is using pretest posttest control group design. The samples were chosen by purposive sampling technique. The population is all students of SMP Negeri 1 Gunungsari grade VIII, while the samples are the  students in VIII D class (experiment class 1) and VIII F class (experiment class 2). The instrument of this research  is the science process skills test in form of reasoned multiple choice, which has been tested statistically it’s  validity, reliability, discrimination index and level of difficulty of  the item. The data analysed used  independent sample t-test at significant  level  of 5 % with  tcount is 2,535 and ttable  is 1,671 because tcoun > ttable,, then H0  is  rejected and Ha accepted. The result indicates that there is a difference between science process through inquiry learning model and  inquiry learning  model with  pictorial riddle  method for student in SMP Negeri 1 Gunungsari academic year  2015/2016. 


Author(s):  
Laily Rochmawati Listiyani

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan mengimplementasikan model pembelajaran inkuiri berbasis refleksi kelompok untuk mengukur keefektifan pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar dan aktivitas siswa. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelas X-1 sebagai kelas eksperimen, mendapat pembelajaran dengan model inkuiri berbasis refleksi kelompok dan kelas X-2 sebagai kelas kontrol dengan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Penelitian ini menggunakan posttest only control group design. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan dokumentasi kemampuan awal siswa, lembar observasi, tes tertulis dan angket. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, rata-rata nilai posttest kelas eksperimen adalah 78,88 dan kelas kontrol 71,68. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri berbasis refleksi kelompok efektif terhadap hasil belajar dan aktivitas siswa. Kata kunci: model pembelajaran inkuiri, refleksi kelompok   THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL BASED ON TEAM REFLECTION ON REDOX REACTION TOPIC  Abstract This study aims to implement inquiry learning model based on team reflection to measure the effectiveness of learning achievement and student activities. This research is quasi experimental research. The samples in this research are X-1 students as an experiment class, got inquiry learning model based on team reflection and class X-2 as a control class with expository learning model. This research was used posttest only control group design. Data collection techniques were documentation for initial academic ability, observation sheet, paper test and questionnaire. Based on the result of research, the average of experimental class posttest value is 78.88 and control class 71.68. The results have shown that the implementation of inquiry learning model based on team effective to improves student learning achievement and activities. Keywords: inquiry learning model, team reflection


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Dewi Astuti

Abstract This research was conducted based on the fact that there was a lack in student’s mathematical connection ability. The aim of this research was to examine the enhancement of student’s mathematical connection ability by Alberta model inquiry learning. This research used nonequivalent control group design. Population of this research was all engineering faculty UNA, and the samples were two classes selected by using purposive sampling technique, in which they were used as an experimental class and control class. The experimental class was treated by Alberta Model inquiry learning and control class by conventional learning. Instruments used in this research were mathematics connection ability test and observation sheet. Results showed that student’s mathematical connection ability enhancement in students received Alberta model inquiry learning was better than students who received conventional learning. Keywords: Inquiry Learning of Alberta Model, Mathematical Connection Ability 


Author(s):  
Gina Ayu ◽  
Yesi Gusmania

Abstrak.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui (1) Pengaruh model pembelajaran Tipe Team Assisted Individualization terhadap hasil belajar matematika, (2) Pengaruh model pembelajaran Konvensional terhadap hasil belajar matematika, (3) Perbedaan pengaruh model pembelajaran Tipe Team Assisted Individualization dengan model pembelajaran Konvensional terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Jenis penelitian ini adalah Quasi Eksperimental dengan desain Non-equivalent Posttest-Only Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh Siswa Kelas XI SMK Widya 2 Batam tahun pelajaran 2017/2018 dengan jumlah 34 siswa. Teknik pengampilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik  Sampling Jenuh. Data diperoleh dengan instrumen yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah one sample t test dan independen sample test. Hasil penelitian menunjukan: (1) Terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization terhadap hasil belajar, hal ini terlihat dari () (3,0962,093) (2) Tidak terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran Konvensional terhadap hasil belajar, hal ini terlihat dari () (1,844 2,160), (3) Terdapat perbedaan pengaruh antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Team Assisted Individualzation denganmodel pembelajaran konvensionalterhadap hasil belajar Matematika( = 3,385 = 2,037)Kata Kunci :Team Assisted Individualization, Hasil Belajar. Abstract. This research intent to know: (1) influence of learning model of Team Assisted Individualization to mathematics learning result, (2) the influence of conventional learning model on mathrmatics learning autcomes, (3) differences in Team Assisted Individualization learning model with conventional learning model on mathrmatics learning autcomes. The type of this research was quasi experimental research with Non-equivalent Posttest-Only Control Group Design. The population in this research is all of students at eleventh grade students of SMK Widya 2 Batam in 2018/2019 academic year with two classes that total 34. The techniqeue of collecting sample used sampling jenuh. The data obtained used instrument test has tested validity and reliability. The data analysis used one simple t test and independent samles test. The finding results showed: (1) there are influence of Team Assisted Individualization learning model on learning outcomes, this is seen () (3,0962,093) (2) there is no conventional learning model on the learning outcomes, this is seen () (1,844 2,160) (3) there are differences in the influence of Team Assisted Individualization learning model with the conventional learning midel on mathematics learning outcomes ( = 3,385 = 2,037) Kata Kunci :Team Assisted Individualization, Learning Outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-88
Author(s):  
Ediawati Kusuma Devi ◽  
Emi Sulistri ◽  
Haris Rosdianto

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi hukum Archimedes dan pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran POGIL terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi hukum Archimedes. Metode penelitian menggunakan quasy exsperiment dengan desain penelitian nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Singkawang. Teknik pengambilan sampel berupa teknik purposive sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa tes kemampuan berpikir kritis berjumlah 10 soal dalam bentuk pilihan ganda beralasan yang telah diuji validitasnya. Hasil data tersebut kemudian dianalisis menggunakan uji N-gain dan uji statistik. Hasil peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas eksperimen sebesar 0,60 dalam kategori sedang dan kelas kontrol sebesar 0,22 dalam kategori rendah. Sehingga data yang diperoleh berdistribusi normal dan homogen. Dari hasil perhitungan uji t dua sampel tidak berkorelasi didapatkan nilai t hitung > t tabel yaitu 6,797 > 2,045, maka Ha diterima dan H0 ditolak pada taraf signifikansi a = 0,05. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran POGIL terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi hukum Archimedes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 215-221
Author(s):  
Maria Wisnu kanita ◽  
Ika Subekti Wulandari ◽  
Gatot Suparmanto ◽  
Heni Nur Kusumawati

Pembelajaran dalam praktik klinik merupakan komponen penting dalam pendidikan keperawatan mengingat keperawatan merupakan profesi berbasis praktik. Pembelajaran praktik klinik oleh mahasiswa keperawatan memerlukan adanya pengembangan metode yang dapat mempersiapkan mahasiswa untuk dapat mengasah keterampilannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektifitas modul basic airway management berbasis guided inquiry learning model terhadap keterampilan mahasiswa keperawatan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan quasi experimental dalam bentuk nonequivalent pretes-postest group design. 50 responden dipilih dengan teknik purposive sampling, 25 responden pada kelompok eksperimen, sedangkan 25 responden pada kelompok kontrol. Keterampilan sebelum perlakuan pada kelompok kontrol dinyatakan lulus sebanyak 3 responden (12%) dan kelompok intervensi sebanyak 6 responden (24%). Keterampilan setelah dilakukan perlakuan pada kelompok kontrol dinyatakan lulus sebanyak 11 responden (44%) dan kelompok intervensi sebanyak 15 responden (66%). Data dalam penelitian dianalisis dengan uji Mann-Whitney. Hasil uji menunjukkan nilai p = 0,000 dimana hasil ini menyatakan bahwa Modul Berbasis Guided Inquiry Learning Model cukup efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan mahasiswa. Learning in clinical practice is an important component in nursing education considering that it is a practice-based profession. Learning clinical practice by students requires the development of methods that can prepare students to hone their skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the basic airway management module based on the guided inquiry learning model on the skills of students. This study was a quantitative study with a quasi-experimental form of nonequivalent pretest-posttest group design. 50 respondents were selected by purposive sampling technique, 25 respondents were in the experimental group, while 25 respondents were in the control group. Before receiving the treatments, 3 respondents (12%) in the control group and 6 respondents (24%) were passed the skills. After receiving the treatment, as many as 11 respondents (44%) in the control group and 15 respondents (66%) the intervention group could pass the skills. The data in the study were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test. The test results showed the value of p = 0.000 which stated that the Guided Inquiry Learning Model-Based Module is quite effective for improving student skills.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antomi Saregar ◽  
Anis Marlina ◽  
Idham Kholid

The researcher reports the research result toward of how students understand on physics learning concept material efficiently. A research method that used is Quasi-experiment, by using post-test only control group design with purposive sampling technique. Data collecting technique uses test method to achieve data concept understanding, meanwhile, questionnaire method to achieve scientific character information. Hypothesis testing of the research uses two ways analysis of variance. The conclusion of the research are; (1). ARIAS learning model is more efficient than conventional learning model toward students understanding on physics concept; (2). The scientific attitude of students influencing on students physics concept understanding; (3). There is no interaction between ARIAS learning model application and conventional learning model, as seen on students scientific attitude toward physics concept understanding.Peneliti melaporkan hasil penelitian terkait efektivitas penggunaan model pembelajaran dalam memudahkan memahami konsep materi fisika. Model pembelajaran yang digunakan adalah model pembelajaran ARIAS, ditinjau dari sikap ilmiah siswa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Quasi Eksperiment. Post-test only control group design dengan teknik purposive sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan metode tes untuk mendapatkan data pemahaman konsep, sedangkan metode angket untuk mendapatkan informasi sikap ilmiah. Uji hipotesis penelitian menggunakan anava dua jalan. Simpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah: (1). Model pembelajaran ARIAS lebih efektif daripada model pembelajaran konvensional terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika siswa; (2). Sikap ilmiah siswa berpengaruh terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika siswa; (3). Tidak terdapat interaksi antara penerapan model pembelajaran ARIAS dan konvensional, ditinjau dari sikap ilmiah terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika siswa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document