scholarly journals Kemampuan argumentasi siswa: Perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog Socrates

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Ekaputri Pitorini ◽  
Suciati Suciati ◽  
Joko Ariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Scientific Argumentation ◽  
Test Technique ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada atau tidaknya perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi experimental research dengan desain penelitian posttest only with nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri A Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas XI IPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dan kelas XI IPA 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik tes dan teknik non tes. Uji hipotesis yang digunakan adalah uji t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata argumentasi ilmiah tertulis kelas eksperimen 2 lebih tinggi yaitu 74,44 dibandingkan dengan kelas eksperimen 1 yaitu 65,99. Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa thitung>ttabel (4,675>1,99444), artinya terdapat perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa yang signifikan antara kelas eksperimen 1 dan kelas eksperimen 2. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah bahwa ada perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Students' argumentation skills: A comparison between the guided-inquiry learning model and the Socrates dialogue-integrated guided-inquiry learning model AbstractThe research aimed to determine whether there was a difference in students’ written scientific argumentation skills through Guided Inquiry learning model and Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socratic Dialogue. The research was quasi-experimental research. The research design used was posttest only with nonequivalent group design. The population in this research were all students of class XI IPA of SMA Negeri A Karanganyar academic year 2018/2019. The sampling technique used in this research was cluster random sampling. The sample in this study was class XI IPA 1 as the experimental class 1 with the Guided Inquiry learning model and class XI IPA 2 as the experimental class 2 with the Guided Inquiry learning model combined with Socrates Dialogue.  The data collection technique used was test technique and non-test technique. The hypothesis test used was t-test. The results of the research showed that the average scientific written argument for the experimental class 2 was higher at 74.44 compared to the experimental class 1 at 65.99. The t-test results show that tcount>ttable (4,675> 1,99444), meaning that there were significant differences in students' written scientific argumentation skills between the experimental class 1 and the experimental class 2. The conclusion of this study was that there was a difference in students' written scientific argumentation skills through the Guided Inquiry learning model with Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socrates Dialogue.

scholarly journals Pengaruh problem solving terhadap efektivitas inkuiri terbimbing dalam pembelajaran larutan penyangga ditinjau dari kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsaniyatur Rizqi Nurul Laily ◽  
Suharti Suharti ◽  
Siti Marfu’ah ◽  
Munthalib Munthalib
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Scientific Argumentation ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Buffer Solution ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This study aims to determine a guided inquiry learning model enriched by problem solving can provide better results for students’ scientific argumentation skills than guided-inquiry learning models. This study applies a quasi-experimental research design with post-test and a descriptive design. The sampling technique in this study applies a cluster random sampling technique. The data of the students’ scientific argumentation skills is obtained from the ability of students to answer the descriptive questions of scientific argumentation. The instruments include learning instruments and measurement instruments. Descriptive analysis and a one-part t-test with the help of SPSS 25 for Windows are used in analyzing the data. The results show that guided inquiry learning model enriched by problem solving serves better results than guided inquiry models towards students' scientific argumentation skills in buffer solution material. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing yang diperkaya problem solving terhadap keterampilan argumentasi peserta didik pada materi larutan penyangga. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan penelitian eksperimental semu dengan pasca tes dan rancangan deskriptif. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling. Data keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik diperoleh dari kemampuan peserta didik menjawab soal tes uraian keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah. Instrumen yang digunakan meliputi instrumen perlakuan dan instrumen pengukuran. Analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan uji-t satu pihak dengan bantuan program SPSS 25 for windows. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing yang diperkaya problem solving memberikan hasil yang lebih baik dibandingkan model inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik pada materi larutan penyangga.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL ON STUDENT’S LEARNING OUTCOMES IN TOPIC DYNAMIC ELECTRICITY IN CLASS X SEMESTER II SMA N 2 KISARAN A.Y.2014/2015

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lia Anggraini Siregar ◽  
Motlan .
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Method ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
And Control ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

ABSTRACT The research aimed to know the influence ofguided inquiry learning model on student’s learning outcomes in topic dynamic electricity in class X semester II SMA N 2 Kisaran A.Y 2014/2015. Beside that, the research also aimed to determine the differences between students learning outcomes by using guided inquiry learning model and conventional learning, and to know the student’s activities as affective and psychomotor. The research used a quasi-experimental method. The population were all students of class X consist of 8 classes. The samples defined by cluster random sampling and conducted in class X-1 as the experiment class and X-2 as the control class. The instruments were used learning outcomes test and the observation sheet.The result showed that the average value of posttest in experiment class is 64.25 higher than in control class is 53. The hypothesis result of posttest in experiment class and control class get >, so Ha can be accepted. The observation result showed student’s activity in experiment class included in active category. Finally, it can be concluded that there is an effect of guided inquiry learning model on student’s learning outcomes in topic dynamic electricity.   Keywords : guided inquiry learning model, student’s learning outcomes, affective, psychomotor

scholarly journals Peningkatan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Pada Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Argument- Driven Inquiry (ADI)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Eni Sumanti Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sample Selection ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Scientific Argumentation ◽  
Research Instrument ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Quasi Experiment

Destination of research to analyze increased students' scientific argumentative ability by way of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model in SMA Negeri 1 Batang Angkola. The study was conducted in a quasi-experiment manner. As for population of the research was students of class X SMAN 1 Batang Angkola. Sample selection that has been used by cluster random sampling, namely class X IPA1 and X IPA2. This research instrument uses a valid and reliable Learning Outcomes test. The data in this study were analyzed by T- test. The results of the study obtained differences in values of scientific argumentation skills in students through argument-driven inquiry learning model at 76.6 and conventional learning 70.06, this means that there is an influence of students' scientific argumentation skills using the Argument Driven Inquiry learning model more improved compared to using conventional learning.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GUIDED INQUIRY TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF MATERI SISTEM SARAF MANUSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Sariningsih Sariningsih ◽  
Purwati Kuswarini Suprapto ◽  
Liah Badriah
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
True Experiment

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran guided inquiry terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik di kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih pada materi sistem saraf manusia. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada bulan September 2018 sampai dengan bulan Juli 2019 di SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah true experiment. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih sebanyak 3 kelas. Sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 2 kelas yaitu kelas XI MIPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA 3 sebagai kelas kontrol yang diambil dengan teknik cluster random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa tes tulis hasil belajar pada materi sistem saraf manusia yang dilakukan sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran berlangsung. Data hasil penelitian dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji ancova. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran guided inquiry terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi sistem saraf manusia di kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih.Abstract. This study aimed to determine the effect guided inquiry learning model toward learning outcomes of students in XI MIPA classes at SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih on nervous system subject. This research was conducted from September 2018 until July 2019 at SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih. The research used the true experiment method. The population in this study were all XI MIPA at SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih as many as 3 classes. The sample used was 2 classes, namely class XI MIPA 1 as the experimental class and class XI MIPA 3 as the control class taken by cluster random sampling technique. Data collection techniques in the form of tests of learning outcomes on the nervous system subject was conducted before and after learning process were taken place. The datas were analyzed by using the Ancova test. The results showed that there was the effect guided inquiry learning model toward learning outcomes of students on nervous system subject in XI MIPA classes at SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih.

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS MODUL BASIC AIRWAY MANAGEMENT BERBASIS GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN MAHASISWA KEPERAWATAN

2021 ◽  
pp. 215-221
Author(s):  
Maria Wisnu kanita ◽  
Ika Subekti Wulandari ◽  
Gatot Suparmanto ◽  
Heni Nur Kusumawati
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Pembelajaran dalam praktik klinik merupakan komponen penting dalam pendidikan keperawatan mengingat keperawatan merupakan profesi berbasis praktik. Pembelajaran praktik klinik oleh mahasiswa keperawatan memerlukan adanya pengembangan metode yang dapat mempersiapkan mahasiswa untuk dapat mengasah keterampilannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektifitas modul basic airway management berbasis guided inquiry learning model terhadap keterampilan mahasiswa keperawatan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan quasi experimental dalam bentuk nonequivalent pretes-postest group design. 50 responden dipilih dengan teknik purposive sampling, 25 responden pada kelompok eksperimen, sedangkan 25 responden pada kelompok kontrol. Keterampilan sebelum perlakuan pada kelompok kontrol dinyatakan lulus sebanyak 3 responden (12%) dan kelompok intervensi sebanyak 6 responden (24%). Keterampilan setelah dilakukan perlakuan pada kelompok kontrol dinyatakan lulus sebanyak 11 responden (44%) dan kelompok intervensi sebanyak 15 responden (66%). Data dalam penelitian dianalisis dengan uji Mann-Whitney. Hasil uji menunjukkan nilai p = 0,000 dimana hasil ini menyatakan bahwa Modul Berbasis Guided Inquiry Learning Model cukup efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan mahasiswa. Learning in clinical practice is an important component in nursing education considering that it is a practice-based profession. Learning clinical practice by students requires the development of methods that can prepare students to hone their skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the basic airway management module based on the guided inquiry learning model on the skills of students. This study was a quantitative study with a quasi-experimental form of nonequivalent pretest-posttest group design. 50 respondents were selected by purposive sampling technique, 25 respondents were in the experimental group, while 25 respondents were in the control group. Before receiving the treatments, 3 respondents (12%) in the control group and 6 respondents (24%) were passed the skills. After receiving the treatment, as many as 11 respondents (44%) in the control group and 15 respondents (66%) the intervention group could pass the skills. The data in the study were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test. The test results showed the value of p = 0.000 which stated that the Guided Inquiry Learning Model-Based Module is quite effective for improving student skills.

Efektifitas Guided Inquiry Learning Model Group Investigation dan Klasikal untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berfikir Kritis

2018 ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Ariati Dina Puspitasari
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: 1) peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis untuk kelas kelompok dan klasikal; 2) perbedaan peningkatan keterampilan berfikir kritis antara kelas kelompok dan kelas klasikal. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah quasi experimen, dengan model pretest-posttest control group design. Populasi pada penelitian ini sebanyak 4 kelas dengan 120 siswa kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 8 Kota Yogyakarta, sampel penelitian menggunakan 2 kelas yang ditentukan menggunakan teknik proportionate Stratified Random Sampling. Satu kelas sebagai kelas eksperimen yaitu kelas yang menggunakan pembelajaran berbasis guided inquiry model kelompok dan satu kelas lainnya sebagai kelas kontrol yaitu kelas dengan pembelajaran menggunakan pembelajaran berbasis guided inquiry model klasikal. Pengumpulan data dilakukan menggunakan tes yang berupa tes keterampilan berfikir kritis. Teknis analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif menggunakan N-Gain dan secara statistik inferensial menggunakan uji-t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan antara kelas A dan Kelas B. Pada kelas VII A aspek memberikan penjelasan maupun membangun keterampilan dasar berada pada kategori sedang (0,58 dan 0,52). Sedangkan kelas VII B, pada aspek memberikan penjelasan berada pada kategori sedang (0,64) dan pada aspek membangun keterampilan dasar berada pada kategori tinggi (0,90). Kata kunci: Guided inquiry, Arduino, Berfikir Kritis   EFFECTIVENESS OF GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL OF GROUP AND CLASS INVESTIGATION TO INCREASE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS Abstract This study aims to know: 1) the improvement of critical thinking skills for groups and classical; 2) the difference of critical thinking skill increasing between group and class. The method used in this research was quasi experiment, with pretest-posttest control group design model. The population of this study were 4 classes (120) students in the 7th grade of Muhammadiyah 8 Yogyakarta Junior High School, the sample used 2 classes determined by proportionate Stratified Random Sampling technique. One class is an experimental class which implement guided inquiry based on group investigastion learning model and one other class is a control class that implement guided inquiry based on classical investigation learning model. Data was collecting by critical thinking skills test. Data were analyzed by descriptive techniques using N-Gain and inferential statistic using t-test. The results shown that there are the significant differences between class A and Class B. In class VII A, the aspects of giving the explanation and build the basic skill are in medium category (0,58 and 0,52). While class VII B, the aspect of giving the explanation is in the medium category (0.64) and aspect of building the basic skills is in high category (0.90). Keywords: Guided Inquiry, Arduino, Critical Thinking

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

scholarly journals The effect of the group investigation-guided inquiry (GI-GI) learning model to improve students’ collaboration and science process skills

2021 ◽  
Vol 2104 (1) ◽  
pp. 012027
Author(s):  
Indrawati ◽  
I K Mahardika ◽  
J Prihatin ◽  
Supeno ◽  
S Astutik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Schools ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Process Skills ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Science Process Skills ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstract The GI-GI learning model is a combination of the Group Investigation and the Guided Inquiry model. The research aimed to examine the effect of the GI-GI learning model on collaboration and students’ science process skills. The type of research carried out was Quasi-Experimental and used a post-test only control group design and purposive sampling covering four high schools in the Besuki Residency, two classes as the experimental class and the control class. The research instrument used tests, observations, and documentation. The results showed a significant effect of the GI-GI learning model on collaboration and students’ science process skills. This research implies that the GI-GI learning model can condition students to research in groups to interact actively with friends and educators to exchange opinions, knowledge, or experiences, find and solve problems, and hypothesize through investigation, exploration, and discussion outside or inside in class.

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE PAIR CHECK DENGAN TIPE THINK PAIR SQUARE DI SMA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Nurul Huda Arianti ◽  
Syubhan Annur ◽  
Mastuang Mastuang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Achievement Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Model Pair ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Student learning outcomes is still less than optimal or unsatisfactory, it can be known through the data replication midterm class XI IPA at SMAN 9 Banjarmasin. This happens because the learning methods and models used by teachers based on observations during the learning tend to be monotonous and less engaging students, so that students are less enthusiastic and less active in the following study. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Pair Check with the type of Think Pair Square in class XI SMA Negeri 9 Banjarmasin. This type of research used in this research is quantitative quasi-experimental research design. This study population is all students in grade XI IPA at SMAN 9 Banjarmasin. Samples were taken using cluster random sampling. Data collection techniques are techniques achievement test and documentation. The results showed that there are differences in learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Pair Check with the type of Think Pair Square in class XI SMA Negeri 9 Banjarmasin.

scholarly journals DISCOVERY AND CORE LEARNING MODEL TOWARD CREATIVE THINKING VIEWED FROM LOGICAL MATHEMATICAL INTELLIGENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 308
Author(s):  
Veronika Yusnita Andriani Prastika ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi ◽  
Siswanto Siswanto
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Control Design ◽  
Eighth Graders ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This research aims to 1) which learning model that supports students’ creative thinking ability whether discovery, CORE, or conventional learning model, 2) which model that supports creative thinking ability the most to high, moderate, and low level students, 3) know if there is interaction between learning model and students’ logical mathematical intelligence, and creative thinking ability. This is a quasi-experimental research with the population of eighth graders of junior high schools in Madiun Regency. The research design used a group pretest-posttest control design. The sample was determined using stratified cluster random sampling. This research uses two-way unequal ANOVA. This research concluded that 1) students’ creative thinking skill is developed better using Discovery than CORE and conventional learning model, 2) students with high logical mathematical intelligence have higher creative thinking ability than those with moderate and low logical mathematical intelligence,3) there is no interaction between learning model and logical mathematical intelligence with creative thinking ability.Keywords: Creative Thinking; Learning Model; Logical Mathematical Intelligence. AbstrakTujuan dari penelitan ini untuk mengetahui 1) model pembelajaran manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih  antara model pembelajaran discovery learning, CORE atau konvensional, 2) manakah yang memberikan kemampuan berpikir kreatif yang lebih baik siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi, sedang, atau rendah, 3) apakah terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan keceredasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian adalah eksperimen semu, dengan populasi siswa kelas VIII SMP N Se-Kabupaten Madiun. Desain penelitian menggunakan group pretest-posttest control design Pemilihan sampel dengan menggunakan stratified cluster random sampling. Teknik analisis penelitian ini menggunakan anava dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Kesimpulan pada penelitian ini 1) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang kenai model discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran CORE dan konvensional, 2) Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan logis matematis sedang dan rendah, , 3) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan logis matematis dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif.Kata kunci: Berpikir kreatif; kecerdasan logis matematis; model pembelajaran.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document