scholarly journals KAJIAN HUKUM NORMATIF TERHADAP SANKSI ADMINISTRASI NEGARA DALAM QANUN KOTA BANDA ACEH

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apri Rotin Djusfi
Keyword(s):  
Local Area ◽  
The Other ◽  
Local Autonomy ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Permit System ◽  
Banda Aceh

The development of Indonesia state administration law is indicated when the government manage the people by using the law order with determine the decision about prohibition  or by the issuance of permit system. Quanun based on the Law of Aceh Government is “Regulations in local regulations that rule the government administration and the society living of local area in Aceh. Generally, the type and several of sanctions is recorded and determine clearly in the administration rule. There are any sanction in administration law, i.e. government coercion, withdraw the advantage decision (subsidy permit, payment), coercion fee by government, and administration fine.  The policy on concept of administration sanction in Quanun according to the description of Act No. 11 of 2006 concerning to Aceh Government indicates that Quanun  is a rule that override  the other rules by follow the principles of Lex Specialis derogaat Lex Generalis. Asrticle 18 of Constitution of 1945 is a law base for the implementation of local autonomy by provides the local head with wide authority, real and accountable.Keyword : Development, Law, Panismen, Local Goverment

The Executive Council, with Special Reference to Massachusetts

1915 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-308
Author(s):  
A. N. Holcombe
Keyword(s):  
Special Reference ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
The Other ◽  
Executive Council ◽  
Executive Authority ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government ◽  
In The Beginning

The Massachusetts constitution of 1780 provided that there should be a council “for advising the governor in the executive part of the government.” The governor was authorized to convene the council at any time at his discretion “for the ordering and directing the affairs of the commonwealth.” Without the advice and consent of the council, the governor was declared to be incapable of exercising any of his powers of convoking, adjourning, or proroguing the legislature, of making appointments to office, of pardoning criminals, or of authorizing by warrant the expenditure of public moneys. The governor was not made dependent upon the advice and consent of his council in exercise of his legislative powers. He might at discretion recommend measures to the legislature and veto legislative enactments, but no executive authority whatsoever was entrusted to him alone, to be exercised without his council's advice and consent, except the command of the armed forces of the commonwealth. In short, the governor, though declared to be the supreme executive magistrate of the commonwealth, without the consent of his council was impotent in the conduct of state administration.In the beginning the Massachusetts council was chosen by the legislature, and constituted one of the chief agencies relied upon by the revolutionary “fathers” to protect the people against the menace of executive usurpation and tyranny. Similar bulwarks of liberty were established in most of the other states.

scholarly journals REFORMULASI DISKRESI DALAM PENATAAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Arfan Faiz Muhlizi
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Law ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Principle Of Legality

<p>Instrumen hukum paling klasik untuk melaksanakan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan guna mewujudkan masyarakat yang adil dan makmur adalah Hukum Administrasi Negara (HAN). Untuk mencapai tujuan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan tersebut, birokrasi menjadi alat yang efektif didalam menjalankan pengelolaan negara. Persoalan hukum dari birokrasi yang menjadi permasalahan saat ini adalah persinggungan asas legalitas ( wetmatigheid ) dan diskresi ( pouvoir discretionnaire ) pejabat negara (eksekutif). Tulisan ini berusaha menjawab permasalahan di atas dengan lebih menitikberatkan bahasan mengenai “diskresi” dalam hukum administrasi. Dengan metode yuridis normative, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa diskresi memang diperlukan dalam hukum administrasi, khususnya di dalam menyelesaikan persoalan dimana peraturan perundang-undangan belum mengaturnya atau hanya mengatur secara umum. Disamping itu diskresi juga diperlukan dalam hal terdapat prosedur yang tidak dapat diselesaikan menurut administrasi yang normal. Dengan demikian penataan Hukum Administrasi menjadi sangat penting dan tentunya bukan sekedar melihat dari sisi pembentukan atau penataan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait administrasi negara, tetapi lebih jauh dari itu adalah penataan tatanan hukum yang terdiri dari struktur, substansi, dan kultur masyarakat, birokrasi, dan penegak hukum.</p><p>The most classical legal instruments to carry out government administration in order to realize a just and prosperous society is the Law of State Administration (HAN). To achieve the objectives of the government, the bureaucracy into an effective tool in the management of state run. Legal issues of bureaucracy which is the case today is the intersection of the principle of legality (wetmatigheid) and discretionary (pouvoir discretionnaire) state officials (executive). This article tries to answer the above problems with a more focused discussion on the “discretion” in administrative law. With normative juridical methods, the study concluded that discretion was necessary in administrative law, especially in solving problems in which the legislation has not been set or simply set in general. Besides, discretion is also required in case there are procedures that cannot be resolved according to the normal administration. Thus the arrangement of Administrative Law to be very important and certainly not just a look from the side of the formation or arrangement of the legislation related to state administration, but further than that is the arrangement of the legal order which consists of the structure, substance, and the culture of the society, bureaucracy, and enforcement the law.</p>

scholarly journals KOALISI PARTAI POLITIK DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP SISTEM PRESIDENSIAL MULTIPARTAI DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Political Party ◽  
Party System ◽  
The Other ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Presidential System ◽  
Effective System ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Stability

Artikel ini berupaya meninjau kembali praktik koalisi partai politik di tengah sistem presidensial pasca reformasi, dan menilai sejauh mana dampaknya terhadap kestabilan pemerintahan. Pasca reformasi 1998, sejumlah besar partai politik telah didirikan, menunjukkan bahwa munculnya fragmentasi politik adalah sesuatu yang tidak terhindarkan. Alih-alih melaksanakan pemerintahan secara sehat, partai politik membentuk koalisi untuk memperkuat kedudukan mereka di parlemen. Implikasi penerapan multi partai dalam sistem presidensial ini seringkali menimbulkan deadlock antara eksekutif dan legislatif. Sistem presidensial yang dikombinasikan dengan sistem multi partai dapat menjadi sistem yang stabil dan efektif dengan cara penyederhanaan partai politik, desain pelembagaan koalisi, dan pengaturan pelembagaan oposisi. Namun di sisi lain koalisi juga menjadi sangat berpengaruh pada stabilitas pemerintahan. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, artikel ini bertujuan untuk meneliti politik hukum terkait praktik koalisi partai politik di Indonesia dan mengetahui upaya-upaya dalam praktik ketatanegaraan yang dapat merealisasikan stabilitas sistem pemerintahan presidensial pada koalisi di multi partai. Artikel ini menemukan kesimpulan bahwa model pemilihan legislatif dan eksekutif yang dipilih langsung oleh rakyat justru menjadi penyebab disharmonisasi antara legislatif dan eksekutif yang mengarah kepada terjadinya kebuntuan antar kedua lembaga tersebut. Lebih-lebih apabila yang menguasai lembaga ekesekutif dan lembaga legislatif adalah dari latar belakang partai politik yang berbeda. Akibatnya, praktik koalisi seperti ini cenderung mengakibatkan lebih banyak masalah, sehingga penerapan sistem ini memiliki dampak signifikan terhadap demokrasi yang didefinisikan dan dinegosiasikan. This article attempts to review the practice of coalitions of political parties in the post-reform presidential system and assess the extent of their impact on the stability of the government. Post-1998 reform, a large number of political parties have been established, suggesting that the emergence of political fragmentation is inevitable. Instead of implementing a healthy government, political parties formed coalitions to strengthen their positions in parliament. The implication of implementing multi-party in the presidential system often creates deadlocks between the executive and the legislature. A presidential system combined with a multi-party system can become a stable and effective system by simplifying political parties, designing institutionalized coalitions, and organizing opposition institutions. But on the other hand, the coalition has also greatly influenced the stability of the government. By using normative juridical research methods, this article aims to examine legal politics related to the practice of political party coalitions in Indonesia and to find out the efforts in state administration practices that can realize the stability of the presidential system of government in multi-party coalitions. This article finds the conclusion that the legislative and executive election models directly elected by the people are the cause of disharmony between the legislature and the executive which leads to a deadlock between the two institutions. This is even more so if those who control the executive and legislative bodies are from different political party backgrounds. As a result, coalition practices like this are likely to cause more problems, so the adoption of these systems has a significant impact on defined and negotiated democracy.

scholarly journals The Meaning of the Expansion of Administrative Court that Covers Factual Actions

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-192
Author(s):  
Fellista Ersyta Aji
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
The State ◽  
The Public ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Research Material ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Administrative Justice

The Administrative Court and Law No. 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Justice have been provided facilities for the public to sue the government and ask to cancel the decision made by the government. Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration has been stipulated that Government Administration Act more or less supersedes the provisions contained in the Law of the State administrative justice. Especially in this Law which attracts attention is the expansion of object disputes state Administration. The object of the state Administration dispute in this Act is different from its elements to the Law of the State administrative justice. One of these is a written stipulation that includes factual action. There is no explanation for the meaning of factual acts in this Administrative Administration Act. Therefore, further research is needed in this regard. This study aims to find out and understand the meaning of factual actions in Article 87 letter (a) of Law Number 30 of 2014. This study uses a qualitative approach to the type of research Normative Juridical. Data collection techniques are Library study is to collect data conducted by reading, quoting, recording and understanding various literature that have to do with research material. The object of the state Administration disputed in Law Number 5 of 1986 and its amendment has expanded on Law Number 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration. When the object of the dispute expands, it will affect the decision taken by the legal practitioner in this case is the state Administration judge.

scholarly journals Providing Free Legal Services in Notarial Field Based on Notary Law Article 37 Paragraph (1) and (2) in Brebes Regency

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 721
Author(s):  
Khairul Iman Susanto ◽  
Jawade Hafidz
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Legal Services ◽  
Basic Rights ◽  
The People ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Poor Person ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

The idea of a legal state demands the state administration and the government must be based on law and provide assurance of the basic rights of the people as stipulated in the law. Notary as a general official is appointed by the state, he/she does not receive honorarium from the State, but receives honorarium for legal services provided in accordance with his authority in accordance with Article 36 paragraph (2) of the UUJN. The purpose of this study was to analyze the meaning of article 37 paragraph (1) and (2) UUJN to notaries who provide legal services for free, to find and to analyze constraints in the application of article 37 paragraph (1) and (2) UUJN in providing services the law in the notary field to a poor person by a notary in Brebes Regency. The method used was empirical juridical and took location in Brebes Regency. The samples in this study were notary in Brebes Regency.Keywords: legal services; free; notary.

scholarly journals PERGESERAN KOMPETENSI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PASCA DIUNDANGKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-207
Author(s):  
Iskatrinah Iskatrinah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

One of the characteristics of State Administrative Law, among others, states that the field of state administrative law is difficult to codify because its arrangements are scattered in various institutions / institutions / government agencies. However, difficult does not mean it can not be done. The promulgation of Law 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration proves that there has been a codification of the law governing the practice of government administration, therefore it is expected to be able to reinforce the existence of the State Administrative Court in administrative law enforcement. Through this paper, the author tries to explain the authority of the State Administrative Court after the Government Administration Act. This research uses the Normative Juridical Approach method, by tracing, examining the object of research through its legal principles, through its laws and legal history, which is used to find out the rationale, background of the legislation that is the object of research, namely the Law 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. So at the end of this study it can be concluded that the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Government Administration has increasingly complemented and strengthened the role of the State Administrative Court in the order of administrative law in Indonesia, and as a legal political basis for law enforcement in state administration

Peranan KPPU Bagi Pemangku Kepentingan Dalam Menegakkan Undang-Undang Larangan Praktik Monopoli Di Indonesia

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Muchtar Riva’i ◽  
Darwin Erhandy
Keyword(s):  
Stakeholder Participation ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Law Commission

The establishment of the KPPU is to control the implementation of the Act. No. 5/1999 on Concerning the Ban on Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia. Various duties and authority of the KPPU contained in Article 35 and Article 36 of the Act. But in reality, KPPU does not have executorial rights so that the various decisions of the commission often could not be implemented. Therefore internally strengthening of institutional existence by way of amending the Law Commission is very appropriate to be used by the government and parliament agenda. Externally, stakeholder participation is something very urgent and that the KPPU’s strategic optimally capable of performing their duties according to its motto: “Healthy competition Welfare of the people”.

scholarly journals Misconception on the Authority Abuse of Power in the Law Enforcement against Corruption

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Sadjijono Sadjijono ◽  
Bagus Teguh Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Abuse Of Power ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Administrative Jurisdiction

Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration brings the strength and the averment on the performance of the governmental functions which include executive, legislative, and juridical in order to provide the public services (bestuurzorg). Such regulation also aims to prevent and to eliminate any kinds of the maladministration done by the government officials/organs in implementing their functions so that good governance can be realized. In implementing their function, the government should rely on the useful performance (doelmatigheid) and the effectiveness (doeltreffenhgeid) according to the norms of each authority. It is a sophism when the ‘authority’ and/or the ‘competence’ mentioned under the Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration are defined differently in the letterlijk gramatikal wet without associating those terms with an understanding of bevoegheid in an administrative legal concept. An idea that distinctively defines the term ‘competence’ as a right and ‘authority’ as a power is considered as an inconsistent idea, which may cause dualism and distortion in the common law enforcement reffering to the administrative law, particularly related to the concept of the authority abuse of power mentioned under the Law No. 31/ 1999 amended by the Law No. 20/ 2001 on deeds against corruption. As the result, when the notion of ‘authority abuse of power’ is defined as a right (as mentioned in article 1, subsection 5 jo. article 17, Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration), it will be characterized into the absolute competence of the administrative jurisdiction, and when the notion of ‘authority abuse of power’ is defined as a power (as mentioned in article 3, Law No. 31/ 1999 on deeds against corruption), it will be characterized into the absolute competence of the corruption-act jurisdiction. Meanwhile, implementing the government’s ‘competence’ and/or ‘authority’ is characterized into one concept based on the norms of the authority power.

scholarly journals Keputusan Fiktif Sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Gugatan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
I Gede Buonsu ◽  
A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Definition Of

Based on the definition of a state administrative dispute, it can be seen that a State Administrative Dispute has an object in the form of a State Administrative Court, which has been regulated in Article 1 paragraph (9) of Law Number 51 of 2009. State Administrative Court itself can be divided into two, namely negative and positive fictional KTUN regulated in article 3 of the Administrative Court Law and article 53 of the Government Administration Law. This study aims to analyze the arrangement of fictitious TUN decisions according to positive law in Indonesia and to find out the fictional TUN decisions as objects of state administration disputes. This research uses descriptive normative research methods with legal, conceptual and case approaches. The results showed that the decision of fictitious TUN can be divided into two, namely negative fictitious TUN and positive fictitious TUN in which the two rules indirectly cause conflict because they both regulate fictitious TUN but have different meanings, where based on Article 3 is interpreted as a decision rejection (negative fictitious KTUN) while according to the provisions of Article 53 it is interpreted as a decision to grant (positive fictitious KTUN).

scholarly journals AIR QUALITY MONITORING OF KALABAHI-ALOR’S SEAPORT-EAST OF NUSA TENGGARA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-133
Author(s):  
Rikson Siburian ◽  
Minsyahril Bukit ◽  
Herlince Sihotang ◽  
Saur Lumban Raja ◽  
Minto Supeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Air Quality ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Quality Monitoring ◽  
Air Quality Monitoring ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Evaluation of environment of seaport is needed as well as our responsibility to nature sustainability. The Alor’s seaport belongs to Pelindo III. In order to know the air quality of Alor’s seaport, we did this study. Our aims are to know level quality of air at Alor’s seaport and compare to the government regulation. This study refers to Pararosaniline (SOx), Saltzman (NOx), Particle Calculation (dust) and decibel (noisy) methods. We used four locations, those are A-1 (Entrance gate of PELINDO (8013’09.12”S, 124031’07.21”E)); A-2 (In front of passengers terminal (8013’08.75”S, 124031’01.60”E)); A-3 (Exit  gate Kalabahi’s seaport (8013’08.2”S, 124031’00.87”E)) and A-4 (In front of port of the people (8011’09.12”S, 124031’07.21”E)). Results show that the averages level of SOx, NOx and dust of A-1, A-2 and A-3 are 103.01, 104.65 and 107.47 (µg/Nm3), 37.87, 30.62, and 39.73 (µg/Nm3), 56.64, 47.47 and 50.72 (µg/Nm), respectively. On the other hand, the level of noisy of A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 are 68.76, 65.69, 65.20 and 73.60 (dBA), respectively. Base on all of data, we conclude that the air quality of Alor’s seaport is still appropriate according to government regulation (PP. No. 4, 1999).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document