scholarly journals Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning with Advisor Group Strategy in 7th Grade Mathematics Classroom

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-16
Author(s):  
Asrina ◽  
Nurdin Arsyad ◽  
Fajar Arwadi

This study aims to determine the Effectiveness of the Cooperative Learning Model with Group Advisory Strategy in Mathematics Learning of the Grade VII SMP. This research is pre-experiment with techniques sampling is cluster random sampling. Data collection was carried out using observation sheets of  implementation of learning, test results of learning (pretest and posttest), observation sheets of student activities, and student questionnaire responses. The data analysis technique used is descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. The results of  descriptive statistical analysis showed: (1) The average score of learning outcomes after learning reaches 80.04 with standard deviation of 8.79, (2) the posttest results show that classical completeness is achieved 91% (3) The average percentage of student activity is 89%  (4) the average percentage of students who gave positive response 89%. The results of inferential statistical analysis showed : (1) The average value of students taught using cooperative learning models with the Advisor Group Strategy is greater than completeness, which is 70, and (2) The proportion of classical completeness of learning outcomes after the application of the cooperative learning model with Group Advisors Strategy achieve classical completeness. From the results of this research it can be concluded that cooperative learning models with the Group Advisory Strategy are effectively used in students of grade VII.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Ruslan Layn

This research is a Classroom Action Research (PTK), which aims to improve the learning outcomes of mathematics through NHT type cooperative learning model in students of class VIII A MTs. Muhammadiyah conducted collaboratively between researchers and teachers of mathematics studies. In the implementation of this research, it is done by giving group worksheet and observation sheet of student activity using NHT type cooperative learning model after giving an explanation about Pythagoras Theorem material as much as two cycles that cycle I and II. After being given group worksheets then conducted the assessment includes assessment of test results of a cycle I and cycles II and group worksheet to students that is by applying learning model of cooperative learning type NHT. The subjects of this study were students of class VIII A which amounted to 20 students consisting of 15 male students and 5 female students. Techniques of collecting data in research are this observation and test. The data obtained were then analyzed. The results of the study showed that the implementation using NHT type cooperative learning model on Pythagoras Theorem material. the ability of students in solving problems on the material above has increased. With the increase of the average value of students in the first cycle was 43.45 and increased in cycle II 83.90. Improvement of student learning outcomes to mathematics learning using NHT type cooperative learning is good. This is indicated by the average value of group learning outcomes in cycle I 60.00 or being in the medium category and the average score of the learning outcomes of the group in cycle I 82.50 or in the high category. This shows the result of increased mathematics learning after conducting cooperative learning model of NHT type



2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Sifra Bertin Mbosisi ◽  
Kasmudin Mustapa ◽  
Ratman Ratman

This study aimed to determine the effect of the cooperative learning model type teams scramble tournament games based scramble on motivation and learning outcomes students SMA Kristen GPID Palu. The population in this study were all students of class X. The research sample was students (n = 25) of class Xa as a control class and students (n= 24) of class Xb as an experiment class. The testing of student’s learning outcomes data was using the statistical analysis t-test of the two parties and the testing of student’s' motivation using the questionnaire data used a descriptive analysis. The average score of student’s learning outcomes of the experiment class (X1) was 52.83 with a standard deviation of 11.97 and the control class (X2) was 48.12 with a standard deviation of 11.37. Based on the statistical analysis of the hypothesis by t-test two parties, it was obtained that –ttable ≤ tcalculation ³ +ttable (tcalculation = 2.09 and ttable = 2.02) with a significance level a = 0.05 and degrees of freedom = 47, then H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted, therefore it can be said that there is a difference in student’s learning outcomes using cooperative learning model type teams tournament games based scramble. The results of the data analysis of student motivation indicated that the percentage value for the experimental class was 83.4% and for the control class was 81.21% and both were on the agrees attitude with the positive category, so it can be concluded that there is an influence of the cooperative learning model type teams scramble tournament games based scramble on motivation and learning outcomes of students SMA Kristen GPID Palu.



2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Desi Anggraini

This article aims to determine the differences in the results of learning mathematics by using the appropriate learning model in the application of cooperative learning model Number Head Type Togeteher (NHT) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subject of Circles at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan, Kampar District. In this research the problem statement is "Are there differences in learning outcomes of mathematics using Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types in class VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar District on the subject of Circles?" This article uses comparative research which found a difference between the use of Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types, in this study the researchers played a direct role as teachers in the learning process. In this study Cooperative Learning NHT type is X1 and STAD type is X2 variable and learning result is Y variable. The population of this study is all Muhammadiyah MTS students and the sample used is VIIIA class as a class using Cooperative Learning Type Number Head Together (NHT) and class VIIIB as a class that uses Student Team Achievement Divison (STAD) Type Learning Model. The research subjects were eighth grade eighth grade students and the object was learning outcomes using the cooperative learning type NHT model and learning outcomes using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique is in the form of observation, documentation and tests conducted at the sixth meeting after the learning meeting is complete. This data is processed using the test-t formula and obtained a t value of 4.115 with a significant value of 2.69 where the significant value obtained from the calculation is greater than the significance level α = 0.05, then Ha is accepted. Based on the results of the data analysis, it was concluded that there were differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students using the Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types on the subject of the Circle at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar Distric



2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-131
Author(s):  
Yulia Anita Siregar

Abstract. This study aims to improve the learning outcomes of Mathematics students in grade IV SD N 101212 Padang Bujur. This study uses Classroom Action Research (CAR) type of collaboration with steps of planning, action, observation, and reflection consisting of two cycles. Data collection techniques used are test, non-test, and documentation. Adapaun indicator of success of this study is 85% of all students got a value of ≥ 75. The results of the study were analyzed by completeness analysis. In the teaching and learning process using the cooperative type NHT learning model, in cycles 1 and 2 Mathematics learning outcomes increased. Of the students with 15 children, when the pre-cycle students were completed there were 5 (33.33%). Whereas 10 students (66.66%) did not complete. After conducting classroom action research using the NHT cooperative learning model in the first cycle the students who completed the study numbered 8 students (53.33%) while the incomplete ones in the study were 7 students with an average score of 73.66. In the second cycle, students who completed learning were 13 students (86.66%), while those who did not complete the study were 2 students (13.33%) with an average score of 81.33. The results of this study indicate that through the NHT cooperative learning model can improve Mathematics learning outcomes for students in Class IV SD N 101212 Padang Bujur.Keywords: Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) type, Mathematics Learning Outcomes



2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Idham Kamil ◽  
Kashardi Kashardi

This study aims to find out the significant differences between students' mathematical understanding abilities that are taught using the Cooperative Learning Model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and conventional learning models, and which learning model gives better results to improve students' mathematical understanding abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental. The population in this study was class VIII 27 of Seluma State Junior High School consisting of 4 classes. The sample of this study was chosen 3 classes randomly, namely class VIII A as the experimental class I using the Cooperative learning model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), class VIII B as the experimental class II using the cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Class VIII C as a control class using conventional learning models. Data collection on student mathematics learning outcomes in the form of tests consisting of pre-test and post-test. Data were analyzed using ANAVA and BNT. Based on ANAVA results, there are differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes in experimental class I, experimental class II, and control class. Based on the LSD test it was found that the treatment between the experimental class I with the experimental class II, the experimental class I with the control class, and the experimental class II with the control class there were differences. Auditory IntellectualyReceptition (AIR) cooperative learning model provides better results than the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and Conventional learning model.Keywords: mathematical understanding ability,  AIR,  NHT, learning model



2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Sri Fatoyah ◽  
Akhmad Nayazik ◽  
Arie Wahyuni

Abstract This study aims to find out which is better between mathematics learning outcomes in Cokroaminoto Batang Junior High School students who are taught using the Cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) or those who are taught using the Cooperative learning model type Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) in the material mathematics field rectangular. The sample of this study consisted of 2 classes, namely experimental class 1 and experimental class 2 using the NHT and STAD methods. This study used qualitative research methods. Data collection methods used are documentation and test methods. Research instruments in the form of learning tools and mathematics test results. Data analysis performed was a prerequisite test using the average similarity test and hypothesis testing by calculating the average. The results showed that the average learning outcomes of experimental class 1 students amounted to 76,875 and experimental class 2 amounted to 72,56667 which means that classroom learning outcomes taught by NHT type cooperative learning models were better than classroom learning outcomes taught by the STAD type cooperative learning models. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the NHT type of cooperative learning model is more effective when compared to the STAD type cooperative learning model on the subject of quadrilateral in class VII students of Cokroaminoto Batang Middle School Academic Year 2018/2019 Keywords: STAD type cooperative learning model, NHT type cooperative learning model, learning outcomes .



2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nurhusain

<p>This research is a comparative experiment. This study aims to determine the effect of the application of cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) towards mathematics learning outcomes through comparison with the results of studying mathematics taught using direct learning model. Population, namely the eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Polong Bangkeng Utara Kabupaten Takalar semester of academic year 2016/2017, with a sample of students in grade VIIIA and VIIIB class. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis techniques and inferential statistics. Descriptive analysis showed that the average student learning outcomes experimental class at the high category, an average of 80.78 with a standard deviation of 11.28; and the average student learning outcomes control class in middle category with an average score of 73.82 with a standard deviation of 12.98. Inferential analysis results obtained H0 and H1 accepted. It can be concluded with 95% confidence that the results of students 'mathematics learning through cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) higher than the results of students' mathematics learning through direct learning model.</p>



2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Iltavia Iltavia ◽  
Nurhasnah Nurhasnah

The problem formulation in this study is 1). How is the teacher's activity in the application of a scramble type cooperative learning model on Mathematics learning in class XI SMK Cendana Padangpanjang 2017/2018 Academic Year? 2). How is the activity of students in the application of scramble type cooperative learning models in mathematics learning in class XI SMK Cendana Padangpanjang class year 2017/2018, 3). Are students' mathematics learning outcomes using a scramble type cooperative model on effective mathematics learning to improve mathematics learning outcomes in the cognitive domain? To test the validity of the hypothesis the pretest and posttest values were analyzed using the t-test. Obtained then  rejected and  be accepted . This has the effect of increasing the percentage of good completeness as much as 75% of the mathematics learning outcomes. From the results of data analysis it can be concluded that by applying the Scramble Type Cooperative learning model has a good effect on students' mathematics learning outcomes in class XI TKJ SMK Cendana Padangpanjang



2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Sri Fatoyah ◽  
Akhmad Nayazik ◽  
Arie Wahyuni

Abstract This study aims to find out which is better between mathematics learning outcomes in Cokroaminoto Batang Junior High School students who are taught using the Cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) or those who are taught using the Cooperative learning model type Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) in the material mathematics field rectangular. The sample of this study consisted of 2 classes, namely experimental class 1 and experimental class 2 using the NHT and STAD methods. This study used qualitative research methods. Data collection methods used are documentation and test methods. Research instruments in the form of learning tools and mathematics test results. Data analysis performed was a prerequisite test using the average similarity test and hypothesis testing by calculating the average. The results showed that the average learning outcomes of experimental class 1 students amounted to 76,875 and experimental class 2 amounted to 72,56667 which means that classroom learning outcomes taught by NHT type cooperative learning models were better than classroom learning outcomes taught by the STAD type cooperative learning models. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the NHT type of cooperative learning model is more effective when compared to the STAD type cooperative learning model on the subject of quadrilateral in class VII students of Cokroaminoto Batang Middle School Academic Year 2018/2019 Keywords: STAD type cooperative learning model, NHT type cooperative learning model, learning outcomes .



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32
Author(s):  
Nur Asrawati

This type of research is experimental research. This study aims to compare the learning outcomes of mathematics with the Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Model and the 7E Learning Cycle Model. The population in this study were all students of class X SMK Muhammadiyah Bulukumba totaling 127 people. The sample in the study consisted of class X Kep1 which numbered 24 people, class X Kep2 which amounted to 21 people. Based on the results of descriptive statistical analysis obtained the average score of learning outcomes taught by Think Pair Share (TPS) Learning Model is 77.92 with a standard deviation of 10.660 which is categorized good while the average score of learning outcomes taught with the 7E Learning Cycle Model is 63,29 with a standard deviation of 12,170 which is categorized sufficient. Based on the results of inferential statistical analysis obtained tcount = 4.300 and ttable = 1.68. Because tcount > ttable, H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. The results of descriptive and inferential statistical analysis showed that the mathematics learning outcomes of class I students of SMK Muhammadiyah Bulukumba were taught through the Think Pair Share (TPS) learning model higher than the mathematics learning outcomes taught by the 7E learning cycle model.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document