EFFICIENCY OF THE USE OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AS A FACTOR OF INCREASING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
A. V. DZHIOEV ◽  

The article analyzes the reasons for the unstable development of the Russian economy in the period after the introduction of sanctions by the US and EU countries. It is shown that in the context of the fourth industrial revolution in Russia, it is extremely important to actively increase and effectively use such a powerful factor of economic growth and achieving international competitiveness as national intellectual capital.

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1234-1255
Author(s):  
Valerii V. SMIRNOV

Subject. The article investigates a Russian approach to ensuring economic growth. Objectives. The aim is to identify the basis of the Russian approach to ensuring economic growth. Methods. The study rests on the systems approach, using the methods of statistical, neural network, and cluster analysis. Results. The paper defines the structural importance of exports of goods and services, and changes in inventories. It highlights significant links with public consumption expenditures. The Russian approach to ensuring economic growth comes down to devaluation of the national currencyб resulting from the loss of the real inflationary potential of economic growth to maintain the volume of exports of goods and services in the context of maintaining public consumption expenditures. The increase in M2 forces the Central Bank of the Russian Federation to increase its foreign exchange reserves. This has a restraining effect on the growth of Russian Ruble’s monetary exchange rate. This phenomenon causes a drop in the Russian federal loan bond (OFZ) index and a replacement of strategic priorities with tactical ones. Conclusions. The basis of the Russian approach to ensuring economic growth is a reflection of the limits of the Russian economy development and the effectiveness of the Government of the Russian Federation.


2020 ◽  
pp. 26-40
Author(s):  
G. Skachkova

The article deals with issues related to changes in the fixing of labor relations of citizens working under an employment contract in the conditions of the Fourth industrial revolution, characterized by the connection of the material world with the virtual one. But first, the process of «introducing» documents containing basic information about an employee into labor relations, which led to the appearance of the work book in its modern sense, is described in the historical aspect. Then it is shown what changes have occurred recently in the labor legislation of the Russian Federation regarding labor books with the advent of information technologies that record information about the labor activity of employees.


Author(s):  
Галина Крохичева ◽  
Galina Krohicheva ◽  
Анастасия Нелипа ◽  
Anastasiya Nelipa

The article is devoted to the anti-inflation policy as an important condition for its economic growth. The choice of anti-inflation impact methods of anti-inflationary impact should be determined by the nature and level of inflation, the economic mechanism specifics. The aspects of inflation in the modern Russian economy are revealed and the measures of anti-inflation policy as a means of complex influence on the reasons of inflation processes formation are offered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 03040
Author(s):  
Vladimir Filatov ◽  
Victor Mishakov ◽  
Svetlana Osipenko ◽  
Svetlana Artemyeva ◽  
Irina Kolontaevskaya

This work is devoted to the analysis of “Industry 4.0” concepts as an incentive to increase the competitiveness of the food and processing industry of the Russian Federation. The article explores the phenomenon of the fourth industrial revolution as a modern stage of scientific, technical and technological progress. The upcoming fourth industrial revolution is a serious challenge for the government. The main competition of the new revolution is not so much in the technologies themselves but in the skills and education that are necessary for their use. Competition is escalating at the level of education systems but ready-made specialists in the context of globalization still need to be kept, and nowadays the low level of salaries in Russia contributes to a further brain drain. Finally, in the development of Industry 4.0 a systematic approach is important taking into account national characteristics but today it is not in Russia. The development of individual elements of the new industrial revolution is unstable that is why the additional advantages of interdisciplinary research and development are missed. A new round in the development of production will greatly change the social landscape. In order to prevent fatal mass technological unemployment it is necessary to create a social ecosystem for the smooth introduction of technologies with their social design. It is shown that it is accompanied by increased integration, concentration of economic assets under the control of larger business entities. In this regard, the possible consequences of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in the social and humanitarian sphere are examined, and the problem is also raised regarding the development of the Russian food and processing industry of the Russian Federation.


Author(s):  
D. Morkovkin ◽  
E. Kolosova ◽  
N. Semkina

The existing global integration and the current trends in the development of the world leaders of innovative entrepreneurship show that the most promising way of development of the Russian economy is the formation of an innovative corporate sector that has effectively established the reproduction of full-cycle innovations. In modern economic conditions, it is the intellectual capital of corporations that is the basis of the innovation economy, and therefore the core of the knowledge economy. However, at present, innovation activity in the Russian Federation is not the main factor in the growth of the national economy. Over the past few years, the state leadership has been paying great attention to issues related to the state of the scientific and technical sphere, as well as to the formation of an effective innovation policy in Russia. The necessity of implementing the results of scientific research in various industries of the Russian Federation is noted. The article evaluates the innovative activity of Russian companies, highlights their strengths and weaknesses, and shows the role of intellectual capital in the innovative development of the Russian economy using the example of the oil and gas industry. The priority value of the corporate research and design complex (on the example of Rosneft) in the reproduction of the company's intellectual capital as a basic unit for making any scientific and technical decisions and producing organizational and managerial innovations in the production areas of economic activity is determined and justified. The study highlights the current problems and promising directions for the development of corporate intellectual capital in basic industries as a key factor in the innovative transformation of the real sector of the Russian economy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 160-166
Author(s):  
Natalya N. Trofimova ◽  

The article discusses the Japanese strategy of innovative development of the economy and society – the strategy «Society 5.0». The author emphasizes that active digital transformation is currently necessary for global economic growth, which is the basis of «Society 5.0». This strategy implies the develop-ment of technologies that sets the vector of development of both industry and the manufacturing sector, as well as society as a whole. The article substantiates the need for a global digital transformation that ensures serious changes in the life of society, including management, the structure of industry and employment. It is shown that «Society 5.0» is based on the integration of physical and cyberspace to solve social problems, allowing people to live as comfortably as possible due to technological innovations. The obstacles that countries have to overcome when implementing the new innovation strategy «Society 5.0» are highlighted. The problems that pushed the Japanese government to the need to develop innovative approaches to the devel-opment of the economy and society are described. It is emphasized that the basis for the transition to the strategy «Society 5.0» is the program «Digital Economy of the Russian Federation».


2020 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
Elena A. Matchenko ◽  

Monetary policy currently pursued by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is a reflection of external market conditions. Regulatory approaches should, in particular, help reduce the dependence of monetary policy on external factors — such as oil prices, foreign loans, access to foreign markets, etc. This is not about completely isolating the monetary sphere of the Russian Federation from parameters and the external environment. It is required to refuse close, automatic communication with the given parameters. It is necessary to increase the stability of the monetary system of the Russian Federation and the economy as a whole in relation to external shocks. This can be done through more active use of a wide range of tools available to the regulator. These include monetary and regulatory mechanisms (interest rates, reserve requirements, foreign exchange positions, etc.), gold reserves, verbal interventions, etc., which can have a stimulating effect on economic growth. The high volatility of the ruble now observed makes it extremely difficult for enterprises to plan and forecast, thereby making it impossible for the normal course of investment processes and expanded reproduction. In order to use monetary mechanisms to stimulate economic growth and eliminate the negative effects of current monetary policy (in particular, implemented since autumn 2014), a departure from inflation targeting and free floating of the ruble exchange rate is necessary. At the same time, it is obviously necessary to abandon many components or closely related elements (for example, “monetary contraction”). In addition, steps will be needed to stabilize the foreign exchange market, which would have positive effects (falling volatility, lower inflation, etc.). Under current conditions, with limited access to external financial resources, it is important to use mechanisms for generating financial flows based on internal sources. In other words, the monetary base should be formed due to internal factors, and not depend on the dynamics of energy prices. In previous years, the main emphasis in the Russian economy was placed on the external sphere as a source of growth financing. Restricting access to external cheap financial resources (due to low oil prices, sanctions, etc.), as well as continuing geopolitical tensions with regard to Russia, reduce the possibilities for implementing longterm investment projects in the economy. This increases the relevance of national mechanisms and sources of formation of the resource base (including long) necessary to refinance previously taken loans, as well as to implement structural changes in the Russian economy.


10.12737/5448 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Басовская ◽  
Elena Basovskaya

The technique for assessing sustainability of regional economic development based on applying diagnostics of system sustainability failure is used to explore dynamics of economic development of the Russian Federation and federal districts. The degree of development sustainability is assessed by dispersion of economic growth rates. The author’s findings reveal the increasing lack of sustainability in the development of the Russian economy as for the period of 2011–2013, which means that a new economic crisis may happen. Differences in the economic development of the federal districts in the period of 2008–2012 are observed. During the 2011–2012 period the Central, Northwest, Southern, North Caucasus, Volga, Urals and Siberian federal districts showed sustainable economic development. The economic development of the Far Eastern federal district showed the lack of sustainability and recessionary production decline.


2020 ◽  
pp. 96-104
Author(s):  
Marina Buyanova ◽  
Irina Averina

The phenomenon of the fourth industrial revolution causes extensive changes in the economic system at all levels of its functioning. Of particular interest in this aspect are regional studies, as they allow us to consider and assess the readiness of individual subjects of the Russian Federation to these changes, as well as the degree of potential adaptation to them and opportunities for development in a new “key”, taking into account historical, geographical, social and economic prerequisites. The article includes the analysis of major constraints to economic growth at the international, national and regional levels and the full involvement of domestic economy in Industry 4.0. The differentiation in the development of meso-economic systems in Russia leads to the specificity of the approaches to adaptation of subjects to rapidly changing technological realities. The study is based on the analysis of socio-economic components of one of the regions of the Russian Federation – Volgograd region, in order to further identify the degree of its readiness for systematic development in the new neo-industrial era. The presence of a complex of problematic (similar to general) issues of a regulatory, social, financial, information and technological nature has been revealed. The identified problems require the development of directions for their solution (economic and institutional orientation) in order to reduce the level of losses in the process of transition to a new industrial model of economic development and increase the opportunities to ensure favorable competitive positions within it for the region.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (26) ◽  
pp. 146-157
Author(s):  
Oleg Ilyasovich Katlishin ◽  
Alexander Sergeevich Baleevskikh

Currently, the Russian Federation is a significant geopolitical and economic player in the modern global world, it has its own interests and traditional partnerships with most states, including business representatives of those countries that are trying to restrain its development through restrictions and partial isolation from global development opportunities . Despite the sanctions and the unfavorable world market conditions, the Russian economy showed high plasticity, stability and adaptability to external changes, which was reflected in the positive dynamics of foreign trade growth in the existing conditions. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the dynamics of official statistics on economic growth and foreign trade in the Russian Federation for the period 2013-2018. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were solved: 1) an analysis of the dynamics of the gross domestic product of the Russian Federation for the period 2013-2018; 2) the role of foreign trade in the gross domestic product of the country is estimated through the calculation of foreign economic quotas; 3) analyzed the dynamics of foreign trade, imports and exports of the Russian Federation; 4) revealed the shares of product groups in the structure of exports and imports, as well as the most significant counterparties of the Russian Federation. The hypothesis of the study was the thesis of the interdependence of the volume of economic growth and foreign economic activity, including taking into account changes in foreign economic conditions. The article provides a retrospective analysis of the dynamics of economic growth in terms of nominal value and purchasing power parity, as well as the dynamics of foreign trade of the Russian Federation for the period 2013-2018. A preliminary forecast of foreign trade volumes for 2019 is given. The calculation of foreign economic, export and import quotas for the same period. The Russian specifics of the dynamics and structure of export supplies and import flows, as well as the structure of both imports and exports by counteragent countries and enlarged groups of the commodity nomenclature of foreign economic activity, are examined. For the period under review, the nominal GDP fell by 28.8%, while in terms of purchasing power parity, the Russian economy grew by 5.7% over the same period. At the same time, the largest drawdown in the economy occurred in the middle of the period; in recent years, the situation in the economy has improved. The role of foreign trade in the formation of GDP during the period was relatively stable, with the exception of 2018, when the foreign trade quota sharply increased (as well as export and import). The dynamics of foreign trade and export quotas in the Russian Federation are almost identical, while imports depend on export earnings. For the study period, foreign trade turnover of the Russian Federation decreased by 18.4%, export volumes decreased by 14.8%, import purchases decreased by 24.5%. The main problem of the economy and foreign economic activity remains its dependence on the export of mineral products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document