scholarly journals The Implementasi Kebijakan Pengawasan Keimigrasian Terhadap Orang Asing Di Kantor Imigrasi Malang Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19

PLENO JURE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-97
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mufli Syahjehan ◽  
M Zaki Ramdhani ◽  
Shafa Salsabila

Kemunculan wabah pandemi Covid-19 yang menyebar ke seluruh belahan dunia, salah satunya Indonesia,telah memberikan banyak pengaruh pada segala aspek kehidupan yaitu salah satunya dalam melakukan pengawasan keimigrasian. Berbagai kebijakan atau peraturan keimigrasian diterbitkan seiring dengan berkembangnya kasus aktif Covid-19. Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I TPI Malang selaku Unit Pelaksana Teknis Keimigrasian melaksanakan pengawasan keimigrasian terhadap Orang Asing sekaligus melakukan penegakan hukum keimigrasian. Pengawasan keimigrasian tersebut dilakukan melalui pengawasan lapangan dan pengawasan administratif. Metode penelitian yang dipakai yaitu metode penelitian hukum normatif-empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa beberapa kebijakan keimigrasian yang diantaranya memuat ketentuan pengawasan keimigrasian terhadap orang asing di masa pandemi Covid-19 diterbitkan menyesuaikan dengan perkembangan kasus aktif Covid-19 Indonesia dan pelaksanaannya di Kantor Imigrasi Malang telah berjalan sesuai aturan yang berlaku. Abstract:The emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak that has spread to all parts of the world, including Indonesia, has had a lot of influence on all aspects of life, one of which is in conducting immigration surveillance. Various immigration policies or regulations were issued in line with the development of active cases of Covid-19. The Immigration Office Class I TPI Malang as the Immigration Technical Implementation Unit carries out immigration supervision of foreigners as well as enforces immigration law. Immigration supervision is carried out through field supervision and administrative supervision. The research method used is the normative-empirical legal research method. The results of the study show that several immigration policies, which include provisions for supervision of immigration against foreigners during the Covid-19 pandemic, were issued in accordance with the development of active cases of Covid-19 in Indonesia and their implementation at the Malang Immigration Office has been running according to the applicable rules.

LEGALITAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rezky Rinaldy Dan Syamsudin

Indonesia and even the world now feel the impact of the Corona virus outbreak (covid-19), in connection with it hindering the burial of the bodies of victims who died. The phenomenon of corpse rejection of corona virus patients (covid-19) continues to occur in various regions. In fact, the body must be buried immediately no later than 4 hours after being declared dead. The main reason people are reluctant to accept the bodies of patients co-19 because of fear of contracting. While the medical ensure that the body will not transmit the virus. The body in the coffin has been wrapped and declared sterile. The type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results of the study showed that obstructing officers who will carry out official burials could indeed be convicted. Law enforcement officials can use Article 178 of the Criminal Code. not a complaint offense. Law enforcement officials can immediately take action without anyone complaining. "If the incident fulfills the elements contained in Article 178 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrators can be charged. However, it must look at intentions and actions as a condition for imposing a crime on someone.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Gede Angga Prawirayuda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati

The most detrimental thing is the use of domain names on internet networks that often use company name, brand and services without permission from the brand owner. The position of the brand is very important in the world of advertising and marketing. That happens because consumers in choosing a product related to the reputation of a brand, based on a sense of trust in the experience in using products with that brand. Aside from being a differentiator of a product with other products, a brand is also a valuable and commercial asset that has moral rights and economic rights. This study aims to analyse the preventive and repressive legal protection of trademark rights holders in e-commerce transactions. This research was conducted using the normative legal research method. The results of this study indicate that the preventive legal protection of trademark rights holders in e-commerce transactions is to register the trademark. The emphasis on preventive protection in this research is related to guarantees of the exercise of rights for brand rights holders in e-commerce transactions. That the presence of the government by drafting the Electronic Commerce Act and conducting socialization related to the legal protection of the parties in e-commerce is expected to be able to provide legal certainty of legal protection. Repressive legal protection in resolving trademark disputes is expected to create a guarantee for the enforcement of the rights of registered trademark rights holders in e-commerce transactions. Settlement of trademark disputes in e-commerce transactions can be done in 2 (two) ways, namely litigation and non-litigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Kunarso Kunarso ◽  
A Djoko Sumaryanto

Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19) has a significant impact on all aspects of human life in the world, especially in Indonesia which is very large in area and has a large population (around 267 million people) with different kinds of professions. The purpose of this study is to focus on civil matters, with more emphasis on the problem of agreements that are influenced by Covid-19. The normative legal research method uses a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach to force majeure and describes an analysis (analytical descriptive). The results showed that the agreement in the state of the Covid-19 outbreak greatly influenced the implementation of the agreement set and agreed upon by the parties, because the agreement binds the parties, so the parties are subject to the contents of the agreement.


Author(s):  
Refina Mirza Devianti ◽  
Tomy Michael

The Covid-19 is a new virus found in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, to be precise in December.  This virus spreads very quickly to various parts of the world, causing access between countries to be closed in anticipation of the transmission of covid-19. Covid-19 can be transmitted from one person to another by touching objects that have been exposed to a person with Covid-19 and can also catch it through coughing or sneezing droplets from that person. The existence of Covid-19 has led to changes in the order of life from normal to having to comply with health protocols implemented by the government in various places to anticipate the spread of covid-19, for example in implementing health protocols in places of worship and in crowded places.  In terms of performing worship in a mosque environment, a person is obliged to obey the protocols that have been implemented but in reality, many people don’t comply with health protocols and don’t care about the safety of others. If this is the case, then the mosque administrators or as takmir of the mosque must be responsible for the violations that occur because they are supposed to enforce health protocols in the mosque environment which is their obligation. The research method used by researchers is normative legal research with a statutory and case approach. The takmir of the mosque as the person in charge of all activities carried out in the mosque must fulfill its responsibility in a civil manner towards public disobedience to health protocols that aren’t obeyed because the mosque takmir should strictly enforce the health protocol


Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
I Dewa Gede Cahaya Dita Darmaangga ◽  
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari

This study aims to find out about the legality of the inauguration of cyber-based notary deeds through the Zoom Conference media and the legal consequences of notarial deeds inaugurating the Zoom Conference media. The research method used is normative legal research methods that use a statutory approach and analysis of legal concepts based on primary and secondary legal materials. The study result show that according to Article 1868 of the Civil Code stipulates that the making of an authentic deeds is made is the presence of an authorized public official. Homeever, when referring to the explanation of Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public, there is no clarity regarding the explanation regarding electronic certification (cyber notary) whether tappers must remain physically present in front of a notary or may not ignore it virtually. Regarding the inauguration of deeds through the Zoom Conference media, its is necessary to have clearer regulations regarding the concept of cyber notary in the world of notary so that notaries can carry out their duties without violating laws and regulations. The concept of cyber notary, in the inauguration of the deed, it is felt that there is a need for regulations that clearly regulate how the terms or conditions in the inauguration of authentic deeds/notaries are carried out using the concept of cyber notary, one of which is the Zoom Cenference media.   Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai legalitas peresmian akta Notaris berbasis cyber notary melalui media Konferensi Zoom dan akibat hukum peresmian akta otaris dilakukan dengan media Konferensi Zoom. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan serta analisis konsep hukum dengan bersumber pada bahan-bahan hukum primer maupun sekunder. Hasil studi menunjukan bahwa menurut Pasal 1868 KUHPerdata menentukan mengenai pembuatan akta otentik tersebut dibuat dihadapan pejabat umum yang berwenang. Tetapi apabila merujuk terhadap penjelasan Pasal 15 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris tidak ada kejelasan mengenai penjelasan mengenai sertifikasi elektronik (cyber notary) apakah para penghadap harus tetap hadir secara fisik dihadapan notaris ataukah boleh tidak melaikan secara virtual. Terkait dengan peresmian akta melalui media Konferensi Zoom maka diperlukan adanya pengaturan lebih jelas mengenai konsep cyber notary dalam dunia kenotariatan agar notaris dapat menjalankan tugas jabatannya tanpa menyalahi undang-undang dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Konsep cyber notary ini dalam peresmian akta dirasa perlunya ada pengaturan yang mengatur dengan jelas bagaimana ketentuan atau syarat dalam peresmian akta autentik/notaris yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan konsep cyber notary salah satunya adalah media Konferensi Zoom.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-137
Author(s):  
Sri Dewi Rahayu Dewi ◽  
Yulia Monita

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan pidana terhadap pelaku penyalahguna narkotika golongan I bagi diri sendiri. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum Yuridis Normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penyebab hakim menjatuhkan putusan berbeda terhadap kedua kasus ini karena terdapat keadaan yang meringankan terhadap kedua terdakwa. Pada studi kasus keadaan yang meringankan yang dipertimbangkan oleh hakim yaitu: karena terdakwa merupakan korban penyalahguna narkotika yang sudah kecanduan serta didukung dengan keterangan saksi di persidangan. Oleh karena itu hakim harus mempertimbangkan fakta yuridis, fakta persidangan dan fakta sosiologis dari terdakwa. Hal ini dilakukan agar terdakwa merasa bahwa hakim menjatuhkan putusan pidana sesuai dengan perbuatan terdakwa. ABSTRACT This article aims to analyze the basic considerations of judges in convicting criminals against class I narcotics abusers themselves. This research method is a normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that the cause of the judge handed down a different verdict in these two cases because there were circumstances that alleviated the two defendants. In the case study the mitigating circumstances considered by the judge are: because the defendant is a victim of narcotics who are addicted and supported by witness testimony at the trial. Therefore the judge must consider the juridical facts, the facts of the trial and the sociological facts of the defendant. This was done so that the defendant felt that the judge handed down the criminal verdict according to the defendant's actions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-124
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Gita Loka Chindiyana Dewi ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Corruption is a problem in the economy of every nation in the world, whether in Government or private environments. With the promulgation of Act No. 31 of the year 1999 Jo Act No. 20 year 2001. The Government in the year 2002 through Law – Law Number 30 year 2002 about corruption eradication Commission formed corruption eradication Commission (KPK) which is a specialized agency in dealing with the special corruption. At issue is how the authorities of the corruption eradication Commission (KPK) in conducting the investigation, the crime of corruption? And how coordination between the corruption eradication Commission (KPK) and other law enforcement agencies in conducting the investigation, the crime of corruption? The study used is the normative legal research i.e. research examines law is a law written from various aspects, but does not examine aspects of applied or implementation. Approach this research method by means of reviewing all laws, understanding the hierarchy of principles and legislation. The conclusion in May of this research is that in regards to the investigation of criminal acts of corruption, the corruption eradication Commission (KPK) has authority that is doing the coordination and supervision that can perform the takeover against investigation or the prosecution conducted by the Police and the Prosecutor's Office. But in the relationship between the coordination with other law enforcement agencies KPK still haven't made good cooperation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1262
Author(s):  
Alexzander Rinaldy ◽  
Dian Andriawan Daeng Tawang

The current football competition has changed because it began to be infiltrated by organized criminals, especially in match manipulation and match fixing. Setting scores and match manipulation as a global threat in the world of football. The problem faced in writing this essay is how to criminalize match fixing in soccer matches in Indonesia based on Law Number 11 of 1980 on the Crime of Bribery. The research method used in this research is normative legal research that is research which gives systematic explanation of rules governing a certain legal category, analyze the relation between regulation explain difficulty area and may predict future development. The results showed that the criminalization of match fixing in Indonesian soccer matches based on Law Number 11 of 1980 on the Crime of Bribery was threatened with a criminal sanction although bribes in the private sector can’t be regarded as an act of corruption because they do not belong to the category of corruption based on Corruption Act. This means that it does not mean it has no impact at all in enforcing the rule. In fact, the non-regulation of bribery in the private sector in Corruption Law is related to the actors who can eradicate and enforce the provisions. Bribes (as well as corruption in general) in the private sector have brought so many bad impacts on the business sector including in football matches.  


Author(s):  
Made Nurmawati ◽  
I Nengah Suantra

Globalization has implications for the Indonesian diaspora in various parts of the world. Indonesian diaspora groups are aggressively fighting for their citizenship status in order to have dual citizenship. Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia has not regulated dual citizenship status for the Indonesian diaspora. The purpose of the study is to identify and analyze the dual citizenship position of the Indonesian diaspora in the Indonesian Citizenship Law. The research method used is normative legal research. The study suggested that citizenship status is very important because it relates to issues of rights and obligations. The bipartite status provides the protection and identity of the two countries. However, it is not the time to grant unlimited dual citizenship status because first, it needs an in-depth study of the implications of social, economic, cultural, political, security, and legal aspects as well as changes to the relevant related laws and regulations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 39-58
Author(s):  
Mohammad Belayet Hossain ◽  
Asmah Laili Yeon ◽  
Ahmad Shamsul Abdul Aziz

At present, the BITs are playing a significant part in regulating foreign direct investment (FDI) in the host countries and like other members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Malaysia have also signed BITs to facilitate trade. Malaysia’s FDI laws and BITs mainly protect foreign investors, however, neither of them has any specific provision on the protection of sovereignty, national interest and security. This paper addresses the question, to what extent are sovereignty, national interest and security protected through BITs during entry of FDI into Malaysia? Using non-doctrinal socio-legal research method, the authors critically analyzed 15 BITs to explore whether they protect the sovereignty, national interest and security of Malaysia. The findings show that the existing Malaysian BITs contain provisions to promote and protect foreign investments but lack specific references to protect sovereignty, national interest and security, therefore, the government should consider these important factors when signing future BITs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document