scholarly journals THE FORMATION OF THE LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF THE INNOVATIVE ECONOMY ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirojiddin MAKHATOV ◽  

This article describes the main legal and institutional aspects of supporting the national innovation system and ensuring innovative development in the Republic of Korea at the modern stage.

Author(s):  
Khursanov Rustam Kholmuratovich ◽  

In fact, the development of startups plays an important role in shaping the national innovation system of the country, further increasing the share of innovation in the economy, creating new types of goods, works and services. Although there is no separate law in our country directly regulate the activities of startups, there are dozens of laws that indirectly cover this area. It is natural that the existing legal framework in this area will serve as a legal regulator in the development of startups in the country and the formation of a national innovation system. Today, the models of developed countries in the legal regulation of innovative activities are used as an example by many developing countries. The national model of innovative development of the Republic of Korea is one of them.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 110-116
Author(s):  
G. A. SHCHERBAKOV ◽  

The National Innovation System (NIS) of the Republic of Korea is a successful experience in the implementation of national economic policy based on the implementation of advanced technologies in its own production. This approach makes it possible to successfully develop, along with the innovation sector, traditional industries, whose products meet the most intense competition in world markets. The article contains an overview of the formation and analysis of the current state of the NIS in South Korea.


2020 ◽  
pp. 144-148
Author(s):  
А.П. Фомина ◽  
Р.А. Дрозд ◽  
М.И. Гайченя

Для достижения необходимого уровня конкурентоспособности экономики страны, развития национальной инновационной системы, требуется идентификация и актуализация факторов, оказывающих влияние на национальную инновационную систему, ее успешное функционирование. Из множества факторов, влияющих на инновационное развитие, необходимо выделить основные и второстепенные. В статье рассматриваются основные характеристики инновационного процесса, механизмы взаимодействия субъектов экономики и науки. Рассматриваются модели эндогенного роста и имитационного инновационного развития и интенсивного инновационного роста. При рассмотрении двух подходов к природе зарождения инновации: модель technology – push и модель market-pull, авторами выдвигается и подтверждается гипотеза о том, что фактором развития национальной инновационной системы является, прежде всего, реализация технологических инноваций. Авторами доказывается, что особое внимание необходимо уделить развитию научно-технической инновационной инфраструктуры. Развитие национальных инновационных систем может иметь секторальный характер: применение соответствующей экономической политики, стимулирующей развитие науки, технологий, инноваций в отдельных секторах экономики и кластерах, в которых под влиянием различных факторов сложились наиболее благоприятные условия для развития в сфере технологий. To achieve the required level of competitiveness of the country's economy, the development of a national innovation system, identification and updating of factors that influence the national innovation system and its successful functioning is required. Of the many factors affecting innovative development, it is necessary to distinguish the main and secondary. The article discusses the main characteristics of the innovation process, the mechanisms of interaction between economic entities and science. The models of endogenous growth and imitation innovative development and intensive innovative growth are considered. When considering two approaches to the nature of the origin of innovation: the technology-push model and the market-pull model, the authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the factor of development of the national innovation system is, first of all, the implementation of technological innovations. The authors prove that special attention should be paid to the development of scientific and technical innovation infrastructure. The development of national innovation systems can be of a sectoral nature: the application of appropriate economic policies that stimulate the development of science, technology, innovation in individual sectors of the economy and clusters, in which under the influence of various factors the most favorable conditions for development in the field of technology have developed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 95-107
Author(s):  
A. A. Titkov ◽  
S. Zh. Ibraimova ◽  
O. V. Kozhevina ◽  
A. Yu. Yudinstev

The purpose of the study is focused on finding optimal and effective organizational and economic mechanisms for integrating the intellectual potential of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation. The introduction of sustainable development tools and the transition to models for achieving the SDGs in the field of education, science and technology is considered by the authors as a strategic priority for the integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation. Intellectual potential is the fundamental basis for the innovative development of business entrepreneurship. The subject of the research is the intellectual potential of economic systems and its relationship with innovative development. The object of the research is the countries with developing economies — Kazakhstan, Russia. The methodology was based on the use of the following general scientific and special research methods: analysis and synthesis, the dialectical approach, the statistical method of data analysis, the method for establishing patterns and hypotheses, the method of aggregated analytical calculation. Within the framework of the results of the research: the creation and development of corporate-type universities; creation and development of regional and interregional centers of competence; creation and development of centers of business initiatives; scientific and educational consortia.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuriy I. Razorenov ◽  
Konstantin V. Vodenko

PurposeThe goal of the research is to analyze the university development trends in the national innovation system. The paper presents a review of the formation of innovative development strategies and the place of a university in them. The structure is based on the analysis of foreign trends of the transformation of universities and the examination of the efficiency of the interaction between the university, industry and the state. Russian experience in the transformation of universities is presented.Design/methodology/approachResearch methodologies include methods of statistical and comparative analysis and synthesis. The information analysis base of the research is composed of the reports of the World Intellectual Property Organization at year-end 2019, as well as global comparative assessments of the status and development of innovation activities by the Global Innovation Index and Global Competitiveness Index, which are calculated according to the methodology of the World Economic Forum and others.FindingsIn the course of research, the authors put forward a new model of universities within the framework of the national innovation system, which is based on the “triple helix model of innovation” implemented by universities, industry and the state. The logic and structure of the research are set forth in the following way. First, a review of the global practice of the formation and implementation of state innovation policy is given, with the university being a key link, the foreign experience in the transformation of universities is analyzed and the efficiency of the interaction between the university, industry and the state is examined. Furthermore, consideration is given to the Russian experience in the transformation of universities. In conclusion, the main findings of the research are presented.Practical implicationsResults testify that goals and objectives that can be solved by achieving indicators in the world rankings are important for improving competitiveness of education, but they are only efficient if they conform to management decisions that are taken for achieving them and coincide with strategic goals and directions that should be implemented within the framework of the national innovation and academic system.Originality/valueResearch hypothesis is as follows: modern age is characterized by the rapid development of digital technologies and globalization processes, which transform technologies and cultural patterns into techniques and methods of working with information. Despite the fact that a university is the center for the development of society and culture, which serves as an axiological core, it is subject to the transformation, which is mainly manifested in instrumental changes and the expansion of the social procurement range. The modern educational system is yet to find a contemporary conceptual framework of a university that would satisfy the up-to-date requirements of the global information society in an age of digital revolution and dominate in the educational services market.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 311
Author(s):  
Sandro Ruduit Garcia ◽  
Tamirez Galvão da Silva Paim ◽  
Figueiredo Artur Muinge

Os parques tecnológicos têm envolvido uma diversidade de situações que reclama considerações sobre a sua capacidade de contribuir para a redução do déficit institucional que assola o “sistema nacional de inovação” no Brasil. Com base no detalhamento de um estudo de caso, tentamos avançar o argumento de que esse tipo de institucionalidade envolve, mais do que uma resposta às novas demandas do sistema produtivo e econômico, processos indeterminados de construção sociopolítica conduzidos pela ação estratégica em meio a diferentes formas de resistência, a limitações de recursos econômicos e sociais, e a quadros regulatórios pré-existentes. A estratégia do parque pode, desse modo, construir uma institucionalidade que avança na direção de certos vínculos, mas deixa de integrar diferentes esferas e atores relevantes (parques de modelo acadêmico). A conjectura é discutida tomando-se como referência a recente experiência do “Zenit Parque da UFRGS”.AbstractTechnology parks have involved a variety of situations that call for considerations on their capacities to contribute to reducing the institutional deficit that plagues the “national innovation system” in Brazil. Based on the details of a case study, we try to advance the argument that this type of institutional framework involves more than a response to the new demands of the productive and economic system, undetermined processes of sociopolitical construction driven by strategic action amid different ways resistance, limitations of economic and social resources, and pre-existing regulatory frameworks. The park’s strategy can thus build an institutionality that advances in the direction of certain links but fails to integrate different spheres and relevant actors (academic model parks). The conjecture is discussed with reference to the recent experience of “Zenit Park at UFRGS.


2021 ◽  
pp. 118-130
Author(s):  
Dmitry N. Zemlyakov

The article is a review of the monograph named in the title, which reflects the multilevel features and problems of the formation of a national innovation system in Russia. According to the reviewer’s summary predictive conclusion, the book will be very interesting and useful for its addressees: researchers and experts, university teachers, graduate students and students, as well as managers of different levels responsible for innovative processes.


Author(s):  
Ekaterina I. Shumskaia ◽  

The article presents the results of a study of the state role in the modern process of innovative development. It relies on academic literature and research to evaluate government measures, such as creating the necessary environment, subsidies and various tax incentives. The analysis of the indirect impact on the innovative development of the country is made through the education and training of scientists and researchers, creation of institutions, as well as supporting the structure for the commercialization of innovation. The synthesis of estimates of the effectiveness of government intervention in the innovative development of the economy is used. A comparative analysis revealed the features of the innovation system in Russia: in comparison with developed countries, unique conditions were created for business development through a comprehensive fiscal policy, however, private sector interest in innovation remains low. Therefore, priority directions in development remain measures to improve the business climate, increase the investment attractiveness of the country and promote competition. With a high degree of involvement of domestic universities in R&D, the relationship with the private sector remains poorly developed, which impedes the commercialization of projects under development, which also leads to the leakage of personnel from the country and reduces the competitiveness of domestic enterprises. The state should create the necessary conditions for the development of an innovative economy and actively work to eliminate these barriers, primarily by stimulating business activity and internal competition. In the future, it is necessary to develop sectors that already have serious competitive advantages, such as oil and gas, mining, agriculture, as well as the banking sector, transport, food processing and electricity, and also focus on development choices full-time promising areas with personnel potential.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document