scholarly journals Accelerating the transition to an innovative economy: efficiency increase and innovative investment stimulation under new conditions

Author(s):  
Yuri A. Malenkov ◽  

The problems of accelerating the transition of Russian enterprises to innovative economy are considered. The structure of new factors constraining the transition of the Russian economy to innovative development is revealed, and their analysis is carried out. A number of significant shortcomings of the scientific base of innovative investment management have been identified. New categories of innovative investments and pseudo-investments based on a strategic approach and classification of investments are proposed. The way and recommendations for resolving one of the most important contradiction between business and the state on the choice of ways and of sources of innovative investment are proposed.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Alexander Semin ◽  
Marina Vasiljeva ◽  
Alexander Sokolov ◽  
Nikolay Kuznetsov ◽  
Maksim Maramygin ◽  
...  

The study is aimed at determining the oscillators of crisis manifestations when the Russian economy tries to make transition to the path for accelerating technological development and forming an innovative economy. Short-term cycles were determined in the development of the Russian economy from 1995 to the first half of 2020 through the Fourier spectral analysis. Using the Granger test, causal relationships between the leading indicators of the economic crisis and the real GDP index in Russia were identified and substantiated. They reflect the influence of the key rate dynamics on the volume of lending, savings, investments, the yield on securities and the exchange rate; volumes of bank loans per the share of non-performing and bad loans and innovative development of the economy. Based on the constructed neural models of the oscillator influence on the level of real GDP in Russia, it was determined that the rapid growth of bank and mortgage lending, the devaluation of the ruble, a decreased volume of gross foreign investment and the level of innovative development predetermine crisis manifestations in the national economy. The lags of the influence of changes in the leading indicators of the economic crisis on the development of the economy were calculated. The results obtained can contribute to the effectiveness of the anti-crisis regulation strategy in Russia. They can serve as a basis for increasing the efficiency of long-term innovative development and creating appropriate conditions for increasing the scientific and technological potential of the country.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 3604-3609 ◽  

In modern conditions of global transformations and the growth of crisis phenomena in the global economy, the question of finding and developing alternative economic models becomes urgent. As a tool for stimulating economic development and a new source of growth, innovations and the results of scientific and technological activities were chosen. This approach was theoretically developed and described at the beginning of the last century, but it has become in demand only now. The development of the innovative sector of the economy leads to the emergence of qualitatively new technologies and is non-linear. The complexity of management objects, the dynamism of innovative processes, which, in turn, transform the economy, markets, institutions, are growing. Changing management objects require new scientific theories, management technologies and tools. In this article, the author analyzes modern economic and technological trends, identifies the main scientific theories that describe these processes, identifies trends in changes in management sciences. The article discusses the classification of models of innovative development, outlines the main directions of changes in the state management of innovative development and innovative infrastructure. Based on the study, the systematic changes in the role of the state in building an innovative economy are systematized, the emerging formats of managerial structures and the institutions for the development of innovative infrastructure are described.


Semiotica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (228) ◽  
pp. 223-235
Author(s):  
Winfried Nöth

AbstractThe paper begins with a survey of the state of the art in multimodal research, an international trend in applied semiotics, linguistics, and media studies, and goes on to compare its approach to verbal and nonverbal signs to Charles S. Peirce’s approach to signs and their classification. The author introduces the concept of transmodality to characterize the way in which Peirce’s classification of signs reflects the modes of multimodality research and argues that Peirce’s classification of the signs takes modes and modalities in two different respects into consideration, (1) from the perspective of the sign and (2) from the one of its interpretant. While current research in multimodality has its focus on the (external) sign in a communicative process, Peirce considers additionally the multimodality of the interpretants, i.e., the mental icons and indexical scenarios evoked in the interpreters’ minds. The paper illustrates and comments on the Peircean method of studying the multi and transmodality of signs in an analysis of Peirce’s close reading of Luke 19:30 in MS 599, Reason’s Rules, of c. 1902. As a sign, this text is “monomodal” insofar as it consists of printed words only. The study shows in which respects the interpretants of this text evince trans and multimodality.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (26) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
M.S. Starikova ◽  
◽  
L.V. Usatova ◽  
E.D Gyamfi ◽  
◽  
...  

The article summarizes modern problems and ways to improve industrial development in Russia, taking into account the challenges of an innovative economy. A comparison is made between the planned in the Strategy for the Innovative Development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020 and the actually achieved indicators reflecting the state of the industry. The conclusion is made about the low level of implementation of the Strategy and the need for further programmatic and methodological support for transformations, taking into account the guidelines of neo-industrialization.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-321
Author(s):  
B. Kalmuratov

At present, there is no single state policy for the development of the building materials industry, including innovation. In this regard, it is necessary to form a strategic approach to the innovative building materials industry. The formation of a regional construction cluster will allow us to link the development of the industry in question with the priorities of state policy, as well as the interests of other participants in the construction complex and the scientific base.


Author(s):  
Ekaterina I. Shumskaia ◽  

The article presents the results of a study of the state role in the modern process of innovative development. It relies on academic literature and research to evaluate government measures, such as creating the necessary environment, subsidies and various tax incentives. The analysis of the indirect impact on the innovative development of the country is made through the education and training of scientists and researchers, creation of institutions, as well as supporting the structure for the commercialization of innovation. The synthesis of estimates of the effectiveness of government intervention in the innovative development of the economy is used. A comparative analysis revealed the features of the innovation system in Russia: in comparison with developed countries, unique conditions were created for business development through a comprehensive fiscal policy, however, private sector interest in innovation remains low. Therefore, priority directions in development remain measures to improve the business climate, increase the investment attractiveness of the country and promote competition. With a high degree of involvement of domestic universities in R&D, the relationship with the private sector remains poorly developed, which impedes the commercialization of projects under development, which also leads to the leakage of personnel from the country and reduces the competitiveness of domestic enterprises. The state should create the necessary conditions for the development of an innovative economy and actively work to eliminate these barriers, primarily by stimulating business activity and internal competition. In the future, it is necessary to develop sectors that already have serious competitive advantages, such as oil and gas, mining, agriculture, as well as the banking sector, transport, food processing and electricity, and also focus on development choices full-time promising areas with personnel potential.


Author(s):  
Елена Гоосен ◽  
Elena Goosen ◽  
Софья Ковригина ◽  
Sofya Kovrigina

The research features the problem of searching for a model of relations between the state and the business in the conditions of the changing development vector of the Russian economy. An important place in this discussion is the issue of the boundaries of the public and private sectors. Based on the analysis of modern approaches to models of government-business relations, the authors define the role of relations in the state-business tandem. The most effective form of relations is public-private partnership. The development of the partnership between the state and the business is a mechanismfor the implementation of socially significant projects, as close to the market as possible. It contributes to the socio-economic development and the changes in the development vector of resource regions. The paper introduces a classification of relations in the "state-business" tandem. The authors use the basis method of comparative analysis to distinguish two diametrically opposite models of state-business interaction, i.e. pluralistic and corporate. The approach based on the dichotomy of a liberal and a coordinated model is more promising for analyzing the interaction between the state and the business in regions with a mono-profile orientation.


Author(s):  
Tigran Karenovich Babayan

The task of transition to innovative development requires the involvement of resources of all contributors to the national economy. The role of big business in this context is unique. The authorities and members of the expert community repeatedly mentioned the considerable potential of attracting resources of big business (which is not used to the full extent) for the innovative development. In recent years in Russia there have been developed and implemented a variety of mechanisms of involvement of big business in innovation development in order to create an effective innovation system. These mechanisms are "scattered" in different industries, at various levels of management, in various government programs and subprograms, in the Federal target programs. These documents include the Strategy of innovative development of Russia up to 2020, the State program "Economic development and innovative economy", the State program "Development of science and technology" by 2020 and others. The variety of mechanisms requires their classification and evaluation. There have been considered and systematized mechanisms of involvement of big business in innovation development (using technological platforms, creating business-incubators in the universities, making demand for the innovative product among important government businesses, etc.), analyzed special means of their use, revealed general advantages and drawbacks. Assessment of the quality of such mechanisms is being carried out. Tax service data show inadequate efficiency of tax mechanisms which could be important for big businesses. Issues of stimulating big business by tax encouragement mechanisms and involving it into innovative development require greater attention. There is the need to call for foreign experience of involving big business into innovative development.


The article is devoted to the important role of clusters in the innovative development of the economy. The article reviews the particularities and regulatory support of the modern clustering policy of the Russian Federation. The results of the activities of 25 pilot innovative territorial cluster-leaders of the Russian Federation in terms of investment potential in 2012-2018 were estimated in the article. The original method of identification of the innovative territorial clusters was suggested in the article, its main advantages being universalism, comprehensiveness and credibility. Using this methodology, the authors of the article identified the territorial industrial clusters and ranged them according to their innovation potential


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document