In the 140-odd years after the first diamond was found in South Africa in
1866, mining catapulted the country from a predominantly agrarian society
into a modern industrial nation. For the biggest part of this period, mining
drove and human development followed. This ?order of importance? was largely
the result of the huge wealth and influence of the mining houses, the
(perceived) importance of the sector for the development of the country, and
the broader skewed power dynamics of colonial and apartheid rule. Over the
last decade, national government enacted new legislation by which it
attempted to ensure that mining is made more serviceable to the post-1994
objectives of (1) broad-based societal reconstruction; (2) shared and
inclusive growth; and (3) regional and rural development. A key component of
this new legislation has been a provision to ensure that mining companies
make tangible contributions to regional and rural development and human
settlement in ?mining areas?. Recent events, such as widespread strikes, the
tragic loss of many lives, and continuing harsh living conditions, have
raised, what has been a nagging question since the introduction of the new
legislation, i.e.: Has the new legal framework (really) assisted in (1)
ensuring that communities in mining areas enjoy a greater of the wealth
created by the industry; (2) enhancing regional and rural development in
mining areas; and (3) establishing a more symbiotic relationship between
mining, regional and rural development planning and human development? In
this paper, research in a mining area during the course of 2011 and 2012 is
used to explore this question. Use is made of documented evidence and
interviews with key role-players in the mining industry, municipal and
provincial government, the private sector, traditional leadership structures
and communities.