scholarly journals Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of patients coming from the community with sepsis due to multidrug resistant bacteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolò Capsoni ◽  
Pietro Bellone ◽  
Stefano Aliberti ◽  
Giovanni Sotgiu ◽  
Donatella Pavanello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Specific Data ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Coagulation Dysfunction

Background: Although previous studies showed an increasing prevalence of infections due to multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in the community, specific data on sepsis are lacking. We aimed to assess prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of patients with sepsis due to MDR bacteria. Methods: An observational, retrospective study was conducted on consecutive adult patients coming from the community and admitted to the Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy, with a diagnosis of sepsis between January 2011 and December 2015. Primary study outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 518 patients, at least one MDR bacteria was isolated in 88 (17%). ESBL+ Enterobacteriaceae were the most prevalent MDR bacteria (9.7%) followed by MRSA (3.9%). Independent risk factors for sepsis due to MDR bacteria were septic shock (OR: 2.2; p = 0.002) and hospitalization in the previous 90 days (OR: 2.3; p = 0.003). Independent risk factors for sepsis due to ESBL+ bacteria were hospitalization in the previous 90 days (OR: 2.1; p = 0.02) and stroke (OR: 2.1; p = 0.04). A significantly higher mortality was detected among patients with vs. without MDR bacteria (40.2% vs. 23.1% respectively, p = 0.001). Independent risk factors for mortality among patients with sepsis were coagulation dysfunction (OR: 3.2; p = 0.03), septic shock (OR: 3.2; p = 0.003), and isolation of a MDR bacteria (OR: 4.6; p < 0.001). Conclusion: In light of the prevalence and impact of MDR bacteria causing sepsis in patients coming from the community, physicians should consider ESBL coverage when starting an empiric antibiotic therapy in patients with specific risk factors, especially in the presence of septic shock.

scholarly journals Impacts of Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens and Inappropriate Initial Antibiotic Therapy on the Outcomes of Neonates with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 760
Author(s):  
Hsiao-Chin Wang ◽  
Chen-Chu Liao ◽  
Shih-Ming Chu ◽  
Mei-Yin Lai ◽  
Hsuan-Rong Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia ◽  
Neurological Sequelae ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

It is unknown whether neonatal ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens and inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment is associated with poor outcomes after adjusting for confounders. Methods: We prospectively observed all neonates with a definite diagnosis of VAP from a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Taiwan between October 2017 and March 2020. All clinical features, therapeutic interventions, and outcomes were compared between the MDR–VAP and non-MDR–VAP groups. Multivariate regression analyses were used to investigate independent risk factors for treatment failure. Results: Of 720 neonates who were intubated for more than 2 days, 184 had a total of 245 VAP episodes. The incidence rate of neonatal VAP was 10.1 episodes/per 1000 ventilator days. Ninety-six cases (39.2%) were caused by MDR pathogens. Neonates with MDR–VAP were more likely to receive inadequate initial antibiotic therapy (51.0% versus 4.7%; p < 0.001) and had delayed resolution of clinical symptoms (38.5% versus 25.5%; p = 0.034), although final treatment outcomes were comparable with the non-MDR–VAP group. Inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment was not significantly associated with worse outcomes. The VAP-attributable mortality rate and overall mortality rate of this cohort were 3.7% and 12.0%, respectively. Independent risk factors for treatment failure included presence of concurrent bacteremia (OR 4.83; 95% CI 2.03–11.51; p < 0.001), septic shock (OR 3.06; 95% CI 1.07–8.72; p = 0.037), neonates on high-frequency oscillatory ventilator (OR 4.10; 95% CI 1.70–9.88; p = 0.002), and underlying neurological sequelae (OR 3.35; 95% CI 1.47–7.67; p = 0.004). Conclusions: MDR–VAP accounted for 39.2% of all neonatal VAP in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), but neither inappropriate initial antibiotics nor MDR pathogens were associated with treatment failure. Neonatal VAP with concurrent bacteremia, septic shock, and underlying neurological sequelae were independently associated with final worse outcomes.

scholarly journals The Role of Adjunctive Therapies in Septic Shock by Gram Negative MDR/XDR Infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Busani ◽  
Erika Roat ◽  
Giulia Serafini ◽  
Elena Mantovani ◽  
Emanuela Biagioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Blood Purification ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Alternative Strategies ◽  
Immune Paralysis ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
The Relationship

Patients with septic shock by multidrug resistant microorganisms (MDR) are a specific sepsis population with a high mortality risk. The exposure to an initial inappropriate empiric antibiotic therapy has been considered responsible for the increased mortality, although other factors such as immune-paralysis seem to play a pivotal role. Therefore, beyond conventional early antibiotic therapy and fluid resuscitation, this population may benefit from the use of alternative strategies aimed at supporting the immune system. In this review we present an overview of the relationship between MDR infections and immune response and focus on the rationale and the clinical data available on the possible adjunctive immunotherapies, including blood purification techniques and different pharmacological approaches.

The Importance of Addressing Multidrug Resistance and Not Assuming Single-Drug Resistance in Case-Control Studies

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 670-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika M. C. D'Agata ◽  
Maria Adriana Cataldo ◽  
Roberto Cauda ◽  
Evelina Tacconelli
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Single Drug ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Background.Case-control studies analyzing antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for antimicrobial resistance usually assume single-drug resistance in the bacteria under study, even though resistance to multiple antimicrobials may be present. Since antibiotic selection pressures differ depending on the susceptibility profile of the antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, an accurate assessment of whether exposure to an individual antimicrobial is a risk factor for the emergence of resistance should distinguish between single-drug–resistant and multidrug-resistant bacteria.Objective.To determine whether the exposures to individual antibiotics that were identified as independent risk factors in case-control studies differed depending on whether single-drug–resistant or multidrug-resistant bacteria were evaluated.Design.Two retrospective case-control studies were performed with data on patients harboringPseudomonas aeruginosastrains resistant only to ciprofloxacin (CRPA) and patients harboringP. aeruginosastrains resistant to ciprofloxacin and other antibiotics (multidrug-resistantP. aeruginosa[MDR-PA]). These 2 groups were compared with patients not harboringP. aeruginosa.Setting.Two tertiary care hospitals.Results.A total of 41 patients harboring CRPA and 151 patients harboring MDR-PA were identified and matched to 192 control subjects. By conditional logistic regression, independent risk factors associated with presence of CRPA were nonambulatory status (OR, 5.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.4-23];P= .02) and prior ciprofloxacin exposure (OR, 5.0 [95% CI, 1.2-21];P= .03). Independent risk factors for presence of MDR-PA were a Charlson score greater than 2 (OR, 3.3 [95% CI 1.8-6.0];P<.001) and exposure to quinolones (OR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.2-5.0];P= .001), third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (OR, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-7.1];P<.001), imipenem (OR, 3.8 [95% CI, 1.2-12.1];P= .02), and/or aminoglycosides (OR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.04-5.1];P= .04).Conclusion.There were substantial differences in exposure to individual antimicrobials between patients harboring CRPA and patients harboring MDR-PA. Future case-control studies addressing risk factors for single-drug–resistant bacteria should consider the complete susceptibility profile of the bacteria under investigation.

The Importance of Addressing Multidrug Resistance and Not Assuming Single-Drug Resistance in Case-Control Studies

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 670-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika M. C. D'Agata ◽  
Maria Adriana Cataldo ◽  
Roberto Cauda ◽  
Evelina Tacconelli
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Single Drug ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Background.Case-control studies analyzing antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for antimicrobial resistance usually assume single-drug resistance in the bacteria under study, even though resistance to multiple antimicrobials may be present. Since antibiotic selection pressures differ depending on the susceptibility profile of the antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, an accurate assessment of whether exposure to an individual antimicrobial is a risk factor for the emergence of resistance should distinguish between single-drug–resistant and multidrug-resistant bacteria.Objective.To determine whether the exposures to individual antibiotics that were identified as independent risk factors in case-control studies differed depending on whether single-drug–resistant or multidrug-resistant bacteria were evaluated.Design.Two retrospective case-control studies were performed with data on patients harboringPseudomonas aeruginosastrains resistant only to ciprofloxacin (CRPA) and patients harboringP. aeruginosastrains resistant to ciprofloxacin and other antibiotics (multidrug-resistantP. aeruginosa[MDR-PA]). These 2 groups were compared with patients not harboringP. aeruginosa.Setting.Two tertiary care hospitals.Results.A total of 41 patients harboring CRPA and 151 patients harboring MDR-PA were identified and matched to 192 control subjects. By conditional logistic regression, independent risk factors associated with presence of CRPA were nonambulatory status (OR, 5.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.4-23];P= .02) and prior ciprofloxacin exposure (OR, 5.0 [95% CI, 1.2-21];P= .03). Independent risk factors for presence of MDR-PA were a Charlson score greater than 2 (OR, 3.3 [95% CI 1.8-6.0];P<.001) and exposure to quinolones (OR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.2-5.0];P= .001), third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (OR, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-7.1];P<.001), imipenem (OR, 3.8 [95% CI, 1.2-12.1];P= .02), and/or aminoglycosides (OR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.04-5.1];P= .04).Conclusion.There were substantial differences in exposure to individual antimicrobials between patients harboring CRPA and patients harboring MDR-PA. Future case-control studies addressing risk factors for single-drug–resistant bacteria should consider the complete susceptibility profile of the bacteria under investigation.

scholarly journals 157. patient to Environment Transmission of Multidrug-resistant Bacteria Within Intensive Care Units

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S207-S208
Author(s):  
Matthew J Ziegler ◽  
Brendan Kelly ◽  
Michael Z David ◽  
Lauren Dutcher ◽  
Pam C Tolomeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase ◽  
Environmental Transmission ◽  
Body Culture ◽  
Clinical Culture ◽  
Multiple Time Points

Abstract Background Identifying risk factors for environmental contamination with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is essential to prioritize methods for prevention of hospital transmission. Methods Patients admitted to an ICU with an MDRO detected on clinical culture in the prior 30 days were enrolled. Patients (4 body sites) and high-touch objects (HTO) (3 composite sites) in ICU rooms were sampled. Environmental transmission was defined by shared MDRO species cultured on patient and HTO cultures obtained on multiple time points during the patient’s stay. Risk factors for environmental transmission were identified with logistic regression. Results Forty-five patients were included (median 2 days of longitudinal sampling [IQR 1–4 days]). Enrollment anatomic cultures included extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBLE) (n=12, 27%), carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) (n=4, 9%), methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) (n=11, 24%), vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) (n=4, 9%), and C.difficile (CDIFF) (n=14, 31%). Patient colonization during serial sampling was common with CRO (n=21, 47%), ESBLE (n=16, 36%), and VRE (n=16, 36%) and less so with MRSA (n=7, 16%) and CDIFF (n=5, 11%). Detection of MDROs on environmental surfaces was also common with identification of CRO in 47% of patient rooms (n=21) and ESBLE in 29% (n=13); MRSA (n=2, 4%), VRE (n=9, 20%), and CDIFF (n=3, 7%) were rarer. Patient to environment transmission was observed in 40% of rooms (n=18). Thirteen (29%) rooms had foreign MDRO contamination (i.e., one not detected on a body culture), most (n=10) with CRO. Environmental MDROs were most common in bathroom/sinks (n=22), followed by surfaces near the patient (n=10), and least common surfaces often touched by staff within the room (n=6). On multivariable logistic regression, naïve to clustering by patient, recent receipt of a proton pump inhibitor (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.00 – 5.52, P=0.049) and presence of one or more wounds (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.05 – 6.26, P=0.038) were significantly associated with environmental transmission (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.01 – 2.43, P=0.046) (Table 1). Conclusion MDRO contamination of patient rooms is common with detection of organisms attributed to, and foreign to, the occupant. Disclosures Michael Z. David, MD PhD, GSK (Consultant)

scholarly journals Independent Behavior of Commensal Flora for Carriage of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Bacteria in Patients at Admission

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 5193-5200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoire de Lastours ◽  
Françoise Chau ◽  
Florence Tubach ◽  
Blandine Pasquet ◽  
Etienne Ruppé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Health Care Facility ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Commensal Flora ◽  
Resistant Strains

ABSTRACT The important role of commensal flora as a natural reservoir of bacterial resistance is now well established. However, whether the behavior of each commensal flora is similar to that of other floras in terms of rates of carriage and risk factors for bacterial resistance is unknown. During a 6-month period, we prospectively investigated colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria in the three main commensal floras from hospitalized patients at admission, targeting Escherichia coli in the fecal flora, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) in the nasal flora, and α-hemolytic streptococci in the pharyngeal flora. Resistant strains were detected on quinolone-containing selective agar. Clinical and epidemiological data were collected. A total of 555 patients were included. Carriage rates of resistance were 8.0% in E. coli, 30.3% in CNS for ciprofloxacin, and 27.2% in streptococci for levofloxacin; 56% of the patients carried resistance in at least one flora but only 0.9% simultaneously in all floras, which is no more than random. Risk factors associated with the carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains differed between fecal E. coli (i.e., colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria) and nasal CNS (i.e., age, coming from a health care facility, and previous antibiotic treatment with a fluoroquinolone) while no risk factors were identified for pharyngeal streptococci. Despite high rates of colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria, each commensal flora behaved independently since simultaneous carriage of resistance in the three distinct floras was uncommon, and risk factors differed. Consequences of environmental selective pressures vary in each commensal flora according to its local specificities (clinical trial NCT00520715 [http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00520715 ]).

Risk factors for colonization and infection by resistant microorganisms in kidney transplant recipients

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (suppl 6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Taminato ◽  
Richarlisson Borges de Morais ◽  
Dayana Souza Fram ◽  
Rogério Rodrigues Floriano Pereira ◽  
Cibele Grothe Esmanhoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Epidemiological Surveillance ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Tract Infections

ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the prevalence of colonization and infection by multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients undergoing kidney transplantation and identify the rate of infection, morbidity and mortality and associated risk factors. Methods: a prospective cohort of 200 randomly included kidney transplant recipients. Epidemiological surveillance of the studied microorganisms was carried out in the first 24 hours and 7 days after transplantation. Results: ninety (45%) patients were considered colonized. Female sex, hypertension and diabetes (p<0.005), dialysis time (p<0.004), length of stay after transplantation, delayed renal function, and length of stay were identified as risk factors. The microorganisms were isolated from surgical site, bloodstream and urinary tract infections. Conclusions: colonization by resistant microorganisms in kidney transplant patients was frequent and risk factors associated with infection were identified. The results should guide the care team in order to minimize morbidity and mortality related to infectious causes in this population.

Impact of empirical antibiotic regimens on mortality in neutropenic patients with bloodstream infection presenting with septic shock

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Chumbita ◽  
Pedro Puerta-Alcalde ◽  
Carlota Gudiol ◽  
Nicole Garcia-Pouton ◽  
Júlia Laporte-Amargós ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Neutropenic Patients ◽  
Prospective Cohorts ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: We analyzed risk factors for mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) presenting with septic shock and assessed the impact of empirical antibiotic regimens. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study (2010-2019) of two prospective cohorts comparing BSI episodes in patients with or without septic shock. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality in episodes with septic shock. Results: Of 1563 patients with BSI, 257 (16%) presented with septic shock. Those patients with septic shock had higher mortality than those without septic shock (55% vs 15%, p<0.001). Gram-negative bacilli caused 81% of episodes with septic shock; gram-positive cocci, 22%; and Candida species 5%. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) was administered in 17.5% of septic shock episodes. Empirical β-lactam combined with other active antibiotics was associated with the lowest mortality observed. When amikacin was the only active antibiotic, mortality was 90%. Addition of empirical specific gram-positive coverage had no impact on mortality. Mortality was higher when IEAT was administered (76% vs 51%, p=0.002). Age >70 years (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.7), IEAT for Candida spp. or gram-negative bacilli (OR 3.8, 1.3-11.1), acute kidney injury (OR 2.6, 1.4-4.9) and amikacin as the only active antibiotic (OR 15.2, 1.7-134.5) were independent risk factors for mortality, while combination of β-lactam and amikacin was protective (OR 0.32, 0.18-0.57). Conclusions: Septic shock in febrile neutropenic patients with BSI is associated with extremely high mortality, especially when IEAT is administered. Combination therapy including an active β-lactam and amikacin results in the best outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document