scholarly journals Criminal Liability Committed by Corporations for Environmental Damage as a Result of Forest and Land Fires (Case Study Case Number 59/PID). B/LH/2020/PN. RGT)

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teuku Azhari ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Commercial Activities ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Operational Activities ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Case Number

The deforestation process that occurs in Riau is very worrying, forest and land fires are proof that environmental management and utilization are no longer reliable. These forest and land fires are proven to involve companies involved in the cultivation and utilization of forest products. For this reason, the corporation must be criminally responsible because UUPPLH No. 32 of 2009 has recognized the corporation as the subject of criminal law. Efforts to hold companies accountable aren't easy — many companies actually stop investigations because they don't have enough evidence. Therefore, the author wants to know the criteria of corporations that are said to commit forest and land fire crimes, as well as how the form of criminal accountability. This research method uses normative legal methods and sculptural approaches that are approaches through legislation. The results of the investigation, the criteria of the corporation to commit the crime of forest and land fires if it meets the elements in the preparation of articles of forest and land fires, namely land clearing by burning and exceeding environmental quality standards. The violation is committed by a person for work or other relationship reasons within the scope of the business entity. If the crime is committed by, for, or on behalf of a business entity, it shall be considered a corporate act. The form of corporate criminal liability in the criminal act of forest and land fires is preliminary, because the error lies with the corporate administrator (director) who is the mastermind or owner of control of the company's operational activities (Director Mind). Because in PP No. 4 of 2001 Article 13 that the director as the person in charge of all commercial activities whose business can cause damage and environmental pollution must comply with government regulation No. forest and land fires.

scholarly journals The Formulation Policy on Corporate Criminal Liability System For The 1950 - 2017 Period and Its Harmonization in The Renewal of National Criminal Law

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Dwidja Priyatno ◽  
Kristian Kristian
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Interpretation Method ◽  
Oriented Approach

The Criminal Code (KUHP) which currently applies does not recognize corporations as the subject of criminal acts. Therefore, the formulation/legislation policy concerning corporate criminal liability system in Indonesia is only regulated in various specific criminal laws (lex specialis). This research discusses the formulation/legislation policy regarding the corporate criminal liability system in 124 special criminal legislations outside the Criminal Code (KUHP) from 1950-2017. This research used a normative juridical research method as well as interpretation method with a policy-oriented approach. Types and sources of data used were secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected data were then analyzed based on qualitative analysis method. The results of the research showed that the corporate criminal liability system in legal politics in Indonesia (especially in the formulation/legislation policy) still experiences disorientation and disharmonious. Besides, the national law development should follow every development and/or change of society that is developing in the direction of modernization and globalization and should be able to accommodate all society�s needs in various fields. This legal development should be continuously carried out (as a dynamic and an endless process) by "improving (making things better)" and "changing the law to be better and modern".Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) yang saat ini berlaku tidak mengakui korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana.Oleh karenanya, kebijakan formulasi/legislasi mengenai sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi di Indonesia hanya diatur dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan pidana yang bersifat khusus (lex specialis). Penelitian ini akan membahas mengenai kebijakan formulasi/legislasi mengenai sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam 124 (seratus dua puluh empat) peraturan perundang-undangan pidana khusus di luar Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dari tahun 1950-2017. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan metode interpretasi dengan pendekatan yang berorientasi pada kebijakan (policy oriented approach). Jenis dan sumber data yang dipergunakan adalah data sekunder yang berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tertier. Data yang telah terkumpul akan dianalisis berdasarkan metode analisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam politik hukum di Indonesia (khususnya pada kebijakan formulasi/legislasi) masih mengalami disorientasi dan disharmoni. Selain itu, pembangunan hukum nasional harus mengikuti setiap perkembangan dan/atau perubahan masyarakat yang sedang berkembang ke arah modernisasi dan globalisasi serta mampu menampung semua kebutuhan masyarakat di berbagai bidang. Pembangunan hukum seperti ini harus terus-menerus dilakukan (sebagai proses yang dinamis dan proses yang tidak pernah berakhir) dengan cara �menyempurnakan (membuat sesuatu yang lebih baik)� dan �mengubah agar hukum menjadi lebih baik dan modern�.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF GENERAL ATTORNEY IN ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION BY CORPORATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
Satya Marta Ruhiyat ◽  
Ismansyah Ismansyah ◽  
Nani Mulyati
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Public ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Legal Subjects ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Corporate Liability

Considerable efforts have been made to fight corruption, however it continues to occur in Indonesia. In the present time, corruptions do not only carry out by individuals but also by corporations. However, the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code do not recognize and regulate corporations as the subject of criminal acts, so that law enforcement officials, especially prosecutors, have difficulty in charging corporations. This paper tries to answer question about the role of prosecutors in the eradication of corruption by corporation based on The General Attorney Regulation Number: PER-028/A/JA/10/2014 on guidelines for prosecuting corporation. The research method employed is normative juridical method, where the data is analyzed with qualitative methodology. The General Attorney Regulation on Corporate Legal Subjects explains more apparent criteria for actions that can be attributed to the corporation. The regulation combines several theories of corporate criminal liability not only heavily rely on vicarious criminal liability theory. It also provides direction about the separation of corporate liability and director’s liability. With this guideline, the public prosecutors have clearer direction to be able to charge the corporation so that it can restore the state finances that have been harmed by the corruption act.

scholarly journals Selected aspects of criminal liability of legal persons

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 2983-2988
Author(s):  
Eva Žatecká
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Person ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

This paper will address issues of corporate criminal liability in terms of enterprises. Criminal liability of legal persons is now a major problem that must deal the enterprises with. The contribution points out the major issues associated with this topic when the legal person may be held criminally responsible and how we can prevent such criminal liability. This issue arises with several questions that need to be pointed out. For example, what are the conditions of the criminal liability of the enterprises, which criminal offenses can be committed, or is it possible to prevent such criminal responsibility, etc. These issues will be the subject of discussion and contribution to current findings. The issue is very new; we have the new act on criminal liability of legal persons effective from 1st January 2012, so the author hopes this paper brings some new solutions and possible matters for discussions.

Die Normgenese des Unternehmensstrafrechts. Eine Fallstudie anhand des österreichischen Verbandsverantwortlichkeitsgesetzes (VbVG) / The law-making process of corporate criminal liability. A case study on the basis of the Austrian corporate responsibility act

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The Law ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Law Making

ZusammenfassungEine Kriminalisierung kollektiver Akteure ist für das Strafrechtsverständnis in deutschsprachigen Ländern immer noch ein ungewöhnliches Instrument. Dennoch gibt es mittlerweile eine supranationale Verpflichtung der Mitgliedsstaaten der Europäischen Union, juristische Personen unter Androhung punitiver Sanktionen für bestimmte Straftaten verantwortlich machen zu können. Dieser Aufsatz untersucht die Entstehungsgeschichte des öster­reichischen Unternehmensstrafrechts mit Hilfe eines heuristischen Rahmens, der von der Feld- und Habitustheorie Bourdieus inspiriert ist, sich aber auch diskurs- und systemtheoretischen Einsichten verdankt. Er versteht sich damit als Beitrag zu einem wenig erschlossenen Gebiet der sozialwissenschaftlichen Rechtsforschung nämlich der Normgenese im Be­reich des Wirtschaftsstrafrechts.

scholarly journals PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN DAN PERTANGGUNGJAWBAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM MICRO-TRANSACTION PADA GAME ONLINE

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1467
Author(s):  
Gede Darma Sannyasa ◽  
I Ketut Mertha
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Online Games ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Online Game ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Government ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

Tujuan studi ini dilakukan guna mengkaji delik perjudian pada micro-transaction dalam game online serta bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana Korporasi sebagai penyedia layanan perjudian micro-transaction dalam game online. Metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, digunakan pada studi ini. Hasil studi menunjukkan Microtransaction dalam game online baik dalam bentuk gacha atau lootbox mengandung unsur tindak pidana perjudian dan mengenai perjudian sendiri telah diatur dalam KUHP, Undang-undang Penertiban Perjudian serta melalui Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pelaksanaan Penertiban Perjudian dan oleh karena perjudian ini dilakukan secara virtual maka Undang-undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik menjadi lex specialis pada micro-transaction dalam game online. Kemudian Publisher dan/atau developer game merupakan Korporasi yang juga sebagai subyek hukum pidana dan menjadi pihak yang menyediakan sarana perjudian dengan bentuk Microtransaction dalam game online baik berupa gacha dan loot box, sehingga atas hal tersebut Publisher dan/atau developer game dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana. The purpose of this study is to examine the offense of gambling on micro-transactions in the online game as well as the form of corporate criminal liability as a provider of micro-transaction gambling services in the online game. The normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach is used in this study. The study results show that microtransaction in online games both in the form of gacha or lootbox contains elements of gambling crime and regarding gambling itself has been regulated in the Criminal Code, the Gambling Control Act and through the Government Regulation on the Implementation of Gambling Control and because of this gambling is done virtually invite Information and Electronic Transactions to be lex specialists on in-online game micro-transactions. Then the Publisher and / or game developer is a corporation that is also a subject of criminal law and becomes a party that provides gambling facilities in the form of microtransaction in the online game in the form of gacha and loot box, so that the Publisher and / or game developer can be held liable for criminal liability.

scholarly journals Understanding Corporate Criminal Liability from a Global Perspective: Whose Liability is It, After All?

2013 ◽  
pp. 98-113
Author(s):  
Arpita Sharma ◽  
Puja Kumari
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Power Laws ◽  
Prima Facie ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The World ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

The jurisprudential foundations of the Criminal Liability of Corporations were laid down much lately in countries like France and India as compared to USA and United Kingdom. This article is a modest attempt on the part of the authors to revisit the subject matter of corporate criminal liability which is often dealt within legal literature as just another offence under the Indian Criminal Justice System. It thoroughly tracks the legislative developments since the origination of the concept in the Romanic Law in 12th-14th century till date, along with the provisions laid down and emergence of the concept in different part of the world. Judicial moods in interpretations to provisions pertaining to corporate criminal liability have been unearthed to show a conservative judiciary giving way to a liberal one, loosening the shackles of power. Laws on the corporate criminal liability need major changes- from amendments in laws to changes in judicial interpretations to changes in victim treatment and approach. This paper attempts to expound the complete subject matter in a thought-through manner to reawaken thinking of an improvised and transformed system of law. A steep rise in the number of crimes committed by the corporations clearly reveals a prima facie malfunctioning of corporate governance which, in return, calls for a much more efficient enforcement of law.

scholarly journals Criminal Responsibility on Captain of Commersial Vessel by Act No 17 of 2008 on Voyage

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Subekhan Subekhan ◽  
Lathifah Hanim
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Subject Field ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Implementation Guidelines ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

The cruise is one of the nation's transportation system that has a strategic importance and as a liaison and outreach throughout the territory of Indonesia's sovereignty and the potential beneficial role for society, both nationally and internationally. The problems of this study are: 1) Why the skipper commercial vessels should be responsible in case of Vesselwreck, 2) How does the skipper criminal liability due to accidents aboard commercial vessels according to Act No. 17 Of 2008 On Voyage? 3) Is it possible corporate criminal liability in accidents merchant vessel according to Act No. 17 Of 2008 On Voyage?Researchers used the method is legal normative juridical approach and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis.� Sources and types of data in this research is secondary data obtained from the study of literature. Data were analyzed qualitatively. The problems studied by the theory of legal certainty and criminal liability.Based on the results of research that skipper as a leader on the Vessel, is fully responsible for the safety of the Vessel, passengers and cargo during the voyage from the port of loading to the port of destination. Criminal sanctions needed to enforce these responsibilities, and sanctions that have been regulated in Act No. 17 Of 2008 on Voyage Article 244 paragraph (3) and (4), 20 Article 247 and Article 248 shall be punished with imprisonment beyond three (3) years or a fine of Rp 400.000.000.00, - (four hundred million). Obliged to take countermeasures, ask or give aid and spread the news of the Vesselwreck to others. If an accident occurs on board the skipper must be above board and record events such accidents in the logbook and reported to the harbor master. There are still many weaknesses of criminal responsibility in the corporation, among others: when the corporation is declared as a criminal, how the corporation is responsible, the types of sanctions what can be meted out to the corporation, not regulated penal substitute fines are not paid by the corporation and unregulated the offense to corporation. Because implementation guidelines in the draft penal Code there is renewal in the subject field of the offense and criminal liability system.Keywords: Commercial Vessels; Skipper; Criminal Liability.

PENERAPAN PIDANA TAMBAHAN DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI PADA TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Hariman Satria
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Disciplinary Action ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Charges ◽  
Additional Charges ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Financial Losses ◽  
Research Analysis

ABSTRAKMahkamah Agung melalui Putusan Nomor 1554 K/PID.SUS/2015 menghukum terdakwa PT KA yang diwakili oleh SR selaku direktur utama, karena melakukan pembakaran hutan yang merusak lingkungan hidup, dengan pidana denda sebesar Rp3.000.000.000,- Permasalahan yang timbul adalah bagaimanakah penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana lingkungan hidup, kaitannya dengan pidana tambahan berupa pemulihan kerugian akibat kerusakan lingkungan yang terjadi? Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan dua pendekatan, yaitu pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi belum dilakukan secara maksimal karena didasari oleh tiga alasan. Pertama, terdakwa dipidana denda dengan menggunakan ancaman pidana minimal sebagaimana yang disebutkan dalam Pasal 108 Undang- Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Kedua, terdakwa tidak dikenai pidana tindakan tata tertib seperti perbaikan akibat tindak pidana guna memulihkan kerugian keuangan negara. Ketiga, terdakwa juga tidak dikenai pidana tambahan. Tegasnya putusan a quo belum maksimal baik dilihat dari sisi pemulihan kerugian keuangan negara, maupun dari sisi sanksi pidana denda kepada pelaku.Kata kunci: pidana tambahan, pertanggungjawaban pidana, korporasi, lingkungan hidup. ABSTRACTSupreme Court convicted PT KA represented by SR as the President Director, through Court Decision Number 1554 K/PID.SUS/2015 on an environmentally damaging forest fire to a maximum fine of Rp3,000,000,000,- The problem addressed in this research analysis is how the implementation of corporate criminal liability in environmental crime related to additional criminal charges, in the form of compensation for environmental damage caused? The method used is a normative legal research, focusing on two approaches: case and conceptual approaches. The results indicated that corporate criminal liability has not performed optimally for three reasons. First, the defendant is subject to minimal criminal sanction as mentioned in Article 108 of Law on Environmental Protection and Management. Second, the defendant is not subject to sanction of disciplinary action, such as the restoration of state financial losses. Third, the defendant is also not  subject to additional criminal charges. As a result, a quo decision is not maximal both in terms of state financial losses recovery and criminal sanction of fines to the offender.Keywords: additional charges, criminal liability, corporate, environment.

PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP KORPORASI TANPA DIDAKWAKAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF ”VICARIOUS LIABILITY”

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Budi Suhariyanto
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Vicarious Liability ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
To Come ◽  
Criminal Conduct ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability

ABSTRAKKorporasi telah ditetapkan sebagai subjek tindak pidana, maka terhadapnya dapat dituntutkan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Sebagai subjek hukum, korporasi juga ditentukan mekanisme pemidanaannya mulai dari proses penyidikan, penuntutan, dan pemeriksaan di sidang pengadilan. Mahkamah Agung dalam Putusan Nomor 2239 K/PID.SUS/2012 mengesampingkan prosedur hukum acara dengan menjatuhkan putusan pemidanaan terhadap korporasi tanpa didakwakan. Permasalahannya bagaimanakah eksistensi pemidanaan korporasi menurut hukum acara pidana di Indonesia, dan bagaimanakah pemidanaan korporasi dalam praktik penegakan hukum, serta bagaimana putusan pemidanaan terhadap korporasi tanpa didakwakan dalam perspektif vicarious liability? Metode penelitian normatif digunakan untuk menjawab permasalahan ini. Terdapat tiga pendekatan untuk mengkaji permasalahan yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Metode analisis yang diterapkan untuk mendapatkan kesimpulan atas permasalahan yang dibahas adalah melalui analisis yuridis kualitatif. Dari hasil pembahasan dapat disimpulkan bahwa dalam perspektif vicarious liability, korporasi dapat dipertanggungjawabkan atas perilaku seseorang yang secara personifikasi mewakili korporasi sehingga dapat dijatuhkan putusan pemidanaan.Kata kunci: putusan pemidanaan, pemidanaan korporasi, vicarious liability.ABSTRACTA corporation has been set as the subject of criminal offense, and so criminal liability on this subject is enforceable by law. As the subject of law, a corporation has its own mechanism in term of criminal liability, starting from investigation process, prosecution and examination before trial. The Supreme Court Decision Number 2239 K/PID.SUS/2012 overruled the ordinances of the procedural law by imposing a sentencing decision against a corporation without charges. The problems are: how does the corporate criminal liability exist according to the criminal procedural law in Indonesia, and how is the corporate criminal liability implemented in the practices of law enforcement, as well as how is the corporate criminal liability without charges examined through the perspective of vicarious liability? Normative research method is applied in responding to this problem. Three approaches to examine these problems are the statutory regulations, the case-based, and conceptual approaches. The analytical method applied to come to the conclusion of the issues discussed is through the qualitative juridical analysis. The results of discussions deduce that in the perspective of vicarious liability, a corporation is liable for the criminal conduct of a person who is in personification of the corporation and may be subject to corporate criminal liability.</p>Keywords: sentencing decision, corporate criminal liability, vicarious liability.

scholarly journals MENYOAL PENAFSIRAN TANAH TELANTAR

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Dian Aries Mujiburohman
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Land Settlement ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Compensation Process ◽  
The People ◽  
Settlement Agreement ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 24/G/2013/PTUN.JKT merupakan putusan mengenai pembatalan keputusan penetapan tanah telantar yang berasal dari Hak Guna Usaha (HGU) atas nama PT SMG. Pokok sengketa yang menjadi perdebatan dan tafsir dalam gugatannya adalah pengertian tanah telantar dan mengenai surat peringatan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 8 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Penertiban dan Pendayagunaan Tanah Telantar serta implikasi pasca pembatalan surat keputusan penetapan tanah telantar oleh pengadilan tata usaha negara. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah penafsiran pengertian tanah telantar dan penafsiran mengenai surat peringatan dalam Putusan Nomor 24/G/2013/PTUN.JKT, serta apa implikasi pembatalan surat keputusan penetapan tanah telantar pasca Putusan Nomor 24/G/2013/PTUN.JKT? Melalui metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus dapat disimpulkan bahwa adanya perbedaan penafsiran mengenai pengertian tanah telantar terkait dengan frase “dengan sengaja” dan “tidak sengaja,” majelis hakim berpendapat bahwa hambatan pemanfaatan tanah karena menunggu proses permohonan pelepasan kawasan hutan dan permasalahan tata ruang serta kendala terhadap pembebasan lahan dan proses ganti rugi disimpulkan sebagai unsur ketidaksengajaan. Implikasi pembatalan surat keputusan penetapan tanah telantar adalah tidak dapat didayagunakan untuk kepentingan masyarakat dan negara.Kata kunci: surat keputusan penetapan, tanah telantar, putusan pengadilan. ABSTRACTDecision of State Administrative Court Number 24/G/2013/PTUN.JKT constitutes a ruling of the revocation of a derelict land settlement agreement derived from Cultivation Rights on behalf of SMG Company. The subject of the dispute debated in the interpretation of the lawsuit is the definition of derelict land and warning letters, as regulated in Article 8 of Government Regulation Number 11 of 2010 regarding Policies and Utilization of Derelict Land and the implications of post-revocation of derelict land stipulated decree by the Administrative Court. The formulation of the problem in this research is the interpretation of derelict land definition and warning letters in the Administrative Court Decision Number 24/G/2013/PTUN.JKT, as well as the implication of revocation of derelict land settlement agreement after the court decision issuance. Through normative legal research method with case study approach, it can be underlined that there is difference in interpretation of the definition of derelict land related to the phrase “intentionally” and “unintentionally”, in which the judges argue that barriers to land utility are the still-in-process request of forest areas acquisition, spatial problems and constraints to land acquisition, as well as the compensation process concluded as an element of inadvertence. The revocation of the settlement agreement makes it impossible to use the derelict land for benefit of the people and the state.Keywords: determination decree, derelict land, court decision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document