scholarly journals INKONSISTENSI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP KEBERADAAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI SEBAGAI LEMBAGA NEGARA INDEPENDEN

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Theresa Yolanda Sirait ◽  
Bintang ME Naibaho ◽  
Janpatar Simamora ◽  
Leonardo David Simatupang
Keyword(s):  
State Institution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Independent State ◽  
Executive Authority ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic

The Constitutional Court as mandated in the constitution has a function as a guardian of the constitution, therefore, if there are norms in the Act that against to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia can be done by a trial. The decision of the Constitutional Court in the trial of the Act is related to the formal and material aspects, then the verdict that has been fulfilled the legal considerations by the judge, it will become the basis of a decision. Therefore, the verdict can not revoked arbitrarily unless in making decision due to coercion or negligence. The thesis deals and focuses on two aspects: First, showing and analyzing the considerations of the Constitutional Court in deciding the case No.012-016-019 / PUU-IV / 2006, No.19 / PUU-V / 2017, No.37-39 / PUU-VIII / 2010, No.5 / PUU-IX / 2011, No.36 / PUU-XV / 2017. Second, explains why the Constitutional Court inconsistency in determining the status and legal position of the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commision) through its verdict. From the new latest verdict of the Constitutional Court said that the KPK is an independent state institution under the executive authority , it is different from the previous four Constitutional Court decisions which said KPK as an independent state institution.

scholarly journals Article 24C Paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia: History and Critical Analysis of Disputes on the Authority of State Institutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-412
Author(s):  
Demas Brian W ◽  
Sudarsono ◽  
Rachmad Safa’at ◽  
Muchamad Ali Safa’at
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Independent State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Executive Agency ◽  
State Requirement

In simple terms, the ratio legis can be interpreted as the reason why there is a provision in the law. Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia determines the authority possessed by the Constitutional Court, paragraph (1) reads: The Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate at the first and final levels whose decisions are final to examine laws against the Constitution, decide disputes over authority a state institution whose authority is granted by the Constitution, decides on the dissolution of political parties, and decides on disputes regarding the results of general elections. The limiting provisions of Article 24C paragraph (1) seem to close the scope for expanding the Constitutional Court authority to decide disputes over the authority of independent state institutions. Meanwhile, this is a state requirement. This research uses a statutory approach with a descriptive analysis method. The conclusions obtained are: 1) it is not possible that a state institution that has supervisory authority has conflict with other legal institutions; 2) there are state institutions whose authorities are regulated by law and have the potential for authority disputes, but are resolved through the executive agency; 3) there is the authority of state institutions that have the potential for conflict of authority but there are no rules for resolving them.  

scholarly journals Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-XIV/2016 terhadap Independensi Komisi Pemilihan Umum

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Allan Fatchan Gani Wardhana
Keyword(s):  
State Institution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Independent State ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Force

The General Elections Commission (KPU) is an independent state institution directly regulated in Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Its position as an independent state institution affirms that the KPU is not under the influence of the DPR and the government in carrying out its duties and authorities. Article 9 Sub-Article a of Law Number 10 Year 2016 (Regional Head Election Law) stipulates the requirement of the KPU to consult the DPR and the Government in drafting and enacting KPU regulations and technical guidelines for each election stage in forums of hearings whose decisions are binding. The Constitutional Court through Decision Number 92/PUU-XIV/2016 finally canceled the word "binding" it; the existence of the word "binding" is considered contrary to the Constitution and interfere with the independence of the Commission. The research concludes, first, the independence of KPU as an organizer of election is one of the requirements for the realization of free and fair election. Secondly, the juridical implication in Decision 92/PUU-XIV/2016 confirms that the binding word in Article 9 sub-paragraph a of the Regional Head Election Law does not have binding legal force, so that the spirit and independence of KPU as an election organizer can be maintained. Abstrak Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) merupakan lembaga negara yang independen yang diatur secara langsung dalam Pasal 22E UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Posisinya sebagai lembaga negara independen menegaskan bahwa KPU tidak berada di bawah pengaruh DPR dan pemerintah dalam menjalankan tugas dan wewenangnya. Pasal 9 huruf a Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 (UU Pilkada) mengatur keharusan KPU untuk berkonsultasi dengan DPR dan Pemerintah dalam menyusun dan menetapkan peraturan KPU dan pedoman teknis untuk setiap tahapan pemilihan dalam forum rapat dengar pendapat yang keputusanya bersifat mengikat. Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Putusan Nomor 92/PUU-XIV/2016 akhirnya membatalkan kata ‘mengikat’ tersebut, karena bertentangan dengan Konstitusi dan mengganggu independensi KPU. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan, pertama, independensi KPU sebagai lembaga penyelenggara pemilu merupakan salah satu syarat bagi terwujudnya pemilu yang bebas dan adil. Kedua, implikasi yuridis dalam putusan 92/PUU-XIV/2016 menegaskan bahwa kata ‘mengikat’ dalam Pasal 9 huruf a UU Pilkada bertentangan dengan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat, sehingga marwah dan independensi KPU sebagai lembaga penyelenggara pemilu dapat terjaga.

scholarly journals Contestation of Kosovo’s Statehood from Within: EULEX Judges Adjudicating Privatization Matters through ‘Status Neutrality’

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 432-443
Author(s):  
Kushtrim Istrefi
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Independent State ◽  
Political Status ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Republic

Abstract Kosovo’s statehood has been contested by foes as well as friends. Much is known about the former and less about the latter. This contribution explores the contestation of Kosovo’s independence by the judges of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (eulex) working on privatization matters before Kosovo courts. As put by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo (kcc), eulex judges working on privatization matters, “simply continued to ignore the existence of Kosovo as an independent State and its legislation emanating from its Assembly”. The kcc stated this after eulex judges working on privatization matters had refused to respect Kosovo laws and institutions subsequent to the 2008 Kosovo Declaration of Independence. This paper explores the judicial dialogue on Kosovo’s independence between eulex judges and the kcc and identifies the limitations and risks of the ‘status neutral’ policy applied by international organizations to collaborate with Kosovar institutions without prejudging its political status. This submission suggests that ‘status neutrality’ leads to either acceptance or contestation of Kosovo’s statehood and thus brings more uncertainty than clarity to Kosovo’s position in international relations.

scholarly journals State Owned Enterprises Finance from the Perspective of State Funds

Yuridika ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 363
Author(s):  
Sopian Sitepu
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
The State ◽  
Company Law ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Clear Distinction ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
The Status

The existence of State-Owned enterprises (SOE) as one of Indonesia’s legal entities, whereby the State owns part of all of the capital of the company has presented several legal issues. The BUMN Act that has become the basis for establishing State-Owned enterprises has become its own independent legal subject and separates itself from the wealth of the State and has adhered to the provisions of the Company Law Act so that the capital that is presented by the State to the corporation remains as the capital of the SOE and not form the State. However, existing legislations regarding State funds places the funds for SOE as being part of the State budget. This ambiguity in the status of BUMN Funds is not only found in legislations but also in two different constitutional court decisions that presents inconsistencies towards law enforcers. This clear distinction is crucial in the practice of law enforcement in Indonesia.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENYELESIAN SENGKETA INTERNAL LEMBAGA NEGARA (STUDI KASUS PELANTIKAN PIMPINAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA PERIODE 2017-2019)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 364
Author(s):  
Yanzah Bagas Nugraha ◽  
Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
The Body ◽  
Internal Conflict ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Leadership Tenure ◽  
The People ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

The establishment of the Regional Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia so called Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD-RI) at least has two objectives. The first is to enhance justice for the people in the region. Secondly, to expanding and increasing the participation of local communities in national life. The process to form this state institution is done by amending the 3rd amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia. However, in doing that  amendment there was an internal conflict within the body of DPD-RI involving the old and the new leaders of this institution last year. The length of leadership tenure which was initially made 5 years was amended to became 2.5 years. The different length of leadership tenure was then canceled by the Supreme Court and it was decided to be the same as other institution such as The People’s Consultative Assembly and The House of Representative in that the leadership tenure should be in accordance with the electoral cycle of 5 years. However, although the regulation of DPD-RI has been canceled, the Supreme Court keeps sending its representative to guide the oath of position of the new DPD-RI leadership. The only regulation that has been introduced by the state was regulation toward conflict between state institutions and this conflict can merely be resolved by the Constitutional Court. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the state to seek solution to solve this problem to prevent the same thing happened to other state institution in the future.

scholarly journals Tafsir Wewenang Seponering Jaksa Agung Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 29/PUU-XIV/2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilham Dwi Rafiqi
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
State Power ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Definition Of

The affirmation of the attorney general's authority in the Elucidation of Article 35 letter C of the Indonesian Prosecutor's Law after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 29/PUU-XIV/2016 still leaves problems and has the potential to cause new legal problems. This research will look at and analyze how the authority of the Attorney General after the decision is as well as how the concept of an ideal arrangement that ensures legal certainty. This research uses normative juridical research with a statutory approach and case studies which in this case are court decisions. The results showed that after Constitutional Court decision, there was a change in the meaning of the Elucidation of Article 35 letter c of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Law. Based on the results of these interpretations and decisions, the legal implications that followed were related to the conditions for setting aside cases in the public interest, namely in setting aside cases in the public interest, the Attorney General was required to 'require' first to pay attention to suggestions and opinions from state power agencies that have relationship with the problem. The concept of an ideal arrangement that can guarantee legal certainty as an indicator to measure and assess the implementation of the Attorney General's obligations can be done by clarifying the definition of "state power agencies" for which advice and opinions are requested and making criteria for the term "public interest".

scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM KEWENANGAN KONSTITUSIONAL DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH DALAM PROSES LEGISLASI PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 92/PUU-X/2012

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Anna Triningsih
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<p>Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (UU MD3) pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dinilai memiliki problem substantif/materil akibat materi muatannya bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945), yang mengakibatkan kerugian konstitusional terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD), meliputi dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk dapat mengajukan (Rancangan Undang-Undang) RUU, dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk membahas RUU dan dikuranginya kewenangan DPD dalam kedudukannya sebagai lembaga perwakilan daerah. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa pembentukan UU MD3 nyata-nyata tidak menghormati putusan MK yang diberi mandat UUD NRI 1945 sebagai lembaga penafsir dan penjaga konstitusi, dengan tidak menghormati, mematuhi, dan melaksanakan putusan MK ini menunjukkan ketidakpatuhan terhadap putusan lembaga negara yang telah ditunjuk konstitusi untuk mengawal kemurnian pelaksanaan konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan ( statute approach ), pendekatan konsep ( conceptual approach ), dan pendekatan historis ( historical approach ). Ketidaktaatan penyusunan UU MD3 pada putusan MK merupakan pengingkaran UUD NRI 1945 dan perkembangan ini merupakan langkah mundur reformasi. Pembentuk Undang-Undang, dalam hal ini, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dan Presiden harus segera melakukan perubahan UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dengan berpijak pada rambu-rambu konstitusional Putusan MK Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012.</p><p>Law Number 17 Year 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives (MD3 Law) after the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) is considered to have a substantive problem due to the substance that is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (the 1945 Constitution), which resulted in the constitutional loss of Regional Representatives Council (DPD), including the reduction of DPD authority to propose draft bills, to discuss draft bills and the reduction in its authority as the regional representative institution. This shows that the drafting of MD3 Law is obviously not respecting the decision of the Court that is mandated by the 1945 Constitution as the interpreter and guardian institution of the constitutional, by not respecting, obeying and implementing MK’s decision which indicates non-compliance with the decision of the state institution that has been designated to guard the purity of the constitution implementation of the constitution. This study uses normative method with statute approach, conceptual approach and a historical approach. The noncompliance of the drafting of MD3 Law towards the MK’s decision is a denial of MK and this development is a step back of Reformation. The legislators, in this case, the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President should immediately amend the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations based on the MK’s Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012. </p>

scholarly journals Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Pembubaran Partai Politik Di Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-239
Author(s):  
Hasir Budiman Ritonga
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Status ◽  
Party Members ◽  
The Republic

Judicial power in Indonesia under the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia shall be exercised by the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. One of the authority of the Constitutional Court according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is to decide the dissolution of political parties. The facts in the current Indonesian system of ketatanegaran no cases of political parties that were dissolved through the decision of the Constitutional Court, it's just that the problem is when the Constitutional Court uses its authority to break the dissolution of political parties there are things that are formal juridically there is no clear rules, such as the legal status of party members who are not directly involved in the violation committed by the party and the status of party members who hold the position of members of the legislature both at the center and in the regions. So for that must be resolved by emphasizing the certainty, justice and benefit in the decision of the constitutional court

scholarly journals PENEMUAN HUKUM HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 21/PUU-XII/2014.MK KASUS PROYEK BIOMEDIASI PT.CHEVRON BACHTIAR ABDUL FATAH

Yustitia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-237
Author(s):  
Ujang Suratno
Keyword(s):  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Joint Decision ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Judicial authority in Indonesia is carried out by a Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court which has the authority to examine laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and decide on the authority dispute of state institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Constitutional Court in examining the Law against the 1945 Constitution became a polemic related to the prejudicial object which was finally answered through the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014. The Constitutional Court granted part of the application for corruption convictions in the case of PT Chevron Bachtiar's Abdul Fatah biomediation project, one of which examined the prejudicial object provisions which were polemic, especially after the South Jakarta District Court's prejudicial has canceled the status of suspect Commissioner Budi Gunawan (BG) by the KPK. This study is a legal research using a normative juridical approach and descriptive analytical research specifications. The data used in this study are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Data obtained through library studies and field research in the form of legislation, books, journals, and authoritative electronic media. The results of this study are 2 (two) explanations, namely First, Constitutional Court Judges have made legal inventions by providing interpretations and limitations on what can be the object of prejudicial in criminal procedural law by testing it against the constitution and seeing whether the KUHAP Articles tested are contradictory with constitutional rights. Secondly, the Constitutional Court uses several interactive techniques used by member judges in decision number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014. In the joint decision, the judges used Authentic, Systematic, Grammatical, Historical, Extensively and sociological interpretation techniques. This can be seen in the decision of point one stating a phrase which means interpreting the law using grammatical techniques

scholarly journals THE LEGAL NATURE OF THE POSITIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAYJAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7(76)) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
Kenul Huseynova
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Characteristic Features

This article investigates the characteristic features of the judicial precedent and legal positions of the Constitutional Court. We consider such concepts as «judicial precedent» and «legal position of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Azerbayjan” and arrive to a conclusion that they are not identical. We single out legal positions of the Constitutional Court and analyze their consistency with the concept of judicial precedent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document