scholarly journals Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-XIV/2016 terhadap Independensi Komisi Pemilihan Umum

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Allan Fatchan Gani Wardhana
Keyword(s):  
State Institution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Independent State ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Force

The General Elections Commission (KPU) is an independent state institution directly regulated in Article 22E of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Its position as an independent state institution affirms that the KPU is not under the influence of the DPR and the government in carrying out its duties and authorities. Article 9 Sub-Article a of Law Number 10 Year 2016 (Regional Head Election Law) stipulates the requirement of the KPU to consult the DPR and the Government in drafting and enacting KPU regulations and technical guidelines for each election stage in forums of hearings whose decisions are binding. The Constitutional Court through Decision Number 92/PUU-XIV/2016 finally canceled the word "binding" it; the existence of the word "binding" is considered contrary to the Constitution and interfere with the independence of the Commission. The research concludes, first, the independence of KPU as an organizer of election is one of the requirements for the realization of free and fair election. Secondly, the juridical implication in Decision 92/PUU-XIV/2016 confirms that the binding word in Article 9 sub-paragraph a of the Regional Head Election Law does not have binding legal force, so that the spirit and independence of KPU as an election organizer can be maintained. Abstrak Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) merupakan lembaga negara yang independen yang diatur secara langsung dalam Pasal 22E UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Posisinya sebagai lembaga negara independen menegaskan bahwa KPU tidak berada di bawah pengaruh DPR dan pemerintah dalam menjalankan tugas dan wewenangnya. Pasal 9 huruf a Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 (UU Pilkada) mengatur keharusan KPU untuk berkonsultasi dengan DPR dan Pemerintah dalam menyusun dan menetapkan peraturan KPU dan pedoman teknis untuk setiap tahapan pemilihan dalam forum rapat dengar pendapat yang keputusanya bersifat mengikat. Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Putusan Nomor 92/PUU-XIV/2016 akhirnya membatalkan kata ‘mengikat’ tersebut, karena bertentangan dengan Konstitusi dan mengganggu independensi KPU. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan, pertama, independensi KPU sebagai lembaga penyelenggara pemilu merupakan salah satu syarat bagi terwujudnya pemilu yang bebas dan adil. Kedua, implikasi yuridis dalam putusan 92/PUU-XIV/2016 menegaskan bahwa kata ‘mengikat’ dalam Pasal 9 huruf a UU Pilkada bertentangan dengan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat, sehingga marwah dan independensi KPU sebagai lembaga penyelenggara pemilu dapat terjaga.

scholarly journals Article 24C Paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia: History and Critical Analysis of Disputes on the Authority of State Institutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-412
Author(s):  
Demas Brian W ◽  
Sudarsono ◽  
Rachmad Safa’at ◽  
Muchamad Ali Safa’at
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Independent State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Executive Agency ◽  
State Requirement

In simple terms, the ratio legis can be interpreted as the reason why there is a provision in the law. Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia determines the authority possessed by the Constitutional Court, paragraph (1) reads: The Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate at the first and final levels whose decisions are final to examine laws against the Constitution, decide disputes over authority a state institution whose authority is granted by the Constitution, decides on the dissolution of political parties, and decides on disputes regarding the results of general elections. The limiting provisions of Article 24C paragraph (1) seem to close the scope for expanding the Constitutional Court authority to decide disputes over the authority of independent state institutions. Meanwhile, this is a state requirement. This research uses a statutory approach with a descriptive analysis method. The conclusions obtained are: 1) it is not possible that a state institution that has supervisory authority has conflict with other legal institutions; 2) there are state institutions whose authorities are regulated by law and have the potential for authority disputes, but are resolved through the executive agency; 3) there is the authority of state institutions that have the potential for conflict of authority but there are no rules for resolving them.  

scholarly journals Election violation and election law enforcement in general election in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
Syailendra Anantya Prawira
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
General Election ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The People ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

General Elections are the embodiments of the mandate stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 1 paragraph (2) which affirms that "sovereignty is in the hands of the people and carried out according to the Constitution". The Formulation Document that will be formulated in the research are: (1) What is the violation in the general election? And (2) What is law enforcement in general election. The method used in this study is normative legal research, normative legal research methods or library law research methods are methods or procedures that are used in legal research by examining existing library material. Election violations constitute acts prohibited by the Election Law against election organizers resulting in the imposition of sanctions for violations. The enactment of Law Number 7 Year 2017 on General Elections provides for different types of violations, disputes, criminal offenses and electoral disputes. The crime of elections is a criminal offense punishable by a particular punishment based on the criminal justice system. The purpose of election is to carry out popular sovereignty and the realization of the political rights of the people to produce leaders who will occupy important positions in the government.

scholarly journals Halal certification in Indonesia; history, development, and implementation

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Hayyun Durrotul Faridah
Keyword(s):  
Raw Materials ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Independent State ◽  
Implementation Effort ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Legal Legitimacy ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
October 17 ◽  
Selection Of

Indonesia's population with a Muslim majority (87.18%) makes the need for halal products very large. There is a need for halal product guarantees for products entering or circulating in Indonesia. Halal guarantee in Indonesia is regulated by the Government through legislation. The halalness of a product can be determined by conducting halal certification by inspecting the product from the selection of raw materials, the production process, to the final product. The halal certification process in Indonesia has been developing. This study aims to describe the history, development, and implementation of halal certification in Indonesia, one of which is before and after the issuance of law on Halal Product Guarantee (Halal Law). Initially, halal certification in Indonesia was taken over by the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) which is a civil society movement that has the support of the state. But after the issuance of the Halal Law, the authority for halal certification was transferred to the Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Produk Halal (BPJPH) which is an independent state institution under the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia. This was also followed by several changes in several policies related to halal certification. Halal certification which was initially voluntary and does not yet have strong legal legitimacy has now become mandatory for business actors. Implementation of the Halal Law began on October 17, 2019, and will be carried out in stages. In the implementation effort, there needs to be a good collaboration between the government, business actors, and the community.

scholarly journals INKONSISTENSI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP KEBERADAAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI SEBAGAI LEMBAGA NEGARA INDEPENDEN

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Theresa Yolanda Sirait ◽  
Bintang ME Naibaho ◽  
Janpatar Simamora ◽  
Leonardo David Simatupang
Keyword(s):  
State Institution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Independent State ◽  
Executive Authority ◽  
The Status ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Republic

The Constitutional Court as mandated in the constitution has a function as a guardian of the constitution, therefore, if there are norms in the Act that against to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia can be done by a trial. The decision of the Constitutional Court in the trial of the Act is related to the formal and material aspects, then the verdict that has been fulfilled the legal considerations by the judge, it will become the basis of a decision. Therefore, the verdict can not revoked arbitrarily unless in making decision due to coercion or negligence. The thesis deals and focuses on two aspects: First, showing and analyzing the considerations of the Constitutional Court in deciding the case No.012-016-019 / PUU-IV / 2006, No.19 / PUU-V / 2017, No.37-39 / PUU-VIII / 2010, No.5 / PUU-IX / 2011, No.36 / PUU-XV / 2017. Second, explains why the Constitutional Court inconsistency in determining the status and legal position of the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commision) through its verdict. From the new latest verdict of the Constitutional Court said that the KPK is an independent state institution under the executive authority , it is different from the previous four Constitutional Court decisions which said KPK as an independent state institution.

scholarly journals Karakter Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Melaksanakan Kewenangan Sesuai Pasal 24C Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-119
Author(s):  
Zuhro Nuridahwati
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Reformation ◽  
General Elections ◽  
Strategic Position ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Main Center

The Constitutional Court is within the scope of the Judicial Power and occupiesa strategic position in the Indonesian constitutional structure. MK as one of the stateinstitutions that was born from the reformation in 1998. MK as a judicial institution hasa very important and strategic task, said to be the sole interpreter of the Republic ofIndonesia's state constitution. Article 24C paragraph (1), of the 1945 Constitution of theRepublic of Indonesia, the Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate at the firstand last level the final decision to review the law against the Constitution, to decide ondisputes over the authority of state institutions whose authority is granted by theConstitution, to decide upon the dissolution of parties politics, and decide upon disputesabout the results of general elections. The results of the study and analysis, the provisionsof the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 24 Year 2003,found legal issues that become legal problems faced by the Constitutional Court, arerelated to their position, competence, and form of decisions, which often makes legalcertainty uncertain or absurd, and conflicts norm, it is very interesting to be studied as acentral theme of the dissertation. Understanding the Position, indicating the position anddegree of the Constitutional Court between state institutions and between the SupremeCourt and the Constitutional Court, while competency shows the competency boundarybetween the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, which has attributie authority,first and foremost authority, born from the format of the government system and thedistribution of state power . Attributie authority as the first and main center forresponsibility and at the same time the basis of delegating authority in the form of delegatie.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENYELESIAN SENGKETA INTERNAL LEMBAGA NEGARA (STUDI KASUS PELANTIKAN PIMPINAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA PERIODE 2017-2019)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 364
Author(s):  
Yanzah Bagas Nugraha ◽  
Dwi Andayani Budisetyowati
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
The Body ◽  
Internal Conflict ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Leadership Tenure ◽  
The People ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

The establishment of the Regional Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia so called Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD-RI) at least has two objectives. The first is to enhance justice for the people in the region. Secondly, to expanding and increasing the participation of local communities in national life. The process to form this state institution is done by amending the 3rd amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia. However, in doing that  amendment there was an internal conflict within the body of DPD-RI involving the old and the new leaders of this institution last year. The length of leadership tenure which was initially made 5 years was amended to became 2.5 years. The different length of leadership tenure was then canceled by the Supreme Court and it was decided to be the same as other institution such as The People’s Consultative Assembly and The House of Representative in that the leadership tenure should be in accordance with the electoral cycle of 5 years. However, although the regulation of DPD-RI has been canceled, the Supreme Court keeps sending its representative to guide the oath of position of the new DPD-RI leadership. The only regulation that has been introduced by the state was regulation toward conflict between state institutions and this conflict can merely be resolved by the Constitutional Court. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the state to seek solution to solve this problem to prevent the same thing happened to other state institution in the future.

Development of Commercial Law in the Slovak Republic - Outline of problems

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-90
Author(s):  
Mojmír Mamojka ◽  
Jacek Dworzecki
Keyword(s):  
Czech Republic ◽  
Slovak Republic ◽  
Ancient Egypt ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Independent State ◽  
The Czech Republic ◽  
Trade Law ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

The article concerns the issue of trade law in the context of its evolution and the current realities of its being in force in Republic of Slovakia. In the paper the authors present an historical view of the creation of legal regulations about trade from ancient times to present days. In the first part of the paper the political system and its components are discussed. The reader will be able to acquaint themselves with the functioning of the apparatus of executive power (the government and ministries), legislative power (the parliament consisting of 150 members) and judiciary (independent courts and prosecutors) in the Republic of Slovakia. Moreover, this part of the article provides information about practical aspects of the creation of selected components of the constitutional legal order (e.g. parliamentary elections). In the second part, the paper covers the evolution of trade law over the centuries, approaches to regulations in Mesopotamia, based on, inter alia, the Code of Hammurabi, and also in ancient Egypt and Greece. Tracing the development of trade law over the centuries, the authors also present the evolution of legal regulations in this field in the XIX century, with particular reference to France, Germany and Austria-Hungary (especially the territory which today forms the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic). In the last part of the article, the forming of regulations of trade law in Czechoslovakia from 1918 and during subsequent periods which created the history of that country, to the overthrow communism and the peaceful division of the state in 1993 into two separate, independent state organisms – the Czech Republic and Slovakia - is approached.

scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM KEWENANGAN KONSTITUSIONAL DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH DALAM PROSES LEGISLASI PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 92/PUU-X/2012

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Anna Triningsih
Keyword(s):  
House Of Representatives ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<p>Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (UU MD3) pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dinilai memiliki problem substantif/materil akibat materi muatannya bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945), yang mengakibatkan kerugian konstitusional terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD), meliputi dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk dapat mengajukan (Rancangan Undang-Undang) RUU, dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk membahas RUU dan dikuranginya kewenangan DPD dalam kedudukannya sebagai lembaga perwakilan daerah. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa pembentukan UU MD3 nyata-nyata tidak menghormati putusan MK yang diberi mandat UUD NRI 1945 sebagai lembaga penafsir dan penjaga konstitusi, dengan tidak menghormati, mematuhi, dan melaksanakan putusan MK ini menunjukkan ketidakpatuhan terhadap putusan lembaga negara yang telah ditunjuk konstitusi untuk mengawal kemurnian pelaksanaan konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan ( statute approach ), pendekatan konsep ( conceptual approach ), dan pendekatan historis ( historical approach ). Ketidaktaatan penyusunan UU MD3 pada putusan MK merupakan pengingkaran UUD NRI 1945 dan perkembangan ini merupakan langkah mundur reformasi. Pembentuk Undang-Undang, dalam hal ini, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dan Presiden harus segera melakukan perubahan UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dengan berpijak pada rambu-rambu konstitusional Putusan MK Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012.</p><p>Law Number 17 Year 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives (MD3 Law) after the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) is considered to have a substantive problem due to the substance that is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (the 1945 Constitution), which resulted in the constitutional loss of Regional Representatives Council (DPD), including the reduction of DPD authority to propose draft bills, to discuss draft bills and the reduction in its authority as the regional representative institution. This shows that the drafting of MD3 Law is obviously not respecting the decision of the Court that is mandated by the 1945 Constitution as the interpreter and guardian institution of the constitutional, by not respecting, obeying and implementing MK’s decision which indicates non-compliance with the decision of the state institution that has been designated to guard the purity of the constitution implementation of the constitution. This study uses normative method with statute approach, conceptual approach and a historical approach. The noncompliance of the drafting of MD3 Law towards the MK’s decision is a denial of MK and this development is a step back of Reformation. The legislators, in this case, the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President should immediately amend the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations based on the MK’s Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012. </p>

scholarly journals Kedudukan Surat Edaran Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia di Aceh

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-61
Author(s):  
Taqiyuddin Faranis ◽  
Husni Djalil ◽  
Mahdi Syabandir
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
General Election ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Pasal 60 ayat (4) Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintah Aceh dinyatakan bahwa masa kerja Panitia Pengawas Pemilihan (Panwaslih) berakhir 3 (tiga) bulan setelah pelantikan kepala daerah tepilih, sementara dalam regulasi yuridis lainnya khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2011 tentang Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum dan Pemilihan menegaskan berakhir paling lambat 2 (dua) bulan setelah seluruh tahapan penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum selesai. Ketua Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu) Republik Indonesia mengeluarkan Surat Edaran Nomor: 0240/K.Bawaslu/TU.0001/III/2017 tentang Penegasan Masa Tugas Lembaga Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Ad Hoc dalam Rangka Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati dan/atau Walikota dan Wakil Walikota Tahun 2017. Surat Edaran tersebut disimpulkan bahwa masa kerja Panwaslih di Aceh berakhir pada bulan Mei bagi daerah yang terdapat penyelesaian sengketa di Mahkamah Konstitusi dan bulan Juni bagi daerah yang vakum sengketa. Hal ini mengakibatkan ketidakpastian hukum bagi penyelenggara Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dan menimbulkan kegaduhan dalam internal Panwaslih di Aceh. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimanakah kedudukan dan  kekuatan hukum Surat Edaran Bawaslu, mengkaji kepastian hukum masa kerja Panwaslih di Aceh atas keputusan Bawaslu Republik Indonesia yang telah mengeluarkan Surat Edaran yang dijadikan rujukan Pemerintah Aceh untuk merevisi Peraturan Gubernur sebelumnya mengenai masa kerja Panwaslih di Aceh. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif atau penelitian hukum kepustakaan.The article 60 paragraph (4) of the Act Number 11, 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh stated that the working period of the Election Committee ends 3 (three) months after the inauguration of the elected regional head, while in other juridical regulations especially the Act Number 15, 2011 concerning the General Election Organizer and the Election stipulates to expire no later than 2 (two) months after all stages of the election are completed. Chairman of the Election Supervisory has issued the Circular Letter Number: 0240/K.Bawaslu/TU.0001/III/2017 on the Affirmation of Ad Hoc Election Observer Period of Governor and Deputy Regent, Deputy Regent and Deputy Regent, and or Mayor and Deputy Mayor 2017. Based on the Circular Letter, it states that the working period of the Committee in Aceh ends in May for the area where there is a dispute resolution at the Constitutional Court and in June for the vacuum of the dispute. This has resulted in legal uncertainty for the election organizers and caused frenzy within the internal the Election Advisory in Aceh. This research aims to explore the position and legal power of the Election Supervisory Board Circular Letter, to review the legal certainty of the working period of the Election Committee in Aceh on the decision of General Election Supervisory Board of the Republic Indonesia which has issued a Circular Letter as the reference of the Government of Aceh to revise the previous Governor Regulation concerning the working period of the committee in Aceh. This is doctrinal legal research or library research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document