scholarly journals RESEARCH OF THE MECHANISM OF OIL RECOVERY FROM HYDROCARBON DEPOSITS WITH LOW PERMEABILITY RESERVOIRS

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (34) ◽  
pp. 892-904
Author(s):  
Zinon A KUANGALIEV ◽  
Gulsin S DOSKASIYEVA ◽  
Altynbek S MARDANOV
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Oil Reserves ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

The main part of Russia's hard-to-recover reserves is 73% for low-grade and carbonate reservoirs, 12% for high-viscosity oil, about 15% of extensive sub-gas zones of oil and gas deposits and 7% of reservoirs lying at great depths. The development of such stocks with the usage of traditional technologies is economically inefficient. It requires the application of new technologies for their development and fundamentally new approaches to design, taking into account the features of extraction of hard-to-extract reserves (HtER). The purpose of this research is to find ways to improve the performance of low-permeability reservoirs. To accomplish this task, the Novobogatinsk South-Eastern Oil Field has been taken as an example and described. The necessary properties of production facilities in the field are highlighted, along with economic feasibility and technological efficiency. The reserves involved in the development are determined and, thanks to the knowledge of the geological oil reserves of the deposits, the potential oil recovery factor is calculated with the existing development technology. As a result of the research, development options were worked out with the results of the calculation of design indicators for the field as a whole. The comparison of oil recovery schedules and ORI, as well as the layout of wells, have been presented. As a result of the study, a description of 3 options for the development of design indicators for the field as a whole is given. The figures show oil production graphs, as well as location patterns. The authors of the study conclude which of the recommended development options can help extract maximum oil reserves.

Financial and Economic Support of Innovation Processes in the Russian Fuel and Energy Complex

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-85
Author(s):  
L. D. Kapranova ◽  
T. V. Pogodina
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Oil Reserves ◽  
Energy Complex ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
Substantial Investment ◽  
The Government

The subject of the research is the current state of the fuel and energy complex (FEC) that ensures generation of a significant part of the budget and the innovative development of the economy.The purpose of the research was to establish priority directions for the development of the FEC sectors based on a comprehensive analysis of their innovative and investment activities. The dynamics of investment in the fuel and energy sector are considered. It is noted that large-scale modernization of the fuel and energy complex requires substantial investment and support from the government. The results of the government programs of corporate innovative development are analyzed. The results of the research identified innovative development priorities in the power, oil, gas and coal sectors of the fuel and energy complex. The most promising areas of innovative development in the oil and gas sector are the technologies of enhanced oil recovery; the development of hard-to-recover oil reserves; the production of liquefied natural gas and its transportation. In the power sector, the prospective areas are activities aimed at improving the performance reliability of the national energy systems and the introduction of digital technologies. Based on the research findings, it is concluded that the innovation activities in the fuel and energy complex primarily include the development of new technologies, modernization of the FEC technical base; adoption of state-of-the-art methods of coal mining and oil recovery; creating favorable economic conditions for industrial extraction of hard-to-recover reserves; transition to carbon-free fuel sources and energy carriers that can reduce energy consumption and cost as well as reducing the negative FEC impact on the environment.

ASSESSMENT OF OIL WELL PRODUCTIVITY IN LOW-PERMEABILITY RESERVOIRS IN THE FIELDS OF EASTERN SIBERIA

2017 ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
R. V. Urvantsev ◽  
S. E. Cheban
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil Extraction ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Oil Well ◽  
Eastern Siberia ◽  
Development Costs ◽  
Traditional Fields ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

The 21st century witnessed the development of the oil extraction industry in Russia due to the intensifica- tion of its production at the existing traditional fields of Western Siberia, the Volga region and other oil-extracting regions, and due discovering new oil and gas provinces. At that time the path to the development of fields in Eastern Siberia was already paved. The large-scale discoveries of a number of fields made here in the 70s-80s of the 20th century are only being developed now. The process of development itself is rather slow in view of a number of reasons. Create a problem of high cost value of oil extraction in the region. One of the major tasks is obtaining the maximum oil recovery factor while reducing the development costs. The carbonate layer lying within the Katangsky suite is low-permeability, and its inventories are categorised as hard to recover. Now, the object is at a stage of trial development,which foregrounds researches on selecting the effective methods of oil extraction.

scholarly journals To the experience of Shkapovo oilfield development

Georesursy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-122
Author(s):  
Evgeny V. Lozin
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Construction Material ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Public Works ◽  
Centrifugal Pumps ◽  
Oil Reserves ◽  
Large Platform ◽  
Capital Construction

The article formulates the main conclusions about the development of a large Shkapovsky oil field with an emphasis on the results of the development of the main objects – horizons DI and DIV of the terrigenous Devonian. The field was commissioned following the neighboring Tuimazinsky and Serafimovsky fields, taking into account the experience of a scientifically organized system for the development of these large platform oil fields in the Volga-Ural oil and gas region. It is shown that this experience was not taken into account much, especially in relation to the unsecured needs of oil production with capital construction, material and technical supply and social facilities. The potential of the field was realized in 18 years. Intra-contour and focal flooding, production technologies using electric centrifugal pumps (ESP), chemicalization of oil extraction processes, primary collection and transportation of products, oil, gas and water treatment technologies, etc., accelerated the development. Shkapov engineers and scientists own a number of innovations: realizing high development rates, means of preventing and eliminating salt-paraffin deposits, the introduction of double-barrel drilling, the development of high-performance ESPs, separate development of facilities, etc. At the same time, tasks were solved on eliminating ecological imbalance in the bowels and the environment, housing and public works. The current urgent problem of the field’s additional development is the activation of the production of residual oil reserves from oil and watered zones drilled with an unreasonably rare grid of wells. The final oil recovery coefficients of the Devonian objects are expected to be high, but, according to the author of the article, could reach CU 0.6.

Assessment of Bottomhole Formation Zone Results for the YUS11 Development Wells at the Fainsk Oil Field with the Application of Hydrocarbon Solvents and Acid Compounds

2018 ◽  
Vol 785 ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Vadim Aleksandrov ◽  
Marsel Kadyrov ◽  
Andrey Ponomarev ◽  
Denis Drugov ◽  
Mikhail Zavatskij
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Reservoir Rocks ◽  
Hydrocarbon Solvents ◽  
Formation Zone ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

One of the acutest problems in the oil and gas industry is the efficient development of low-permeability reservoirs in Jurassic sediments. At that, the choice of efficient technologies can be made basing on the analysis of field-geological and laboratory data, as well as the analysis of previously conducted activities with account of facies genesis of reservoir rocks in the wells, where the geotechnical activities (GTA) are realized. The research objective is the assessment of bottomhole formation zone (BFZ) results for the YUS11 development wells at the Fainsk oil field with the application of hydrocarbon solvents and acid compounds. Using detailed field-geological analysis, the data obtained after the processing of a bottomhole formation area of the development wells with the application of hydrocarbon solvents and acid compounds was assessed.

Feasibility Study on Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Fuzzy-Ball Fluid in Offshore Heterogeneous Sandstone Reservoir

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Wang ◽  
Lihui Zheng ◽  
Panfeng Wei ◽  
Mingzheng Yang ◽  
Wang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Heterogeneous Reservoirs ◽  
Output Ratio ◽  
Polymer Surfactant ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Abstract The heterogeneity of reservoirs in offshore oilfields, which causes low utilization of low-permeability reservoirs and poor exploitation of crude oil, is usually serious. Till date, fuzzy-ball fluids have been used to improve oil recovery of terrestrial heterogeneous reservoirs, but it is still uncertain whether it could enhance the recovery of offshore oilfields, because of high cost and special operating environment in offshore oilfields. To this end, laboratory core flooding experiments and field tests were conducted. The results of the feasibility analysis show that: (1) Fuzzy-ball fluid has good injection and plugging performance, which means fuzzy-ball fluid has great potential to be applied in enhancing recovery. (2) Fuzzy-ball fluid can greatly improve oil recovery, especially the recovery of low-permeability cores. Compared with polymer, surfactant and microsphere, fuzzy-ball fluid led to 30% higher recovery of low-permeability cores. (3) The application of fuzzy-ball fluid in enhancing recovery has good economic feasibility. The input-output ratio of fuzzy-ball fluid is 1:4.3. It is concluded that the use of fuzzy-ball fluid in the heterogeneous sandstone reservoirs for enhanced oil recovery is feasible.

4D Geomechanical Research for Fracturing Optimization of Low-Permeability Reservoir

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Zheng ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Xiaoguang Wang ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Dan Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Production Capacity ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Wellbore Stability ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Reservoir Stimulation ◽  
Single Well ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Abstract China has abundant low-permeability oil and gas resources. A lot of practice has proved that low-permeability reservoirs must undergo hydraulic fracturing to obtain commercial production capacity. Geomechanical characteristics are the key factor for fracturing. It plays a very important role in the oil field exploration and production. It is not only the driving force for oil and gas migration, but also provides a basis for wellbore stability analysis and drilling optimization design. The state of the formation stress field and the mechanical properties of the rock jointly determine the direction, shape and orientation of the fracture extension of the fracturing. Together it affects the stimulation effect of fracturing. Realizing the high-efficiency development of low-permeability reservoirs is a key and difficult problem facing for oil filed operator. Horizontal wells drilling and hydraulic fracturing are the core technology for increasing single well production in low-permeability reservoirs. The effectiveness of reservoir reconstruction directly determines the production capacity of the reservoir. In order to clarify the influence of static and dynamic geomechanics on the scale of reservoir stimulation in the process of horizontal well fracturing, and ultimately provide effective technical support for the formulation and optimization of reservoir stimulation design. This study is based on the study of single well one-dimensional geomechanics, using the structural characteristics and seismic attributes of low-permeability reservoirs to study the characteristics of the three-dimensional spatial distribution of mechanics. On this basis, combined with real-time fracturing treatment data and micro-seismic monitoring data, dynamic (four-dimensional) stress field simulations are continuously carried out. The research results can be mainly used to guide the optimization of reservoir stimulation and the evaluation of filed development plan.

Research and Application of Depressure and Increasing Injection Technology in Low Permeability Oilfield

2011 ◽  
Vol 347-353 ◽  
pp. 651-658
Author(s):  
Wei Dong Liu ◽  
Su Nan Cong ◽  
Hong Jun Gu ◽  
Zhen Rong Nie
Keyword(s):  
Relative Permeability ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Chemical Agent ◽  
Oil Well ◽  
Cross Point ◽  
Oil Reserves

In China, most of undeveloped oil reserves are low and ultra low permeability reservoirs. The total remaining petroleum reserves of CNPC is about 4.07×107m3, and the low and ultra low permeability reserves is 3.16×107m3, So it is important to reasonable develop the oil reserves to keep the petroleum output stable. Under the low permeability layer condition, it is difficult to inject water to the formation, and the output of oil well is very low. The chemical agent can solve the difficulty of injection water and enhance the oil recovery. The relative permeability experiments shows irreducible oil was reduced by the wettability alteration agents, and the mobile oil saturation increased, which enlarging the range of the two phases co-flowing and enhancing oil recovery. As a result with alteration agents, the cross-point relative permeability moves to right, and the core converts to water-wet. In daqing oil field test, the water injection pressure is reduced by 15%, and the term of validity is more than 10 months.

The Current Situation and Prospects of Development of Low Permeability Oil Reservoir

2013 ◽  
Vol 734-737 ◽  
pp. 1286-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Cong ◽  
Wen Long Li ◽  
Jing Chao Lei ◽  
Ru Bin Li
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Oil Reservoir ◽  
Oil Exploration ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Oil And Gas Field ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs ◽  
Technical Measures ◽  
Exploration And Development

Internationally the research of low permeability oil reservoir is a difficult point in the exploration and development of oil and gas field. This thesis, based on the research methods of low permeability reservoirs at home and abroad, summaries several major problems encountered in the process of low permeability oil exploration and development under the current technical conditions as well as the corresponding, but more effective technical measures that need to be constantly improved. And that exploration and development of low permeability of the reservoir will be the main battle field for some time in the future of oil exploration and development.

Development of the Surfactant-Based Chemical EOR Formula for Low Permeability Reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Chun Zhou ◽  
Meng Lu ◽  
Fuchen Liu ◽  
Wenhong Li ◽  
Jianshen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Behavior ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Aqueous Solubility ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Chemical Flooding ◽  
Residual Oil ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Tension ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Abstract Based on the results of the foam flooding for our low permeability reservoirs, we have explored the possibility of using low interfacial tension (IFT) surfactants to improve oil recovery. The objective of this work is to develop a robust low-tension surfactant formula through lab experiments to investigate several key factors for surfactant-based chemical flooding. Microemulsion phase behavior and aqueous solubility experiments at reservoir temperature were performed to develop the surfactant formula. After reviewing surfactant processes in literature and evaluating over 200 formulas using commercially available surfactants, we found that we may have long ignored the challenges of achieving aqueous stability and optimal microemulsion phase behavior for surfactant formulations in low salinity environments. A surfactant formula with a low IFT does not always result in a good microemulsion phase behavior. Therefore, a novel synergistic blend with two surfactants in the formulation was developed with a cost-effective nonionic surfactant. The formula exhibits an increased aqueous solubility, a lower optimum salinity, and an ultra-low IFT in the range of 10-4 mN/m. There were challenges of using a spinning drop tensiometer to measure the IFT of the black crude oil and the injection water at reservoir conditions. We managed the process and studied the IFTs of formulas with good Winsor type III phase behavior results. Several microemulsion phase behavior test methods were investigated, and a practical and rapid test method is proposed to be used in the field under operational conditions. Reservoir core flooding experiments including SP (surfactant-polymer) and LTG (low-tension-gas) were conducted to evaluate the oil recovery. SP flooding with a selected polymer for mobility control and a co-solvent recovered 76% of the waterflood residual oil. Furthermore, 98% residual crude oil recovery was achieved by LTG flooding through using an additional foaming agent and nitrogen. These results demonstrate a favorable mobilization and displacement of the residual oil for low permeability reservoirs. In summary, microemulsion phase behavior and aqueous solubility tests were used to develop coreflood formulations for low salinity, low temperature conditions. The formulation achieved significant oil recovery for both SP flooding and LTG flooding. Key factors for the low-tension surfactant-based chemical flooding are good microemulsion phase behavior, a reasonably aqueous stability, and a decent low IFT.

The Research and Evaluation of Finely Layered Water Injection Standard in Low-Permeability Reservoirs - A Case from Block A in one Low-Permeability Reservoir

2014 ◽  
Vol 1073-1076 ◽  
pp. 2310-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Xian Wang ◽  
Wan Jing Luo ◽  
Jie Ding
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Reservoir Permeability ◽  
Engineering Parameters ◽  
The Common ◽  
Common Problems ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Due to the common problems of waterflood in low-permeability reservoirs, the reasearch of finely layered water injection is carried out. This paper established the finely layered water injection standard in low-permeability reservoirs and analysed the sensitivity of engineering parameters as well as evaluated the effect of the finely layered water injection standard in Block A with the semi-quantitative to quantitative method. The results show that: according to the finely layered water injection standard, it can be divided into three types: layered water injection between the layers, layered water injection in inner layer, layered water injection between fracture segment and no-fracture segment. Under the guidance of the standard, it sloved the problem of uneven absorption profile in Block A in some degree and could improve the oil recovery by 3.5%. The sensitivity analysis shows that good performance of finely layered water injection in Block A requires the reservoir permeability ratio should be less than 10, the perforation thickness should not exceed 10 m, the amount of layered injection layers should be less than 3, the surface injection pressure should be below 14 MPa and the injection rate shuold be controlled at about 35 m3/d.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document