scholarly journals Differences in Reflective Thinking Ability Between Creative Problem Solving and Discovery Learning Models Based on Gender

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Reflective Thinking ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Problem

scholarly journals Perbedaan Self Confidence Siswa antara Creative Problem Solving dan Discovery Learning Ditinjau dari Gender

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 640-646
Author(s):  
Ahmad Isnaini ◽  
Edy Surya
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
Anova Test ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Problem Solving Model ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
Scheffe Method

This study aims to see the differences in students' self confidence between students with the treatment of the creative problem solving learning model and the discovery learning model analysed based on gender. The data analysis was done using two-way Anava with different number of cell to see the effect of gender and learning models on students' self confidence. After the effect of gender and the learning model was found, a further post-Anova test using Scheffe method was executed. This analysis shows the following results: gender has an influence on students' self confidence as well as there is an influence of the learning model on students' self confidence, there is no interaction between gender and learning models on students' self confidence. When a post-Anova test with Scheffe's method was applied, it is found that there are differences in students' self confidence between the creative problem solving model and the discovery learning model. Female students have better self confidence than male students , while the creative problem solving model provides better self confidence than discovery learning model.

scholarly journals MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DAN SELF EFFICACY SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING PADA MATERI SISTEM KOLOID

Vidya Karya ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahyu Wahyu ◽  
Rusmansyah Rusmansyah ◽  
Arif Sholahuddin
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
Colloid System ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Good Score ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

Abstract. This study aims to improve teacher and students activities, creative thinking ability, self efficacy, and student learning outcomes in Colloid system material using creative problem solving model. The subjects were 36 students of grade XI IPA SMA PGRI 4 Banjarmasin. This classroom action research was conducted in 2 cycles through the stages of planning, action, evaluation and observation, and reflection. The data were collected using observation instruments, creative thinking skills tests, student achievement test, and questionnaires. Analysis of the data used qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques. The results of the cycle I and cycle 2 showed: (1) there was an increase in teacher and student activities from good to very good, (2) students' creative thinking ability increased from moderate to high, (3) self efficacy of students increased from moderate to high, (4) students' learning outcomes on the attitude aspects improved from good (score 71,53) to be very good (score 86.34), the skill aspects improved from good enough to good, and the percentage of students' mastery increased from 52.78% in the first cycle to 83.33% in te second cycle.                  Keywords: Creative problem solving, creative thinking ability, self efficacy, colloid system. Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan aktivitas guru dan aktivitas siswa, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, self efficacy, dan hasil belajar siswa pada materi sistem Koloid menggunakan model pembelajaran creative problem solving. Subjek penelitian adalah 36 orang siswa kelas XI IPA SMA PGRI 4 Banjarmasin. Penelitian tindakan kelas ini dilakukan dalam 2 siklus melalui tahap-tahap perencanaan, tindakan, evaluasi dan observasi, dan refleksi. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen observasi, tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif, tes hasil belajar, dan angket. Analisis data menggunakan teknik analisis kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian siklus I dan siklus 2 menunjukkan: (1) terjadi peningkatan aktivitas guru dan aktivitas siswa dari baik menjadi sangat baik, (2) kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa meningkat dari sedang menjadi tinggi, (3) self efficacy siswa menigkat dari sedang menjadi tinggi, (4) hasil belajar siswa pada aspek sikap meningkat dari baik (skor 71,53) menjadi sangat baik (skor 86,34),  aspek keterampilan meningkat dari cukup baik menjadi baik, dan persentase ketuntasan pengetahuan siswa meningkat dari 52,78% pada siklus I menjadi 83,33% di siklus II.Kata kunci: creative problem solving, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, self efikasi, sistem koloid.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) TERHADAP MINAT DAN HASIL BELAJAR KIMIA SISWA

Alotrop ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghea Sefriza Pratiwi ◽  
Amrul Bahar ◽  
Rina Elvia
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
T Test ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
Gain Score ◽  
Problem Solving Model ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
Good For

The purpose of this study is to describe the comparison of Think Talk Write learning models and Creative Problem Solving learning models to the interests and learning outcomes of chemistry in basic chemical law material. This research was conducted in January-May 2019. The research conducted was a kind of quasi-experimental research. The population of this study was class X MIA, totaling 136 students in SMAN 8 Kota Bengkulu in the academic year 2018/2019. Sampling was carried out after the normality and homogeneity test, so the X MIA 2 class was selected using Think Talk Write and X MIA 3 models that used the Creative Problem Solving model with a total of 68. Analysis of the data used was mean, normality test, test homogeneity, interest questionnaire analysis, N-Gain Score test and hypothesis test (t test). In general, both of these learning models are able to increase students 'interest and learning outcomes of chemistry, where the percentage of students' interest in learning chemistry in the Think Talk Write model is 80.5% and categorized as good, for the class of Creative Problem Solving model the percentage is 76.6% and also categorized as good. For the value of N-Gain score on Think Talk Write (TTW) class is and categorized as high while in the Creative Problem Solving class is 0.62 and is categorized as medium. The t-test results on the affective aspects are sig. (2-tailed) of 0.015 and on the cognitive aspect of 0.001. It states that there are significant differences in the interest and learning outcomes of chemistry that apply the Think Talk Write (TTW) learning model and Creative Problem Solving

scholarly journals PENINGKATAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA MELALUI PENDEKATAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS)

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Bambang Subakir
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
High Activity ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

The objective in this research to describing implementation oflearning physics using the approach Creative Problem Solving (CPS) toimprove creative thinking skills and students’ achievement in class XI IPA-1SMA Harapan 3 Delitua. The research method applied is Classroom ActionResearch (CAR) through two learning cycles; each cycle consisted byplanning, implementation, observation and reflection. The results showedthat learning physics with CPS approach can improve students’ ability tothink creatively. After learning undertaken by the CPS approach increasedstudents ability to think creatively and achievement. This is evidenced by: (1) Increasing the number of students who pass out of 12 person in the first cycleto 29 person in the second cycle with an average of 77,39 learning outcomes.N-gain in the first cycle of 0.19 is included in the category of low-and N-gainin the second cycle of 0.30 is included in the medium category, (2) Activitygroup average student in the learning process are included in the categoryActivities Fair increased to High Activity category, and (3) The use ofcreative thinking of students in the first cycle an enough increased to a highin the second cycle. Creative thinking ability of students in teaching physicsto provide benefits in solving problems in the community.

scholarly journals MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA

Vidya Karya ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shella Malisa ◽  
Iriani Bakti ◽  
Rilia Iriani
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
Student Activities ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Problem ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

Abstract. The ability to think creatively is one of the 21st century skills that students must possess. This ability can be improved by using a learning model that exposes students to problems directly. This research aims to increase teacher activity, student activities, creative thinking skills, and student academic achievement by implementing Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model in class XI IPA 2 SMA PGRI 6 Banjarmasin. The research applied classroom action research (CAR) design with 2 cycles. The subjects were 39 eleventh grade students of natural science class. The data were analyzed by percentage and descriptive quantitative technique. The results showed that the teacher's activity in the implementation of the action increased from 70.15% (good) to 85.46% (very good). Student activity in cycle I 67.27% (quite active) to 85% in cycle II (active). Students' creative thinking ability for fluency indicators was originally 59.25% to 77.42%, flexibility which was originally 37.25% to 55.03%, elaboration which was originally 39.75% to 69.75%. Classical cognitive of students with a percentage of 69.23% increased to 87.17%. Students’ affective increased from 53.35% to 70.15% in cycle II and students' psychomotor learning outcomes were originally 59.69% to 69.4% in cycle II.  Keywords: creative thinking ability, academic achievement, creative problem solving                          Abstrak. Kemampuan berpikir kreatif merupakan salah satu dari keterampilan abad 21 yang harus dimiliki siswa. Kemampuan ini dapat ditingkatkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran yang menghadapkan siswa pada masalah secara langsung. Penelitian ini bertujuan meningkatkan aktivitas guru, aktivitas siswa, kemampuan berpikir kreatif, dan hasil belajar siswa di kelas XI IPA 2 SMA PGRI 6 Banjarmasin dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS). Penelitian menggunakan desain penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK) dengan 2 siklus. Subjek penelitian merupakan siswa kelas XI IPA berjumlah 39 orang. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik persentase dan deskriptif kuantitatif Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aktivitas guru dalam pelaksanaan tindakan meningkat dari 70,15% (baik) menjadi 85,46% (sangat baik). Aktivitas siswa pada siklus I 67,27% (cukup aktif) menjadi 85% pada siklus II (aktif). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa untuk indikator fluency, semula 59,25% menjadi 77,42%, flexibility yang semula 37,25 % menjadi 55,03%, elaboration yang awalnya 39,75% menjadi 69,75%. Hasil belajar kognitif siswa secara klasikal  dengan persentase 69,23% meningkat menjadi 87,17%. Hasil belajar afektif siswa meningkat dari 53,35% menjadi 70,15% pada siklus II dan hasil belajar psikomotorik siswa yang semula 59,69% menjadi 69,4% pada siklus II. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran CPS dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Kata kunci: kemampuan berpikir kreatif, hasil belajar, creative problem solving

scholarly journals CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS)-BASED ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY ON STOICHIOMETRY MATERIALS

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 230-245
Author(s):  
Agustini Agustini ◽  
R. Usman Rery ◽  
Lenny Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Development Stage ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
Initial Product ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Comprehensive Information ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Creative Problem

TThe purpose of this study is to design Creative Problem Solving (CPS)-based assessment instrument for critical thinking ability on stoichiometry materials. The method of development utilized in this study is Research and Development (RD) adapted from Borg Gall Model which consists of 10 development steps. However, In this study, only up to the third stage, namely the initial product development stage of the assessment instrument for the critical thinking ability of students based on CPS on Stoichiometric material. The main target in the final result of this research is to design a valid CPS-based critical thinking ability assessment instrument on Stoichiometry material that is valid so that it is suitable for use. The assessment instrument developed produced 10 items which were declared valid and reliable with a reliability price of 0.749. The CPS-based critical thinking ability assessment instrument provides more comprehensive information about the characteristics of the instrument that has been developed.

scholarly journals The Effect of Creative Problem Solving Learning Models on Problem Solving Ability in Learning Motivation and Student Self-Efficacy View

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Baity ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Creative Problem Solving ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Creative Problem

This study aims to determine; 1) the effect of using creative problem-solving learning models on mathematical problem-solving abilities, 2) the influence of learning motivation on mathematical problem-solving abilities, 3) the influence of students' self-efficacy on mathematical problem-solving abilities, 4) interactions between creative problem-solving learning models with students' learning motivation towards mathematical problem-solving abilities, 5) interaction between creative problem-solving learning models with self-efficacy on mathematical problem-solving abilities, 6) interactions between learning motivation and selfefficacy on mathematical problem-solving abilities and 7) interactions between models learning creative problem solving, learning motivation and self-efficacy together on mathematical problem-solving abilities. The method used in this research is an experimental research method. A sample of 70 students was taken using the cluster random sampling technique. The data analysis used was the three-way Anava technique and the follow-up test used a multiple comparison test. The results showed that: 1) creative problemsolving learning models more effectively influence problem-solving abilities than conventional learning models, 2) high learning motivation is more effective in influencing mathematical problem-solving abilities than moderate learning motivation and low learning motivation, 3) high self-efficacy more effective in influencing mathematical problem-solving abilities than moderate selfefficacy and low self-efficacy, 4) there is no effect of differences in learning models with learning motivation on mathematical problem-solving abilities, 5) there is no difference between learning models and self-efficacy on solving abilities problem, 6) high learning motivation with moderate self-efficacy most effectively affects mathematical problem-solving abilities, 7). Creative problem-solving learning model, high learning motivation with moderate self-efficacy most effectively affect mathematical problem-solving abilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document