scholarly journals The development of artificial intelligence in Brazil: emphasis on the military sphere and the questions of intellectual property

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Ksenia Michailovna Belikova
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Technology Infrastructure ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Technical Issues ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Military

The subject of this research is the development of artificial intelligence in Brazil based on the recently adopted act “National Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence” of April 2021 with an emphasis on the military sphere through the prism of legislative provisions on intellectual property, potential and needs of the country, as well as real joint projects with its foreign partner Israel in the sphere of procurement and engineering of unmanned aerial vehicles (Harpia, Elbit Hermes 900 and 450, IAI Heron). The relevance of this article is substantiated by timely consideration of the legal perspective of the approaches of Brazil towards the implementation of artificial intelligence, as multiple foreign states aim to implement the adopted strategies in this sphere. The scientific novelty consists in the following positions: artificial intelligence can be implemented in production, public safety and public authority, through ensuring the due level of the development of such crucial components as education and human resources, scientific and technology infrastructure, and business foundation, legal regulation and management, as well as taking into account international experience. At the same time, the technologies underlying artificial intelligence and machine learning – computational models, algorithms of classification, clusterization, educational, and others are not subject to patenting in Brazil (same as in the European Union), although are regarded as inventions for solution of technical issues – as the engineering applications of artificial intelligence.

scholarly journals Legal regulation of the development and application of artificial intelligence in military sector of the Russian Federation in the context of the government strategy and ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-42
Author(s):  
Maryam Abdurakhmanovna Akhmadova
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
Military Equipment ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Legislative Framework ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

The subject of this research is the examination of legal perspective on the approaches towards regulation of artificial intelligence and robotic technologies in military sector of the Russian Federation, including in ensuring the protection of the results of intellectual activity of researchers and developers, as well as the analysis of law enforcement practice on the protection of intellectual property in the interests of the state. In this format, the author determines the key conditions for recognition of the results of intellectual activity of military, special, and dual purpose as protectable object in accordance with the effective civil legislation. Attention is given to the practical results of domestic military equipment development using the artificial intelligence systems. The scientific novelty consists in articulation of the problem and approaches towards its research. The conclusion is made wide use of artificial intelligence technologies in the sphere of ensuring national security, as well as regulation based on the technical approach, rather than legal, not only create advantages in the military context, but can also cause issues that must be resolved. Taking into account real achievements in legal regulation of the results of intellectual activity, including the theoretical component, the author ascertains the need for improvement of the legislative framework on both, federal level and bylaws, including for the purpose of achieving a uniform use of the conceptual-categorical apparatus.

scholarly journals Problems of identifying subjective features of administrative offenses in the field of intellectual property

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-84
Author(s):  
Petro Makushev ◽  
Andriy Khridochkin
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Mental Attitude ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Recognition ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Internal Side ◽  
The Military ◽  
Subjective Side ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The article deals with the problems of identifying subjective signs of an administrative offense in the field of intellectual property. It is determined that all structures of administrative offenses in the field of intellectual property are characterized by common subjective features (set of relevant entities (directly and the person who committed the offense) and subjective side (internal side of administrative offenses that covers the mental attitude of a person to the public the harmful act which it commits and its consequences). The subject of the administrative offense in the field of intellectual property is analyzed. The existing objective conditions of administrative liability of a legal entity for administrative offenses in the field of intellectual property are considered. The characteristic of the subjective side of the administrative offense in the field of intellectual property is given. It is emphasized that the subjective party to the administrative offenses in the field of intellectual property has mandatory and optional features. A mandatory feature of the subjective side of administrative offenses is wine. Optional features of the subjective side of administrative offenses in the field of intellectual property are the motive and purpose of the perpetrator. It has been established that in most cases the purpose of administrative offenses in the field of intellectual property coincides with its motives, although it sometimes takes on an independent meaning. It is proved that the administrative offenses in the field of intellectual property are committed solely for selfish reasons, and the purpose of the offense as the final result to which the offender seeks to commit this act is gain, illicit enrichment, public recognition, etc. Proposed ways to improve administrative responsibility for intellectual property offenses. The necessity of systematization of the national legislation on administrative responsibility for offenses in the field of intellectual property is emphasized. The necessity of adaptation of domestic legal acts in the field of intellectual property to the corresponding acts of the European Union, regulatory regulation of the problem of utilization of intellectual property objects, creation of a regulatory framework for the protection of intellectual property in the military and technical sphere are argued.

Intellectual property transformation under the influence of the development of artificial intelligence. (Review)

2021 ◽  
pp. 132-141
Author(s):  
Svetlana Kodaneva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Creative Industries ◽  
State University ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
Moscow State University ◽  
Practical Conference

Artificial intelligence is becoming an indispensable assistant not only in solving technical problems, but also in various creative industries and even in creativity, which has always been considered a human prerogative. In April 2021 at the Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov was held an international scientific and practical conference, dedicated to the discussion of the key problems of legal regulation of various aspects of intellectual property both for human-created neural networks and for works (inventions) created by artificial intelligence. This review presents the problems and issues raised in the framework of this conference.

Introduction

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Colin Burrow
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Early Modern ◽  
Rhetorical Tradition ◽  
Learning Practices ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Rhetorical Structures ◽  
The Relationship

The introduction sets out the argument of the book. It suggests that the imitation of authors (imitatio) is not primarily a matter of verbal appropriation but of learning practices from earlier texts. That process is intrinsically hard to describe, and as a result discussions of the topic in the rhetorical tradition relied on a rich store of metaphors. These were themselves to become part of the practice of imitation. The introduction describes the various kinds of imitatio which developed from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries: ‘adaptive’ imitation, in which an earlier text is made ‘apt’ to new times, and ‘formal imitation’, in which an author imitates not the exact words, but the favoured rhetorical structures of an earlier writer. It explains how the word ‘model’ came to be used of an imitated text, and explores the relationship between imitation, plagiarism, and ideas about intellectual property. It explains how regarding an ‘author’ as a potentially open-ended series of texts distinguished by their style and form connects early modern theories of imitation with contemporary interests in artificial intelligence. It briefly suggests some implications of the subject for writing outside Europe, and explains how this book departs from earlier studies of the topic in its scope and argument.

scholarly journals Legal framework for the use of artificial intelligence in India’s military sphere in the context of patent rights protection

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 671-690
Author(s):  
Ksenia Michailovna Belikova
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
Law And Ethics ◽  
The Government ◽  
Role Of The Government ◽  
The Military

This article aims to examine India’s approaches to handling the items of ethics and legal regulation (framework) of the development and application and the use of artificial intelligence in the military sphere in the context of national acts, capabilities and needs of India. It was revealed that the country’s lag behind its neighbors (China, Pakistan) and recognized leaders in this area (USA, Israel) is a motive for formulating the concept of ensuring India’s military superiority based on AI as a force multiplier. It was revealed that the identified problems require a prompt solution based on the concerted joint efforts of the relevant interested parties with the leading role of the government. The theoretical and practical significance of the results obtained is determined by the fact that the readers will be provided with current scientific information about India’s approaches to the designated areas from the standpoint of law and ethics.

scholarly journals Ghostwriters as a Legal Phenomenon: Features and Perspectives of Legal Regulation of Their Activity

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 19-27
Author(s):  
N. V. Zaitseva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Fundamental Property ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Scientific Field ◽  
Property Right ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right

The paper is devoted to the problem of using the work of another person in the intellectual field, primarily in literary activity. The involvement of ghostwriters in writing literary works has created a legal phenomenon when the subject matter of contractual relations represents the inalienable non-property right, namely: the right of authorship the transfer of which is not possible in many jurisdictions, and in others, despite the absence of an explicit prohibition, there is no legal regulation of such alienation. However, the existence of ghostwriters cannot be assessed as a unique phenomenon of modernity. In our time, they have only gained new forms and a special place not only in the literary, but also in the scientific field. In this regard, the establishment of legal mechanisms for attracting and regulating ghostwriters is more effective than the establishment of a system of prohibitions.In the conditions of changing publishing businesses and increasing ways and forms of proof, questions about the authenticity of a person's authorship began to arise increasingly, especially in the field of scientific and scholarly literature, where the work of "new" researchers is often used. The issue of assignment of the right of authorship (copyright) — a fundamental property right — is treated differently in different legal systems. The continental system of law relies on impossibility of transferring copyright from one entity to another as part of a civil law transaction. Therefore, instances of attribution of authorship are assessed in the context of criminal or administrative law. It forms the legal essence of the division of rights of authorship into property and nonproperty ones: any commercial rights to intellectual property can be ceded except the authorship.

scholarly journals Artificial intelligence: economy, intellectual property, threats

2021 ◽  
pp. 56-74
Author(s):  
Hennadii Androshchuk
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
World Market ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
White Paper ◽  
Theoretical Research ◽  
Digital Information ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Personality

Keywords: artificial intelligence, economic impact, intellectual property, regulation,cybersecurity, risks, threats, national security Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, the spread of which is based on thewidespread use of digital information and the rapid growth of computing power, areleaving the realm of purely theoretical research and becoming one of the segmentsof the world market that can have truly revolutionary consequences. The paper provideseconomic and legal analysis of the state and trends of AI, identifies its impacton the economy, the importance of the role of intellectual property (IP), assesses therisks, threats and dangers of criminal use of AI, developed mechanisms to counterthem. The development of AI technologies as an integral part of «Industry 4.0» isconsidered, the main provisions of the «White Paper on Artificial Intelligence» ofthe EU are studied.Over the next decade, the EU plans to spend $20 billion a year on AI development.At the same time, the protection of IP rights in the context of AI development and relatedtechnologies has been unconsidered by the Commission, despite the key importanceof these rights. In legal regulation, AI is seen as a new challenge for the economyand the legal system, a new phenomenon that has a multiplier effect, a legal phenomenonin the structure of legal relations, a new object for legal regulation. The introduction of AI in the field of IP creates new legal and economic problems.The creation of AI works is an integral area of activity in the modern digital economy.These circumstances bring to the fore the problem of recognition of authorship in thecreation of AI works, the possibility of authors to dispose of their rights and their useof mechanisms for legal protection of IP. The analysis of the cases considered bycourts connected with a problem of legal personality of AI is carried out, legislative activityon this question is studied. Possibilities and dangers of criminal use of AI areshown. They are ranked in order of their level of danger — depending on the harmthey may cause, the potential benefit or the benefit of crime. Prospects for the developmentof AI in Ukraine are shown, the Concept of development of artificial intelligencein Ukraine is analysed. It is concluded that AI should become one of the key driversof digital transformation and overall growth of Ukraine's economy.

scholarly journals PARTICULAR ASPECTS OF THE NECESSITY OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN UKRAINE

Legal Ukraine ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 6-24
Author(s):  
Kseniia Zhyhalova
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
National Security ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Security Questions

The purpose of the study was to demonstrate particular legal and objective reasons for necessity and expediency of legal regulation advancement, development and usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Ukraine. Chapter 1 «Understanding of Artificial Intelligence» gives examples of AI applications, doctrinal and diverse legal definitions of AI. Chapter 2 «Necessity and Expediency of legal regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine» shows the necessity of legal regulation, exemplifies the gaps in current legislation. This Chapter demonstrates that it is paramount to establish protection of IP rights within AI legal relationships in Ukraine. Also, Chapter 2 analyzes particular issues in AI and national, international and social security, questions of data protection. Chapter 3 «Conclusion» demonstrates that absence of specific AI regulation could potentially lead to numerous problems in public/private sectors, for economics, businesses, civilians. Key words: Artificial Intelligence (AI), legal regulation of AI, intellectual property (IP) protection, national security, protection of human rights and freedoms, data protection.

scholarly journals Concealment of information as a form of abuse of post by an employee

2020 ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
Alena Viktorovna Ostapenko
Keyword(s):  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
Employment Contract ◽  
Hiring Process ◽  
Labor Agreement ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject

The subject of this research is such legal phenomenon as the abuse of post by an employee in form concealment of information. The author analyzes the labor law, determines the gaps in legal regulation of the questions of abuse of position by employees. The article examines most common instances of abuse of post by employees in form of concealment of legally important facts from the employer, as well as carries out their classification by cases of concealment of information in the hiring process, in course of exercising their labor rights, and in termination of employment contract. The author underlines the inequality of the status of employer and employee with regards to protection by against the abuse of the opposite party of labor agreement. It is established that the range of the methods of protection of interests of the employer is limited, while an employee is in a much better position from the legal perspective. The scientific novelty consists in comprehensive analysis of legislative gaps in the area of regulation of misconduct of employees in the form of concealment of information. The author offers the mechanism for preventing the abuse of post by employees in the form of concealment of information, which is based on inclusion into local regulatory acts of the norms aimed at protection of rights and interests of the employer.

scholarly journals Certain aspects of possible codification of legislation of intellectual property law

2021 ◽  
pp. 108-118
Author(s):  
Olena Shtefan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Independent Branch

Keywords: recodification of the Civil Code of Ukraine, codification of legislation onintellectual property law, subject and method of intellectual property law The article examines the issues related to the possibility ofcodification of legislation in the field of intellectual property rights. Currently, inUkraine there is a three-tier regulation of public relations in the field of intellectualproperty law. On the one hand, the Civil Code of Ukraine, the rules of which are characterizedby a corresponding nature, terminological inconsistency with special legislation;special legislation regulating legal relations arising from the creation and use ofcertain objects of intellectual property rights; as well as the provisions of ratified internationallegal acts in this area. Such legislation does not contribute to effectiveprotection or effective protection of intellectual property rights.The updating of the Civil Code of Ukraine will not improve the situation regardingproper legislative support in this area, and may lead to new conflicts. Based on the analysis of existing approaches in legal doctrine on the possible codificationof legislation in the field of intellectual property law, it is concluded that it ispossible if the latter is separated into an independent branch of law, characterized bythe subject and method of legal regulation. The existing approach to the definition ofthe subject of regulation in the doctrine of intellectual property law coincides with thecivilized approaches and does not reflect the specifics of legal relations that characterizethe field of intellectual property. The subject of intellectual property law is notlimited to private law relations, public law is also quite common. In this regard, it isproposed to understand the subject as a legal relationship arising in connection withthe creation, use and protection of intellectual property rights. It is proved that theright of intellectual property can be separated into an independent branch of law andto codify its legislation. This will be facilitated by the interest of the state and the correspondingpolitical will to do so.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document