scholarly journals Performance Comparison of OSPFV3 and EIGRP with IPv6 Network

2021 ◽  
pp. 31-51
Author(s):  
Richard Essah ◽  
Darpan Anand
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Computer Network ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Ipv6 Network ◽  
Packet Tracer ◽  
Efficient Route ◽  
Ipv6 Networks ◽  
A Minor

A collection of interconnected devices that deal with communication protocols that are common to share resources provided by nodes of a network over digital interconnections is a computer network. The process of determining the most efficient route from a source to a given target is called routing. Cisco's Enriched Internal Routing Gateway Protocol for IPv6 and the IETF's OSPFv3 (First Version 3 of Open Shortest Path) are two of the most frequently studied IPv6 routing protocols among researchers (EIGRPv6). As a result of the popularity of EIGRPv6 and OSPFv3, it is necessary to undertake a thorough contrast of the two protocols once working inside a minor enterprise network on IPv6. Thus, the study analysed the performance comparison of OSPFV3 and EIGRP with IPv6 networks with regards to convergence time, end-to-end delay, and packet loss. Packet Tracer 6.2.2 was used to compare the performance of routing protocols of different kinds. In the simulation, Cisco routers, switches, and generic computers were employed in the test. In these topologies, standard IPv6 addresses have been used. The findings of the study revealed that EIGRPv6 outperforms OSPFv3. As a result, we advocate using EIGRPv6 as an internal routing protocol in a network of IPv6.

scholarly journals Study and Optimized Simulation of OSPFv3 Routing Protocol in IPv6 Network

2019 ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Md. Anwar Hossain ◽  
Mst. Sharmin Akter
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Internet Protocol ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Address Space ◽  
Next Generation Internet ◽  
Ipv6 Address ◽  
Ipv6 Network ◽  
Packet Tracer

Routing is a design way to pass the data packet. User is assigns the path in a routing configuration. A significant role played by the router for providing the dynamic routing in the network. Structure and Configuration are different for each routing protocols. Next generation internet protocol IPv6 which provides large address space, simple header format. It is mainly effective and efficient routing. It is also ensure good quality of service and also provide security. Routing protocol (OSPFv3) in IPv6 network has been studied and implemented using ‘cisco packet tracer’. ‘Ping’ the ping command is used to check the results. The small virtual network created in Cisco platform .It is also used to test the OSPFv3 protocol in the IPv6 network. This paper also contains step by step configuration and explanation in assigning of IPv6 address in routers and end devices. The receiving and sending the packet of data in a network is the responsibility of the internet protocol layer. It also contains the data analysis of packet forwarding through IPv6 on OSPFv3 in simulation mode of cisco packet virtual environment to make the decision eventually secure and faster protocol in IPv6 environment.

scholarly journals Performance Comparison of EIGRP, OSPF and RIP Routing Protocols using Cisco Packet Tracer and OPNET Simulator

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Md. Anwar Hossain ◽  
Md. Mohon Ali ◽  
Mst. Sharmin Akter ◽  
Md. Shahriar Alam Sajib
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Destination Node ◽  
Network Configuration ◽  
Network Information ◽  
Simulation Tools ◽  
Link Utilization ◽  
Packet Tracer

In this paper, the intention has to create a network configuration that is similar for all routing protocols RIP, OSPF, and EIGRP by which we want to analysis the performance of these protocols using Cisco Packet Tracer and OPNET simulator. We use various protocols for forwarding the packets in a network topology. For successful delivery of the packets from the source node to the accurate destination node, the routers maintain a routing table. The amount of network information stored by a router depends on its algorithm. For the performance measure, we will simulate real-time scenarios of the networks using Cisco Packet Tracer and OPNET simulation tools. We will evaluate the performance of EIGRP, OSPF, and RIP based on of network convergence, Ethernet delay, security, and bandwidth requirement, etc. We will observe that the EIGRP routing protocol has the maximum link utilization followed by OSPF, and RIP routing protocols.

scholarly journals Analisis Kinerja EIGRP dan OSPF pada Topologi Ring dan Mesh

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
DWI ARYANTA ◽  
ARSYAD RAMADHAN DARLIS ◽  
DIMAS PRIYAMBODHO
Keyword(s):  
Shortest Path ◽  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Computer Network ◽  
Cost Comparison ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Testing Time ◽  
Mesh Topology ◽  
Packet Tracer ◽  
Mesh Convergence ◽  
Scenario Testing

ABSTRAKEIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) dan OSPF (Open Shortest Path Fisrt) adalah routing protokol yang banyak digunakan pada suatu jaringan komputer. EIGRP hanya dapat digunakan pada perangkat Merk CISCO, sedangkan OSPF dapat digunakan pada semua merk jaringan. Pada penelitian ini dibandingkan delay dan rute dari kedua routing protokol yang diimplementasikan pada topologi Ring dan Mesh. Cisco Packet Tracer 5.3 digunakan untuk mensimulasikan kedua routing protokol ini. Skenario pertama adalah perancangan jaringan kemudian dilakukan pengujian waktu delay 100 kali dalam 5 kasus. Skenario kedua dilakukan pengujian trace route untuk mengetahui jalur yang dilewati paket data lalu memutus link utama. Pada skenario kedua juga dilakukan perbandingan nilai metric dan cost hasil simulasi dengan perhitungan rumus. Skenario ketiga dilakukan pengujian waktu konvergensi untuk setiap routing protokol pada setiap topologi. Hasilnya EIGRP lebih cepat 386 µs daripada OSPF untuk topologi Ring sedangkan OSPF lebih cepat 453 µs daripada EIGRP untuk topologi Mesh. Hasil trace route menunjukan rute yang dipilih oleh routing protokol yaitu nilai metric dan cost yang terkecil. Waktu konvergensi rata-rata topologi Ring pada EIGRP sebesar 12,75 detik dan 34,5 detik pada OSPF sedangkan topologi Mesh di EIGRP sebesar 13 detik dan 35,25 detik di OSPF.Kata Kunci: EIGRP, OSPF, Packet Tracer 5.3, Ring, Mesh, KonvergensiABSTRACTEIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) and OSPF (Open Shortest Path Fisrt) is the routing protocol that is widely used in a computer network. EIGRP can only be used on devices Brand CISCO, while OSPF can be used on all brands of network. In this study comparison of both the delay and the routing protocol implemented on Ring and Mesh topology. Cisco Packet Tracer 5.3 is used to simulate both the routing protocol. The first scenario is the design of the network and then do the test of time delay 100 times in 5 cases. The second scenario tested trace route to determine the path of the data packet and then disconnect the main link. In the second scenario also conducted a cost comparison of metrics and the simulation results with the calculation formula. The third scenario testing time for each routing protocol convergence on any topology. The result EIGRP faster than 386 microseconds for a ring topology while OSPF OSPF 453 microseconds faster than EIGRP for Mesh topology. The results showed trace route chosen by the routing protocol metric value and cost is the smallest. Average convergence time in the EIGRP topology Ring of 12.75 seconds and 34.5 seconds, while the Mesh topology in an OSPF EIGRP for 13 seconds and 35.25 seconds in OSPF.Keywords: EIGRP,OSPF, Packet Tracer 5.3, Ring, Mesh, Convergence

scholarly journals Perancangan dan Analisis Perbandingan Implementasi OSPF pada Jaringan IPv4 dan IPv6

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
PAULINE RAHMIATI ◽  
DWI ARYANTA ◽  
TAUFIQ AGUNG PRIYADI
Keyword(s):  
Network Design ◽  
Shortest Path ◽  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
The Third ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Packet Tracer ◽  
Maximum Limit ◽  
Better Than

ABSTRAKOSPF (Open Shortest Path First) adalah suatu routing protokol bersifat terbuka dan didukung oleh berbagai perangkat network. IPv4 telah mencapai batas maksimum dalam jumlah alamat sehingga IPv6 merupakan solusi dalam hal tersebut. Seperti IPv4, IPv6 juga sudah mulai diimplementasikan untuk routing protokol OSPF, oleh karena itu pada penelitian ini akan dirancang suatu routing protokol OSPF IPv6 dan sebagai bahan perbandingan akan dibandingkan dengan OSPF IPv4. Software Cisco Packet Tracer 5.3 digunakan untuk mensimulasikan perancangan jaringan yang dibuat. Pada penelitian ini akan dibandingkan 2 buah jaringan berbasis routing protokol OSPF, yaitu OSPF untuk IPv4 dan IPv6. Skenario pertama dilakukan 100 kali dalam 5 kasus untuk mengetahui nilai delay OSPF IPv4 dan OSPF IPv6. Skenario kedua dilakukan pemutusan link dilakukan sebanyak 30 kali, hal yang dilihat dari pengujian ini adalah hasil trace route dari cost yang ada. Skenario ketiga dilakukan dengan mengamati waktu konvergensi dari OSPF IPv4 dan IPv6. Secara keseluruhan nilai delay OSPF IPv6 lebih kecil dibandingkan dengan OSPF IPv4 sebesar 3-6%, Trace route dan nilai cost pada OSPF IPv6 dan OSPF IPv4 sama tetapi nilai delay OSPF IPv6 lebih kecil sebesar 3-6% dan waktu konvergensi OSPF IPv4 bernilai sama dengan OSPF IPv6 yaitu 10 detik.Kata kunci: OSPF, IPv4, Ipv6, delay, konvergensiABSTRACTOSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is a routing protocol that opened and supported by a wide range of network devices. IPv4 has reached the maximum limit on the number of addresses that IPv6 are a solution in this case. Same as IPv4, IPv6 also has begun to be implemented for the OSPF routing protocol, therefore this study wiould design an IPv6 OSPF routing protocol and as a comparison will be compared to IPv4 OSPF. Cisco Packet Tracer 5.3 software was used to simulate the made network design. This research would compare two pieces of network-based routing protocol OSPF, OSPF for IPv4 and IPv6. The first scenario was done 100 times in of 5 cases to determine the value of delay OSPF OSPF IPv4 and IPv6. The second scenario was carried out link terminations 30 times, it was seen from the tests was the result of trace route from the existing cost. The third scenario was done by observed at the convergence time of OSPF IPv4 and IPv6. The overall delay value OSPF IPv6 better than IPv4 OSPF by 3-6%, the trace route and the OSPF cost value of IPv6 and IPv4 OSPF were same but delay OSPF IPv6 was better 3-6% and convergence time was the same as IPv4 OSPF OSPF IPv6 as 10 seconds.Keywords: OSPF, IPv4, IPv6, delay, convergence

scholarly journals Distribution of Data Dissemination Model using DTN Routing Protocols

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 3014-3019
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Buffer Capacity ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Data Dissemination ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Dtn Routing ◽  
The Impact

In this research paper compare the protocol’s performance together with the experimental results of optimal routing using real-life scenarios of vehicles and pedestrians roaming in a city. In this research paper, conduct several simulation comparison experiments(in the NS2 Software) to show the impact of changing buffer capacity, packet lifetime, packet generation rate, and number of nodes on the performance metrics. This research paper is concluded by providing guidelines to develop an efficient DTN routing protocol. To the best of researcher(Parameswari et al.,) knowledge, this work is the first to provide a detailed performance comparison among the diverse collection of DTN routing protocols.

scholarly journals Comparative Performance Analysis of Ad-Hoc Routing Protocol using NS-2 Simulator

2012 ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Prashant Rewagad ◽  
Nisha A. Lodha
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc Network ◽  
Network Routing ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Ad Hoc Routing ◽  
Comparative Performance ◽  
Mobile Ad Hoc

Mobile Ad hoc Network is a collection of mobile nodes in which the wireless links are frequently broken down due to mobility and dynamic infrastructure. Routing is a significant issue and challenge in ad hoc networks. In Mobile ad hoc network, due to mobility of nodes network topology change frequently and thus, routing become challenging task to transfer the data from source to destination. A variety of routing protocols with varying network conditions are analyzed to find an optimized route from a source to some destination. This paper is based on performance comparison of two popular mobile ad-hoc network routing protocols using simulator i.e. DSR, ADOV. On the network simulation platform, a systematically simulation and research has been carried out on the performance of two routing protocols, and how the network environments impact on the performance of routing protocol.

scholarly journals RMEER: Reliable Multi-path Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Network

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 4366
Author(s):  
Mukhtiar Ahmed ◽  
Mazleena Salleh ◽  
M. Ibrahim Channa ◽  
Mohd Foad Rohani
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Routing Protocols ◽  
Energy Efficient ◽  
Sensor Nodes ◽  
Wireless Sensor ◽  
Delivery Ratio ◽  
Data Forwarding ◽  
Energy Efficient Routing ◽  
Simulation Performance ◽  
Efficient Route

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) is interesting area for researchers.To extract the information from seabed to water surface the the majority numbers of routing protocols has been introduced. The design of routing protocols faces many challenges like deployment of sensor nodes, controlling of node mobility, development of efficient route for data forwarding, prolong the battery power of the sensor nodes, and removal of void nodes from active data forwarding paths. This research article focuses the design of the Reliable Multipath Energy Efficient Routing (RMEER) which develops the efficient route between sensor nodes, and prolongs the battery life of the nodes. RMEER is a scalable and robust protocol which utilizes the powerful fixed courier nodes in order to enhance the network throughput, data delivery ratio, network lifetime and reduces the end-to-end delay. RMEER is also an energy efficient routing protocol for saving the energy level of the nodes. We have used the NS2.30 simulator with AquaSim package for performance analysis of RMEER.We observed that the simulation performance of RMEER is better than D-DBR protocol.

scholarly journals Performance analysis routing protocol between RIPv2 and EIGRP with termination test on full mesh topology

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
D. R. Prehanto ◽  
A. D. Indriyanti ◽  
G. S. Permadi
Keyword(s):  
Routing Protocol ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Data Access ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Time Range ◽  
Data Packets ◽  
Mesh Topology ◽  
Network Methods ◽  
Packet Tracer ◽  
A Company

<span>Data access on a company is a very important part of an institution or a college. Especially in the present time, the internet has become an important thing in human life. With the existence of certain means there is a problem that will arise, needed solution or way out on a network that can be called protocol. Because an institution needs to choose network methods properly and safely.This study focuses on addressing the path/route of data packets to be sent will be governed by this routing protocol in the form of table routing. Routing used adip RIPv2 with EIGRP which will be compared on both routing protocol which is better against predetermined situation previous.The result of the research using CISCO Packet Tracer 7.10 software shows that EIGRP routing run on two topologies has faster convergence time speed with an average time of 0.01 - 0.02 seconds as well as the change of its routing table at once. Unlike RIPv2 routing that takes longer than EIGRP routing is with the time range from 0.01 to 0.19. </span>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document