Pediatric multicellular tumor spheroid models illustrate a therapeutic potential by combining BH3 mimetics with Natural Killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapy

The induction of apoptosis is a direct way to eliminate tumor cells and improve cancer therapy. Apoptosis is tightly controlled by the balance of pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. BH3 mimetics neutralize the antiapoptotic function of Bcl-2 proteins and are highly promising compounds inducing apoptosis in several cancer entities including pediatric malignancies. However, the clinical application of BH3 mimetics in solid tumors is impeded by the frequent resistance to single BH3 mimetics and the anticipated toxicity of high concentrations or combination treatments. One potential avenue to increase the potency of BH3 mimetics is the development of immune cell-based therapies to counteract the intrinsic apoptosis resistance of tumor cells and sensitize them to immune attack. Here, we describe spheroid cultures of pediatric cancer cells that can serve as models for drug testing. In these 3D models, we were able to demonstrate that activated allogeneic Natural Killer (NK) cells migrated into tumor spheroids and displayed cytotoxicity against a wide range of pediatric cancer spheroids, highlighting their potential as anti-tumor effector cells. Next, we investigated whether treatment of tumor spheroids with subtoxic concentrations of BH3 mimetics can increase the cytotoxicity of NK cells. Notably, the cytotoxic effects of NK cells were enhanced by the addition of BH3 mimetics. Treatment with either the Bcl-XL inhibitor A1331852 or the Mcl-1 inhibitor S63845 increased the cytotoxicity of NK cells and reduced spheroid size, while the Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-199 had no effect on NK cell-mediated killing. Taken together, this is the first study to describe the combination of BH3 mimetics targeting Bcl-XL or Mcl-1 with NK cell-based immunotherapy, highlighting the potential of BH3 mimetics in immunotherapy.

Regulation of Bcl-2 Family Proteins in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Their Implications in Endocrine Therapy

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer accounts for around two-thirds of breast cancer occurrences, with endocrine therapy serving as first-line therapy in most cases. Targeting estrogen signaling pathways, which play a central role in regulating ER+ breast cell proliferation and survival, has proven to improve patient outcomes. However, despite the undeniable advantages of endocrine therapy, a subset of breast cancer patients develop acquired or intrinsic resistance to ER-targeting agents, limiting their efficacy. The activation of downstream ER signaling pathways upregulates pro-survival mechanisms that have been shown to influence the response of cells to endocrine therapy. The Bcl-2 family proteins play a central role in cell death regulation and have been shown to contribute to endocrine therapy resistance, supporting the survival of breast cancer cells and enhancing cell death evasion. Due to the overexpression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins in ER-positive breast cancer, the role of these proteins as potential targets in hormone-responsive breast cancer is growing in interest. In particular, recent advances in the development of BH3 mimetics have enabled their evaluation in preclinical studies with ER+ breast cancer models, and BH3 mimetics have entered early ER+ breast cancer clinical trials. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of Bcl-2 family proteins in ER+ breast cancer. Furthermore, an overview of recent advances in research regarding the efficacy of BH3 mimetics in ER+ breast cancer has been provided.

Bak and Bcl-xL Participate in Regulating Sensitivity of Solid Tumor Derived Cell Lines to Mcl-1 Inhibitors

BH3 mimetics represent a promising tool in cancer treatment. Recently, the drugs targeting the Mcl-1 protein progressed into clinical trials, and numerous studies are focused on the investigation of their activity in various preclinical models. We investigated two BH3 mimetics to Mcl-1, A1210477 and S63845, and found their different efficacies in on-target doses, despite the fact that both agents interacted with the target. Thus, S63845 induced apoptosis more effectively through a Bak-dependent mechanism. There was an increase in the level of Bcl-xL protein in cells with acquired resistance to Mcl-1 inhibition. Cell lines sensitive to S63845 demonstrated low expression of Bcl-xL. Tumor tissues from patients with lung adenocarcinoma were characterized by decreased Bcl-xL and increased Bak levels of both mRNA and proteins. Concomitant inhibition of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 demonstrated dramatic cytotoxicity in six of seven studied cell lines. We proposed that co-targeting Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 might lead to a release of Bak, which cannot be neutralized by other anti-apoptotic proteins. Surprisingly, in Bak-knockout cells, inhibition of Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL still resulted in pronounced cell death, arguing against a sole role of Bak in the studied phenomenon. We demonstrate that Bak and Bcl-xL are co-factors for, respectively, sensitivity and resistance to Mcl-1 inhibition.

Targeting the Intrinsic Apoptosis Pathway: A Window of Opportunity for Prostate Cancer

Despite major improvements in the management of advanced prostate cancer over the last 20 years, the disease remains invariably fatal, and new effective therapies are required. The development of novel hormonal agents and taxane chemotherapy has improved outcomes, although primary and acquired resistance remains problematic. Inducing cancer cell death via apoptosis has long been an attractive goal in the treatment of cancer. Apoptosis, a form of regulated cell death, is a highly controlled process, split into two main pathways (intrinsic and extrinsic), and is stimulated by a multitude of factors, including cellular and genotoxic stress. Numerous therapeutic strategies targeting the intrinsic apoptosis pathway are in clinical development, and BH3 mimetics have shown promising efficacy for hematological malignancies. Utilizing these agents for solid malignancies has proved more challenging, though efforts are ongoing. Molecular characterization and the development of predictive biomarkers is likely to be critical for patient selection, by identifying tumors with a vulnerability in the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. This review provides an up-to-date overview of cell death and apoptosis, specifically focusing on the intrinsic pathway. It summarizes the latest approaches for targeting the intrinsic apoptosis pathway with BH3 mimetics and discusses how these strategies may be leveraged to treat prostate cancer.

Functional apoptosis profiling identifies MCL-1 and BCL-xL as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in advanced thymomas and thymic carcinomas

Background Multi-omics studies have shown a high and lack of common driver mutations in most thymomas (TH) and thymic carcinomas (TC) that hamper the development of novel treatment approaches. However, deregulation of apoptosis has been proposed as a common hallmark of TH and TC. BH3 profiling can be utilized to study the readiness of living cancer cells to undergo apoptosis and their dependency on pro-survival BCL-2 family proteins. Methods We screened a cohort of 62 TH and TC patient samples for expression of BCL-2 family proteins and used the TC cell line 1889c and native TH for dynamic BH3 profiling and treatment with BH3 mimetics. Results Immunohistochemical overexpression of MCL-1 and BCL-xL was a strong prognostic marker of TH and TC, and BH3 profiling indicated a strong dependency on MCL-1 and BCL-xL in TH. Single inhibition of MCL-1 resulted in increased binding of BIM to BCL-xL as an escape mechanism that the combined inhibition of both factors could overcome. Indeed, the inhibition of MCL-1 and BCL-xL in combination induced apoptosis in a caspase-dependent manner in untreated and MCL-1-resistant 1889c cells. Conclusion TH and TC are exquisitely dependent on the pro-survival factors MCL-1 and BCL-xL, making them ideal candidates for co-inhibition by BH3 mimetics. Since TH show a heterogeneous dependency on BCL-2 family proteins, upfront BH3 profiling could select patients and tailor the optimal therapy with the least possible toxicity.

BH3-mimetics: recent developments in cancer therapy

The hopeful outcomes from 30 years of research in BH3-mimetics have indeed served a number of solid paradigms for targeting intermediates from the apoptosis pathway in a variety of diseased states. Not only have such rational approaches in drug design yielded several key therapeutics, such outputs have also offered insights into the integrated mechanistic aspects of basic and clinical research at the genetics level for the future. In no other area of medical research have the effects of such work been felt, than in cancer research, through targeting the BAX-Bcl-2 protein-protein interactions. With these promising outputs in mind, several mimetics, and their potential therapeutic applications, have also been developed for several other pathological conditions, such as cardiovascular disease and tissue fibrosis, thus highlighting the universal importance of the intrinsic arm of the apoptosis pathway and its input to general tissue homeostasis. Considering such recent developments, and in a field that has generated so much scientific interest, we take stock of how the broadening area of BH3-mimetics has developed and diversified, with a focus on their uses in single and combined cancer treatment regimens and recently explored therapeutic delivery methods that may aid the development of future therapeutics of this nature.

Synergistic Activity of BH3-Mimetics By Combined Targeting of Anti-Apoptotic Regulators in B-Cell Precursor ALL

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most frequent malignancy in children and adolescents, deregulated cell death pathways contribute to leukemia development and therapy failure. Apoptosis (programmed cell death) is controlled at the mitochondrial level by different pro- and anti-apoptotic regulators. Molecules of the BCL-2 family are key in regulating intrinsic apoptosis signaling. Pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins such as BIM and BID activate pro-death proteins like BAX and BAK leading to cell death, while anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members including BCL-2, MCL-1 and BCL-XL sequester pro-apoptotic molecules, thereby preventing pro-death protein activation and apoptosis induction. Small molecule inhibitors have been developed, which bind to the anti-apoptotic molecules BCL-2, MCL-1 and BCL-XL leading to cell death induction. In particular inhibition of BCL-2, a key regulator of survival in B-cell malignancies including BCP-ALL, by the specific inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) has shown substantial, clinical anti-tumor activity. However, in BCP-ALL heterogeneous sensitivities for VEN have been described suggesting that other BCL-2 family members like MCL-1 and BCL-XL interfere with BCL-2 inhibition thereby counteracting VEN activity leading to poor treatment response. In this study, we compared the effects of inhibition of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members BCL-2 (venetoclax, VEN), MCL-1 (S63845) and BCL-XL (A-1331852), investigated molecular mechanisms and determinants of inhibitor sensitivity, and addressed potential synergistic activity upon simultaneous blockage of BCL-2 together with MCL-1 or BCL-XL in BCP-ALL. First, we investigated the activity of the single inhibitors to induce cell death (positive staining for propidium iodide) in 7 BCP-ALL cell lines and a series of 27 BCP-ALL patient-derived xenograft samples (PDX). Titrating increasing concentrations, we estimated half-maximal effective concentrations (EC 50) for each inhibitor showing heterogenous responses of individual samples to the different inhibitors. Importantly, sensitivities to either inhibitor were not associated with leukemia characteristics including recurrent genetic alterations described in BCP-ALL. We also did not observe similar sensitivities to the inhibitors of individual samples, however some VEN insensitive samples showed sensitivity to MCL-1 and/or BCL-XL-inhibition, suggesting functional substitution of the anti-apoptotic regulators. Next, we investigated anti-apoptotic addictions of BCP-ALL cells to BCL-2 family proteins upon VEN treatment. Analyzing apoptosis signaling after exposure to VEN and BH3-peptides, we identified that ALL cells adapt their anti-apoptotic addiction to MCL-1 and BCL-XL as an escape strategy from VEN-induced cell death. Analyzing protein complexes by co-immunoprecipitation, we found that exposure of ALL cells to VEN rapidly led to reduced BIM/BCL-2 and compensatory increased BIM/MCL-1 complexes. Conversely, S63845 reduced BIM/MCL-1 complexes and led to increased BIM/BCL-2 binding. Importantly, both protein complexes could be effectively disrupted by combination treatment with VEN and S63845, which resulted in release of BIM and promotion of apoptosis signaling. Based on our mechanistic findings, we evaluated BH3-mimetic combinations for cell death induction using multi-dose matrix assays to calculate synergy metrics based on the Bliss independence model. Analyzing combination effects in seven BCP-ALL cell lines and four PDX samples, we identified positive mean synergy scores of VEN with S63845 and A-1331852 in all cases. However, the most synergistic area of the multi-dose-response matrices differed among different leukemias, indicating different extents of addictions and thereby synergies at different drug concentrations. Finally, combined BCL-2 and MCL-1 inhibition was evaluated in vivo in a PDX model of KMT2A-ENL positive pro-B ALL. Combination treatment of VEN with S63845 led to reduced leukemia loads in spleen, bone marrow and CNS as compared to single agent treatment. Taken together, we found heterogeneous responses of BCP-ALL samples to BH3-mimetics antagonizing BCL-2, MCL-1 and BCL-XL. The ability of leukemia cells to adapt their anti-apoptotic dependency from BCL-2 to MCL-1 or BCL-XL can be used as target for combination therapy, demonstrating synergistic activity in PDX samples ex vivo and in vivo. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Combined Inhibition of Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 Circumvents Resistance of TP53 Deficient/Mutant AML to BH3 Mimetics

AML patients with TP53 mutations have extremely poor clinical outcomes. This is due primarily to limited responses to available therapies including the highly promising FDA-approved combination of Bcl-2 inhibition by venetoclax (VEN) with hypomethylating agents (DiNardo CD et al., Blood 2020), which resulted in CR/CRi rates of 70-95% and good tolerability in elderly patients (DiNardo CD et al., Lancet Oncol 2018 and Blood 2019). Apoptosis is regulated by anti- and pro-apoptotic proteins. While p53 does not directly regulate anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins that are resistance factors for VEN, p53 transcriptionally up-regulates pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Reverse phase protein array analysis of samples from newly-diagnosed AML patients found that pro-apoptotic Bax was significantly decreased in patients with TP53 mutations (Carter BZ, ASH 2019), which, as expected, diminished the effectiveness of Bcl-2 inhibition. Thus, strategies to target additional anti-apoptotic proteins, or increase pro-apoptotic proteins, are needed to enhance the efficacy of Bcl-2 inhibition in these patients. We determined protein levels of Bcl-2 family members in isogeneic Molm13 cells with TP53-knockout (KO), or with various hotspot TP53 mutations including R175H, Y220C, M237I, R248Q, R273H, and R282W. We observed markedly decreased Bax expression, to a less degree Bak decrease, and variable alterations in other Bcl-2 proteins in these cells compared to TP53-wild-type (WT) controls. We treated the aforementioned cells with VEN or the Mcl-1 inhibitor AMG 176 and found that TP53-KO or mutant cells were more resistant to both VEN and AMG 176 compared to WT controls. However, the combination of two inhibitors was highly synergistic in both settings, controls (CI = 0.2) and TP53-KO and mutant cells (CI < 0.1). To demonstrate that the decreased sensitivity to BH3 mimetics was, at least in part, mediated through Bax reduction in the TP53-mutant cells, we treated Bax knockdown (KD) Molm13 cells with VEN, AMG 176, or both. The Bax KD cells were resistant to VEN and AMG 176, while the combination of the two agents synergistically induced cell death. To establish potential clinical relevance of co-targeting Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 in TP53-mutant AML, we co-cultured cells from various TP53-mutant AML patients (n = 8) with mesenchymal stromal cells and treated them with VEN, AMG 176, or both. The combination synergistically induced cell death in both CD45 + leukemia blasts (CI values between 0.04 ± 0.04 to 0.34 ± 0.10) and CD34 + AML stem/progenitor cells (CI values between 0.07 ± 0.08 to 0.28 ± 0.14). RNA-sequencing of mononuclear and MRD cells of clinical samples (Issa G, ASH 2019) collected after induction therapy revealed that Mcl-1 expression was significantly higher in the TP53-mutated mononuclear and MRD cells compared to their WT counterparts (Fig. 1), which suggests that Mcl-1 contributes to treatment resistance and disease relapse. This further suggests that Mcl-1 inhibition should be incorporated in AML treatment, including VEN-based therapies, for patients with TP53 mutations. Finally, we treated NSG mice inoculated with isogeneic TP53-WT luciferase/GFP-labeled Molm13 and BFP-labeled TP53 R248W/R213* Molm13 cells (10:1) with VEN, AMG 176, or their combination. Only the combination treatment markedly decreased the number of GFP- and BFP-labeled cells in circulation and significantly prolonged mouse survival (median 23 d, 25 d, 24.5 d for control, VEN, AMG 176, respectively; and 45 d for VEN + AMG 176: P = 0.0007, 0.0009, and 0.0011 of combination vs. control, VEN, and AMG 176, respectively) (Fig. 2). Collectively, we demonstrate that decreased Bax contributes to resistance of TP53-mutant AML to BH3 mimetics. Mcl-1 expression positively impacts therapy resistance and disease reoccurrence in TP53-mutant AML. Thus, targeting Bcl-2 or Mcl-1 individually is insufficient and inhibition of both proteins is needed to shift cell fate from survival to death and circumvents resistance of TP53 deficient/mutant AML and AML stem/progenitor cells to BH3 mimetics. The concept warrants further clinical evaluation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Carter: Syndax: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding. Jabbour: Amgen, AbbVie, Spectrum, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Adaptive, Genentech: Research Funding. Andreeff: Medicxi: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; Novartis, Cancer UK; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS), German Research Council; NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Clin Network), CLL Foundation; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; ONO Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Syndax: Consultancy; Senti-Bio: Consultancy; Aptose: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Oxford Biomedica UK: Research Funding; Reata, Aptose, Eutropics, SentiBio; Chimerix, Oncolyze: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.