scholarly journals Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters

Author(s):  
Helen Ray-Jones ◽  
Mikhail Spivakov

AbstractTranscriptional enhancers play a key role in the initiation and maintenance of gene expression programmes, particularly in metazoa. How these elements control their target genes in the right place and time is one of the most pertinent questions in functional genomics, with wide implications for most areas of biology. Here, we synthesise classic and recent evidence on the regulatory logic of enhancers, including the principles of enhancer organisation, factors that facilitate and delimit enhancer–promoter communication, and the joint effects of multiple enhancers. We show how modern approaches building on classic insights have begun to unravel the complexity of enhancer–promoter relationships, paving the way towards a quantitative understanding of gene control.

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 559-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damir Alzhanov ◽  
Aditi Mukherjee ◽  
Peter Rotwein

Growth hormone (GH) plays a central role in regulating somatic growth and in controlling multiple physiological processes in humans and other vertebrates. A key agent in many GH actions is the secreted peptide, IGF-I. As established previously, GH stimulates IGF-I gene expression via the Stat5b transcription factor, leading to production of IGF-I mRNAs and proteins. However, the precise mechanisms by which GH-activated Stat5b promotes IGF-I gene transcription have not been defined. Unlike other GH-regulated genes, there are no Stat5b sites near either of the two IGF-I gene promoters. Although dispersed GH-activated Stat5b binding elements have been mapped in rodent Igf1 gene chromatin, it is unknown how these distal sites might function as potential transcriptional enhancers. Here we have addressed mechanisms of regulation of IGF-I gene transcription by GH by generating cell lines in which the rat Igf1 chromosomal locus has been incorporated into the mouse genome. Using these cells we find that physiological levels of GH rapidly and potently activate Igf1 gene transcription while stimulating physical interactions in chromatin between inducible Stat5b-binding elements and the Igf1 promoters. We have thus developed a robust experimental platform for elucidating how dispersed transcriptional enhancers control Igf1 gene expression under different biological conditions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadezda A. Fursova ◽  
Anne H. Turberfield ◽  
Neil P. Blackledge ◽  
Emma L. Findlater ◽  
Anna Lastuvkova ◽  
...  

AbstractHistone-modifying systems play fundamental roles in gene regulation and the development of multicellular organisms. Histone modifications that are enriched at gene regulatory elements have been heavily studied, but the function of modifications that are found more broadly throughout the genome remains poorly understood. This is exemplified by histone H2A mono-ubiquitylation (H2AK119ub1) which is enriched at Polycomb-repressed gene promoters, but also covers the genome at lower levels. Here, using inducible genetic perturbations and quantitative genomics, we discover that the BAP1 deubiquitylase plays an essential role in constraining H2AK119ub1 throughout the genome. Removal of BAP1 leads to pervasive accumulation of H2AK119ub1, which causes widespread reductions in gene expression. We show that elevated H2AK119ub1 represses gene expression by counteracting transcription initiation from gene regulatory elements, causing reductions in transcription-associated histone modifications. Furthermore, failure to constrain pervasive H2AK119ub1 compromises Polycomb complex occupancy at a subset of Polycomb target genes leading to their derepression, therefore explaining the original genetic characterisation of BAP1 as a Polycomb group gene. Together, these observations reveal that the transcriptional potential of the genome can be modulated by regulating the levels of a pervasive histone modification, without the need for elaborate gene-specific targeting mechanisms.


Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 216 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Small ◽  
David N. Arnosti

Key discoveries in Drosophila have shaped our understanding of cellular “enhancers.” With a special focus on the fly, this chapter surveys properties of these adaptable cis-regulatory elements, whose actions are critical for the complex spatial/temporal transcriptional regulation of gene expression in metazoa. The powerful combination of genetics, molecular biology, and genomics available in Drosophila has provided an arena in which the developmental role of enhancers can be explored. Enhancers are characterized by diverse low- or high-throughput assays, which are challenging to interpret, as not all of these methods of identifying enhancers produce concordant results. As a model metazoan, the fly offers important advantages to comprehensive analysis of the central functions that enhancers play in gene expression, and their critical role in mediating the production of phenotypes from genotype and environmental inputs. A major challenge moving forward will be obtaining a quantitative understanding of how these cis-regulatory elements operate in development and disease.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Parmentier ◽  
A Moussy ◽  
S Chantalat ◽  
L Racine ◽  
R Sudharshan ◽  
...  

AbstractWhen human cord blood derived CD34+ cells are induced to differentiate in vitro, they undergo rapid and dynamic morphological and molecular transformation that are critical for the fate commitment. Using ATAC-seq and single-cell RNA sequencing, we detected two phases of this process. In the first phase, we observed that a rapid and widespread chromatin opening - that makes most of the gene promoters in the genome accessible - precedes a global upregulation of gene transcription and a concomitant increase in the cell-to-cell variability of gene expression. The second phase is marked by a slow chromatin closure that precedes an overall downregulation of gene transcription and the emergence of coherent expression profiles that characterize distinct cell subpopulations. We further showed that the accessibility of promoters has a crucial effect on whether transcription factor changes will lead to alterations in the expression of their target genes. Our observations are consistent with a model based on the spontaneous probabilistic organization of the cellular process of fate commitment.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2750-2750
Author(s):  
Akihiro Tomita ◽  
Akihide Atsumi ◽  
Hitoshi Kiyoi ◽  
Tomoki Naoe

Abstract PML-RARα is a chimeric transcription factor deeply associated with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). PML-RARα plays an important role in the aberrant transcription repression on the target genes of wild type retinoic acid receptors (RARα). Pharmacological concentration of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) induces transcription de-repression on several target genes, and results in terminal differentiation of APL cells. However, the detailed mechanisms of transcription repression by PML-RARα in vivo are still unclear. Here we demonstrated that histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3), one component of the N-CoR (nuclear receptor co-repressor)-TBL1/R1 (transducin beta-like protein 1/relating protein) transcription repressor protein complex, is a key regulator of the transcription repression by PML-RARα in vivo. Using immunoprecipitation (IP) assay, we first demonstrated that PML-RARα physically interacted with N-CoR/HDAC3 in vivo in the absence of ligand. The interaction was dissociated by adding ATRA in the dose dependent manner. Next we showed, using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, that N-CoR/HDAC3 co-repressor complex was recruited to the endogenous target gene promoters (RARβ and CYP26) through PML-RARα. The neighboring histone H4 was de-acetylated and the gene expression was significantly repressed. When HDAC3 protein is knocked down by RNA interference in PML-RARα-presenting cells, the endogenous target gene expression was significantly activated. Almost the same results were also obtained when performing the luciferase reporter assay using RARβ and CYP26 promoter reporter vectors. Previously, we have shown that N-CoR-TBLR1 is recruited to the target gene promoter through PML-RARα in the absence of ligand, resulting in the transcription repression. Consistent with these data, it is strongly suggested that N-CoR/HDAC3/TBLR1 co-repressor complex is closely related to the aberrant transcription regulation by PML-RARα in APL cells. Furthermore, we also confirmed that PLZF-RARα, which is expressed in ATRA resistant APL cells, interacted with N-CoR/HDAC3/TBLR1 in ligand independent manner. These insights provide not only the basic mechanism of transcription repression by leukemia-related chimeric transcription factors, but also the new molecular targets for the transcription therapy for leukemia.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (21) ◽  
pp. 6632-6645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Nozell ◽  
Travis Laver ◽  
Dorothy Moseley ◽  
Lisa Nowoslawski ◽  
Marijke DeVos ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The NF-κB family mediates immune and inflammatory responses. In many cancers, NF-κB is constitutively activated and induces the expression of genes that facilitate tumorigenesis. ING4 is a tumor suppressor that is absent or mutated in several cancers. Herein, we demonstrate that in human gliomas, NF-κB is constitutively activated, ING4 expression is negligible, and NF-κB-regulated gene expression is elevated. We demonstrate that an ING4 and NF-κB interaction exists but does not prevent NF-κB activation, nuclear translocation, or DNA binding. Instead, ING4 and NF-κB bind simultaneously at NF-κB-regulated promoters, and this binding correlates with reductions in p65 phosphorylation, p300, and the levels of acetylated histones and H3-Me3K4, while enhancing the levels of HDAC-1 at these promoters. Using a knockdown approach, we correlate reductions in ING4 protein levels with increased basal and inducible NF-κB target gene expression. Collectively, these data suggest that ING4 may specifically regulate the activity of NF-κB molecules that are bound to target gene promoters.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Chen ◽  
Xu Shi ◽  
Andrew F. Neuwald ◽  
Leena Hilakivi-Clarke ◽  
Robert Clarke ◽  
...  

Abstract Background ChIP-seq combines chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with sequencing and identifies genome-wide binding sites for DNA binding proteins. While many binding sites have strong ChIP-seq ‘peak’ observations and are well captured, there are still regions bound by proteins weakly, with a relatively low ChIP-seq signal enrichment. These weak binding sites, especially those at promoters and enhancers, are functionally important because they also regulate nearby gene expression. Yet, it remains a challenge to accurately identify weak binding sites in ChIP-seq data due to the ambiguity in differentiating these weak binding sites from the amplified background DNAs. Results ChIP-BIT2 (http://sourceforge.net/projects/chipbitc/) is a software package for ChIP-seq peak detection. ChIP-BIT2 employs a mixture model integrating protein and control ChIP-seq data and predicts strong or weak protein binding sites at promoters, enhancers, or other genomic locations. For binding sites at gene promoters, ChIP-BIT2 simultaneously predicts their target genes. ChIP-BIT2 has been validated on benchmark regions and tested using large-scale ENCODE ChIP-seq data, demonstrating its high accuracy and wide applicability. Conclusion ChIP-BIT2 is an efficient ChIP-seq peak caller. It provides a better lens to examine weak binding sites and can refine or extend the existing binding site collection, providing additional regulatory regions for decoding the mechanism of gene expression regulation.


PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e1009351
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Weixin Zhang ◽  
Yanli Cao ◽  
Fanglin Zheng ◽  
Guolei Zhao ◽  
...  

Cellulase production in filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei is highly responsive to various environmental cues involving multiple positive and negative regulators. XYR1 (Xylanase regulator 1) has been identified as the key transcriptional activator of cellulase gene expression in T. reesei. However, the precise mechanism by which XYR1 achieves transcriptional activation of cellulase genes is still not fully understood. Here, we identified the TrCYC8/TUP1 complex as a novel coactivator for XYR1 in T. reesei. CYC8/TUP1 is the first identified transcriptional corepressor complex mediating repression of diverse genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Knockdown of Trcyc8 or Trtup1 resulted in markedly impaired cellulase gene expression in T. reesei. We found that TrCYC8/TUP1 was recruited to cellulase gene promoters upon cellulose induction and this recruitment is dependent on XYR1. We further observed that repressed Trtup1 or Trcyc8 expression caused a strong defect in XYR1 occupancy and loss of histone H4 at cellulase gene promoters. The defects in XYR1 binding and transcriptional activation of target genes in Trtup1 or Trcyc8 repressed cells could not be overcome by XYR1 overexpression. Our results reveal a novel coactivator function for TrCYC8/TUP1 at the level of activator binding, and suggest a mechanism in which interdependent recruitment of XYR1 and TrCYC8/TUP1 to cellulase gene promoters represents an important regulatory circuit in ensuring the induced cellulase gene expression. These findings thus contribute to unveiling the intricate regulatory mechanism underlying XYR1-mediated cellulase gene activation and also provide an important clue that will help further improve cellulase production by T. reesei.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2690-2690
Author(s):  
Lisa Richter ◽  
Yiqian Wang ◽  
Michelle Becker ◽  
R. Katherine Hyde

Abstract The fusion of the genes for core binding factor beta and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (CBFB-MYH11) is the recurrent mutation found in inversion 16 (inv(16)) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The expressed fusion protein, CBFβ-SMMHC, binds to the transcriptional regulator RUNX1, and this interaction is required for leukemogenesis. Recent data shows CBFβ-SMMHC and RUNX1 are associated with promoters of both transcribed and repressed genes, implying that the CBFβ-SMMHC:RUNX1 complex directly regulates target gene expression. However, it is not known whether other transcriptional co-factors are also required for this activity. Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) removes acetyl groups from histone tails to regulate the accessibility of chromatin to transcriptional machinery. It is recruited to chromatin by transcription factors, including RUNX1. HDAC1 also colocalizes with RUNX1 and CBFβ-SMMHC to promoter regions in ME-1 cells, a human inv(16) cell line. Based on this, we hypothesized that HDAC1 could bind to the RUNX1: CBFβ-SMMHC complex and plays a role in transcriptional regulation in inv(16). To test if CBFβ-SMMHC and HDAC1 form a complex, we transfected COS-7 cells with expression plasmids for HDAC1-FLAG and CBFβ-SMMHC and performed immunoprecipitations (IP) with nuclear extracts. IP with anti-MYH11 showed an interaction between HDAC1 and CBFβ-SMMHC, as did IP with anti-FLAG. Importantly, we found that HDAC1 and CBFβ-SMMHC co-immunoprecipitate in mouse leukemia cells from our knockin model which expresses CBFβ-SMMHC from the endogenous CBFβ promoter (CBFβ-SMMHC+). Confirming the specificity of this interaction, we found that IP with anti-MYH11 in ME-1 cells shows HDAC1 interaction, but the same IP in the t(8;21) AML cell line Kasumi-1 did not show HDAC1 interaction even though similar levels of HDAC1 are expressed. We next tested whether RUNX1 mediates the interaction between CBFβ-SMMHC and HDAC1. We performed IP experiments using a CBFβ-SMMHC mutant lacking RUNX1 binding (CBFβ-SMMHCN63K,N104K,Δ179-221). This mutant was co-immunoprecipitated with HDAC1, but not RUNX1, indicating that CBFβ-SMMHC's interaction with HDAC1 does not require RUNX1. We tested a construct lacking the c-terminal 95 amino acids, CBFβ-SMMHCΔC95, the domain known to interact with the related protein, HDAC8. We found that HDAC1 immunoprecipitated with CBFβ-SMMHCΔC95, suggesting that HDAC1 binds to a unique region of CBFβ-SMMHC. To test if HDAC1 plays a role in CBFβ-SMMHC-mediated gene expression, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitations on mouse CBFβ-SMMHC+ primary leukemia cells with antibodies against HDAC1, RUNX1, and MYH11, followed by real-time PCR for the promoter regions of three CBFβ-SMMHC target genes: MPO, CSF1R, and CEBPD. We observed all three proteins enriched on the target gene promoters as compared to immunoglobulin controls. This indicates that HDAC1 localizes with CBFβ-SMMHC and RUNX1 on target gene promoters in mouse primary leukemia cells. To test if HDAC1 is required for expression of these target genes, we used shRNA to knockdown Hdac1 expression. Mouse CBFβ-SMMHC+ leukemia cells were transduced with one of 2 different shRNAs against Hdac1 or with a control construct. We found that expression of all three genes was decreased with Hdac1knockdown, implying that HDAC1 is required for CBFβ-SMMHC induced changes in gene expression. These results also suggest that HDAC1 may have a role in transcriptional activation for certain genes, which is in contrast to its traditional role as a transcriptional repressor. These findings imply that HDAC1 activity is required for the maintenance of CBFβ-SMMHC expressing leukemia cells, and that HDAC1 inhibitors may be effective against inv(16) AML. To test this possibility we performed colony-forming assays using mouse leukemia cells grown in the presence of two different HDAC inhibitors, entinostat which is specific for HDAC1, and vorinostat, a nonspecific HDAC inhibitor. Our preliminary results indicate that both entinostat and vorinostat reduce the ability of primary CBFβ-SMMHC+ mouse leukemia cells to form colonies as compared to the vehicle control, while having minimal effects on growth of normal hematopoietic cells. In summary, we demonstrated that HDAC1 forms a complex with CBFβ-SMMHC and is required for its regulation of target gene expression, and that HDAC inhibitors may be effective for the treatment of inv(16) AML patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document