scholarly journals 1173. Expanding the MAGIC: Engagement of Frontline Nursing Staff in Device Stewardship

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S420-S420
Author(s):  
Katherine Linsenmeyer ◽  
Kalpana Gupta ◽  
Suzanne Mosesso ◽  
Christine House ◽  
Judith Strymish

Abstract Background Nearly 40% of all peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placements may be inappropriate. Validated appropriateness criteria (Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters or MAGIC) were developed to improve patient safety and decrease adverse events from PICC line use. Recent studies have demonstrated the impact of MAGIC implementation with success but involve multimodal interventions that may not be sustainable. We evaluated the effect of a nursing-driven MAGIC-derived triage tool online utilization. Methods We conducted a quasi-experimental before and after study evaluating the effect of a MAGIC-derived triage tool including all patients for whom a PICC consult was ordered. The triage tool was implemented January 1, 2018 as part of the consult order and required providers to identify an indication for placement. All consults were reviewed by the IV Team Nurses who collaborated with ID providers when warranted. Providers were contacted if MAGIC criteria suggested alternate access was more appropriate and encouraged to either place a mid or peripheral line or to consider an oral medication. Rates of line utilization and line infections pre-intervention and post-intervention were compared. Results Overall, 242 consults for PICC lines were placed during the one year intervention period January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Indications included: antibiotics (54%), TPN/chemo (21%) difficult access (17%), no response (8%). Thirty-five PICCs were averted directly related to the intervention. Appropriate indication of PICC placement with the tool was 88%. During this same time period, the line utilization ratio (lines/1,000 patient-days of care) decreased from a mean of 3.8 (range 3.3 to 4.2 for years 2015–2017) to 2.6, a 32% reduction (IIR 0.72; P < 0.05). Central line bloodstream infection rates (infections/1,000 line days of care) also decreased from a mean of 0.81 (range 0.56 to 1.18 for years 2015–2017) to 0.37, a 54% reduction (IIR 0.4; P = 0.10). Conclusion Even in a setting of low line infection and line utilization rates, further reductions in potential device harm can be achieved using point of care feedback tools. This intervention empowers nursing involvement in device stewardship, thus expanding the range of their involvement in stewardship activities. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S55-S55
Author(s):  
Matthew Nestler ◽  
John D Markley ◽  
Andrew Noda ◽  
Emily Godbout ◽  
Jihye Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cascade reporting is a form of selective reporting where antibiotic susceptibility results are revealed in a sequential order to optimize antibiotic use. On May 1, 2019, Virginia Commonwealth University Health implemented cascade reporting for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin for E. coli from urine cultures. We hypothesize that suppressing fluoroquinolone (FQ) results for urine isolate E. coli susceptibility panels using cascade reporting led to a decrease in the overall rate of inpatient FQ use. Methods We compared inpatient FQ use (in days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient days (PD)) for the one-year pre-cascade period (May 2018-April 2019) to the one-year post cascade period (May 2019-April 2020). Inpatient FQ use for May 2018-April 2020 was modeled as an interrupted time series (ITS) using ordinary least squares regression. The regression model followed the form of Y = B0 +B1T + B2 X + B3 XT with Y = (DOT/1,000 PD), T = time in months, X = cascade reporting represented with a binary digit, and XT= time since cascade reporting was implemented. Results were examined for autocorrelation and lag effects. Analysis conducted using Microsoft Excel and Python Statsmodel library v0.11.1. Results A segmented regression model was successfully fitted with R^2 = 0.73 (Figure 1). The pre-intervention slope (T), intervention change (X), and post-intervention slope (XT) were -3.9, -2.3, and 3.8 DOT respectively. A significant positive change in pre versus post intervention slope was detected (p = 0.01). Conclusion Results showed no significant change in FQ DOT/1000 PD when cascade reporting was implemented in May 2019. This may be due to empiric prescribing of FQs in the inpatient setting, due to the fact the rate of FQ use was already decreasing prior to cascade reporting adoption, or due to other factors. We detected a significant positive change in the slope of FQ from -4 to 4 DOT/1000 PD each month post-cascade reporting. Our hospital has had a decrease in FQ use over the past 8 years so this may be due to a ‘floor’ effect where the true minimum of necessary FQ use was reached; further investigation is warranted. We believe our data will be of interest to other Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs considering cascade reporting. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (06) ◽  
pp. 445-452
Author(s):  
Gabriela Ramos Ferreira Curan ◽  
Edilaine Giovanini Rossetto ◽  
Thaíla Corrêa Castral

Introduction: The use of central catheters in intensive care is essential, but exposes the patient to the risk of a bloodstream infection. Although there is evidence to improve the care for these patients, there is a gap between knowledge and healthcare practices. This study was designed to describe the bundle implementation for central catheters in light of the knowledge translation (KT) conceptual framework in a neonatal unit and assess its impact on care practices with catheters. Methodology: A time-series quasi-experimental study design was conducted in a Brazilian neonatal unit, through 289 non-participant observations of professional practices before and after the implementation of the bundles. Results: The deployment of two bundles was guided through the steps of a careful selection of adopting KT evidence and context-related and investment factors in the facilitation process. The implementation of the bundles was planned by a group manager, mediated by a facilitator, and guided by targets established by professionals. The biggest impact was on the maintenance of catheters; seven of eleven practices improved significantly (p < 0.01). The insertion of catheters showed lesser impact of change, with high adequacy ratios before implementation, but also presented satisfactory adherence to recommendations. Conclusions: This is the first Brazilian study using the KT conceptual framework to develop, implement, and evaluate the impact of central line bundles in a neonatal care environment, detailing the implementation process. It highlights the importance of accountability and staff involvement in all stages of the study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (9) ◽  
pp. e2.16-e2
Author(s):  
Adam Sutherland ◽  
Liz Jemmett ◽  
Rachael Barber

IntroductionInfusion preparation in British PICUs uses the Rule of Six (ROS) which was developed for administration without infusion devices. This method is inaccurate.1 Regulators recommend standardised approaches to IV infusions to improve patient safety and quality of care.2 Administration set changes also have an association with resource use and central line infections.3 We report the impact of fixed concentration infusions and reduced administration set changes on nursing time and infusion equipment cost.MethodsMorphine and midazolam infusions were standardised in September 2014. Direct observation of infusion preparation was carried out beforeand after the introduction of fixed-concentration (FC) infusions to quantify the nursing time required to prepare infusions. Administration was prospectively documented using purposive sampling until a population-representative sample for age and weight was obtained (1 month). This data was then scaled up to predict activity over one year. Syringe use and administration set use was calculated. Reducing frequency of administration set changes to 72 hrs in accordance with infection control policy was then calculated retrospectively.ResultsIt takes 40 minutes (2 nurses×20 minutes) to prepare ROS syringes and 30 minutes (2 nurses×15 minutes) for FC syringes.In total ROS infusions required 2433 hrs of nursing time to prepare. FC infusions reduced this time by 25% (608 hrs) releasing 0.5 WTE nursing time back to patient care.Mean duration of IV sedation in these patients was 100 hrs. The cost associated with replacing administration sets with each syringe was £16,060. By changing every 72 hrs, this cost is reduced to £4,400 – a cost saving of £11,660.ConclusionsFC syringes are more efficient than ROS. FC preparations have released 0.5 WTE nurses back to patient care. Changing administration sets 72 hrly realises significant cost efficiencies.


EMBRIO ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Khobibah ◽  
Budi Astyandini ◽  
Mimi Ruspita

The risk of obesity and hypertension is associated with the influence of the hormone estrogen and the impact of the use of contraceptives. Use over one year is at risk of 1.36 times overweight, and will continue to increase in use over seven years (8.3 times). An important component for weight loss is aerobic exercise, so expected BMI, triglycerides, total cholesterol. LDL and HDL under normal conditions.  Interventions in the form of treadmills, aerobic gymnastics or ergocycle. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of aerobic gymnastics BMI, abdominal circumference and lipid profile of KB DMPA acceptors. The design was the quasi-experimental research (one group pretest posttest design). Pretest BMI, abdominal circumference, cholesterol, HDL and LDL were performed before and after the acceptor performed aerobic gymnastics a total of 16 meetings with a frequency of 3 times per week. The sample numbered 31 people. Data analysis using t-test and Wilcoxon. The results showed that aerobic gymnastics had no significant effect on BMI (p=0.818) and HDL (p=0.416) but had no significant effect on decreased abdominal fat (p=0.002), cholesterol (p = 0.044) and LDL (p=0.030). This recommendation of research is the need for routine physical activity such as aerobic gymnastics for DMPA KB acceptors so as to reduce complaints due to the side effects of DMPA contraceptives.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 228-233
Author(s):  
Alfredo J Mena Lora ◽  
Mirza Ali ◽  
Candice Krill ◽  
Sherrie Spencer ◽  
Eden Takhsh ◽  
...  

Background: Device utilisation ratios (DUR) correlate with device-associated complications and rates of infection. We implemented a hospital-wide Daily Interdisciplinary Safety Huddle (DISH) with infection control and device components. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of DISH on DURs and rates of infection for indwelling urinary catheters (IUC) and central venous catheters (CVC). Methods: A quasi-experimental study assessing DURs and rates of infection before and after implementation of DISH. At DISH, usage of IUC and CVC is reported by managers and the infection preventionist reviews indications and plans for removal. Data before and after implementation were compared. Paired T-test was used to assess for differences between both groups. Results: DISH was successfully implemented at a community hospital. The average DUR for IUC in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings was reduced from 0.56 to 0.35 and 0.27 to 0.12, respectively. CVC DUR decreased from 0.29 to 0.26 in the ICU and 0.14 to 0.12 in non-ICU settings. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) decreased by 87% and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) by 96%. Conclusion: DISH was associated with hospital-wide reductions in DUR and device-associated healthcare-associated infections. Reduction of CLABSIs and CAUTIs had estimated cost savings of $688,050. The impact was more profound in non-ICU settings. To our knowledge, an infection prevention hospital-wide safety huddle has not been reported in the literature. DISH increased device removal, accountability and promoted a culture of safety.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Van Kalsbeek ◽  
Karl Enroth ◽  
Elizabeth Lyden ◽  
Mark E. Rupp ◽  
Christopher J. Smith

Abstract Background Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) devices are becoming more widely used in healthcare and have the potential to act as fomites. The objective of this project was to study the thoroughness of cleaning of POCUS machines before and after a quality improvement initiative. We designed a mixed-methods, pre/post study which took place over the course of one year at a university-affiliated health center. Cleaning rates of four ultrasound machines used by hospital medicine and critical care medicine services were evaluated using fluorescent marking. Interventions targeted physicians’ knowledge of best practices and improved access to cleaning supplies. Pre- and post-intervention cleaning rates were compared using a generalized linear model. The impact of the corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on baseline cleaning rates was also evaluated. Physicians’ attitudes and knowledge of cleaning practices were evaluated via unpaired pre/post surveys. Results There was significant improvement in thoroughness of cleaning following intervention (pre 0.62, SE 0.05; post 0.89, SE 0.07), p < 0.0001). There was no difference in baseline cleaning rates before (0.63, SE 0.09) and after (0.61, SE 0.1) the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.78). Post-intervention surveying found improved understanding of guideline-based cleaning practice, better performance on knowledge-based questions, and fewer reported barriers to machine cleaning. Conclusion Thoroughness of cleaning of POCUS machines can be improved with practical interventions that target knowledge and access to cleaning supplies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 478
Author(s):  
Ching Chang ◽  
Chien-Hao Huang ◽  
Hsiao-Jung Tseng ◽  
Fang-Chen Yang ◽  
Rong-Nan Chien

Background: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a neuropsychiatric complication of decompensated cirrhosis, is associated with high mortality and high risk of recurrence. Rifaximin add-on to lactulose for 3 to 6 months is recommended for the prevention of recurrent episodes of HE after the second episode. However, whether the combination for more than 6 months is superior to lactulose alone in the maintenance of HE remission is less evident. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the one-year efficacy of rifaximin add-on to lactulose for the maintenance of HE remission in Taiwan. Methods: We conducted a real-world single-center retrospective cohort study to compare the long-term efficacy of rifaximin add-on to lactulose (group R + L) versus lactulose alone (group L, control group). Furthermore, the treatment efficacy before and after rifaximin add-on to lactulose was also analyzed. The primary endpoint of our study was time to first HE recurrence (Conn score ≥ 2). All patients were followed up every three months until death, and censored at one year if still alive. Results and Conclusions: 12 patients were enrolled in group R + L. Another 31 patients were stratified into group L. Sex, comorbidity, ammonia level, and ascites grade were matched while age, HE grade, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score were adjusted in the multivariable logistic regression model. Compared with group L, significant improvement in the maintenance of HE remission and decreased episodes and days of HE-related hospitalizations were demonstrated in group R + L. The serum ammonia levels were significantly lower at the 3rd and 6th month in group 1. Concerning changes before and after rifaximin add-on in group R + L, mini-mental status examination (MMSE), episodes of hospitalization, and variceal bleeding also improved at 6 and 12 months. Days of hospitalization, serum ammonia levels also improved at 6th month. Except for concern over price, no patients discontinued rifaximin due to adverse events or complications. The above results provide evidence for the one-year use of rifaximin add-on to lactulose in reducing HE recurrence and HE-related hospitalization for patients with decompensated cirrhosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S684-S684
Author(s):  
Victoria Konold ◽  
Palak Bhagat ◽  
Jennifer Pisano ◽  
Natasha N Pettit ◽  
Anish Choksi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To meet the core elements required for antimicrobial stewardship programs, our institution implemented a pharmacy-led antibiotic timeout (ATO) process in 2017 and a multidisciplinary ATO process in 2019. An antibiotic timeout is a discussion and review of the need for ongoing empirical antibiotics 2-4 days after initiation. This study sought to evaluate both the multidisciplinary ATO and the pharmacy-led ATO in a pediatric population, compare the impact of each intervention on antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) to a pre-intervention group without an ATO, and to then compare the impact of the pharmacy-led ATO versus multidisciplinary ATO on antibiotic days of therapy (DOT). Methods This was a retrospective, pre-post, quasi-experimental study of pediatric patients comparing antibiotic DOT prior to ATO implementation (pre-ATO), during the pharmacy-led ATO (pharm-ATO), and during the multidisciplinary ATO (multi-ATO). The pre-ATO group was a patient sample from February-September 2016, prior to the initiation of a formal ATO. The pharmacy-led ATO was implemented from February-September 2018. This was followed by a multidisciplinary ATO led by pediatric residents and nurses from February-September 2019. Both the pharm-ATO and the multi-ATO were implemented as an active non-interruptive alert added to the electronic health record patient list. This alert triggered when new antibiotics had been administered to the patient for 48 hours, at which time, the responsible clinician would discuss the antibiotic and document their decision via the alert workspace. Pediatric patients receiving IV or PO antibiotics administered for at least 48 hours were included. The primary outcome was DOT. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Results 1284 unique antibiotic orders (n= 572 patients) were reviewed in the pre-ATO group, 868 (n= 323 patients) in the pharm-ATO and 949 (n= 305 patients) in the multi-ATO groups. Average DOT was not significantly different pre vs post intervention for either methodology (Table 1). Mortality was similar between groups, but LOS was longer for both intervention groups (Table 1). Impact of an ATO on DOT, Mortality and LOS Conclusion An ATO had no impact on average antibiotic DOT in a pediatric population, regardless of the ATO methodology. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S362-S363
Author(s):  
Gaurav Agnihotri ◽  
Alan E Gross ◽  
Minji Seok ◽  
Cheng Yu Yen ◽  
Farah Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although it is recommended that an OPAT program should be managed by a formal OPAT team that supports the treating physician, many OPAT programs face challenges in obtaining necessary program staff (i.e nurses or pharmacists) due to limited data examining the impact of a dedicated OPAT team on patient outcomes. Our objective was to compare OPAT-related readmission rates among patients receiving OPAT before and after the implementation of a strengthened OPAT program. Methods This retrospective quasi-experiment compared adult patients discharged on intravenous (IV) antibiotics from the University of Illinois Hospital before and after implementation of programmatic changes to strengthen the OPAT program. Data from our previous study were used as the pre-intervention group (1/1/2012 to 8/1/2013), where only individual infectious disease (ID) physicians coordinated OPAT. Post-intervention (10/1/2017 to 1/1/2019), a dedicated OPAT nurse provided full time support to the treating ID physicians through care coordination, utilization of protocols for lab monitoring and management, and enhanced documentation. Factors associated with readmission for OPAT-related problems at a significance level of p&lt; 0.1 in univariate analysis were eligible for testing in a forward stepwise multinomial logistic regression to identify independent predictors of readmission. Results Demographics, antimicrobial indications, and OPAT administration location of the 428 patients pre- and post-intervention are listed in Table 1. After implementation of the strengthened OPAT program, the readmission rate due to OPAT-related complications decreased from 17.8% (13/73) to 6.5% (23/355) (p=0.001). OPAT-related readmission reasons included: infection recurrence/progression (56%), adverse drug reaction (28%), or line-associated issues (17%). Independent predictors of hospital readmission due to OPAT-related problems are listed in Table 2. Table 1. OPAT Patient Demographics and Factors Pre- and Post-intervention Table 2. Factors independently associated with hospital readmission in OPAT patients Conclusion An OPAT program with dedicated staff at a large academic tertiary care hospital was independently associated with decreased risk for readmission, which provides critical evidence to substantiate additional resources being dedicated to OPAT by health systems in the future. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Dementia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 985-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Bailey ◽  
Paul Kingston ◽  
Simon Alford ◽  
Louise Taylor ◽  
Edward Tolhurst

This research aimed to ascertain the impact of a pragmatic Cognitive Stimulation Therapy course of 10 sessions on the cognitive function of people living with dementia and whether attending a concomitant carers support group was beneficial to carers. A mixed method quasi-experimental approach was adopted; data were collected pre- and post-intervention. The quantitative arm utilised three validated questionnaires rated by the carers. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with carers regarding their perceptions of the impact of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy and the carers support group. Quantitative data analysis found no statistically significant differences within or between groups. The qualitative data demonstrated that carers perceived Cognitive Stimulation Therapy had some benefits for the people living with dementia, especially social benefits. Carers also perceived that attending the carers support group was beneficial for them in terms of gaining a better understanding of dementia, developing coping skills and having peer support. The study was limited in scale and further research with a larger sample, using direct measures of the impact of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy with people living with dementia and supplementary research exploring which characteristic of carers support groups are effective would be worthwhile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document