New Model to Analyze Nonlinear Leak-Off Test Behavior

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Altun ◽  
E. Shirman ◽  
J. P. Langlinais ◽  
A. T. Bourgoyne
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Nonlinear Behavior ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Maximum Pressure ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Total System ◽  
Verification Method ◽  
Fracture Pressure ◽  
Wellbore Pressure

A leak-off test (LOT) is a verification method to estimate fracture pressure of exposed formations. After cementing each casing string, LOT is run to verify that the casing, cement and formation below the casing seat can withstand the wellbore pressure required to drill for the next casing string safely. Estimated fracture pressure from the test is used as the maximum pressure that may be imposed on that formation. Critical drilling decisions for mud weights, casing setting depths, and well control techniques are based upon the result of a LOT. Although LOT is a simple and inexpensive test, its interpretation is not always easy, particularly in formations that give nonlinear relationships between pumped volume and injection pressure. The observed shape of the LOT is primarily controlled by the local stresses. However, there are other factors that can affect and distort LOT results. Physically the LOT, indeed, reflects the total system compressibility, i.e., the compressibility of the drilling fluid, wellbore expansion, or so-called borehole ballooning, and leak (filtration) of drilling fluids into the formation. There is, however, no mathematical model explaining the nonlinear behavior. Disagreement on determining or interpreting actual leak-off pressure from the test data among the operators is common. In this paper, a mathematical model using a well-known compressibility equation is derived for total system compressibility to fully analyze nonlinear LOT behavior. This model accurately predicts the observed nonlinear behavior in a field example. The model also predicts the fracture pressure of the formation without running a test until formation fracture.

scholarly journals Laboratory Study on Core Fracturing Simulations for Wellbore Strengthening

Geofluids ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biao Ma ◽  
Xiaolin Pu ◽  
Zhengguo Zhao ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Wenxin Dong
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Laboratory Study ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Lost Circulation ◽  
The Core ◽  
Fracture Pressure ◽  
Fluid Systems ◽  
Fracturing Process ◽  
Wellbore Strengthening

The lost circulation in a formation is one of the most complicated problems that have existed in drilling engineering for a long time. The key to solving the loss of drilling fluid circulation is to improve the pressure-bearing capacity of the formation. The tendency is to improve the formation pressure-bearing capacity with drilling fluid technology for strengthening the wellbore, either to the low fracture pressure of the formation or to that of the naturally fractured formation. Therefore, a laboratory study focused on core fracturing simulations for the strengthening of wellbores was conducted with self-developed fracture experiment equipment. Experiments were performed to determine the effect of the gradation of plugging materials, kinds of plugging materials, and drilling fluid systems. The results showed that fracture pressure in the presence of drilling fluid was significantly higher than that in the presence of water. The kinds and gradation of drilling fluids had obvious effects on the core fracturing process. In addition, different drilling fluid systems had different effects on the core fracture process. In the same case, the core fracture pressure in the presence of oil-based drilling fluid was less than that in the presence of water-based drilling fluid.

A Wellbore Pressure Calculation Method Considering Gas Suspension in Wellbore Shut-In Condition

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Zhang ◽  
Baojiang Sun ◽  
Zhiyuan Wang ◽  
Shaowei Pan ◽  
Wenqiang Lou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Yield Stress ◽  
Calculation Method ◽  
Optimization Design ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Drilling Process ◽  
Gas Suspension ◽  
Wellhead Pressure ◽  
Suspension Concentration ◽  
Wellbore Pressure

Abstract In the oil industry, the drilling fluid is yield stress fluid. The gas invading the wellbore during the drilling process is distributed in the wellbore in the form of bubbles. When the buoyancy of the bubble is less than the resistance of the yield stress, the bubble will be suspended in the drilling fluid, which will lead to wellbore pressure inaccurately predicting and overflow. In this paper, the prediction model of gas limit suspension concentration under different yield stresses of drilling fluids is obtained by experiments, and the calculation method of wellbore pressure considering the influence of gas suspension under shut-in conditions is established. Based on the calculation of the basic data of a case well, the distribution of gas in different yield stress drilling fluids and the influence of gas suspension on the wellbore pressure are analyzed. The results show that with the increase of yield stress, the volume of suspended single bubbles increases, the gas suspension concentration increases, and the height at which the gas can rise is reduced. When the yield stress of drilling fluid is 2 Pa, the increment of wellhead pressure decreases by 37.1% compared with that without considering gas suspension, and when the yield stress of drilling fluid is 10Pa, the increment of wellhead pressure can decrease by 78.6%, which shows that when the yield stress of drilling fluid is different, the final stable wellhead pressure is quite different. This is of great significance for the optimization design of field overflow and kill parameters, and for the accurate calculation of wellbore pressure by considering the suspension effect of drilling fluid on the invasion gas through the shut in wellhead pressure.

Effect of Drillstring Deflection and Rotary Speed on Annular Frictional Pressure Losses

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oney Erge ◽  
Mehmet E. Ozbayoglu ◽  
Stefan Z. Miska ◽  
Mengjiao Yu ◽  
Nicholas Takach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Loss ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Hole Drilling ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Gas Drilling ◽  
Fracture Pressure

Keeping the drilling fluid equivalent circulating density in the operating window between the pore and fracture pressure is a challenge, particularly when the gap between these two is narrow, such as in offshore applications. To overcome this challenge, accurate estimation of frictional pressure loss in the annulus is essential, especially for multilateral, extended reach and slim hole drilling applications usually encountered in shale gas and/or oil drilling. A better estimation of frictional pressure losses will provide improved well control, optimized bit hydraulics, a better drilling fluid program and pump selection. Field and experimental measurements showed that pressure loss in the annulus is strongly affected by the pipe rotation and eccentricity. Eccentricity will not be constant throughout a wellbore, especially in highly inclined and horizontal sections. In an actual wellbore, because of rotation speed and the applied weight, some portion of the drillstring will undergo compression. As a result, variable eccentricity will be encountered. At high compression, the drillstring will buckle, resulting in sinusoidal or helical buckling configurations. Most of the drilling fluids used today show highly non-Newtonian flow behavior, which can be characterized using the Yield Power Law (YPL). Nevertheless, in the literature, there is limited information and research on YPL fluids flowing through annular geometries with the inner pipe buckled, rotating, and eccentric. Furthermore, there are discrepancies reported between the estimated and measured frictional pressure losses with or without drillstring rotation of YPL fluids, even when the inner pipe is straight. The major focus of this project is on a horizontal well setup with drillstring under compression, considering the influence of rotation on frictional pressure losses of YPL fluids. The test matrix includes flow through the annulus for various buckling modes with and without rotation of the inner pipe. Sinusoidal, helical and transition from sinusoidal to helical configurations with and without the rotation of the drillstring are investigated. Results show a substantial difference of frictional pressure losses between the non-compressed and compressed drillstring. The drilling industry has recently been involved in incidents that show the need for critical improvements for evaluating and avoiding risks in oil/gas drilling. The information obtained from this study can be used to improve the control of bottomhole pressures during extended reach, horizontal, managed pressure, offshore and slim hole drilling applications. This will lead to safer and enhanced optimization of drilling operations.

Effect on Fracture Pressure by Adding Iron-Based and Calcium-Based Nanoparticles to a Nonaqueous Drilling Fluid for Permeable Formations

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Contreras ◽  
Mortadha Alsaba ◽  
Geir Hareland ◽  
Maen Husein ◽  
Runar Nygaard
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Filter Press ◽  
Fluid Loss ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Fracture Pressure ◽  
High Pressure High Temperature ◽  
Iron Based ◽  
Wellbore Strengthening ◽  
Fracturing Experiments

This paper presents a comprehensive experimental evaluation to investigate the effects of adding iron-based and calcium-based nanoparticles (NPs) to nonaqueous drilling fluids (NAFs) as a fluid loss additive and for wellbore strengthening applications in permeable formations. API standard high-pressure-high-temperature (HPHT) filter press in conjunction with ceramic disks is used to quantify fluid loss reduction. Hydraulic fracturing experiments are carried out to measure fracturing and re-opening pressures. A significant enhancement in both filtration and strengthening was achieved by means of in situ prepared NPs. Our results demonstrate that filtration reduction is essential for successful wellbore strengthening; however, excessive reduction could affect the strengthening negatively.

Detailed Modeling of Drilling Fluid Flow in a Wellbore Annulus While Drilling

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evgeny Podryabinkin ◽  
Valery Rudyak ◽  
Andrey Gavrilov ◽  
Roland May
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Solutions ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Newtonian Fluids ◽  
Rheological Parameters ◽  
Flow Mode ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
New Model ◽  
Wellbore Pressure ◽  
Analytical Approaches

To produce a well safely, the wellbore pressure during drilling must be in a range that prevents collapse yet avoids fracturing. This range is often called “the operating window”. Exceeding the limits of this range can trigger wellbore instability or initiate well control incidents. Pressure prediction requires an understanding of the hydrodynamics processes that occur in a borehole while drilling. Describing these processes is complicated by many factors: the mud rheology is usually non-Newtonian, the flow mode can be laminar or turbulent, and the drillstring can rotate and be positioned eccentrically. Known semi-analytical approaches cannot account for the full range of fluid flows that can arise during drilling. These techniques don’t take into account all factors. Accurate numerical simulation of the flow of drilling fluids is a means to describe the fluid behavior in detail. For numerical solutions of hydrodynamics equations a unique algorithm based on a finite-volume method and a new model of turbulence for non-Newtonian fluids was developed. The model considers string rotation and eccentricity of the drillstring. Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids as described by the Herschel–Bulkley rheological model have been implemented. Data obtained via systematic parameter studies of the flow in a borehole are available for fast determination of parameters like pressure drop, velocity field, and stresses corresponding to any drilling condition. Applying the new model for the annulus flow and comparing the results to the parallel plate flow approximation enabled us to quantify the error made due to the approximated solution for non-Newtonian fluid rheology. The difference between the solutions grows as the annular gap increases. This situation is a function of the rheological parameters. Secondary flow effects can only be seen when applying the new solution method.

scholarly journals Equivalent Circulation Density Analysis of Geothermal Well by Coupling Temperature

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuhua Zheng ◽  
Chenyang Duan ◽  
Zheng Yan ◽  
Hongyu Ye ◽  
Zhiqing Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Model Fitting ◽  
Geothermal Gradient ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Geothermal Field ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Geothermal Well ◽  
Time Flow ◽  
Wellbore Pressure

The accurate wellbore pressure control not only prevents from lost circulation/blowout and fracturing formation by managing density of drilling fluid, but also improves productivity by mitigating reservoir damage. The geothermal pressure calculated by constant parameters for geothermal well would bring big error easily, as the changes of physical, rheological and thermal properties of drilling fluids with temperature were neglected. This paper researches the wellbore pressure coupling by calculating the temperature distribution with existed model, fitting the rule of density of drilling fluid with temperature and establishing mathematical models to stimulate the wellbore pressures, which is expressed as the variation of Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) under different conditions. With this method, temperature and ECDs in the wellbore of the first medium-deep geothermal well ZK212 Yangyi Geothermal Field in Tibet were determined, and the sensitivity analysis was simulated by assumed parameters, i.e. circulating time, flow rate, geothermal gradient, diameters of wellbore, rheological models and regimes, the results indicated the geothermal gradient and flow rate were the most influence parameters on the temperature and ECD distribution, and additives added in drilling fluid should be careful which would change the properties of drilling fluid and induce the temperature redistribution. To make sure the safe drilling, velocity of pipes tripping into the hole, depth and diameter of wellbore are considered to control the surge pressure.

Gas-Kick Simulation in Oil-Based Drilling Fluids with Nonequilibrium Gas-Dissolution and -Evolution Effects

SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Zhengming Xu ◽  
Xuejiao Chen ◽  
Xianzhi Song ◽  
Zhaopeng Zhu ◽  
Wenping Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Gas Evolution ◽  
Dissolved Gas ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Nonequilibrium Gas ◽  
Gas Kick ◽  
Wellbore Pressure ◽  
Outflow Rate ◽  
State Models

Summary The nonequilibrium dissolution and evolution characteristics of gas in oil-based drilling fluids (OBDFs) greatly affect the ratio of free gas to dissolved gas in the wellbore, thus influencing the prediction accuracy of the wellbore-pressure and surface responses. Previous equilibrium-state models can result in the incorrect estimation of the multiphase-flow parameters during a gas kick in OBDFs. Therefore, a nonequilibrium gas/liquid two-phase-flow model is developed for simulations of gas kicks in OBDFs. Nonequilibrium gas-kick behaviors in OBDFs are investigated using the proposed model, and it is concluded that there is a unique gas-dissolving stage in comparison to the equilibrium gas-kick conditions. In this stage, the pit gain decreases to a large extent, and this phenomenon can be misinterpreted by the drilling crew as a loss of circulation or a decrease in the gas-kick intensity. The drilling-fluid-outflow rate is not a reliable gas-kick indicator because of the lower increment in the drilling-fluid-outflow rate under both nonequilibrium and equilibrium gas-dissolution conditions. Neglecting the gas-evolution rate in OBDFs could lead to overestimations of the maximum pit gain and the drilling-fluid-outflow rate. More gas moves from the wellbore in the form of dissolved gas under noninstantaneous gas-evolution conditions. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the safe and efficient treatment of gas kicks in OBDFs.

Dynamic Differential Pressure Effects on Drilling of Permeable Formations

1998 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Hoberock ◽  
G. J. Bratcher
Keyword(s):  
Rock Strength ◽  
Penetration Rate ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Differential Pressure ◽  
Pressure Effects ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Bottom Hole ◽  
Wellbore Pressure ◽  
Dynamic Quantity

In the mathematical modeling of bit penetration rate for tri-cone roller bits in permeable formations, virtually all of the current techniques assume that the differential pressure between the bottom-hole wellbore pressure and the formation is a “static” value. This work shows that the appropriate differential pressure is a dynamic quantity, because for overbalanced drilling, fluid filtrate from the wellbore requires a finite time to flow into the formation, producing a changing pressure gradient ahead of the bit. Moreover, this dynamic gradient is directly dependent upon the rate of drill bit penetration, which is in turn dependent upon the dynamic gradient itself. Accordingly, coupled penetration rate and dynamic gradient equations must be solved, which frequently result in the prediction of higher drilling penetration rates than when the static gradient is used. The appropriate dynamic differential pressure equations are developed and applied to an example drilling situation. It is shown that with water-based drilling fluids, for rock with permeability greater than a few microdarcies at virtually all penetration rates, and for penetration rates less than 3 m/h (9.84 ft/h) at permeabilities greater than 1 μd (microdarcy), the dynamic differential pressure is significantly less than the static differential pressure. Accordingly, using the conventional static differential pressure results in the prediction of penetration rates that are much too low. Moreover, using measured penetration rates from the field, the conventional approach yields predicted in-situ rock strength that is much too high.

MODELING OF THE DYNAMIC PROCESS RELEASE OF STUCK DRILLING TOOLS BY HYDRO-PULSE METHOD

2019 ◽  
pp. 94-103
Author(s):  
K. H. Levchyk ◽  
M. V. Shcherbyna
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Dynamic Process ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Pulse Method ◽  
Geometrical Parameters ◽  
Technical Solution ◽  
Rock Layer ◽  
Drilling Tool ◽  
Drilling Tools ◽  
Drill Pipes

A technical solution is proposed for the elimination the grabbing of drilling tool, based on the use of energy due to the circulation of the drilling fluid. The expediency eliminating the grabbing drilling tool using the hydro-impulse method is substantiated. A method of drawing up a mathematical model for the dynamic process of a grabbing string of drill pipes in the case of perturbation of hydro-impulse oscillations in the area of the productive rock layer is developed. The law of longitudinal displacements arising in the trapped string is obtained, which allows choosing the optimal geometrical parameters of the passage channels and the frequency rotational of shutter for these channels. Recommendations for using this method for practical use have been systematized.

scholarly journals Application of Thermal Resistant Gemini Surfactants in Highly Thixotropic Water-in-oil Drilling Fluid System

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1435-1441
Author(s):  
Yonggui Liu ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Jing Yan ◽  
Tao Song ◽  
Yongjun Xu
Keyword(s):  
Gemini Surfactants ◽  
Drilling Fluid ◽  
Drilling Fluids ◽  
Excellent Thermal Stability ◽  
Oil Drilling ◽  
Low Viscosity ◽  
Emulsion Drops ◽  
Oil Emulsions ◽  
Building Capability ◽  
Liquid Precipitation

AbstractTraditional water-in-oil drilling fluids are limited by their shear thinning behavior. In this article, we propose the synthesis of a thermal resistant quaternary ammonium salt gemini surfactant DQGE-I. This surfactant was synthesized using monomers such as N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine, organic acids and epichlorohydrin, as well as blocking groups such as N-vinylpyrrolidone (NVP). The prepared surfactant exhibited various advantages over traditional surfactants, including excellent thermal stability, good emulsifying and wetting capability. The use of these surfactants was shown to improve the compactness of emulsifier molecules at the oil/water interface, as well as the overall emulsificaiton effect. Laboratory studies revealed that water-in-oil emulsions prepared using DQGE-I showed high emulsion breaking voltage, low liquid precipitation and small and uniformly distributed emulsion drops. Highly thixotropic water-in-oil drilling fluids based on DQGE-I showed low viscosity, high shear rate and thermal tolerance up to 260oC. Additionally, the proposed fluid was applied in 16 wells (including WS1-H2, GS3 and XS1-H8) in the Daqing Oilfield. Testing showed that DQGE-1 exhibited excellent rheological behavior and wall-building capability. The emulsion breaking voltage exceeded 1500 V, and the yield point/ plastic viscosity ratio exceeded 0.4. The use of this surfactant can help to solve problems such as high formation temperature and poor well wall stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document