Proposal of a RANS Model to Predict Both K- and D-Type Roughness

Author(s):  
Makoto Yamamoto

The effect of surface roughness on the aerodynamic performance of a blade and an airfoil is one of very important issues in aeronautic and mechanical engineering. Since existing turbulence models were developed for uniformly distributed roughness, the availability would be limited under a certain flow and roughness conditions. Considering a blade surface with ice accretion, foreign object damage and erosion, the roughness is not uniformly distributed, but isolated or local. Therefore, in such a multi-physics simulation, it is needed to develop a more universal turbulence model to predict the flow fields around a blade with various types of surface roughness. In the present study, employing the virtual force that represents the effect of each roughness element on the mean flow field, I develop and verify a new k–ε turbulence model that can be successfully applied to both k- and d-type roughness.

2003 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonu S. Varghese ◽  
Steven H. Frankel

Pulsatile turbulent flow in stenotic vessels has been numerically modeled using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equation approach. The commercially available computational fluid dynamics code (CFD), FLUENT, has been used for these studies. Two different experiments were modeled involving pulsatile flow through axisymmetric stenoses. Four different turbulence models were employed to study their influence on the results. It was found that the low Reynolds number k-ω turbulence model was in much better agreement with previous experimental measurements than both the low and high Reynolds number versions of the RNG (renormalization-group theory) k-ε turbulence model and the standard k-ε model, with regard to predicting the mean flow distal to the stenosis including aspects of the vortex shedding process and the turbulent flow field. All models predicted a wall shear stress peak at the throat of the stenosis with minimum values observed distal to the stenosis where flow separation occurred.


Water SA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3 July) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M Helmi

Floodways, where a road embankment is permitted to be overtopped by flood water, are usually designed as broad-crested weirs. Determination of the water level above the floodway is crucial and related to road safety. Hydraulic performance of floodways can be assessed numerically using 1-D modelling or 3-D simulation using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) packages. Turbulence modelling is one of the key elements in CFD simulations. A wide variety of turbulence models are utilized in CFD packages; in order to identify the most relevant turbulence model for the case in question, 96 3-D CFD simulations were conducted using Flow-3D package, for 24 broad-crested weir configurations selected based on experimental data from a previous study. Four turbulence models (one-equation, k-ε, RNG k-ε, and k-ω) ere examined for each configuration. The volume of fluid (VOF) algorithm was adopted for free water surface determination. In addition, 24 1-D simulations using HEC-RAS-1-D were conducted for comparison with CFD results and experimental data. Validation of the simulated water free surface profiles versus the experimental measurements was carried out by the evaluation of the mean absolute error, the mean relative error percentage, and the root mean square error. It was concluded that the minimum error in simulating the full upstream to downstream free surface profile is achieved by using one-equation turbulence model with mixing length equal to 7% of the smallest domain dimension. Nevertheless, for the broad-crested weir upstream section, no significant difference in accuracy was found between all turbulence models and the one-dimensional analysis results, due to the low turbulence intensity at this part. For engineering design purposes, in which the water level is the main concern at the location of the flood way, the one-dimensional analysis has sufficient accuracy to determine the water level.


Author(s):  
C. J. Lea ◽  
A. P. Watkins

A study is made here of the application of a differential stress model (DSM) of turbulence to flows in two model reciprocating engines. For the first time this study includes compressive effects. An assessment between DSM and k-ɛ results is made comparing with laser Doppler anemometry experimental data of the mean flow and turbulence intensity levels during intake and compression strokes. A well-established two-dimensional finite-volume computer code is employed. Two discretization schemes are used, namely the HYBRID scheme and the QUICK scheme. The latter is found to be essential if differentiation is to be made between the turbulence models. During the intake stroke the DSM results are, in general, similar to the k-ɛ results in comparison to the experimental data, except for the turbulence levels, which the DSM seriously underpredicts. This is in contrast to a parallel set of calculations of steady in-flow, which showed significant gains from using the DSM, particularly at the turbulence field level. The increased number of grid lines employed in those calculations contribute to this apparent difference between steady and unsteady flows, but cycle- to-cycle variations are more likely to be the primary cause, resulting in too high levels of turbulence intensity being measured. However, during the compression stroke the DSM returns vastly superior results to the k-ɛ model at both the mean flow and turbulence intensity levels. This is because the DSM generates an anisotropic shear stress field during the early stages of compression that suppresses the main vortical structure, in line with the experimental data.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 3290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireille B. Tadie Fogaing ◽  
Arman Hemmati ◽  
Carlos F. Lange ◽  
Brian A. Fleck

The performance of five conventional turbulence models, commonly used in the wind industry, are examined in predicting the complex wake of an infinite span thin normal flat plate with large pressure gradients at Reynolds number of 1200. This body represents a large array of Photovoltaics modules, where two edges of the plate dominate the flow. This study provided a benchmark for capabilities of conventional turbulence models that are commonly used for wind forecasting in the wind energy industry. The results obtained from Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) k - ε , Reynolds Normalization Group (RNG) k - ε , RANS k - ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) and Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) were compared with existing Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS). The mean flow features and unsteady wake characteristics were used as testing criteria amongst these models. All turbulence models over-predicted the mean recirculation length and under-predicted the mean drag coefficient. The major differences between numerical results in predicting the mean recirculation length, mean drag and velocity gradients, leading to deficits in turbulence kinetic energy production and diffusion, hint at major difficulties in modeling velocity gradients and thus turbulence energy transport terms, by traditional turbulence models. Unsteadiness of flow physics and nature of eddy viscosity approximations are potential reasons. This hints at the deficiencies of these models to predict complex flows with large pressure gradients, which are commonly observed in wind and solar farms. The under-prediction of wind loads on PV modules and over-estimation of the recirculation length behind them significantly affects the efficiency and operational feasibility of solar energy systems.


Author(s):  
Mahmoud Charmiyan ◽  
Ahmed-Reza Azimian ◽  
Ebrahim Shirani ◽  
Fethi Aloui

In this paper, impingement of a turbulent rectangular flow to a fixed wall is investigated. The jet flows from bottom-to-top and the output jet Reynolds is 16000. The nozzle-to-plate distance is equal to 10 (H/e = 10). Five turbulence models, including k-ε, RNG k-ε, k-ω SST, RSM and v2f model have been used for two-dimensional numerical simulation of the turbulent flow. Because of the complexities of the impingement flow, such as curved streamlines, flow separation, normal strains and sudden deceleration in different areas, different turbulence models are proposed to simulate different regions of the flow. To investigate the capability of these turbulence models in simulating different regions of the impinging jet, the mean flow velocity field and turbulent kinetic energy are extracted and compared with the experimental data of a two-dimensional particle image velocimetry (PIV). The calculated error of these five turbulence models was presented for the various flow regions, while it have not been clearly investigated earlier. Results indicate the highest conformity of the v2f model with the experimental data at the jet centerline. However, this model does not predict well the flow at the shear layer and wall-jet areas. RSM Gibson and Lander model has the highest conformity with the experimental data in these regions.


1980 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 673-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Güven ◽  
C. Farell ◽  
V. C. Patel

Measurements of mean-pressure distributions and boundary-layer development on rough-walled circular cylinders in a uniform stream are described. Five sizes of distributed sandpaper roughness have been tested over the Reynolds-number range 7 × 104to 5·5 × 105. The results are examined together with those of previous investigators, and the observed roughness effects are discussed in the light of boundary-layer theory. It is found that there is a significant influence of surface roughness on the mean-pressure distribution even at very large Reynolds numbers. This observation is supported by an extension of the Stratford–Townsend theory of turbulent boundary-layer separation to the case of circular cylinders with distributed roughness. The pressure rise to separation is shown to be closely related, as expected, to the characteristics of the boundary layer, smaller pressure rises being associated with thicker boundary layers with greater momentum deficits. Larger roughness gives rise to a thicker and more retarded boundary layer which separates earlier and with a smaller pressure recovery.


2007 ◽  
Vol 336-338 ◽  
pp. 1603-1605
Author(s):  
Ji Hua Chen ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Zhi Hao Jin ◽  
Ji Qiang Gao ◽  
San Jun Zhao

This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of surface roughness on anchoring strength between ceramic and coating glass. Commercial Vita alpha glass-ceramic was selected as the coating glass, while the zirconia/alumina (Z/A) composite as the substrate. Anchoring strength between substrate and coating-glass was tested, and microstructure of the junction was also observed. From the experiments we can find the following results. There was significant difference in the mean strength of different surface roughness groups and HF acid-etching also had a favorable effect on matching properties. The highest amount of anchoring strength was occurred at the high scope of roughness after HF acid-etching and surface roughness will also affect the microstructure of the junction. Therefore, we can draw the conclusions that with the limit of this research, roughness will influence matching properties between ceramic substrate and coating-glass, while hydrofluoric acid etching was also suggested in the matching procedure. Testing matching properties between ceramic substrate and coating-glass should consider the influence of surface roughness.


Author(s):  
Micheál S O’Regan ◽  
Philip C Griffin ◽  
Trevor M Young

The near-field (up to three chord lengths) development of a wing-tip vortex is investigated both numerically and experimentally. The research was conducted in a medium speed wind tunnel on a NACA 0012 square tip half-wing at a Reynolds number of 3.2 × 105. A full Reynolds stress turbulence model with a hybrid unstructured grid was used to compute the wing-tip vortex in the near field while an x-wire anemometer and five-hole probe recorded the experimental results. The mean flow of the computed vortex was in good agreement with experiment as the circulation parameter was within 6% of the experimental value at x/ c = 0 for α = 10° and the crossflow velocity magnitude was within 1% of the experimental value at x/ c = 1 for α = 5°. The trajectory of the computed vortex was also in good agreement as it had moved inboard by the same amount (10% chord) as the experimental vortex at the last measurement location. The axial velocity excess is under predicted for α = 10°, whereas the velocity deficit is in relatively good agreement for α = 5°. The computed Reynolds shear stress component 〈 u′v′〉 is in good agreement with experiment at x/ c = 0 for α = 5°, but is greatly under predicted further downstream and at all locations for α = 10°. It is thought that a lack of local grid refinement in the vortex core and deficiencies in the Reynolds stress turbulence model may have led to errors in the mean flow and turbulence results respectively.


Author(s):  
K. M. Britchford ◽  
J. F. Carrotte ◽  
S. J. Stevens ◽  
J. J. McGuirk

This paper describes an investigation of the mean and fluctuating flow field within an annular S-shaped duct which is representative of that used to connect the compressor spools of aircraft gas turbine engines. Data was obtained from a fully annular test facility using a 3-component Laser Doppler Anemometry (LDA) system. The measurements indicate that development of the flow within the duct is complex and significantly influenced by the combined effects of streamwise pressure gradients and flow curvature. In addition CFD predictions of the flow, using both the k-ε and Reynolds stress transport equation turbulence models, are compared with the experimental data. Whereas curvature effects are not described properly by the k-ε model, such effects are captured more accurately by the Reynolds stress model leading to a better prediction of the Reynolds shear stress distribution. This, in turn, leads to a more accurate prediction of the mean velocity profiles, as reflected by the boundary layer shape parameters, particularly in the critical regions of the duct where flow separation is most likely to occur.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document