Robustness Assessment of a Prediffuser, Strut, and Frame
For most industrial applications, design and analysis is typically performed using only a nominal geometry at nominal operating conditions due to limitations in the design process, analysis capability, and computational resources. In the present study, full lifecycle management and assessment during the early stages of design was conducted through the completion of a robustness assessment, in addition to performance analysis, of a prediffuser flow path, strut, and frame in order to identify significant factors influencing performance and cost. Application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) was utilized to capture the critical-to-quality customer requirements in relation to the functional requirements of the component. Key sources of variation influencing the component were then identified and prioritized based on legacy component service and design experience using robust design (also know as design for process excellence, or design for six sigma) tools. Results from the application of the robust design tools indicate that manufacturing and usage variations are likely to have a larger impact on the aerodynamic performance than structural performance. Aerodynamic analysis of the prediffuser and strut was performed to quantify the sensitivity of the aerodynamic performance to manufacturing and usage variations. Full three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was performed using a series of latin hypercube design of experiments to statistically quantify the variation in the aerodynamic performance metrics of the prediffuser with a strut. It was determined that manufacturing and/or usage variations had a significant impact on the variation in aerodynamic performance. In addition, for some cases the variation in aerodynamic performance resulting from variations in noise factors was greater than those resulting from changes in the strut design parameters.