The Effect of Ad Libitum Consumption of a Milk-Based Liquid Meal Supplement vs. a Traditional Sports Drink on Fluid Balance After Exercise

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenton J. Baguley ◽  
Jessica Zilujko ◽  
Michael D. Leveritt ◽  
Ben Desbrow ◽  
Christopher Irwin
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Urine Output ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Fluid Loss ◽  
Liquid Meal ◽  
Sports Drink ◽  
Gastrointestinal Tolerance ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Exercise Induced

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of ad libitum intake of a milk-based liquid meal supplement against a carbohydrate-electrolyte sports drink following exercise induced fluid loss. Seven male participants (age 22.3 ± 3.4 years, height 179.3 ± 7.9 cm, body mass 74.3 ± 7.3 kg; mean ± SD) completed 4 separate trials and lost 1.89 ± 0.44% body mass through moderate intensity exercise in the laboratory. After exercise, participants consumed ad libitum over 2 h a milk-based liquid meal supplement (Sustagen Sport) on two of the trials (S1, S2) or a carbohydrate-electrolyte sports drink (Powerade) on two of the trials (P1, P2), with an additional 1 hr observational period. Measures of body mass, urine output, gastrointestinal tolerance and palatability were collected throughout the recovery period. Participants consumed significantly more Powerade than Sustagen Sport over the 2 h rehydration period (P1 = 2225 ± 888 ml, P2 = 2602 ± 1119 mL, S1 = 1375 ± 711 mL, S2 = 1447 ± 857 ml). Total urine output on both Sustagen trails was significantly lower than the second Powerade trial (P2 = 1447 ± 656 ml, S1 = 153 ± 62 ml, S2 = 182 ± 118 mL; p < .05) and trended toward being lower compared with the first Powerade trial (P1 = 1057 ± 699 ml vs. S1, p = .067 and vs. S2, p = .061). No significant differences in net fluid balance were observed between any of the drinks at the conclusion of each trial (P1 = −0.50 ±0. 46 kg, P2 = −0.40 ± 0.35 kg, S1 = −0.61 ± 0.74 kg, S2 = −0.45 ± 0.58 kg). Gastrointestinal tolerance and beverage palatability measures indicated Powerade to be preferred as a rehydration beverage. Ad libitum milk-based liquid meal supplement results in similar net fluid balance as a carbohydrate-electrolyte sports drink after exercise induced fluid loss.

scholarly journals Postexercise rehydration: potassium-rich drinks versus water and a sports drink

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1167-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Pérez-Idárraga ◽  
Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Relative Humidity ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Urine Output ◽  
Small Volume ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Fluid Retention ◽  
Physically Active ◽  
Sports Drink

Fluid retention, thirst quenching, tolerance, and palatability of different drinks were assessed. On 4 different days, 12 healthy, physically active volunteers (24.4 ± 3.2 years old, 74.75 ± 11.36 kg body mass (mean ± S.D)), were dehydrated to 2.10% ± 0.24% body mass by exercising in an environmental chamber (32.0 ± 0.4 °C dry bulb, 53.8 ± 5.2% relative humidity). Each day they drank 1 of 4 beverages in random order: fresh coconut water (FCW), bottled water (W), sports drink (SD), or potassium-rich drink (NEW); volume was 120% of weight loss. Urine was collected and perceptions self-reported for 3 h. Urine output was higher (p < 0.05) for W (894 ± 178 mL) than SD (605 ± 297 mL) and NEW (599 ± 254 mL). FCW (686 ± 250 mL) was not different from any other drink (p > 0.05). Fluid retention was higher for SD than W (68.2% ± 13.0% vs. 51.3% ± 12.6%, p = 0.013), but not for FCW and NEW (62.5% ± 15.4% and 65.9% ± 15.4%, p > 0.05). All beverages were palatable and well tolerated; none maintained a positive net fluid balance after 3 h, but deficit was greater in W versus SD (p = 0.001). FCW scored higher for sweetness (p = 0.03). Thirst increased immediately after exercise but returned to baseline after drinking a small volume (p < 0.0005). In conclusion, additional potassium in FCW and NEW did not result in additional rehydration benefits over those already found in a conventional sports drink with sodium.

scholarly journals The Utility of Thirst as a Measure of Hydration Status Following Exercise-Induced Dehydration

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2689 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Adams ◽  
Lesley W. Vandermark ◽  
Luke N. Belval ◽  
Douglas J. Casa
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Prolonged Exercise ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Fluid Replacement ◽  
Hydration Status ◽  
Post Exercise ◽  
Visual Analog Scales ◽  
Hot Environment ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Exercise Induced

The purpose of this study was to examine the perception of thirst as a marker of hydration status following prolonged exercise in the heat. Twelve men (mean ± SD; age, 23 ± 4 y; body mass, 81.4 ± 9.9 kg; height, 182 ± 9 cm; body fat, 14.3% ± 4.7%) completed two 180 min bouts of exercise on a motorized treadmill in a hot environment (35.2 ± 0.6 °C; RH, 30.0 ± 5.4%), followed by a 60 min recovery period. Participants completed a euhydrated (EUH) and hypohydrated (HYPO) trial. During recovery, participants were randomly assigned to either fluid replacement (EUHFL and HYPOFL; 10 min ad libitum consumption) or no fluid replacement (EUHNF and HYPONF). Thirst was measured using both a nine-point scale and separate visual analog scales. The percent of body mass loss (%BML) was significantly greater immediately post exercise in HYPO (HYPOFL, 3.0% ± 1.2%; HYPONF, 2.6% ± 0.6%) compared to EUH (EUHFL, 0.2% ± 0.7%; EUHNF, 0.6% ± 0.5%) trials (p < 0.001). Following recovery, there were no differences in %BML between HYPOFL and HYPONF (p > 0.05) or between EUHFL and EUHNF (p > 0.05). Beginning at minute 5 during the recovery period, thirst perception was significantly greater in HYPONF than EUHFL, EUHNF, and HYPOFL (p < 0.05). A 10 min, ad libitum consumption of fluid post exercise when hypohydrated (%BML > 2%), negated differences in perception of thirst between euhydrated and hypohydrated trials. These results represent a limitation in the utility of thirst in guiding hydration practices.

Volume repletion after exercise-induced volume depletion in humans: replacement of water and sodium losses

1998 ◽  
Vol 274 (5) ◽  
pp. F868-F875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Shirreffs ◽  
Ronald J. Maughan
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Intermittent Exercise ◽  
Sodium Intake ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Sodium Balance ◽  
Volume Depletion ◽  
Urine Production ◽  
Exercise Induced

Sodium and water loss during, and replacement after, exercise-induced volume depletion was investigated in six volunteers volume depleted by 1.89 ± 0.17% (SD) of body mass by intermittent exercise in a warm, humid environment. Subjects exercised in a large, open plastic bag, allowing collection of all sweat secreted during exercise. For over 60 min beginning 40 min after the end of exercise, subjects ingested drinks containing 0, 25, 50, or 100 mmol/l sodium ( trials 0, 25, 50, and 100) in a volume (ml) equivalent to 150% of the mass lost (g) by volume depletion. Body mass loss and sweat electrolyte (Na+, K+, and Cl−) loss were the same on each trial. The measured sweat sodium concentration was 49.2 ± 18.5 mmol/l, and the total loss (63.9 ± 38.7 mmol) was greater than that ingested on trials 0 and 25. Urine production over the 6-h recovery period was inversely related to the amount of sodium ingested. Subjects were in whole body negative sodium balance on trials 0 (−104 ± 48 mmol) and 25 (−65 ± 30 mmol) and essentially in balance on trial 50(−13 ± 29 mmol) but were in positive sodium balance on trial 100 (75 ± 40 mmol). Only on trial 100 were subjects in positive fluid balance at the end of the study. There was a large urinary loss of potassium over the recovery period on trial 100, despite a negligible intake during volume repletion. These results confirm the importance of replacement of sodium as well as water for volume repletion after sweat loss. The sodium intake on trial 100 was appropriate for acute fluid balance restoration, but its consequences for potassium levels must be considered to be undesirable in terms of whole body electrolyte homeostasis for anything other than the short term.

scholarly journals The influence of angiotensin converting enzyme and bradykinin receptor B2 gene variants on voluntary fluid intake and fluid balance in healthy men during moderate-intensity exercise in the heat

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adora M.W. Yau ◽  
Andrew D. Moss ◽  
Lewis John James ◽  
William Gilmore ◽  
Jason J. Ashworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Fluid Intake ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Moderate Intensity Exercise ◽  
Healthy Men ◽  
Bradykinin Receptor

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and bradykinin receptor B2 (B2R) genetic variation may affect thirst because of effects on angiotensin II production and bradykinin activity, respectively. To examine this, 45 healthy Caucasian men completed 60 min of cycle exercise at 62% ± 5% peak oxygen uptake in a room heated to 30.5 ± 0.3 °C with ad libitum fluid intake. Blood samples were collected pre-, mid-, and immediately post-cycle. Fluid intake, body mass loss (BML), sweat loss (determined via changes in body mass and fluid intake), and thirst sensation were recorded. All participants were genotyped for the ACE insert fragment (I) and the B2R insert sequence (P). Participants were homozygous for the wild-type allele (WW or MM), heterozygous (WI or MP) or homozygous for the insert (II or PP). No differences between genotype groups were found in mean (±SD) voluntary fluid intake (WW: 613 ± 388, WI: 753 ± 385, II: 862 ± 421 mL, p = 0.31; MM: 599 ± 322, MP: 745 ± 374, PP: 870 ± 459 mL, p = 0.20), percentage BML or any other fluid balance variables for both the ACE and B2R genes, respectively. Mean thirst perception in the B2R PP group, however, was higher (p < 0.05) than both MM and MP at 30, 45, and 60 min. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that voluntary fluid intake and fluid balance in healthy men performing 60 min of moderate-intensity exercise in the heat are not predominantly influenced by ACE or B2R genetic variation.

scholarly journals Fluid, energy, and nutrient recovery via ad libitum intake of different commercial beverages and food in female athletes

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle McCartney ◽  
Christopher Irwin ◽  
Gregory R. Cox ◽  
Ben Desbrow
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Uptake ◽  
Maximal Oxygen Uptake ◽  
Urine Output ◽  
Female Athletes ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Nutrient Recovery ◽  
Total Water ◽  
Sports Drink ◽  
Food And Beverage ◽  
Ad Libitum

This study investigated the effect of consuming different commercial beverages with food ad libitum after exercise on fluid, energy, and nutrient recovery in trained females. On 4 separate occasions, 8 females (body mass (BM): 61.8 ± 10.7 kg; maximal oxygen uptake: 46.3 ± 7.5 mL·kg−1·min−1) lost 2.0% ± 0.3% BM cycling at ∼75% maximal oxygen uptake before completing a 4-h recovery period with ad libitum access to 1 of 4 beverages: Water, Powerade (Sports Drink), Up & Go Reduced Sugar (Lower Sugar (LS)-MILK) or Up & Go Energize (Higher Protein (HP)-MILK). Participants also had two 15-min opportunities to access food within the first 2 h of the recovery period. Beverage intake, total water/nutrient intake, and indicators of fluid recovery (BM, urine output, plasma osmolality), gastrointestinal tolerance and palatability were assessed periodically. While total water intake (from food and beverage) (Water: 1918 ± 580 g; Sports Drink: 1809 ± 338 g; LS-MILK: 1458 ± 431 g; HP-MILK: 1523 ± 472 g; p = 0.010) and total urine output (Water: 566 ± 314 g; Sports Drink: 459 ± 290 g; LS-MILK: 220 ± 53 g; HP-MILK: 230 ± 117 g; p = 0.009) differed significantly by beverage, the quantity of ingested water retained was similar across treatments (Water: 1352 ± 462 g; Sports Drink: 1349 ± 407 g; LS-MILK: 1238 ± 400 g; HP-MILK: 1293 ± 453 g; p = 0.691). Total energy intake (from food and beverage) increased in proportion to the energy density of the beverage (Water: 4129 ± 1080 kJ; Sports Drink: 5167 ± 643 kJ; LS-MILK: 6019 ± 1925 kJ; HP-MILK: 7096 ± 2058 kJ; p = 0.014). When consumed voluntarily and with food, different beverages promote similar levels of fluid recovery, but alter energy/nutrient intakes. Providing access to food and understanding the longer-term dietary goals of female athletes are important considerations when recommending a recovery beverage.

scholarly journals Comparing the rehydration potential of different milk-based drinks to a carbohydrate–electrolyte beverage

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1366-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Desbrow ◽  
Sarah Jansen ◽  
Abby Barrett ◽  
Michael D. Leveritt ◽  
Christopher Irwin
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Cow’S Milk ◽  
Soy Milk ◽  
Additional Energy ◽  
Liquid Meal ◽  
Cow's Milk ◽  
Sports Drinks ◽  
Traditional Sports ◽  
Blood And Urine Samples ◽  
Exercise Induced

The aim of this study was to compare the rehydration potential of a carbohydrate–electrolyte beverage with several varieties of milk following exercise-induced fluid losses. Fifteen male participants (age 24.9 ± 5.5 years, height 179.3 ± 4.9 cm, body mass 75.8 ± 6.6 kg (mean ± SD)) lost 2.0% ± 0.2% body mass through intermittent cycling before consuming a different beverage on 4 separate occasions. Drinks included cow’s milk (286 kJ·100 mL−1), soy milk (273 kJ·100 mL−1), a milk-based liquid meal supplement (Sustagen Sport (Nestle); 417 kJ·100 mL−1), and a sports drink (Powerade (Coca Cola Ltd); 129 kJ·100 mL−1). Beverages were consumed over 1 h in volumes equivalent to 150% of body mass loss. Body mass, blood and urine samples, and measures of gastrointestinal tolerance were obtained before and hourly for 4 h after beverage consumption. Net body mass at the conclusion of each trial was significantly less with Powerade (–1.37 ± 0.3 kg) than with cow’s milk (–0.92 ± 0.48 kg), soy milk (–0.78 ± 0.37 kg), and Sustagen Sport (–0.48 ± 0.39 kg). Net body mass was also significantly greater for Sustagen Sport compared with cow’s milk trials, but not soy milk. Upon completion of trials, the percentage of beverage retained was Sustagen Sport 65.1% ± 14.7%, soy milk 46.9% ± 19.9%, cow’s milk 40.0% ± 24.9%, and Powerade 16.6% ± 16.5%. Changes in plasma volume and electrolytes were unaffected by drink treatment. Subjective ratings of bloating and fullness were higher during all milk trials compared with Powerade whereas ratings of overall thirst were not different between beverages. Milk-based drinks are more effective rehydration options compared with traditional sports drinks. The additional energy, protein, and sodium in a milk-based liquid meal supplement facilitate superior fluid recovery following exercise.

scholarly journals The effect of an incremental increase in exercise on appetite, eating behaviour and energy balance in lean men and women feedingad libitum

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1109-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Whybrow ◽  
Darren A. Hughes ◽  
Patrick Ritz ◽  
Alexandra M. Johnstone ◽  
Graham W. Horgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eating Behaviour ◽  
Energy Deficit ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Constant Composition ◽  
Moderate Intensity Exercise ◽  
Doubly Labelled Water ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Exercise Induced ◽  
Incremental Increase

The effects of incremental exercise on appetite, energy intake (EI), expenditure (EE) and balance (EB) in lean men and women were examined. Six men (age 29·7 (sd5·9) years, weight 75·2 (sd15·3) kg, height 1·75 (sd0·11) m) and six women (age 24·7 (sd5·9) years, weight 66·7 (sd9·10) kg, height 1·70 (sd0·09) m) were each studied three times during a 16 d protocol, corresponding to no additional exercise (Nex), moderate-intensity exercise (Mex; 1·5–2·0 MJ/d) and high-intensity exercise (Hex; 3·0–4·0 MJ/d) regimens. Subjects were fed to EB during days 1–2, and during days 3–16 they fedad libitumfrom a medium-fat diet of constant composition. Daily EE, assessed using the doubly labelled water method, was 9·2, 11·6 and 13·7 MJ/d (P < 0·001;sed0·45) for the women and 12·2, 14·0 and 16·7 MJ/d (P = 0·007;sed1·11) for the men on the Nex, Mex and Hex treatments, respectively. EI was 8·3, 8·6 and 9·9 MJ/d (P = 0·118;sed0·72) for the women and 10·6, 11·6 and 12·0 MJ/d (P = 0·031;sed0·47) for the men, respectively. On average, subjects compensated for about 30 % of the exercise-induced energy deficit. However, the degree of compensation varied considerably among individuals. The present study captured the initial compensation in EI for exercise-induced energy deficits. Total compensation would take a matter of weeks.

scholarly journals The Beverage Hydration Index: Influence of Electrolytes, Carbohydrate and Protein

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2933
Author(s):  
Mindy Millard-Stafford ◽  
Teresa K. Snow ◽  
Michael L. Jones ◽  
HyunGyu Suh
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Urine Osmolality ◽  
Fluid Retention ◽  
Deionized Water ◽  
Additive Effects ◽  
Hydration Properties ◽  
Sports Drink ◽  
Sports Drinks

The beverage hydration index (BHI) facilitates a comparison of relative hydration properties of beverages using water as the standard. The additive effects of electrolytes, carbohydrate, and protein on rehydration were assessed using BHI. Nineteen healthy young adults completed four test sessions in randomized order: deionized water (W), electrolytes only (E), carbohydrate-electrolytes (C + E), and 2 g/L dipeptide (alanyl-glutamine)-electrolytes (AG + E). One liter of beverage was consumed, after which urine and body mass were obtained every 60 min through 240 min. Compared to W, BHI was higher (p = 0.007) for C + E (1.15 ± 0.17) after 120 min and for AG + E (p = 0.021) at 240 min (1.15 ± 0.20). BHI did not differ (p > 0.05) among E, C + E, or AG + E; however, E contributed the greatest absolute net effect (>12%) on BHI relative to W. Net fluid balance was lower for W (p = 0.048) compared to C + E and AG + E after 120 min. AG + E and E elicited higher (p < 0.001) overall urine osmolality vs. W. W also elicited greater reports of stomach bloating (p = 0.02) compared to AG + E and C + E. The addition of electrolytes alone (in the range of sports drinks) did not consistently improve BHI versus water; however, the combination with carbohydrate or dipeptides increased fluid retention, although this occurred earlier for the sports drink than the dipeptide beverage. Electrolyte content appears to make the largest contribution in hydration properties of beverages for young adults when consumed at rest.

The Effect Of Ad Libitum Intake Of Different Commercial Beverages And Snack Foods Following Exercise-induced Fluid Loss.

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Nadia Campagnolo ◽  
Elizaveta Iudakhina ◽  
Chris Irwin ◽  
Matthew Schubert ◽  
Greg Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Loss ◽  
Snack Foods ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Exercise Induced ◽  
Ad Libitum Intake

scholarly journals OR-055 Effect of whey protein on rehydration after exercise

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lantian Zhang ◽  
Chenge Dang ◽  
Chunyan Xu
Keyword(s):  
Specific Gravity ◽  
Whey Protein ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Intermittent Exercise ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Urine Osmolality ◽  
The Body ◽  
Urine Specific Gravity ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Exercise Induced

Objective The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of a rehydration solution containing whey protein on fluid balance after exercise-induced dehydration.The ACSM Sports Guide recommends that healthy adults exercise moderate-intensity aerobic exercise for 30 minutes a day.This type of exercise can dehydrate the body by about 1%.Dehydration 1% affects exercise capacity and performance.The purpose of this study was to exercise-induced dehydration of sports drinks containing whey protein. Methods Twelve college students ( 20 ± 2 years, 169.9 ± 8.1 cm, 63.3 ± 13 kg) participated. Participants reduced body mass by (0.67±0.33) after intermittent exercise and re-hydrated with a volume of drink in liter equivalent to 1.5 times their body mass loss in kilograms of a solution of 4 kinds of drinks：Distilled water(trial C), carbohydrate-electrolyte(trail D), carbohydrate-electrolyte-low whey protein(trial LWP) and carbohydrate-electrolyte-high whey protein(trail HWP). Solutions were matched for carbohydrate and electrolyte content in trail D、LWP and HWP. Trials were administered in a random, counterbalanced, crossover design, with subjects blinded as to which drink they consumed during each trial.  Each participant completed 4 experimental trials, which were separated by at least one week. Urine samples were collected before and after exercise (immediately, 40、80、120、160minutes later). Urine volume, drink retention, urine osmolality and urine specific gravity were tested. Drink retention was calculated as difference between the volume of drink ingested and urine produced. Results 1.Total cumulative urine output after exercise was not different between each of the four groups(C:1002 ±102mL;D:;LWP: ;HWP:，p>0.5 )； 2. During the study, drink retention of trail LWP is the highest(80.3±11.2%), but there was not different between each of the four groups(C: 70.5±20.6%;D:70.7±17.9% ;HWP: 75.0±12.4%， p>0.5). 3. At the 40th minute after exercise, the urine specific gravity of the D was significantly lower than that of the LWP(1.020±0.006 vs 1.028±0.003, p=0.020), and the urine specific gravity of the LWP at 120 minutes after exercise significantly higher than the D (1.018 ± 0.003 vs 1.021 ± 0.007, p = 0.006). Conclusions When the amount of dehydration after exercise is 1%-2%, each kind of the drinks in the study is useful for rehydration， and the addition of whey protein does not increase rehydration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document