PA24 A grounded theory analysis to explore the impact of group work as a method of service delivery by community matrons to support those living with multiple long-term conditions

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A26.3-A27
Author(s):  
Abigail Barkham
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Group Work ◽  
Theory Analysis ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Impact of the UK COVID-19 pandemic on HbA1c testing and its implications for diabetes diagnosis and management

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Holland ◽  
Adrian Heald ◽  
Mike Stedman ◽  
Lewis Green ◽  
Jonathan Scargill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diabetes Diagnosis ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Our findings illustrate the widespread collateral impact of implementing measures to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 in people with, or being investigated for diabetes mellitus (DM). Ironically, failure to focus of the wider implications for people with DM and other groups with long-term conditions, may place them at increased risk of poor outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection itself, irrespective of the implications for their longer-term health prospects.

scholarly journals How does the use of digital consulting change the meaning of being a patient and/or a health professional? Lessons from the Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication study

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205520762094235
Author(s):  
Jackie Sturt ◽  
Caroline Huxley ◽  
Btihaj Ajana ◽  
Caitjan Gainty ◽  
Chris Gibbons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Medical Ethics ◽  
Health Professional ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Access To Healthcare ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Interview Data ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
The Impact

Background While studies have examined the impact of digital communication technology on healthcare, there is little exploration of how new models of digital care change the roles and identities of the health professional and patient. The purpose of the current study is to generate multidisciplinary reflections and questions around the use of digital consulting and the way it changes the meaning of being a patient and/or a health professional. Method We used a large pre-existing qualitative dataset from the Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication (LYNC) study which involved interviews with healthcare professionals and a group of 16–24 years patients with long-term physical and mental health conditions. We conducted a three-stage mixed methods analysis. First, using a small sample of interview data from the LYNC study, we identified three key themes to explore in the data and relevant academic literature. Second, in small groups we conducted secondary analysis of samples of patient and health professional LYNC interview data. Third, we ran a series of rapid evidence reviews. Findings We identified three key themes: workload/flow, impact of increased access to healthcare and vulnerabilities. Both health professionals and patients were 'on duty' in their role more often. Increased access to healthcare introduced more responsibilities to both patients and health professionals. Traditional concepts in medical ethics, confidentiality, empathy, empowerment/power, efficiency and mutual responsibilities are reframed in the context of digital consulting. Conclusions Our collaboration identified conflicts and constraints in the construction of digital patients and digital clinicians. There is evidence that digital technologies change the nature of a medical consultation and with it the identities and the roles of clinicians and patients which, in turn, calls for a redefinition of traditional concepts of medical ethics. Overall, digital consulting has the potential to significantly reduce costs while maintaining or improving patient care and clinical outcomes. Timely study of digital engagement in the National Health Service is a matter of critical importance.

MO488HOSPITALISATION EVENTS IN PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE AND MULTIPLE LONG-TERM CONDITIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sullivan ◽  
Bhautesh Jani ◽  
Alex McConnachie ◽  
Frances Mair ◽  
Patrick Mark
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Event Rates ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and Aims: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) typically co-exists with multiple long-term conditions (LTCs). The impact of CKD combined with multiple LTCs on hospitalisation rates is not known. We hypothesised that hospitalisation rates would be high in people with multiple LTCs, particularly in those with CKD. We also hypothesised that the association between multiple LTCs and hospitalisation would be greatest in subgroups and with certain patterns of LTCs. Method: Two cohorts were studied in parallel: UK Biobank (2006-2019) and Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (SAIL: 2011-2018, Wales, UK). UK Biobank is a prospective research cohort. SAIL is a routine care database. Participants were included if their kidney function was measured at baseline. LTCs were obtained from self-report (UK Biobank) and primary care read codes (SAIL). Participants were categorised into zero, one, two, three and four or more LTCs with and without CKD. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (single blood test for UK Biobank, two blood tests three months apart for SAIL). Hospitalisation events were obtained from linked hospital records. Results: Among 469,344 of 502,503 UK Biobank participants, those without CKD had a median age of 58 and a median of 1 LTC. Those with CKD had a median age of 64 and a median of 2 LTCs. Among 1,620,490 of 2,768,862 SAIL participants, those without CKD had a median age of 50 and a median of 1 LTC. Those with CKD had a median age of 79 and a median of 4 LTCs. Participants with four or more LTCs had high event rates (Rate Ratios (RRs) 5.35 (95% CI 5.20-5.51)/3.77 (95% CI 3.71-3.82)) with higher rates in CKD (RRs 8.99 (95% CI 8.47-9.54)/9.92 (95% CI 9.75-10.09)). Amongst those with CKD, the association between each increase in LTC count and hospitalisation was greatest in those under the age of 50 (RRs 1.93 (95% CI 1.73-2.16)/1.35(95% CI 1.29-1.41)). Event rates were highest in those with eGFR<30ml/min/1.73m2, but the impact of multiple LTCs was weaker in these participants compared to those with higher eGFRs. Event rates were high in certain patterns of LTCs: cardiometabolic LTCs (RRs 4.45 (95% CI 4.02-4.92)/2.81 (95% CI 2.71-2.91)), complex patterns (RRs 3.60 (95% CI 3.26-3.96)/2.91 (95% CI 2.81-3.01)) and physical/mental LTCs (RRs 3.30 (95% CI 2.86-3.80)/3.18 (95% CI 3.06-3.30)). Conclusion: People with multiple LTCs have high rates of hospitalisation and the rates are augmented in those with CKD. The impact of multiple LTCs is greatest in younger patients and in those with certain patterns of LTCs. Strategies should be developed to prevent hospitalisations in these high-risk groups. Hospitalisation Events by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) status and number of Long-term conditions (LTCs) in UK Biobank Hospitalisation Events by Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) status and number of Long-term conditions (LTCs) in SAIL

scholarly journals Excess mortality in the first COVID pandemic peak: cross-sectional analyses of the impact of age, sex, ethnicity, household size, and long-term conditions in people of known SARS-CoV-2 status in England

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (701) ◽  
pp. e890-e898
Author(s):  
Mark Joy ◽  
FD Richard Hobbs ◽  
Jamie Lopez Bernal ◽  
Julian Sherlock ◽  
Gayatri Amirthalingam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Excess Mortality ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sentinel Network ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has passed its first peak in Europe.AimTo describe the mortality in England and its association with SARS-CoV-2 status and other demographic and risk factors.Design and settingCross-sectional analyses of people with known SARS-CoV-2 status in the Oxford RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) sentinel network.MethodPseudonymised, coded clinical data were uploaded from volunteer general practice members of this nationally representative network (n = 4 413 734). All-cause mortality was compared with national rates for 2019, using a relative survival model, reporting relative hazard ratios (RHR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A multivariable adjusted odds ratios (OR) analysis was conducted for those with known SARS-CoV-2 status (n = 56 628, 1.3%) including multiple imputation and inverse probability analysis, and a complete cases sensitivity analysis.ResultsMortality peaked in week 16. People living in households of ≥9 had a fivefold increase in relative mortality (RHR = 5.1, 95% CI = 4.87 to 5.31, P<0.0001). The ORs of mortality were 8.9 (95% CI = 6.7 to 11.8, P<0.0001) and 9.7 (95% CI = 7.1 to 13.2, P<0.0001) for virologically and clinically diagnosed cases respectively, using people with negative tests as reference. The adjusted mortality for the virologically confirmed group was 18.1% (95% CI = 17.6 to 18.7). Male sex, population density, black ethnicity (compared to white), and people with long-term conditions, including learning disability (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.22 to 3.18, P = 0.0056) had higher odds of mortality.ConclusionThe first SARS-CoV-2 peak in England has been associated with excess mortality. Planning for subsequent peaks needs to better manage risk in males, those of black ethnicity, older people, people with learning disabilities, and people who live in multi-occupancy dwellings.

scholarly journals Facilitated group work for people with long-term conditions: a systematic review of benefits from studies of group-work interventions

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (682) ◽  
pp. e363-e372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Jackson ◽  
Daniel Jones ◽  
Judith Dyson ◽  
Una Macleod
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Group Work ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Current Evidence Base ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundAbout 15.4 million people in the UK live with a long-term condition. Of the health and social care spend, 70% is invested in caring for this population. Evidence suggests that group-work interventions offer patient support, improved outcomes, and reduce the costs of care.AimTo review the current evidence base examining the effectiveness of group work in long-term physical disease where such groups are facilitated by healthcare professionals.Design and settingSystematic review and narrative synthesis of studies of group-work interventions led by health professionals for adults with specified long-term illnesses.MethodMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched using terms relating to group work and long-term conditions. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a control group that did not include group work.ResultsThe 14 included studies demonstrated a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of participant characteristics, interventions, and outcome measures and were of varying quality. The studies demonstrated some statistically significant improvements in pain, psychological outcomes, self-efficacy, self-care, and quality of life resulting from intervention.ConclusionThis review demonstrates significant benefits resulting from group participation, in adults with long-term disease. Results were mixed and some benefits were short-lived. Nevertheless, these results suggest that group work should be more widely used in the management and support of adults with long-term illness. There is a need for larger and better-quality studies to explore this potentially important area further.

scholarly journals General practice referral of ‘at risk’ populations to community leisure services: applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of a community-based physical activity programme for inactive adults with long-term conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Bird ◽  
M. S. Y. Biddle ◽  
J. E. Powell
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
At Risk ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Recruitment Target

Abstract Background In the UK a high proportion of adults with long-term conditions do not engage in regular physical activity. General practice (GP) referral to community-based physical activity is one strategy that has gained traction in recent years. However, evidence for the real-world effectiveness and translation of such programmes is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the individual and organisational impacts of the ‘CLICK into Activity’ programme - GP referral of inactive adults living with (or at risk of) long-term conditions to community-based physical activity. Methods A mixed methods evaluation using the RE-AIM framework was conducted with data obtained from a range of sources: follow-up questionnaires, qualitative interviews, and programme-related documentation, including programme cost data. Triangulation methods were used to analyse data, with findings synthesised across each dimension of the RE-AIM framework. Results A total of 602 individuals were referred to CLICK into Activity physical activity sessions. Of those referred, 326 individuals participated in at least one session; the programme therefore reached 30.2% of the 1080 recruitment target. A range of individual-, social-, and environmental-level factors contributed to initial physical activity participation. Positive changes over time in physical activity and other outcomes assessed were observed among participants. Programme adoption at GP surgeries was successful, but the GP referral process was not consistently implemented across sites. Physical activity sessions were successfully implemented, with programme deliverers and group-based delivery identified as having an influential effect on programme outcomes. Changes to physical activity session content were made in response to participant feedback. CLICK into Activity cost £175,000 over 3 years, with an average cost per person attending at least one programme session of £535. Conclusions Despite not reaching its recruitment target, CLICK into Activity was successfully adopted. Positive outcomes were associated with participation, although low 6- and 12-month follow-up response rates limit understanding of longer-term programme effects. Contextual and individual factors, which may facilitate successful implementation with the target population, were identified. Findings highlight strategies to be explored in future development and implementation of GP referral to community-based physical activity programmes targeting inactive adults living with (or at risk of) long-term conditions.

scholarly journals Continuity of care and clinical outcomes in the community for people with severe mental illness

2018 ◽  
Vol 214 (5) ◽  
pp. 273-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alastair Macdonald ◽  
Dimitrios Adamis ◽  
Tom Craig ◽  
Robin Murray
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Independent Effect ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Community Data ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Generalised Estimating Equations

BackgroundHigh continuity of care is prized by users of mental health services and lauded in health policy. It is especially important in long-term conditions like schizophrenia. However, it is not routinely measured, and therefore not often evaluated when service reorganisations take place. In addition, the impact of continuity of care on clinical outcomes is unclear.AimsWe set out to examine continuity of care in people with schizophrenia, and to relate this to demographic variables and clinical outcomes.MethodPseudoanonymised community data from 5552 individuals with schizophrenia presenting over 11 years were examined for changes in continuity of care using the numbers of community teams caring for them and the Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI). These and demographic variables were related to clinical outcomes measured with the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Data were analysed using generalised estimating equations and multivariate marginal models.ResultsThere was a significant decline in MMCI and significant worsening of HoNOS total scores over 11 years. Higher (worse) HoNOS scores were significantly and independently related to older age, later years and both lower MMCI and more teams caring for the individual in each year. Most HoNOS scales contributed to the higher total scores.ConclusionsThere is evidence of declining continuity of care in this 11-year study of people with schizophrenia, and of an independent effect of this on worse clinical outcomes. We suggest that this is related to reorganisation of services.Declaration of interestNone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document