scholarly journals Efficacy of biological therapies and small molecules in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2021-326390
Author(s):  
Nicholas E Burr ◽  
David J Gracie ◽  
Christopher J Black ◽  
Alexander C Ford
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Molecules ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Reported Data

ObjectiveBiological therapies and small molecules continue to be evaluated in moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis, but are often studied in placebo-controlled trials, meaning their relative efficacy and safety is unknown. We examined this in a network meta-analysis.DesignWe searched the literature to October 2021 to identify eligible trials. We judged efficacy using clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, or clinical response, and according to previous exposure or non-exposure to antitumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy. We also assessed safety. We used a random effects model and reported data as pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Interventions were ranked according to their P-score.ResultsWe identified 28 trials (12 504 patients). Based on failure to achieve clinical remission, upadacitinib 45 mg once daily ranked first versus placebo (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.80, P-score 0.98), with infliximab 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg second and third, respectively. Upadacitinib ranked first for clinical remission in both patients naïve to anti-TNF-α drugs (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.78, P-score 0.99) and previously exposed (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.85, P-score 0.99). Upadacitinib was superior to almost all other drugs in these analyses. Based on failure to achieve endoscopic improvement infliximab 10 mg/kg ranked first (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.72, P-score 0.97), with upadacitinib 45 mg once daily, second, and infliximab 5 mg/kg third. Upadacitinib was more likely to lead to adverse events, but serious adverse events were no more frequent, and withdrawals due to adverse events were significantly lower than with placebo. Infections were significantly more likely with tofacitinib than placebo (RR 1.41; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.91).ConclusionIn a network meta-analysis, upadacitinib 45 mg once daily ranked first for clinical remission in all patients, patients naïve to anti-TNF-α drugs and patients previously exposed. Infliximab 10 mg/kg ranked first for endoscopic improvement. Most drugs were safe and well tolerated.

scholarly journals Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as Therapy for Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Xiaolei Liu ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Kaichun Wu ◽  
Yongquan Shi ◽  
Min Chen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Remission

Aim. Increasing evidence supports the role of the gut microbiota in the etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly effective treatment against recurrent Clostridium difficile infection; however, its efficacy in UC is still controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT for treatment of active UC. Methods. We searched Cochrane, Medline, Web of Science, and Embase from inception to February 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adults with active UC, which compared FMT with controls, were eligible. The primary outcome was combined clinical remission with endoscopic remission/response. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission, endoscopic remission, and serious adverse events. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) is reported. Results. Five RCTs with 292 participants were eligible for inclusion. When data were pooled for all patients, FMT was associated with a higher combined clinical remission with endoscopic remission/response; the RR of combined outcome not achieving after FMT vs. control was 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.88). FMT delivered via lower gastrointestinal route was superior to upper gastrointestinal route with regard to combined clinical remission with endoscopic remission/response ( RR = 0.79 , 95% CI 0.70-0.89). FMT with pooled donor stool ( RR = 0.69 , 95% CI 0.56-0.85) and higher frequency of administration ( RR = 0.76 , 95% CI 0.62-0.93) may be more effective with regard to clinical remission. There was no statistically significant difference in serious adverse events with FMT compared with controls ( RR = 0.98 , 95% CI 0.93-1.03). Conclusion. FMT shows a promising perspective with comparable safety and favorable clinical efficacy for the treatment of active UC in the short term. However, further larger, more rigorously conducted RCTs of FMT in UC are still needed in order to resolve the controversial questions.

scholarly journals The Clinical and Steroid-Free Remission of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation to Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wai Ching Lam ◽  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Wen Juan Ma ◽  
Liang Yao
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background and Purpose. Since the first case of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of ulcerative colitis was described in the year 1989, there have been an increment of case reports, case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this study, we were going to investigate general clinical remission, clinical response, and steroid-free remission of fecal microbiota transplantation. Methods. We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, focusing prospective studies including randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The outcomes were clinical remission, clinical response, steroid-free remission, and serious adverse events. We used RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analyses. Key Results. A total of 4 RCTs and 2 cohort studies (340 cases from 5 countries) were included. We found that FMT might be more effective than placebo on clinical remission (OR, 3.85 [2.21, 6.7]; P<0.001; I2=0%) and clinical response (OR, 2.75 [1.33, 5.67]; P=0.006; I2=49%), but no statistical difference on steroid-free remission (OR, 2.08 [0.41, 10.5]; P=0.37; I2=69%) and serious adverse events (OR, 2.0 [0.17, 22.97]; P=0.44; I2=0%). Conclusions and Inferences. Fecal microbiota transplantations were associated with significant clinical remission and response in ulcerative colitis patients while there was no significant difference found between FMT and placebo in steroid-free remission. Moreover, a common consensus on the route, volume, timing, preferred donor characteristics, and frequency of fecal administration is necessary to achieve remission.

scholarly journals Vedolizumab Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics With Reduced Frequency of Dosing From Every 4 Weeks to Every 8 Weeks in Patients With Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 1066-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Séverine Vermeire ◽  
Milan Lukáš ◽  
Fernando Magro ◽  
Shashi Adsul ◽  
Dirk Lindner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Reduced Frequency ◽  
Extended Access

Abstract Background and Aims Vedolizumab was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of Crohn’s disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] in the GEMINI Long-Term Safety [LTS] study. The vedolizumab Extended Access Program [XAP] provides patients with continued treatment. This XAP pharmacokinetics [PK] sub-study investigated vedolizumab efficacy, safety, and PK. Methods Vedolizumab dosing frequency was reduced from every 4 weeks [Q4W] to every 8 weeks [Q8W] at XAP enrolment, and patients were followed for 56 weeks. Outcomes included: efficacy, loss of clinical benefit, and re-escalation to Q4W dosing; and vedolizumab PK, immunogenicity, and adverse events. Results Among 167 enrolled patients [CD = 88, UC = 79], 80 [91%] with CD and 73 [92%] with UC completed 56 weeks; 76 [86%] and 71 [90%] with CD and UC, respectively, remained on Q8W dosing for 56 weeks. Clinical remission, corticosteroid-free clinical remission, and C-reactive protein levels were stable among patients remaining on Q8W through Week 56. Four patients with CD and two with UC resumed Q4W dosing [three with CD regained clinical response]. Patients with CD who completed Week 56 on Q8W dosing had median trough vedolizumab concentrations of 43.6 µg/mL at enrolment and 10.4 µg/mL at Week 56; concentrations were 42.4 µg/mL and 13.3 µg/mL, respectively, in patients with UC. Treatment-related adverse events were infrequent; no new or serious adverse events related to vedolizumab were reported. Conclusions In the XAP-PK sub-study, adherence to Q8W dosing was high, with no loss of efficacy; very few patients required re-escalation to Q4W. There were no new safety signals.

scholarly journals P308 Effectiveness and Safety of tofacitinib for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Single-Arm Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S336-S336
Author(s):  
F S Macaluso ◽  
M Maida ◽  
M Ventimiglia ◽  
A Orlando
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Real World ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Endoscopic Remission ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Background Several observational studies on Tofacitinib (TOFA) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) have been published over the last 2 years. The aim of this single-arm meta-analysis was to estimate the effectiveness and safety of TOFA arising from real-world observational studies. Methods PubMed Central/Medline and Embase, as well as reference lists of articles, were systematically searched for real-world observational studies of TOFA for the treatment of UC through November 2020. Results Seven studies comprising 759 patients met the inclusion criteria. Almost all patients (range: 76.5-100%) had been previously exposed to anti-TNFs, and a variable proportion (range: 38.8-100%) had been previously treated with Vedolizumab The pooled estimate rates were 49% for clinical response, 40% for clinical remission, and 34% for corticosteroid-free clinical remission at induction, while the rates of endoscopic response and endoscopic remission were 37% and 19%, respectively. At maintenance, the pooled estimate rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission were 36%, 35%, and 24%, respectively. The pooled estimate of incidence rate of total adverse events was 53.0 per 100 person-years (PY), while the pooled estimate of incidence rate of withdrawal of TOFA due to adverse events was 9.3 per 100 PY, with a pooled rate of infections of 17.6 per 100 PY. Conclusion Cumulative analysis of data from real-world studies confirmed the good efficacy of TOFA in UC shown by randomized controlled trials for both induction and maintenance, while the safety profile was consistent with previous reports.

scholarly journals P344 Effectiveness and safety of switching patients with inflammatory bowel disease from originator infliximab to CT-P13: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S367-S368
Author(s):  
J Hanzel ◽  
A Strik ◽  
K Gecse ◽  
G D’Haens ◽  
E Dreesen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Switching from originator infliximab (IFX) to the CT-P13 biosimilar is a widespread practice, although some concerns persist, particularly about long-term outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods We systematically searched electronic databases for randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies of adult patients with IBD who had switched from originator IFX to CT-P13 and were followed up for at least 12 months. The main outcomes were the pooled rate of clinical remission (as defined by the included studies) and adverse events at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation and de novo immunogenicity. A DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis of proportions with double arcsine transformation was performed. Variables judged to be clinically important were studied in an exploratory random-effects meta-regression analysis. Results Eleven studies with 1204 patients (71% with Crohn’s disease [CD]) switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 were identified. Pooled rates of clinical remission at 12 months were 83.6% in ulcerative colitis (UC), 75.9% in CD, and 79.6% in mixed cohorts (Figure 1). Clinical remission at 12 months was negatively associated with combined immunosuppression at switch (7% decrease in remission at 12 months per 10% increase in patients receiving combination therapy) and positively associated with remission at switch (6% increase in remission at 12 months per 10% increase in remission at switch). The pooled rate of adverse events at 12 months was 21.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.4–34.1%). Pooled rates of treatment discontinuation at 12 months were 24.4% (95% CI 12.0–39.4%) in UC, 18.6% (95% CI 8.8–30.9%) in CD, and 13.1% (95% CI 0.7–35.6%) in mixed cohorts. De novo immunogenicity was rare (3.3%, 95% CI 1.5–5.6%). All estimates had at least moderate heterogeneity. Figure 1: Meta-analysis of clinical remission rates at 12 months after switching from originator infliximab to CT-P13 in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Conclusion Switching from originator IFX to CT-P13 appears to be effective and safe, although these findings should be interpreted in the context of the limitations of the primary publications which lacked control arms. Combined immunosuppression at switch, potentially as a marker of disease severity, was negatively associated with clinical remission at 12 months after the switch.

scholarly journals Beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants versus placebo, ‘active placebo’, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for a systematic review of published and unpublished data with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Juul ◽  
Faiza Siddiqui ◽  
Marija Barbateskovic ◽  
Caroline Kamp Jørgensen ◽  
Michael Pascal Hengartner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Harmful Effects

Abstract Background Major depressive disorder is one of the most common, burdensome, and costly psychiatric disorders worldwide. Antidepressants are frequently used to treat major depressive disorder. It has been shown repeatedly that antidepressants seem to reduce depressive symptoms with a statistically significant effect, but the clinical importance of the effect sizes seems questionable. Both beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants have not previously been sufficiently assessed. The main objective of this review will be to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants versus placebo, ‘active placebo’, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. Methods/design A systematic review with meta-analysis will be reported as recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool-version 2 (ROB2), our eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, Trial Sequential Analysis will be conducted to control for random errors, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. To identify relevant trials, we will search both for published and unpublished trials in major medical databases from their inception to the present. Clinical study reports will be obtained from regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies. Two review authors will independently screen the results of the literature searches, extract data, and perform risk of bias assessment. We will include any published or unpublished randomised clinical trial comparing one or more antidepressants with placebo, ‘active placebo’, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. The following active agents will be included: agomelatine, amineptine, amitriptyline, bupropion, butriptyline, cianopramine, citalopram, clomipramine, dapoxetine, demexiptiline, desipramine, desvenlafaxine, dibenzepin, dosulepin, dothiepin, doxepin, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, imipramine, iprindole, levomilnacipran, lofepramine, maprotiline, melitracen, metapramine, milnacipran, mirtazapine, nefazodone, nortriptyline, noxiptiline, opipramol, paroxetine, protriptyline, quinupramine, reboxetine, sertraline, trazodone, tianeptine, trimipramine, venlafaxine, vilazodone, and vortioxetine. Primary outcomes will be depressive symptoms, serious adverse events, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes will be suicide or suicide attempt, suicidal ideation, and non-serious adverse events. Discussion As antidepressants are commonly used to treat major depressive disorder in adults, a systematic review evaluating their beneficial and harmful effects is urgently needed. This review will inform best practice in treatment and clinical research of this highly prevalent and burdensome disorder. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020220279

scholarly journals HPV vaccines for prevention of cervical pre-cancer in adolescent girls and women

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Jia Jian Li ◽  
Jessica Stetz
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Adolescent Girls ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hpv Vaccination ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Significant Benefit ◽  
Hpv Vaccines ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

The evidence presented in this Cochrane meta-analysis shows the HPV vaccination confers significant benefit in preventing cervical pre-cancer. NNT of 60 for preventing one cervical pre-cancer (women 15 to 25 years old with or without HPV infection). The effect is higher for lesions associated with HPV16/18. The data also demonstrates an absence of serious adverse events. Therefore, we have assigned a color recommendation of Green (Benefit > Harm) to this vaccine.

Efficacy and Safety of PEGPH20 in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Solipuram ◽  
Harish Gopalakrishna ◽  
Gayatri Naira ◽  
Akhila Mohan
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive tumor that had an estimated 57,600 new cases and 47,050 deaths in 2020 in the US alone. Recent studies have targeted tumor microenvironment (TME) for better delivery of systemic chemotherapy like PEGPH20, which degrades hyaluronic acid in the extracellular matrix (ECM). A meta-analysis of these Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to test the efficacy of PEGPH20 was performed. Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library without language limitations from inception to July 30, 2020. A total of 59 articles was identified, and 3 RCTs were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), deaths from adverse events, thromboembolic events, serious adverse events (SAE), and febrile neutropenia. Results: There was no statistically significant improvement in PFS (HR= 0.94; 95%CI (0.79, 1.11)) in the PEGPH20 group when compared to the standard treatment/placebo group. There was no significant difference among OS (HR= 0.99, 95%CI (0.83, 1.17), deaths from adverse events (RR=0.97; 95%CI (0.54, 1.73)), thromboembolic events (RR= 1.49; 95%CI (0.92, 2.44)), and febrile neutropenia (RR= 0.88; 95%CI (0.45, 1.72), however, there was statistically significant increase in SAE (RR = 1.59; 95%CI (1.01, 2.52) in the PEGPH20 group compared to the placebo group. Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that PEGPH20 did not improve the PFS or OS. Moreover, there is an increased incidence of serious adverse events with the use of PEGPH20 compared to standard therapies.

Safety and Efficacy of Fremanezumab for the Prevention of Migraine: a Meta-analysis from Random Clinical Trails

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bixi Gao ◽  
Nan Sun ◽  
Yanbo Yang ◽  
Yue Sun ◽  
Mingjia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Therapeutic Drugs ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Clinical Trails

Abstract Background Fremanezumab (TEV-48125) is a fully humanized immunoglobulin G isotype 2a selective monoclonal antibody that potently binds to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). It is one of novel therapeutic drugs for the prevention of migraine, which is one of the most common neurological diseases worldwide. Several clinical trails have been conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of fremanezumab, but there is no systematic review of existing literature has been performed. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for prevention of migraine. Method Pubmed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 2001 to August 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Five RCTs with 3379 patients were finally included in our study. Result We pooled 3379 patients from 5 RCTs, the primary endpoints were mean monthly migraine and headache days, baseline to week 12. We found that fremanezumab led to a significant reduction in migraine days (P < 0.0001) and headache days (P < 0.0001) during 12 weeks compared with placebo. In addition, after using fremanezumab, the risk of at least one adverse event (P=0.001) or related to the trail regimen (P=0.0005) significantly increase compared with placebo. Conclusions Fremanezumab has good efficacy for the prevention of migraine. The administration of fremanezumab can cause some mild adverse events but not serious adverse events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document