scholarly journals The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000734
Author(s):  
Nina Shah ◽  
Jack Aiello ◽  
David E Avigan ◽  
Jesus G Berdeja ◽  
Ivan M Borrello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloma Cell ◽  
Cell Surface Antigens ◽  
Car T ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Immunotherapy Of Cancer

Outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) have improved dramatically in the last two decades with the advent of novel therapies including immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. In recent years, immunotherapy for the treatment of MM has advanced rapidly, with the approval of new targeted agents and monoclonal antibodies directed against myeloma cell-surface antigens, as well as maturing data from late stage trials of chimeric antigen receptor CAR T cells. Therapies that engage the immune system to treat myeloma offer significant clinical benefits with durable responses and manageable toxicity profiles, however, the appropriate use of these immunotherapy agents can present unique challenges for practicing physicians. Therefore, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer convened an expert panel, which met to consider the current role of approved and emerging immunotherapy agents in MM and provide guidance to the oncology community by developing consensus recommendations. As immunotherapy evolves as a therapeutic option for the treatment of MM, these guidelines will be updated.

scholarly journals NK cells and CD38: Implication for (Immuno)Therapy in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Zambello ◽  
Gregorio Barilà ◽  
Sabrina Manni ◽  
Francesco Piazza ◽  
Gianpietro Semenzato
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Immune System ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Myeloma Cell ◽  
Initial Reduction ◽  
Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

Immunotherapy represents a promising new avenue for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, particularly with the availability of Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) as anti-CD38 Daratumumab and Isatuximab and anti-SLAM-F7 Elotuzumab. Although a clear NK activation has been demonstrated for Elotuzumab, the effect of anti-CD38 mAbs on NK system is controversial. As a matter of fact, an initial reduction of NK cells number characterizes Daratumumab therapy, limiting the potential role of this subset on myeloma immunotherapy. In this paper we discuss the role of NK cells along with anti-CD38 therapy and their implication in plasma cell dyscrasias, showing that mechanisms triggered by anti-CD38 mAbs ultimately lead to the activation of the immune system against myeloma cell growth.

scholarly journals Molecularly Targeted Therapies in Multiple Myeloma

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar de la Puente ◽  
Barbara Muz ◽  
Feda Azab ◽  
Micah Luderer ◽  
Abdel Kareem Azab
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Cell Signaling ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Therapeutic Outcomes

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy that remains incurable because most patients will eventually relapse or become refractory to the treatments. Although the treatments have improved, the major problem in MM is the resistance to therapy. Novel agents are currently in development for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, cell signaling targeted therapies, and strategies targeting the tumor microenvironment. We have previously reviewed in detail the contemporary immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies therapies for MM. Therefore, in this review, we focused on the role of molecular targeted therapies in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, including cell signaling targeted therapies (HDAC, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, p38 MAPK, Hsp90, Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, and cell cycle) and strategies targeting the tumor microenvironment (hypoxia, angiogenesis, integrins, CD44, CXCR4, and selectins). Although these novel agents have improved the therapeutic outcomes for MM patients, further development of new therapeutic agents is warranted.

scholarly journals Update on the role of lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 175-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Holstein ◽  
Vera J. Suman ◽  
Philip L. McCarthy
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Myeloma Cell ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Insight Into

Lenalidomide is a derivative of thalidomide and belongs to the class of drugs known as the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). The IMiDs have played a large role in improving the survival outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma. In particular, lenalidomide is currently standard of care in the newly diagnosed setting, in the maintenance setting post-autologous stem cell transplant, as well as in the relapsed/refractory setting. While the combination of lenalidomide and various proteasome inhibitors has proven particularly effective, there are emerging data demonstrating the effectiveness of lenalidomide in combination with other important classes of drugs including the monoclonal antibodies. Recent studies have provided insight into the molecular target of lenalidomide and the other IMiDs, although there is still much to be learned regarding the mechanisms by which lenalidomide affects the myeloma cell and the immune system. Here we review the molecular mechanisms of action, side effects, and the results of the clinical trials which have led to the widespread incorporation of lenalidomide into the myeloma therapeutic armamentarium.

scholarly journals Advances and practical use of monoclonal antibodies in multiple myeloma therapy

Hematology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
pp. 512-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans C. Lee ◽  
Donna M. Weber
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Cell Surface ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Myeloma Cell ◽  
Surface Proteins ◽  
Cell Surface Antigens ◽  
Immune Effector ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule

Abstract The use of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents in the treatment of myeloma have resulted in significant improvements in patient outcomes over the last decade. Although these agents now form the backbone of current myeloma treatment regimens both in the frontline and in a relapsed setting, drug resistance remains an inevitable challenge that most patients will encounter during their disease course. Hence, new treatment strategies continue to be explored, and the recent regulatory approvals of the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) daratumumab (DARA) and elotuzumab (ELO), which target the plasma cell surface proteins CD38 and signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 (SLAMF7), respectively, have heralded the long-awaited era of antibody-based approaches in the treatment of myeloma. Hoping to build on these advances, a number of other mAbs are in various stages of clinical development, including those targeting myeloma cell surface antigens, the bone marrow microenvironment, and immune effector T cells such as anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies. In this review, the current landscape and practical use of mAb-based therapy in myeloma will be discussed.

scholarly journals The Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in the Era of Bi-Specifics Antibodies and CAR T Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 4909
Author(s):  
Meera Mohan ◽  
Theresa Camille Maatman ◽  
Carolina Schinke
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Car T ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains largely incurable despite enormous improvement in the outcome of patients [1]. Over the past decade, we have witnessed the “era of monoclonal antibody (moAb)”, setting new benchmarks in clinical outcomes for relapsed and newly diagnosed MM. Due to their excellent efficacy and relative safe toxicity profile, moAbs in combination with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have become the new backbone of upfront anti-MM therapy. Yet, most patients will eventually relapse and patients who become refractory to IMiDs, PIs and moAbs have a dismal outcome. Emerging T-cell directing therapies, such as bispecific antibody (bsAb) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T) have shown unprecedented responses and outcomes in these heavily pretreated and treatment-refractory patients. Their clinical efficacy combined with high tolerability will likely lead to the use of these agents earlier in the treatment course and there is great enthusiasm that a combination of T cell directed therapy with moAbs can lead to long duration remission in the near future, possibly even without the need of high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Herein, we summarize the role of naked moAbs in MM in the context of newer immunotherapeutic agents like bsAb and CAR T therapy.

scholarly journals The Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in Smoldering and Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 451
Author(s):  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Paola Deias ◽  
Francesca Patriarca
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Immune System ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Cellular Targets ◽  
Recent Introduction

The recent introduction of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), with several cellular targets, such as CD-38 (daratumumab and isatuximab) and SLAM F7 (elotuzumab), differently combined with other classes of agents, has significantly extended the outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in different phases of the disease. Initially used in advanced/refractory patients, different MoAbs combination have been introduced in the treatment of newly diagnosed transplant eligible patients (NDTEMM), showing a significant improvement in the depth of the response and in survival outcomes, without a significant price in terms of toxicity. In smoldering MM, MoAbs have been applied, either alone or in combination with other drugs, with the goal of delaying the progression to active MM and restoring the immune system. In this review, we will focus on the main results achieved so far and on the main on-going trials using MoAbs in SMM and NDTEMM.

scholarly journals Boosting Immunity against Multiple Myeloma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1221
Author(s):  
Raquel Lopes ◽  
Bruna Velosa Ferreira ◽  
Joana Caetano ◽  
Filipa Barahona ◽  
Emilie Arnault Carneiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Drug Conjugates ◽  
Incurable Disease ◽  
Car T ◽  
Patient’S Outcome ◽  
The Impact

Despite the improvement of patient’s outcome obtained by the current use of immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors or anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease. More recently, the testing in clinical trials of novel drugs such as anti-BCMA CAR-T cells, antibody–drug conjugates or bispecific antibodies broadened the possibility of improving patients’ survival. However, thus far, these treatment strategies have not been able to steadily eliminate all malignant cells, and the aim has been to induce a long-term complete response with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status. In this sense, approaches that target not only myeloma cells but also the surrounding microenvironment are promising strategies to achieve a sustained MRD negativity with prolonged survival. This review provides an overview of current and future strategies used for immunomodulation of MM focusing on the impact on bone marrow (BM) immunome.

scholarly journals Role and Modulation of NK Cells in Multiple Myeloma

Hemato ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-181
Author(s):  
Marie Thérèse Rubio ◽  
Adèle Dhuyser ◽  
Stéphanie Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Killer Cell ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Evolution ◽  
Cell Functions

Myeloma tumor cells are particularly dependent on their microenvironment and sensitive to cellular antitumor immune response, including natural killer (NK) cells. These later are essential innate lymphocytes implicated in the control of viral infections and cancers. Their cytotoxic activity is regulated by a balance between activating and inhibitory signals resulting from the complex interaction of surface receptors and their respective ligands. Myeloma disease evolution is associated with a progressive alteration of NK cell number, phenotype and cytotoxic functions. We review here the different therapeutic approaches that could restore or enhance NK cell functions in multiple myeloma. First, conventional treatments (immunomodulatory drugs-IMids and proteasome inhibitors) can enhance NK killing of tumor cells by modulating the expression of NK receptors and their corresponding ligands on NK and myeloma cells, respectively. Because of their ability to kill by antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity, NK cells are important effectors involved in the efficacy of anti-myeloma monoclonal antibodies targeting the tumor antigens CD38, CS1 or BCMA. These complementary mechanisms support the more recent therapeutic combination of IMids or proteasome inhibitors to monoclonal antibodies. We finally discuss the ongoing development of new NK cell-based immunotherapies, such as ex vivo expanded killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR)-mismatched NK cells, chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-NK cells, check point and KIR inhibitors.

scholarly journals PD-L1/PD-1 Axis in Multiple Myeloma Microenvironment and a Possible Link with CD38-Mediated Immune-Suppression

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
Federica Costa ◽  
Valentina Marchica ◽  
Paola Storti ◽  
Fabio Malavasi ◽  
Nicola Giuliani
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Immune Suppression ◽  
Metabolic Pathways ◽  
Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Myeloma Cell ◽  
Immune Microenvironment ◽  
Potential Use

The emerging role of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in MM immune-microenvironment has been highlighted by several studies. However, discordant data have been reported on PD-1/PD-L1 distribution within the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. In addition, the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as a therapeutic strategy to reverse myeloma immune suppression and inhibit myeloma cell survival still remains unknown. Recent data suggest that, among the potential mechanisms behind the lack of responsiveness or resistance to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 antibodies, the CD38 metabolic pathways involving the immune-suppressive factor, adenosine, could play an important role. This review summarizes the available data on PD-1/PD-L1 expression in patients with MM, reporting the main mechanisms of regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 axis. The possible link between the CD38 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways is also reported, highlighting the rationale for the potential use of a combined therapeutic approach with CD38 blocking agents and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in order to improve their anti-tumoral effect in MM patients.

scholarly journals Inhibition of aurora kinases for tailored risk-adapted treatment of multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (18) ◽  
pp. 4331-4340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Hose ◽  
Thierry Rème ◽  
Tobias Meissner ◽  
Jérôme Moreaux ◽  
Anja Seckinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Chromosomal Aberrations ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Myeloma Cell ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Myeloma Cells

Abstract Genetic instability and cellular proliferation have been associated with aurora kinase expression in several cancer entities, including multiple myeloma. Therefore, the expression of aurora-A, -B, and -C was determined by Affymetrix DNA microarrays in 784 samples including 2 independent sets of 233 and 345 CD138-purified myeloma cells from previously untreated patients. Chromosomal aberrations were assessed by comprehensive interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and proliferation of primary myeloma cells by propidium iodine staining. We found aurora-A and -B to be expressed at varying frequencies in primary myeloma cells of different patient cohorts, but aurora-C in testis cell samples only. Myeloma cell samples with detectable versus absent aurora-A expression show a significantly higher proliferation rate, but neither a higher absolute number of chromosomal aberrations (aneuploidy), nor of subclonal aberrations (chromosomal instability). The clinical aurora kinase inhibitor VX680 induced apoptosis in 20 of 20 myeloma cell lines and 5 of 5 primary myeloma cell samples. Presence of aurora-A expression delineates significantly inferior event-free and overall survival in 2 independent cohorts of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy, independent from conventional prognostic factors. Using gene expression profiling, aurora kinase inhibitors as a promising therapeutic option in myeloma can be tailoredly given to patients expressing aurora-A, who in turn have an adverse prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document