scholarly journals 492 Phase 2 efficacy and safety of autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy in combination with pembrolizumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced cancers

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A523-A524
Author(s):  
David O’Malley ◽  
Sylvia Lee ◽  
Amanda Psyrri ◽  
Ammar Sukari ◽  
Sajeve Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Link Type

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard-of-care in the treatment of several types of cancer; however, an unmet medical need exists for early-line combination therapies that are able to provide higher response rates, more durable responses, and manageable long-term safety. Lifileucel (LN-144) and LN-145, adoptive cell therapies using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), have demonstrated encouraging efficacy with acceptable safety in patients with advanced cancer that has failed ICI.1–2 To improve efficacy and safety of early-line treatment options, we explored a combination of TIL and pembrolizumab in patients with ICI-naïve melanoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and cervical cancer.MethodsIOV-COM-202 (NCT03645928) and C-145-04 (NCT03108495) are ongoing Phase 2 multicenter, multicohort, prospective, open-label studies evaluating TIL cell therapy in ICI-naïve patients with solid tumors. We report efficacy and safety from IOV-COM-202 (Cohort 1A: lifileucel and pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma; Cohort 2A: LN-145 and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic HNSCC) and C-145-04 (Cohort 3: LN-145 and pembrolizumab in patients with stage 4b, persistent or recurrent cervical cancer who have not received prior systemic therapy). Eligibility across cohorts included ECOG PS ≤1, ≥1 resectable lesion (diameter ≥1.5 cm post-resection) for TIL manufacturing, and ≥1 measurable lesion for response assessment (by investigator per RECIST v1.1). Lifileucel and LN-145 are cryopreserved TIL infusion products generated at central GMP facilities in a 22-day process. Treatment included tumor resection for TIL manufacturing, followed by 1 dose of pembrolizumab, nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine), TIL infusion, ≤6 interleukin-2 doses (600,000 IU/kg IV), and continued pembrolizumab for ≤24 months.ResultsAs of 09July2021, 32 patients received TIL and pembrolizumab (full-analysis set [FAS]; table 1). Across all cohorts, the objective response rate (ORR) in the FAS was 56.3% (Cohort 1A [melanoma], 87.5%; Cohort 2A [HNSCC], 42.9%; Cohort 3 [cervical], 50.0%; figure 1). Among confirmed responders (n=17), 10 responses (58.8%) were ongoing at data cutoff, with a median study follow-up of 9.7 months. The treatment-emergent adverse-event (TEAE) profile was consistent with the underlying diseases and known profiles of pembrolizumab, nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion, and interleukin-2. The most common (≥30%) Grade ≥3 TEAEs were thrombocytopenia (53.1%), anemia (50.0%), neutropenia (46.9%), and febrile neutropenia (43.8%).ConclusionsThe observed efficacy, including ORR and CR rate, and acceptable safety profile are encouraging and warrant continued investigation of the combination of TIL and pembrolizumab in early-line treatment of patients with advanced cancer. Enrollment is ongoing; updated data will be presented.AcknowledgementsThis study and analysis were funded by Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. (San Carlos, CA, USA). Writing support was provided by Amanda Kelly (Iovance); graphics support was provided by Cognition Studio (Seattle, WA, USA).Trial RegistrationNCT03645928 and NCT03108495ReferencesSarnaik AA, et al. J Clin Oncol 2021; doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00612.Jazaeri AA, et al. J Clin Oncol 2019;37 (suppl; abstract 182).Jimeno A, et al. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8 (suppl; abstract 353).Ethics ApprovalThe IOV-COM-202 study was approved by Advarra Institutional Review Board, approval number Pro00035064; the C-145-04 was approved by WIRB Copernicus Group, approval number 7-1425772-1. All study participants provided written consent via signature of the IRB-approved informed consent form.Abstract 492 Table 1Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and efficacyAbstract 492 Figure 1Best percentage change from baseline in target lesion sum of diameters for efficacy-evaluable set*

scholarly journals 458 First phase 2 results of autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL; LN-145) monotherapy in patients with advanced, immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A486-A487
Author(s):  
Adam Schoenfeld ◽  
Sylvia Lee ◽  
Luis Paz-Ares ◽  
Bernard Doger ◽  
Scott Gettinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Drug Product ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Tcr Repertoire ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundA majority of patients with advanced NSCLC develop disease progression with first-line immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± chemotherapy. In the setting of ICI resistance, effective strategies to provide deep and durable responses are urgently needed. Lifileucel (LN-144) and LN-145 are centrally manufactured (cryopreserved drug-product, 22-day manufacturing process) autologous TIL products that have demonstrated activity in advanced melanoma, cervical cancer, and head and neck carcinoma.1–4 Here, we report the first safety and efficacy data for LN-145 as monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.MethodsIOV-COM-202 (NCT03645928) is a phase 2 multicenter, multicohort, open-label study evaluating autologous TIL cell therapy in patients with solid tumors. We report data from Cohort 3B, investigating LN-145 monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Eligibility required 1–3 prior lines of systemic therapy, including either ICI or oncogene-directed therapy. Treatment included nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion, TIL infusion, and ≤6 interleukin-2 doses. Primary endpoints were safety (incidence of Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) and objective response rate (ORR, investigator-assessed using RECIST v1.1). Exploratory biomarker analyses, including T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire, were performed.ResultsAs of 24June2021, 28 patients received LN-145 (full-analysis set [FAS]; table 1) and 24 were efficacy-evaluable; all had received prior ICI. TIL were most commonly harvested from lung metastases (57.1%). Safety was consistent with the underlying disease and known TEAE profiles of nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion and interleukin-2. Grade ≥3 TEAEs in ≥30% of patients were thrombocytopenia and anemia. The ORR in the FAS and efficacy-evaluable set was 21.4% (6/28) and 25.0% (6/24; figure 1), respectively. Median duration of response was not reached and 83% (5/6) of responses were ongoing at last follow-up (median study follow-up, 8.2 months). One patient had a complete metabolic response, ongoing at 20.7 months; 2 responses occurred in patients who were PD-L1–negative. All responders received ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy. Twenty-six patients had TIL available from the final drug-product for TCR repertoire analysis; mean (min-max) number of unique TCR clones was 13,142 (3093–35,734) and Shannon Entropy index was 7.34 (3.7–12). Updated data will be presented.Abstract 458 Figure 1Best percentage change from baseline in target lesion sum of diameters for efficacy-evaluable setAbstract 458 Table 1Baseline patient demographic and clinical characteristics; efficacy parametersConclusionsLN-145 was successfully manufactured and one-time treatment produced an expected safety profile and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression. The activity of LN-145 monotherapy is encouraging and warrants further investigation of LN-145 as a single-agent and in combination in patients with NSCLC in ongoing studies IOV-LUN-202 (NCT04614103) and IOV-COM-202 Cohorts 3A and 3C (3B closed to enrollment).AcknowledgementsThis study and analysis were funded by Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. (San Carlos, CA, USA). Writing support was provided by Amanda Kelly (Iovance); graphics support was provided by Cognition Studio (Seattle, WA, USA).Trial RegistrationNCT03645928ReferencesSarnaik AA, et al. J Clin Oncol 2021; doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00612.. Thomas SS, et al. J Clin Oncol 2021;39: (suppl; abstract 9537).Jazaeri A, et al. J Clin Oncol 2019;37: (suppl; abstract 2538).Jimeno A, et al. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8: (suppl; abstract A378).Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Advarra Institutional Review Board, approval number Pro00035064 and all study participants provided written consent via signature of the IRB-approved Informed Consent form.

scholarly journals Prior treatment status: impact on the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis

BMC Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Comi ◽  
Mark S. Freedman ◽  
José E. Meca-Lallana ◽  
Patrick Vermersch ◽  
Byoung Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
The Core ◽  
Treatment Status ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Patient Attrition ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Abstract Background In this pooled, post hoc analysis of a phase 2 trial and the phase 3 TEMSO, TOWER, and TENERE clinical trials, long-term efficacy and safety of teriflunomide were assessed in subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) defined by prior treatment status. Methods Patients were classified according to their prior treatment status in the core and core plus extension periods. In the core period, patients were grouped according to treatment status at the start of the study: treatment naive (no prior disease-modifying therapy [DMT] or DMT > 2 years prior to randomization), previously treated with another DMT (DMT > 6 to ≤24 months prior to randomization), and recently treated with another DMT (DMT ≤6 months prior to randomization). In the core plus extension period, patients were re-baselined to the time of starting teriflunomide 14 mg and grouped according to prior treatment status at that time point. Efficacy endpoints included annualized relapse rate (ARR), probability of confirmed disability worsening (CDW) over 12 weeks, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. The incidence of adverse events was also assessed. Results Most frequently received prior DMTs at baseline were glatiramer acetate and interferon beta-1a across treatment groups. Teriflunomide 14 mg significantly reduced ARR versus placebo in the core period, regardless of prior treatment status. In the core and extension periods, adjusted ARRs were low (0.193–0.284) in patients treated with teriflunomide 14 mg across all subgroups. Probability of CDW by Year 4 was similar across subgroups; by Year 5, the percentage of patients with 12-week CDW was similar in treatment-naive patients and patients recently treated with another DMT (33.9 and 33.7%, respectively). EDSS scores were stable over time in all prior-treatment subgroups. There were no new or unexpected safety signals. Limitations include selective bias due to patient attrition, variability in subgroup size, and lack of magnetic resonance imaging outcomes. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of teriflunomide 14 mg was similar in all patients with relapsing MS, regardless of prior treatment history. Trial registration Phase 2 trial core: NCT01487096; Phase 2 trial extension: NCT00228163; TEMSO core: NCT00134563; TEMSO extension: NCT00803049; TOWER: NCT00751881; TENERE: NCT00883337.

Bortezomib, Bendamustine, and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Encouraging Activity in the Phase 2 VERTICAL Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 933-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Brad S Kahl ◽  
Peter Rosen ◽  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
Amanda Cashen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 933 Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an incurable, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although survival has improved with the introduction of rituximab (Rituxan®, R), relapse is inevitable and new therapies are needed. Bortezomib (Velcade®, V) plus rituximab is active in relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) FL (de Vos et al, ASH 2006). Bendamustine (Treanda®, B) plus R has also shown activity in rel/ref FL (Robinson et al, J Clin Oncol 2008), and V has been safely combined with B in patients (pts) with advanced multiple myeloma (Fenk et al, Leuk Lymph 2007). The single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 VERTICAL study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of V and R in combination with B (VBR) in pts with rel/ref FL. Here we report preliminary phase 2 efficacy and safety findings from pts treated with VBR at doses determined in the dose-escalation phase of this study (Matous et al, ASCO 2009). Pts with rel/ref FL who had received ≥4 prior doses of R (no prior V or B), and had ≥1 measurable tumor mass, no active central nervous system lymphoma, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥50%, adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function, and no grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN) were eligible. Pts could receive up to five 35-d cycles of V 1.6 mg/m2 (d 1, 8, 15, 22), B 90 mg/m2 (d 1, 2), and R 375 mg/m2 (d 1, 8, 15, 22, cycle 1; d 1, cycles 2–5). Response was assessed by the investigator using International Working Group criteria (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 2007). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the CTCAE v3.0, and by laboratory assessment of hematologic toxicity. Sixty-three pts received VBR; median age was 58 years, 63% were male and 25% had KPS ≤80%. At diagnosis, 47% had grade 1, 26% grade 2, and 8% grade 3 histology, and 18% unknown histology; 35% had high-risk Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score. Pts had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1–11), and 39% were refractory to their last prior rituximab-containing therapy. The median time from diagnosis was 48 months. As of data cut-off (14 Aug 2009), pts had received a median of 3 cycles (range 1–5); 29 pts remain on therapy and 10 have completed treatment. In the 49 pts with at least one post baseline response assessment, to date, the overall best response rate was 84%; 23 (47%) pts achieved a complete response (CR) and 18 (37%) a partial response (PR). VBR was generally well tolerated, with manageable toxicities. The most common treatment-related AEs were primarily grade 1 and 2 and included nausea (79%; 3% grade 3), fatigue (65%; 10% grade 3), diarrhea (57%; 3% grade 3), and vomiting (44%; 5% grade 3). Other non-hematologic grade 3/4 AEs that occurred in more than one pt included syncope (n=2; 3%) and PN (see below). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were seen in 25%, 6%, and 3% of pts, respectively. Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in 17 (27%) pts, including 3 (5%) with febrile neutropenia and 1 (2%) with grade 3 herpes zoster who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis and discontinued therapy. Of the 17 (27%) pts with treatment-related PN, only 4 (6%) had grade 3 (2 discontinued therapy; no grade 4); PN has resolved in 5 (29%) pts to date. There was one on-study death (cardiac arrest) that was considered treatment-related. Additional follow-up is required to assess long-term outcomes, including progression-free and overall survival. VBR is active in this heavily pre-treated, high-risk population, with high CR rates, and was generally well tolerated. Efficacy and safety data will be updated and reported at ASH. Disclosures: Fowler: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Kahl:Milllennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosen:Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Southern California Lymphoma Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen : Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Tower Cancer Research Foundation: Employment. Matous:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cephalon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Amin:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Oncotype DX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Williams:Milllennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Smith:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cephalon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shi:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Parasuraman:Milllennium: Employment. Cheson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Randomized and dose-escalation trials of recombinant human serum albumin /granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanshan Chen ◽  
Yiqun Han ◽  
Quchang Ouyang ◽  
Jianguo Lu ◽  
Qingyuan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 2 ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Recombinant Human Serum Albumin ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Abstract Background To evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human serum albumin /granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHSA/G-CSF) in breast cancer following receipt of cytotoxic agents. Methods The phase 1b trial assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of dose-escalation, ranging from rHSA/G-CSF 1800 μg, 2100 μg, and 2400 μg. Randomized controlled phase 2b trial was further conducted to ensure the comparative efficacy and safety of rHSA/G-CSF 2400 μg and rhG-CSF 5 μg/kg. In multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel, phase 2 study, participants treated with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were assigned in a ratio 1:1:1 to receive double delivery of rHSA/G-CSF 1200 μg, 1500 μg, and continuous rhG-CSF 5 μg/kg. Results Between December 16, 2014, to July 23, 2018, a total of 320 patients were enrolled, including 25 individuals in phase 1b trial, 80 patients in phase 2b trial, and 215 participants in phase 2 study. The mean duration of agranulocytosis during the first chemotherapeutic intermission was observed as 1.14 ± 1.35 days in rHSA/G-CSF 1500 μg, which was comparable with that of 1.07 ± 0.97 days obtained in rhG-CSF control (P = 0.71). Safety profiles were assessed to be acceptable ranging from rHSA/G-CSF 1800 μg to 2400 μg, while the double delivery of HSA/G-CSF 2400 μg failed to meet the noninferiority in comparison with rhG-CSF. Conclusion The prospective randomized controlled trials demonstrated that rHSA/G-CSF was efficacious and well-tolerated with an approachable frequency and expense of application for prophylactic management of agranulocytosis. The double delivery of rHSA/G-CSF 1500 μg in comparisons with paralleling G-CSF preparations is warranted in the phase 3 trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02465801 (11/17/2014), NCT03246009 (08/08/2017), NCT03251768 (08/07/2017).

scholarly journals Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Cohort Study in the Total Population of Croatian Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Dora Čerina ◽  
Višnja Matković ◽  
Kristina Katić ◽  
Ingrid Belac Lovasić ◽  
Robert Šeparović ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Real ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background. Although today it is almost preventable, cervical cancer still represents a significant cancer burden, especially in some developing parts of the world. Since the introduction of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic disease, improvements of the outcomes were noted. However, results from randomized controlled trials are often hard to recreate in the real-world setting. Objective. To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as a first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the total population of Croatian patients diagnosed with metastatic cervical cancer from 2016 to 2019 who were treated with bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and paclitaxel (TCB) in the first line. The comparison group was the consecutive sample of patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, incidence of adverse events, and the proportion of treatment discontinuation. Results. We enrolled 67 patients treated with TCB and a control group of 62 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The TCB cohort had significantly longer unadjusted OS with a median of 27.0 (95% CI 18.5; not calculable) months, compared to 15.5 (10.7; 30.1) months in the chemotherapy-alone cohort. Adjusted OS was not significantly different. PFS was significantly longer for the TCB cohort, with a median of 10.6 (95% CI 8.5; 15.4) months, than for the chemotherapy-alone cohort, with a median of 5.4 (95% CI 3.9; 9.1) months, even after adjustment for baseline covariates (HRadjusted = 0.60; 95% CI 0.39; 0.94; p = 0.027 ; false discovery rate <5%). Conclusions. In a real-world setting, TCB as a first-line treatment of metastatic cervical cancer was associated with longer PFS, better objective disease control rate, and acceptable toxicity profile in comparison to chemotherapy alone. These results may indicate its utility and potential applicability in other parts of the developing world.

Evaluation of bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in cervical cancer: Data from phase 1 and phase 2 studies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5509-5509
Author(s):  
Julius Strauss ◽  
Fadi S. Braiteh ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Maria De Miguel ◽  
Andres Cervantes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Bifunctional Fusion Protein ◽  
Grade 3

5509 Background: The accelerated FDA approval of pembrolizumab validated the efficacy of anti–PD-(L)1 therapy for pts with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer; however, the objective response rate (ORR) with pembrolizumab was 14.3% in pts with PD-L1 expressing tumors. HPV infection is implicated in > 95% of cervical cancers and is linked to upregulation of TGF-β signaling. Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1. We report pooled safety and efficacy in pts with immune checkpoint inhibitor–naive, recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer treated with bintrafusp alfa in phase 1 (INTR@PID 001; NCT02517398) and phase 2 (study 012; NCT03427411) studies. Methods: Pts with pretreated, immune checkpoint inhibitor–naive, recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer received bintrafusp alfa 0.3-30 mg/kg (phase 1 dose escalation) or 1200 mg Q2W (phase 1 expansion/phase 2) until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Treatment past progression was allowed. Primary endpoints were safety for the dose-escalation part of the phase 1 study and best overall response per RECIST 1.1 for the expansion part of phase 1 and phase 2 studies. Secondary endpoints for the expansion part of the phase 1 and 2 studies included safety. Results: As of May 15, 2020 (phase 1) and December 22, 2020 (phase 2), 39 pts had received bintrafusp alfa for a median duration of 2.8 months (range, 0.5-19.3). The median follow-up to data cutoff was 35.0 months and 24.1 months for the phase 1 and phase 2 studies, respectively. All pts had received prior anticancer therapy; 16 pts (41.0%) had received ≥3 prior anticancer regimens. There were 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses (PRs; ORR per RECIST 1.1, 28.2%). Median duration of response was 11.7 months (range, 1.4-41.2), and 5 pts (45.5%) had ongoing responses (duration 1.5-41.2 months). An additional delayed PR was observed (duration 23.7 months). Reponses occurred irrespective of tumor histology or prior bevacizumab or radiation treatment. Median overall survival (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 5.5 to not reached); 24-month OS rate was 33.2%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 33 pts (84.6%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 8 pts (20.5%; anemia, colitis, gastroparesis, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, keratoacanthoma, cystitis noninfective, hematuria, pneumonitis, rash macular [n = 1 each]); 1 patient (2.6%) had a grade 4 TRAE (asymptomatic hypokalemia related to the above grade 3 gastroparesis). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Bintrafusp alfa had a manageable safety profile and demonstrated clinical activity in pts with heavily pretreated, immune checkpoint inhibitor–naive recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02517398 , NCT03427411.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in patients with cervical cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-77
Author(s):  
A. G. Kedrova
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Correct Choice ◽  
Adoptive T Cell Therapy ◽  
Treatment Standards ◽  
T Cell Therapy

Immunotherapy, also known as therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has shown good results in the treatment of both solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Patients with diseases that were considered incurable earlier now have an opportunity for long-term disease stabilization and high frequency of clinical remissions. This review focuses on clinical benefits and toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors used for cervical cancer, as well as on the ways to improve prognosis and indications for immunotherapy. Correct choice of biomarkers for predicting the response to immunotherapy will ensure more precise selection of patients. This review of immunotherapy methods aims to help clinicians with the indications for this relatively new treatment which has revolutionized treatment standards. Immunotherapy has many forms, including oncolytic virus therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR), cancer vaccines, and adoptive T-cell therapy, in particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors, first generation of which includes monoclonal antibodies against PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and cemiplimab), against PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab), and against CTLA-4 protein (ipilimumab).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document