scholarly journals Knowledge Management for Topological Optimization Integration in Additive Manufacturing

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Gardan
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Topological Optimization ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Support Material ◽  
Manufacturing Costs ◽  
Material Volume ◽  
Globalized World

Engineering design optimization of mechanical structures is nowadays essential in the mechanical industry (automotive, aeronautics, etc.). To remain competitive in the globalized world, it is necessary to create and design structures that, in addition to complying specific mechanical performance, should be less expensive. Engineers must then design parts or assemblies that are a better compromise between mechanical and functional performance, weight, manufacturing costs, and so forth. In this context Additive Manufacturing (AM) process offers the possibility to avoid tools and manufacture directly the part. There are numerous technologies which are using different kind of material. For each of these, there are at least two materials: the production material and the support one. Support material is, in most cases, cleaned and becomes a manufacturing residue. Improving the material volume and the global mass of the product is an essential aim surrounding the integration of simulation in additive manufacturing process. Moreover, the layer-by-layer technology of additive manufacturing allows the design of innovative objects, and the use of topological optimization in this context can create a very interesting combination. The purpose of our paper is to present the knowledge management of an AM trade oriented tool which integrated the topological optimization of parts and internal patterns.

Investigation of Parameter Spaces for Topology Optimization With Three-Dimensional Orientation Fields for Multi-Axis Additive Manufacturing

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Kubalak ◽  
Alfred L. Wicks ◽  
Christopher B. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Topology Optimization ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Material Distribution ◽  
Orientation Fields ◽  
Material Orientation

Abstract The layer-by-layer deposition process used in material extrusion (ME) additive manufacturing results in inter- and intra-layer bonds that reduce the mechanical performance of printed parts. Multi-axis (MA) ME techniques have shown potential for mitigating this issue by enabling tailored deposition directions based on loading conditions in three dimensions (3D). Planning deposition paths leveraging this capability remains a challenge, as an intelligent method for assigning these directions does not exist. Existing literature has introduced topology optimization (TO) methods that assign material orientations to discrete regions of a part by simultaneously optimizing material distribution and orientation. These methods are insufficient for MA–ME, as the process offers additional freedom in varying material orientation that is not accounted for in the orientation parameterizations used in those methods. Additionally, optimizing orientation design spaces is challenging due to their non-convexity, and this issue is amplified with increased flexibility; the chosen orientation parameterization heavily impacts the algorithm’s performance. Therefore, the authors (i) present a TO method to simultaneously optimize material distribution and orientation with considerations for 3D material orientation variation and (ii) establish a suitable parameterization of the orientation design space. Three parameterizations are explored in this work: Euler angles, explicit quaternions, and natural quaternions. The parameterizations are compared using two benchmark minimum compliance problems, a 2.5D Messerschmitt–Bölkow–Blohm beam and a 3D Wheel, and a multi-loaded structure undergoing (i) pure tension and (ii) three-point bending. For the Wheel, the presented algorithm demonstrated a 38% improvement in compliance over an algorithm that only allowed planar orientation variation. Additionally, natural quaternions maintain the well-shaped design space of explicit quaternions without the need for unit length constraints, which lowers computational costs. Finally, the authors present a path toward integrating optimized geometries and material orientation fields resulting from the presented algorithm with MA–ME processes.

scholarly journals PART ORIENTATION AND SEPARATION TO REDUCE PROCESS COSTS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2399-2408
Author(s):  
Jannik Reichwein ◽  
Eckhard Kirchner
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Manufacturing System ◽  
Geometric Design ◽  
Component Separation ◽  
System Component ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Manufacturing Costs ◽  
Complex Component ◽  
Supporting Structure ◽  
Part Orientation

AbstractAdditive manufacturing offers great potential in geometric design through the layer-by-layer production of components. This is often used in the development of additively manufactured components to make components lighter. An even greater reduction in mass is possible if several components are combined into a more complex component. However, as complexity increases, so do the manufacturing costs, due to a higher demand for supporting structure, reworking and longer production time. Especially for complex components, which make poor use of the space available in the additive manufacturing system, component separation can be a useful way of reducing manufacturing costs. Therefore, a procedure for automated component separation is presented, which determines an optimal cutting plane with respect to the manufacturing costs. The presented procedure is evaluated using two exemplary components where a reduction of manufacturing costs up to 54 % could be achieved.

scholarly journals 3D Puzzle in Cube Pattern for Anisotropic/Isotropic Mechanical Control of Structure Fabricated by Metal Additive Manufacturing

Crystals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 959
Author(s):  
Naoko Ikeo ◽  
Hidetsugu Fukuda ◽  
Aira Matsugaki ◽  
Toru Inoue ◽  
Ai Serizawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Material Design ◽  
Metal Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Anisotropic Mechanical Properties ◽  
Innovative Material ◽  
Living Tissues ◽  
Metal Additive

Metal additive manufacturing is a powerful tool for providing the desired functional performance through a three-dimensional (3D) structural design. Among the material functions, anisotropic mechanical properties are indispensable for enabling the capabilities of structural materials for living tissues. For biomedical materials to replace bone function, it is necessary to provide an anisotropic mechanical property that mimics that of bones. For desired control of the mechanical performance of the materials, we propose a novel 3D puzzle structure with cube-shaped parts comprising 27 (3 × 3 × 3) unit compartments. We designed and fabricated a Co–Cr–Mo composite structure through spatial control of the positional arrangement of powder/solid parts using the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) method. The mechanical function of the fabricated structure can be predicted using the rule of mixtures based on the arrangement pattern of each part. The solid parts in the cubic structure were obtained by melting and solidifying the metal powder with a laser, while the powder parts were obtained through the remaining nonmelted powders inside the structure. This is the first report to achieve an innovative material design that can provide an anisotropic Young’s modulus by arranging the powder and solid parts using additive manufacturing technology.

Additive Manufacturing of Kevlar Reinforced Epoxy Composites

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nashat Nawafleh ◽  
Jordan Chabot ◽  
Mutabe Aljaghtham ◽  
Cagri Oztan ◽  
Edward Dauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Failure Strain ◽  
Flexural Modulus ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Structural Components ◽  
Thermoset Composites ◽  
3D Objects ◽  
Layer Deposition ◽  
Subtractive Manufacturing

Abstract Additive manufacturing is defined as layer-by-layer deposition of materials on a surface to fabricate 3D objects with reduction in waste, unlike subtractive manufacturing processes. Short, flexible Kevlar fibers have been used in numerous studies to alter mechanical performance of structural components but never investigated within printed thermoset composites. This study investigates the effects of adding short Kevlar fibers on mechanical performance of epoxy thermoset composites and demonstrates that the addition of Kevlar by 5% in weight significantly improves flexure strength, flexural modulus, and failure strain by approximately 49%, 19%, and 38%, respectively. Hierarchical microstructures were imaged using scanning electron microscopy to observe the artefacts such as porosity, infill and material interdiffusion, which are inherent drawbacks of the 3D printing process.

scholarly journals Additive manufacturing of polymer-based structures by extrusion technologies

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alianna Maguire ◽  
Neethu Pottackal ◽  
M A S R Saadi ◽  
Muhammad M Rahman ◽  
Pulickel M Ajayan
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Composite Materials ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Structural Applications ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Extrusion Printing

Abstract Extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of three-dimensional structures with intricate cellular architectures where the material is selectively dispensed through a nozzle or orifice in a layer-by-layer fashion at the macro-, meso-, and micro-scale. Polymers and their composites are one of the most widely used materials and are of great interest in the field of AM due to their vast potential for various applications, especially for the medical, military, aerospace, and automotive industries. Because architected polymer-based structures impart remarkably improved material properties such as low density and high mechanical performance compared to their bulk counterparts, this review focuses particularly on the development of such objects by extrusion-based AM intended for structural applications. This review introduces the extrusion-based AM techniques followed by a discussion on the wide variety of materials used for extrusion printing, various architected structures, and their mechanical properties. Notable advances in newly developed polymer and composite materials and their potential applications are summarized. Finally, perspectives and insights into future research of extrusion-based AM on developing high-performance ultra-light materials using polymers and their composite materials are discussed.

scholarly journals Additive Manufacturing of Prostheses Using Forest-Based Composites

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Erik Stenvall ◽  
Göran Flodberg ◽  
Henrik Pettersson ◽  
Kennet Hellberg ◽  
Liselotte Hermansson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Fused Deposition Modeling ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Industrial Applications ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Biobased Materials ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Transtibial Prosthesis

A custom-made prosthetic product is unique for each patient. Fossil-based thermoplastics are the dominant raw materials in both prosthetic and industrial applications; there is a general demand for reducing their use and replacing them with renewable, biobased materials. A transtibial prosthesis sets strict demands on mechanical strength, durability, reliability, etc., which depend on the biocomposite used and also the additive manufacturing (AM) process. The aim of this project was to develop systematic solutions for prosthetic products and services by combining biocomposites using forestry-based derivatives with AM techniques. Composite materials made of polypropylene (PP) reinforced with microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) were developed. The MFC contents (20, 30 and 40 wt%) were uniformly dispersed in the polymer PP matrix, and the MFC addition significantly enhanced the mechanical performance of the materials. With 30 wt% MFC, the tensile strength and Young´s modulus was about twice that of the PP when injection molding was performed. The composite material was successfully applied with an AM process, i.e., fused deposition modeling (FDM), and a transtibial prosthesis was created based on the end-user’s data. A clinical trial of the prosthesis was conducted with successful outcomes in terms of wearing experience, appearance (color), and acceptance towards the materials and the technique. Given the layer-by-layer nature of AM processes, structural and process optimizations are needed to maximize the reinforcement effects of MFC to eliminate variations in the binding area between adjacent layers and to improve the adhesion between layers.

scholarly journals A Survey of Modeling of Lattice Structures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoying Dong ◽  
Yunlong Tang ◽  
Yaoyao Fiona Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Lattice Structure ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Lattice Structures ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
Modeling Approaches ◽  
Specific Loading ◽  
Traditional Manufacturing ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies

The lattice structure is a type of cellular material with trusslike frames which can be optimized for specific loading conditions. The fabrication of its intricate architecture is restricted by traditional manufacturing technologies. However, additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of complex structures by aggregation of materials in a layer-by-layer fashion, which has unlocked the potential of lattice structures. In the last decade, lattice structures have received considerable research attention focusing on the design, simulation, and fabrication for AM techniques. And different modeling approaches have been proposed to predict the mechanical performance of lattice structures. This review introduces the aspects of modeling of lattice structures and the correlation between them, summarizes the existing modeling approaches for simulation, and discusses the strength and weakness in different simulation methods. This review also summarizes the characteristics of AM in manufacturing cellular materials and discusses their influence on the modeling of lattice structures.

Additive Manufacturing: Exploration of Porosity and Form Features Using Layer by Layer Deposition

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devdas Shetty ◽  
Daniel Ly
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Complex Geometries ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Monitoring And Control ◽  
Process Qualification ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Form Features

Aerospace companies use high-strength metal alloys like Inconel or Titanium which could be very difficult to fabricate using conventional methods. The current manufacturing techniques result in significant waste. Additive Manufacturing (AM), in its current state is not sufficiently understood, nor characterized such that conventional design practices and process qualification methodologies can be used. In addition, AM cannot be considered for the manufacture of aircraft components unless the process is stable and controlled. The mechanical properties of fabricated parts require to be characterized to demonstrate their invariability. The laser deposition using complex geometries is a challenge. In addition, the structural performances of AM parts have to be proved. Inherent in these requirements is the need to develop a process specification which requires the monitoring and control of key raw materials, consumables, and process parameters; the development of a fixed practice for each of the AM process. Several procedures are required in order to understand how additive manufacturing works using advanced and complex design models. The ability to adopt AM to the production of components is not only predicated on the ability of AM to be competitive with conventional manufacturing methods in terms of cost, but also on its ability to deliver parts with repeatable mechanical performance. The objective of this paper is to define and characterize the limitation of various complex geometries using additive manufacturing. The experimental research involved the creation of a number of specimens using direct metal laser sintering process, examination of their form features, documenting DMLS geometry limits for the form features and finally the creation of calibration models that can be used in aerospace design manuals.

Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite and its composite materials: A review

2020 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 2030002
Author(s):  
Chunze Yan ◽  
Gao Ma ◽  
Annan Chen ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Jiamin Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Composite Materials ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Tissue Engineering Scaffolds

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a promising biomaterial for tissue engineering scaffolds due to its similar performance and composition to natural bone. However, the brittleness and poor toughness of pure HA limit its clinical application. Therefore, a lot of HA composites have been prepared to improve their mechanical performance. Fabricating complex and customized tissue engineering HA scaffolds have a very high requirement for manufacturing processes. It is difficult to fabricate ideal HA porous structures for artificial bone implants using traditional manufacturing processes, such as plasma spraying–sintering, and injection forming. Additive manufacturing (AM) could make three-dimensional physical parts with complex structures directly from computer-aided-design (CAD) models in a layer-by-layer way, and therefore show unique advantages in fabricating bone tissue engineering scaffolds with complex external shape and internal microporous structures. This paper reviews the state of the art for the preparation and AM process of HA and its composite materials, and raises the prospects for this research field.

scholarly journals A New Approach in the Design of Microstructured Ultralight Components to Achieve Maximum Functional Performance

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1588
Author(s):  
Amaia Calleja-Ochoa ◽  
Haizea Gonzalez-Barrio ◽  
Norberto López de Lacalle ◽  
Silvia Martínez ◽  
Joseba Albizuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Mechanical Performance ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Turbine Blades ◽  
High Ratio ◽  
Metal Powders ◽  
Space Applications ◽  
New Approach

In the energy and aeronautics industry, some components need to be very light but with high strength. For instance, turbine blades and structural components under rotational centrifugal forces, or internal supports, ask for low weight, and in general, all pieces in energy turbine devices will benefit from weight reductions. In space applications, a high ratio strength/weight is even more important. Light components imply new optimal design concepts, but to be able to be manufactured is the real key enable technology. Additive manufacturing can be an alternative, applying radical new approaches regarding part design and components’ internal structure. Here, a new approach is proposed using the replica of a small structure (cell) in two or three orders of magnitude. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) is one of the most well-known additive manufacturing methods of functional parts (and prototypes as well), for instance, starting from metal powders of heat-resistant alloys. The working conditions for such components demand high mechanical properties at high temperatures, Ni-Co superalloys are a choice. The work here presented proposes the use of “replicative” structures in different sizes and orders of magnitude, to manufacture parts with the minimum weight but achieving the required mechanical properties. Printing process parameters and mechanical performance are analyzed, along with several examples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document