A Comparison of Chemotherapy Used with and without Apatinib for Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma Who Progressed after Standard Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the therapeutic efficacy and clinical safety of the combination therapy of apatinib plus chemotherapy with that of chemotherapy alone in patients with refractory or recurrent ovarian carcinoma (OC). Methods. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) or case-control studies (CCS) were identified by searching Chinese and English databases up to October 31, 2020. The risk of methodological bias tool and Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) were used to assess trial quality. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the therapeutic effects and adverse drug reactions. Subgroup analyses of study type, study sample size, dosage of apatinib, and chemotherapy regimen between treatment group and control group were performed. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot symmetry, Begg–Mazumdar test, and Egger test. The robustness of our results was presented by removing the trial one by one. Results. Fifteen eligible studies covering 1,020 patients were included in this review and meta-analysis. Among these studies, 8 were RCTs, and 7 were CCSs. Compared with chemotherapy alone, apatinib plus chemotherapy significantly increased objective response rate (OR = 3.55; 95% CI 2.31 to 5.47), disease control rate (OR = 3.04; 95% CI 2.12 to 4.36), and overall survival (OR = 5.03; 95% CI 3.16 to 6.90). Conclusions. The combination treatment of apatinib plus chemotherapy provides better clinical benefits for OC patients when compared to chemotherapy alone and should be recommended for suitable patients with OC after the failure of standard regimens. However, further investigation into future large-scale prospective randomized research is still needed.

Download Full-text

Association between ALDH2 Gene Polymorphism and Late-onset Alzheimer Disease: An Up-to-date Meta-analysis

Current Alzheimer Research ◽

10.2174/1567205017666200317102337 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 105-111

Author(s):

Haitao Liu ◽

Wei Ge ◽

Wei Chen ◽

Xue Kong ◽

Weiming Jian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Polymorphism ◽

Large Scale ◽

Late Onset ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Positive Trend ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽

Aldh2 Gene

Objectives: Previous case-control studies have focused on the relationship between ALDH2 gene polymorphism and late-onset Alzheimer's Disease (LOAD), but no definite unified conclusion has been reached. Therefore, the correlation between ALDH2 Glu504Lys polymorphism and LOAD remains controversial. To analyze the correlation between ALDH2 polymorphism and the risk of LOAD, we implemented this up-to-date meta-analysis to assess the probable association. Methods: Studies were searched through China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, China Biology Medicine, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Clinical- Trials.gov, Embase, and MEDLINE from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2018, without any restrictions on language and ethnicity. Results: Five studies of 1057 LOAD patients and 1136 healthy controls met our criteria for the analysis. Statistically, the ALDH2 GA/AA genotype was not linked with raising LOAD risk (odds ratio (OR) = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-2.28, p = 0.07). In subgroup analysis, the phenomenon that men with ALDH2*2 had higher risk for LOAD (OR = 1.72, 95%CI = 1.10-2.67, p = 0.02) was observed. Conclusions: This study comprehends only five existing case-control studies and the result is negative. The positive trend might appear when the sample size is enlarged. In the future, more large-scale casecontrol or cohort studies should be done to enhance the association between ALDH2 polymorphism and AD or other neurodegenerative diseases.

Download Full-text

Oral Contraceptive Use and Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies, 2009–2020

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13225654 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (22) ◽

pp. 5654

Author(s):

Agnieszka Barańska ◽

Agata Błaszczuk ◽

Wiesław Kanadys ◽

Maria Malm ◽

Katarzyna Drop ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Oral Contraceptive ◽

Cancer Risk ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Control Group ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

To perform a meta-analysis of case-control studies that addressed the association between oral contraceptive pills (OC) use and breast cancer (BrCa), PubMED (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify case-control studies of OC and BrCa published between 2009 and 2020. We used the DerSimonian–Laird method to compute pooled odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs), and the Mantel–Haenszel test to assess the association between OC use and cancer. Forty-two studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria and we included a total of 110,580 women (30,778 into the BrCa group and 79,802 into the control group, of which 15,722 and 38,334 were using OC, respectively). The conducted meta-analysis showed that the use of OC was associated with a significantly increased risk of BrCa in general, OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.31, p = 0.0358. Regarding other risk factors for BrCa, we found that increased risk was associated significantly with early menarche, nulliparous, non-breastfeeding, older age at first parity, postmenopause, obesity, smoking, and family history of BrCa. Despite our conclusion that birth control pills increase the cancer risk being supported by extensive previous studies and meta-analyzes, further confirmation is required.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis

BMJ ◽

10.1136/bmj.k3529 ◽

2018 ◽

pp. k3529 ◽

Cited By ~ 108

Author(s):

Xian Shen ◽

Bin Zhao

Keyword(s):

Cell Death ◽

Programmed Cell Death ◽

Randomised Controlled Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Control Group ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Clinical Benefits ◽

American Society ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

Expression Status

Abstract Objective To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. Review methods Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. Results 4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. Conclusions PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.

Download Full-text

Meta-Analysis Based on Clinical RCTs: The Effect of Molecular Epimerism on the Safety of Glycyrrhizic Acid

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine ◽

10.1155/2020/3869698 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Hongdou Chen ◽

Fangfang Zheng ◽

Menglei Wang ◽

Xu Wang ◽

Qingqing Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Glycyrrhizic Acid ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Control Group ◽

China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽

Clinical Safety ◽

Medical Network ◽

The Difference ◽

Clinical Control Trial ◽

Experimental Group ◽

Magnesium Isoglycyrrhizinate

Objective. To carry out the meta-analysis on the clinical safety of glycyrrhizic acid and the influencing factors between 18α-glycyrrhizinate (18α-GL) and 18β-glycyrrhizinate (18β-GL). Methods. Magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate injection was used as the representative preparation of 18α-GL, and compound glycyrrhizin injection was used as the representative preparation of 18β-GL. The clinical control trial of magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate injection and compound glycyrrhizin injection was searched in a computer, which was published from January 2006 to December 2019 on the databases such as PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ), and Wanfang Medical Network (Wanfang Data). The data associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were extracted. RevMan5.3 was used for statistical analysis. Results. Finally, 24 studies were included, and 2757 patients were involved, of which the experimental group was mainly treated with magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate, while the control group was mainly treated with compound glycyrrhizin. The results showed that the occurrence of ADRs was significantly lower in the experimental group than that in the control group, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (RR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.18, 0.38), P < 0.00001 ). There was no heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 0%, P = 1.00 ). Conclusion. Compared with 18β-GL, 18α-GL had a lower incidence of adverse reactions and better clinical safety.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Javanica Oil Emulsion Injection on Chemotherapy Efficacy and Cellular Immune Indicators in Patients with Advanced NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine ◽

10.1155/2019/7560269 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-12

Author(s):

Huilin Xu ◽

Zhucheng Yin ◽

Anbing He ◽

Dedong Cao

Keyword(s):

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Karnofsky Performance Status ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Combination Group ◽

Control Group ◽

Oil Emulsion ◽

Standard Mean Difference ◽

The Impact

Background. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Javanica oil emulsion injection (JOI) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. Electronic databases including EMBASE, PUBMED, the Cochrane library, and Chinese Biological Medical disc (CBM) were searched until May 2018. The clinical trials reporting efficacy and immune function of JOI combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata 11 and RevMan 5.3 were used for meta-analysis. Results. Twenty-four studies involving 2089 cases were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in objective response rate (risk ratio (RR) = 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.29; P<0.05), improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status (standard mean difference (SMD) = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.41–1.77; P<0.01), incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.7–0.87; P<0.05), percentage changes of CD3+ cells (SMD = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.49–2.50; P<0.01), CD4+ cells (SMD = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.2–1.9; P<0.01), natural killer cells (SMD = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.15–2.82; P<0.01), but not CD8+ (SMD = −1.44; 95% CI: −4.53–1.65; P=0.36), and value of CD4+/CD8+ (SMD = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.28–0.36; P<0.01) between the JOI combination group and control group. Funnel plot and Begg’s and Egger’s analysis indicated that there was no significant publication bias (P>0.05). Conclusions. JOI may be effective to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients, accompanied with better levels of immune cells.

Download Full-text

Lights and Shadows about the Effectiveness of IVF in HIV Infected Women: A Systematic Review

Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology ◽

10.1155/2015/517208 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 2015 ◽

pp. 1-10 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Catarina Marques ◽

Cristina Guerreiro ◽

Sérgio Reis Soares

Keyword(s):

Meta Analysis ◽

Ovarian Response ◽

Control Group ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Infected Female ◽

Specific Effects ◽

Icsi Cycle ◽

Pubmed Database ◽

Matched Case

Background. HIV infected women have higher rates of infertility.Objective. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the effectiveness of fresh IVF/ICSI cycles in HIV infected women.Materials and Methods. A search of the PubMed database was performed to identify studies assessing fresh nondonor oocyte IVF/ICSI cycle outcomes of serodiscordant couples with an HIV infected female partner.Results and Discussion. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Whenever a comparison with a control group was available, with the exception of one case, ovarian stimulation cancelation rate was higher and pregnancy rate (PR) was lower in HIV infected women. However, statistically significant differences in both rates were only seen in one and two studies, respectively. A number of noncontrolled sources of bias for IVF outcome were identified. This fact, added to the small size of samples studied and heterogeneity in study design and methodology, still hampers the performance of a meta-analysis on the issue.Conclusion. Prospective matched case-control studies are necessary for the understanding of the specific effects of HIV infection on ovarian response and ART outcome.

Download Full-text

Association of IL-6 -174G>C (rs1800795) polymorphism with cervical cancer susceptibility

Bioscience Reports ◽

10.1042/bsr20181071 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 38 (5) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hai-Xia Duan ◽

You-Yi Chen ◽

Juan-Zi Shi ◽

Nan-Nan Ren ◽

Xiao-Juan Li

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Large Scale ◽

Cancer Susceptibility ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Cervical Cancer Risk ◽

Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium ◽

The Relationship ◽

Multifunctional Cytokine

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a multifunctional cytokine that has been implicated in the etiology of cancer. Several case–control studies have been conducted to assess the association of IL-6 -174G>C (rs1800795) polymorphism with the risk of cervical cancer, yet with conflicting conclusions. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed this meta-analysis updated to June 2018. A total of seven original publications were identified covering IL-6 -174G>C (rs1800795) polymorphism. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the relationship strengths. Statistically significant relationship was observed between IL-6 -174G>C polymorphism and cervical cancer risk (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40–0.94 for GG vs. CC, and OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64–0.93 for G vs. C). Moreover, the significant association was found among Asians (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29–0.75 for GG vs. CC, and OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.57–0.89 for G vs. C); hospital-based subgroup (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38–0.72 for GG vs. CC, and OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87 for G vs. C); and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium ≤0.05 (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37–0.86 for GG vs. GC, and OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47–0.93 for G vs. C). This meta-analysis showed the evidence that the IL-6 -174G>C polymorphism was a low-penetrance susceptibility variant for cervical cancer. Further large-scale case–control studies are needed to confirm these results.

Download Full-text

Anlotinib in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian carcinoma: A prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.6061 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 6061-6061 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Boer Shan ◽

Wenbin Shen ◽

Huaying Wang

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Carcinoma ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Therapeutic Effects ◽

High Grade ◽

Platinum Resistant ◽

Gynecologic Tumor ◽

Hand Foot Syndrome

6061 Background: Recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian carcinoma is difficult to treat, and how to improve the treatment effect of these patients is still an urgent problem to solve. Anlotinib is a new multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor and its anti-tumor vascular targets include VEGFR, PDGFR and FGFR. Previous researches have shown clinical antitumor activity of anlotinib in various cancers, including the phase I study on gynecologic tumor. This phase II study (ChiCTR2000029654) aims to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian carcinoma. Methods: Patients who have previously received second-line or more chemotherapy, with histopathologically confirmed ovarian high-grade serous gonadal carcinoma (including salpingocarcinoma and peritoneal carcinoma), ECOG 0-2 were considered eligible for enrollment. Anlotinib was administered orally (12 mg qd, d1-14; 21 days per cycle) till disease progression, death or intolerant toxicity. Therapeutic effects are evaluated every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and quality of life (QOL). Results: Between 2019 March to 2020 January, 15 patients (female) with FIGO histopathological stage IA(6.7%), IIIA (73.3%), IIIC (6.7%) and IV (13.3%) were enrolled and 14 patients were evaluable with a median age of 59 years (range: 47-69). The mean follow-up period is 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.1-4.8). Therapeutic evaluation showed the incidence of partial response, stable disease and progression disease was 14.3%, 57.1% and 28.6% respectively, yielding the ORR of 14.3% (2/14; 95% CI: 1.8%-42.8%) and the DCR of 71.4% (10/14; 95% CI: 41.9%-91.6%). The median PFS was not reached. Most of the occurring AEs were grade 1, including hypertention (57.1%), fatigue (50.0%), hand-foot syndrome (35.7%), hoarseness (14.3%), diarrhea (7.1%), gum-pain (7.1%), decrease in leukocyte count (6.7%) and urine protein (7.1%). Only cancer pain (7.1%) was grade 2. No high grade AE was observed in these 14 patients. Neither unexpected safety signals nor treatment related death occurred. Conclusions: Anlotinib showed a promising efficacy with a favourable toxicity profile for patients with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian carcinoma. And we will report more results ahout anlotinib in the future. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000029654.

Download Full-text

Oral hormone pregnancy tests and the risks of congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

F1000Research ◽

10.12688/f1000research.16758.2 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 ◽

pp. 1725 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Carl Heneghan ◽

Jeffrey K. Aronson ◽

Elizabeth Spencer ◽

Bennett Holman ◽

Kamal R. Mahtani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cohort Studies ◽

Congenital Malformations ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Control ◽

Control Group ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Renal Anomalies ◽

Congenital Heart Malformations ◽

Increased Risk

Background: Oral hormone pregnancy tests (HPTs), such as Primodos, containing ethinylestradiol and high doses of norethisterone, were given to over a million women from 1958 to 1978, when Primodos was withdrawn from the market because of concerns about possible teratogenicity. We aimed to study the association between maternal exposure to oral HPTs and congenital malformations. Methods: We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies that included data from pregnant women and were exposed to oral HPTs within the estimated first three months of pregnancy, if compared with a relevant control group. We used random-effects meta-analysis and assessed the quality of each study using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for non-randomized studies. Results: We found 16 case control studies and 10 prospective cohort studies, together including 71 330 women, of whom 4,209 were exposed to HPTs. Exposure to oral HPTs was associated with a 40% increased risk of all congenital malformations: pooled odds ratio (OR) = 1.40 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.66; P<0.0001; I2 = 0%). Exposure to HPTs was associated with an increased risk of congenital heart malformations: pooled OR = 1.89 (95% CI 1.32 to 2.72; P = 0.0006; I2=0%); nervous system malformations OR = 2.98 (95% CI 1.32 to 6.76; P = 0.0109 I2 = 78%); gastrointestinal malformations, OR = 4.50 (95% CI 0.63 to 32.20; P = 0.13; I2 = 54%); musculoskeletal malformations, OR = 2.24 (95% CI 1.23 to 4.08; P= 0.009; I2 = 0%); the VACTERL syndrome (Vertebral defects, Anal atresia, Cardiovascular anomalies, Tracheoesophageal fistula, Esophageal atresia, Renal anomalies, and Limb defects), OR = 7.47 (95% CI 2.92 to 19.07; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that use of oral HPTs in pregnancy is associated with increased risks of congenital malformations.

Download Full-text

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of second-line therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Current Oncology ◽

10.3747/co.27.6583 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 27 (6) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

S. Delos Santos ◽

S. Udayakumar ◽

A. Nguyen ◽

Y.J. Ko ◽

S. Berry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Second Line ◽

Clinical Benefits ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Grade 3

Background In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc) following sorafenib failure, it is unclear which treatment is most efficacious, as treatments in the second-line setting have not been directly compared and no standard therapy exists. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (nma) aimed to compare the clinical benefits and toxicities of these treatments. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (rcts) was conducted to identify phase iii rcts in advanced hcc following sorafenib failure. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of placebo were examined for heterogeneity. Primary outcomes of interest were extracted for results, including overall survival (os), progression-free survival (pfs), objective response rate (orr), grade 3/4 toxicities, and subgroups. An nma was conducted to compare both drugs through the intermediate placebo. Comparisons were expressed as hazard ratios (hrs) for os and pfs, and as risk difference (rd) for orr and toxicities. Subgroup analyses for os and pfs were also performed. Results Two rcts were identified (1280 patients) and compared through an indirect network; celestial (cabozantinib vs. placebo) and resorce (regorafenib vs. placebo). Baseline characteristics of patients in both trials were similar. Both trials also had similar placebo outcomes. Cabozantinib, compared with regorafenib, showed similar os [hazard ratio (hr): 1.21; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.90 to 1.62], pfs (hr: 1.02; 95% ci: 0.78 to 1.34) and orr (−3.0%; 95% ci: −7.6% to 1.7%). Both treatments showed similar toxicities, but there were marginally higher risks of grade 3/4 hand–foot syndrome (5%; 95% ci: 0.1% to 9.8%), diarrhea (4.8%; 95% ci: 1.1% to 8.5%), and anorexia (4.4%; 95% ci: 0.8% to 8.0%) for cabozantinib. Subgroup results for os and pfs were consistent with overall results. Conclusions Overall, this nma determined that cabozantinib and regorafenib have similar clinical benefits and toxicities for second-line hcc.

Download Full-text