scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model for Transplant-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Peng Zhao ◽  
Ye-Jun Wu ◽  
Qing-Yuan Qu ◽  
Shan Chong ◽  
Xiao-Wan Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Peking University ◽  
Score Model

Introduction Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a potentially life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), which can result in multiorgan injury and increased risk for mortality. Renewed interest has emerged in the prognostication of TA-TMA with the development of novel diagnostic and management algorithms. Our previous study reported an adverse outcome in patients with TA-TMA and concomitant acute graft-versus-host disease (Eur J Haematol, 2018). However, information on markers for the early identification of severe cases remains limited. Therefore, this study is concentrated on the development and validation of a prognostic model for TA-TMA, which might facilitate risk stratification and contribute to individualized management. Methods Patients receiving allo-HSCT in Peking University People's Hospital with 1) a diagnosis of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) or 2) evidence of microangiopathy were retrospectively identified from 2010 to 2018. The diagnosis of TA-TMA was reviewed according to the Overall-TMA criteria (Transplantation, 2010). Patients without fulfillment of the diagnostic criteria or complicated with other causes of MAHA were excluded from analysis. Prognostic factors for TA-TMA were determined among patients receiving HSCT between 2010 and 2014 (derivation cohort). Candidate predictors (univariate P < 0.1) were included in the multivariate analysis using a backward stepwise logistic regression model. A risk score model was then established according to the regression coefficient of each independent prognostic factor. The performance of this predictive model was evaluated through internal validation (bootstrap method with 1000 repetitions) and external temporal validation performed on data from those who received HSCT between 2015 and 2018 (validation cohort). Results 5337 patients underwent allo-HSCT at Peking University Institute of Hematology from 2010 to 2018. A total of 1255 patients with a diagnosis of MAHA and/or evidence of microangiopathy were retrospectively identified, among whom 493 patients met the inclusion criteria for this analysis (269 in the derivation cohort and 224 in the validation cohort). The median age at the time of TA-TMA diagnosis was 28 (IQR: 17-41) years. The median duration from the time of transplantation to the diagnosis of TA-TMA was 63 (IQR: 38-121) days. The 6-month overall survival rate was 42.2% (208/493), and the 1-year overall survival rate was 45.0% (222/493). In the derivation cohort, patient age (≥35 years), anemia (hemoglobin <70 g/L), severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <15,000/μL), elevated lactic dehydrogenase (serum LDH >800 U/L) and elevated total bilirubin (TBIL >1.5*ULN) were identified by multivariate analysis as independent prognostic factors for the 6-month outcome of TA-TMA. A risk score model was constructed according to the regression coefficients (Table 1), and patients were stratified into a low-risk group (0-1 points), an intermediate-risk group (2-4 points) and a high-risk group (5-6 points). The Kaplan-Meier estimations of overall survival separated well between these risk groups (Figure 1). The prognostic model showed significant discriminatory capacity, with a cross-validated c-index of 0.770 (95%CI, 0.714-0.826) in the internal validation and 0.768 (95%CI, 0.707-0.829) in the external validation cohort. The calibration plots also indicated a good correlation between model-predicted and observed probabilities. Conclusions A prognostic model for TA-TMA incorporating several baseline laboratory factors was developed and evaluated, which demonstrated significant predictive capacity through internal and external validation. This predictive model might facilitate prognostication of TA-TMA and contribute to early identification of patients at higher risk for adverse outcomes. Further study may focus on whether these high-risk patients could benefit from early application of specific management. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals A prognostic model (BATAP) with external validation for patients with transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhao ◽  
Yejun Wu ◽  
Yun He ◽  
Shan Chong ◽  
Qingyuan Qu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thrombotic Microangiopathy ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Temporal Validation ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Score Model

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a potentially life-threatening complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Information on markers for early prognostication remains limited, and no predictive tools for TA-TMA are available. We attempt to develop and validate a prognostic model for TA-TMA. A total of 507 patients who developed TA-TMA following allo-HSCT were retrospectively identified and separated into a derivation cohort and a validation cohort according to the time of transplantation to perform external temporal validation. Patient age (OR 2.371, 95% CI 1.264-4.445), anemia (OR 2.836, 95% CI 1.566-5.138), severe thrombocytopenia (OR 3.871, 95% CI 2.156-6.950), elevated total bilirubin (OR 2.716, 95% CI 1.489-4.955) and proteinuria (OR 2.289, 95% CI 1.257-4.168) were identified as independent prognostic factors for the 6-month outcome of TA-TMA. A risk score model termed BATAP (Bilirubin, Age, Thrombocytopenia, Anemia, Proteinuria) was then constructed according to the regression coefficients. The validated c-statistics were 0.816 (95% CI 0.766-0.867) and 0.756 (95% CI 0.696-0.817) in the internal and external validation, respectively. Calibration plots indicated that the model-predicted probabilities correlated well with the actual observed frequencies. This predictive model may facilitate the prognostication of TA-TMA and contribute to the early identification of high-risk patients.

scholarly journals Clinical Risk Factors and Prognostic Model for Idiopathic Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2902-2902
Author(s):  
Rui-Xin Deng ◽  
Yun He ◽  
Xiao-Lu Zhu ◽  
Hai-Xia Fu ◽  
Xiao-Dong Mo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Regression Coefficient ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Demyelinating Diseases ◽  
Decision Curve Analysis ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Introduction As a neurological complication following haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT), immune-mediated demyelinating diseases (IIDDs) of the central nervous system (CNS) are rare, but they seriously affect a patient's quality of life (J Neurooncol, 2012). Although several reports have demonstrated that IIDDs have a high mortality rate and a poor prognosis (J Neurooncol, 2012; Neurology 2013), a method to predict the outcome of CNS IIDDs after haplo-HSCT is not currently available. Here, we reported the largest research on CNS IIDDs post haplo-HSCT, and we developed and validated a prognostic model for predicting the outcome of CNS IIDDs after haplo-HSCT. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 184 consecutive CNS IIDD patients who had undergone haplo-HSCT at a single center between 2008 and 2019. The derivation cohort included 124 patients receiving haplo-HSCT from 2014 to 2019, and the validation cohort included 60 patients receiving haplo-HSCT from 2008 to 2013. The diagnosis of CNS IIDDs was based on the clinical manifestations and exclusion of other aetiologies, including infection, neurotoxicity, metabolic encephalopathy, ischaemic demyelinating disorders, and tumor infiltration. The final prognostic model selection was performed by backward stepwise logistic regression using the Akaike information criterion. The final model was internally and externally validated using the bootstrap method with 1000 repetitions. We assessed the prognostic model performance by evaluating the discrimination [area under the curve (AUC)], calibration (calibration plot), and net benefit [decision curve analysis (DCA)]. Results In total, 184 of 4532 patients (4.1%) were diagnosed with CNS IIDDs after transplantation. Among them, 120 patients had MS, 53 patients had NMO, 7 patients had ADEM, 3 patients had Schilder's disease, and 1 patient had Marburg disease. Grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (p<0.001) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (p<0.001) were identified as risk factors for developing IIDDs after haplo-HSCT. We also tested immune reconstitution by measuring the following parameters 30, 60, and 90 days after haplo-HSCT: proportions of CD19+ B cells, CD3+ T cells and CD4+ T cells; counts of lymphocytes and monocytes; and levels of immunoglobulins A, G, and M. These parameters showed no significant differences between patients with and without IIDD. CNS IIDDs were significantly associated with higher mortality and a poor prognosis (p＜0.001). In a/the multivariate logistic analysis of the derivation cohort, four candidate predictors were entered into the final prognostic model: cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) IgG synthesis index (IgG-Syn), and spinal cord lesions. The value assignment was completed according to the regression coefficient of each identified independent prognostic factor for CNS IIDDs in the derivation cohort to establish the CELS risk score model. According to the regression coefficient, point values were given to each factor based on the log scale, and 1 point was awarded for each variable. These 4 factors determined the total risk score, ranging from 0 to 4. There was a higher risk of death in IIDD patients with higher CELS scores and we, therefore, defined three levels of risk of death in IIDD patients: a low-risk group for patients with a score of 0, a medium-risk group for patients with a total score of 1 or 2, and a high-risk group for patients with a total score of 3 or 4. The prognostic model had an area under the curve of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.803-0.925) in the internal validation cohort and 0.871 (95% CI: 0.806-0.931) in the external validation cohort. The calibration plots showed a high agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. Decision curve analysis indicated that IIDD patients could benefit from the clinical application of the prognostic model. Conclusion s We identified the risk factors for IIDD onset after haplo-HSCT, and we also developed and validated a reliable prediction model, namely, the CELS, to accurately assess the outcome of IIDD patients after haplo-HSCT. Identifying IIDD patients who are at a high risk of death can help physicians treat them in advance, which will improve patient survival and prognosis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Development and external validation of a prognostic tool for COVID-19 critical disease

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0242953
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Chow ◽  
Justin Glavis-Bloom ◽  
Jennifer E. Soun ◽  
Brent Weinberg ◽  
Theresa Berens Loveless ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Laboratory Values ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Care Capacity

Background The rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) revealed significant constraints in critical care capacity. In anticipation of subsequent waves, reliable prediction of disease severity is essential for critical care capacity management and may enable earlier targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to develop and externally validate a prognostic model/clinical tool for predicting COVID-19 critical disease at presentation to medical care. Methods This is a retrospective study of a prognostic model for the prediction of COVID-19 critical disease where critical disease was defined as ICU admission, ventilation, and/or death. The derivation cohort was used to develop a multivariable logistic regression model. Covariates included patient comorbidities, presenting vital signs, and laboratory values. Model performance was assessed on the validation cohort by concordance statistics. The model was developed with consecutive patients with COVID-19 who presented to University of California Irvine Medical Center in Orange County, California. External validation was performed with a random sample of patients with COVID-19 at Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Georgia. Results Of a total 3208 patients tested in the derivation cohort, 9% (299/3028) were positive for COVID-19. Clinical data including past medical history and presenting laboratory values were available for 29% (87/299) of patients (median age, 48 years [range, 21–88 years]; 64% [36/55] male). The most common comorbidities included obesity (37%, 31/87), hypertension (37%, 32/87), and diabetes (24%, 24/87). Critical disease was present in 24% (21/87). After backward stepwise selection, the following factors were associated with greatest increased risk of critical disease: number of comorbidities, body mass index, respiratory rate, white blood cell count, % lymphocytes, serum creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, high sensitivity troponin I, ferritin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein. Of a total of 40 patients in the validation cohort (median age, 60 years [range, 27–88 years]; 55% [22/40] male), critical disease was present in 65% (26/40). Model discrimination in the validation cohort was high (concordance statistic: 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.87–1.01). A web-based tool was developed to enable clinicians to input patient data and view likelihood of critical disease. Conclusions and relevance We present a model which accurately predicted COVID-19 critical disease risk using comorbidities and presenting vital signs and laboratory values, on derivation and validation cohorts from two different institutions. If further validated on additional cohorts of patients, this model/clinical tool may provide useful prognostication of critical care needs.

scholarly journals Development and validation of nomograms for prediction of overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients of colorectal cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-269
Author(s):  
Jieyun Zhang ◽  
Yue Yang ◽  
Xiaojian Fu ◽  
Weijian Guo
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Development And Validation

Abstract Purpose Nomograms are intuitive tools for individualized cancer prognosis. We sought to develop a clinical nomogram for prediction of overall survival and cancer-specific survival for patients with colorectal cancer. Methods Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 2006 and those who underwent surgery were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and randomly divided into the training (n = 119 797) and validation (n = 119 797) cohorts. Log-rank and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used in our analysis. To find out death from other cancer causes and non-cancer causes, a competing-risks model was used, based on which we integrated these significant prognostic factors into nomograms and subjected the nomograms to bootstrap internal validation and to external validation. Results The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year probabilities of overall survival in patients of colorectal cancer after surgery intervention were 83.04, 65.54, 54.79 and 38.62%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival was 87.36, 73.44, 66.22 and 59.11%, respectively. Nine independent prognostic factors for overall survival and nine independent prognostic factors for cancer specific survival were included to build the nomograms. Internal and external validation CI indexes of overall survival were 0.722 and 0.721, and those of cancer-specific survival were 0.765 and 0.766, which was satisfactory. Conclusions Nomograms for prediction of overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Performance of the model was excellent. This practical prognostic model may help clinicians in decision-making and design of clinical studies.

scholarly journals Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: the PLANS (platelet lymphocyte age neutrophil sex) model

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiong Li ◽  
Yuntao Chen ◽  
Shujing Chen ◽  
Sihua Wang ◽  
Dingyu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Prognostic Models ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Bootstrap Approach

Abstract Background Previous published prognostic models for COVID-19 patients have been suggested to be prone to bias due to unrepresentativeness of patient population, lack of external validation, inappropriate statistical analyses, or poor reporting. A high-quality and easy-to-use prognostic model to predict in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients could support physicians to make better clinical decisions. Methods Fine-Gray models were used to derive a prognostic model to predict in-hospital mortality (treating discharged alive from hospital as the competing event) in COVID-19 patients using two retrospective cohorts (n = 1008) in Wuhan, China from January 1 to February 10, 2020. The proposed model was internally evaluated by bootstrap approach and externally evaluated in an external cohort (n = 1031). Results The derivation cohort was a case-mix of mild-to-severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients (43.6% females, median age 55). The final model (PLANS), including five predictor variables of platelet count, lymphocyte count, age, neutrophil count, and sex, had an excellent predictive performance (optimism-adjusted C-index: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.87; averaged calibration slope: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.08). Internal validation showed little overfitting. External validation using an independent cohort (47.8% female, median age 63) demonstrated excellent predictive performance (C-index: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.89; calibration slope: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.12). The averaged predicted cumulative incidence curves were close to the observed cumulative incidence curves in patients with different risk profiles. Conclusions The PLANS model based on five routinely collected predictors would assist clinicians in better triaging patients and allocating healthcare resources to reduce COVID-19 fatality.

scholarly journals A Computed Tomography Radiomics-Based Prediction Model on Interstitial Lung Disease in Anti-MDA5-Positive Dermatomyositis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenwen Xu ◽  
Wanlong Wu ◽  
Yu Zheng ◽  
Zhiwei Chen ◽  
Xinwei Tao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
External Validation ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Derivation Cohort

Objectives: Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease (MDA5+ DM-ILD) is a life-threatening disease. The current study aimed to quantitatively assess the pulmonary high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images of MDA5+ DM-ILD by applying the radiomics approach and establish a multidimensional risk prediction model for the 6-month mortality.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 228 patients from two centers, namely, a derivation cohort and a longitudinal internal validation cohort in Renji Hospital, as well as an external validation cohort in Guangzhou. The derivation cohort was randomly divided into training and testing sets. The primary outcome was 6-month all-cause mortality since the time of admission. Baseline pulmonary HRCT images were quantitatively analyzed by radiomics approach, and a radiomic score (Rad-score) was generated. Clinical predictors selected by univariable Cox regression were further incorporated with the Rad-score, to enhance the prediction performance of the final model (Rad-score plus model). In parallel, an idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)-based visual CT score and ILD-GAP score were calculated as comparators.Results: The Rad-score was significantly associated with the 6-month mortality, outperformed the traditional visual score and ILD-GAP score. The Rad-score plus model was successfully developed to predict the 6-month mortality, with C-index values of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79–0.96] in the training set (n = 121), 0.88 (95%CI, 0.71–1.0) in the testing set (n = 31), 0.83 (95%CI, 0.68–0.98) in the internal validation cohort (n = 44), and 0.84 (95%CI, 0.64–1.0) in the external validation cohort (n = 32).Conclusions: The radiomic feature was an independent and reliable prognostic predictor for MDA5+ DM-ILD.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prognostic Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Surgical Resection

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Huang ◽  
Hengkai Chen ◽  
Yongyi Zeng ◽  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
Handong Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Internal Validation

Surgical resection remains primary curative treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while over 50% of patients experience recurrence, which calls for individualized recurrence prediction and early surveillance. This study aimed to develop a machine learning prognostic model to identify high-risk patients after surgical resection and to review importance of variables in different time intervals. The patients in this study were from two centers including Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHSH) and Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital (MHH). The best-performed model was determined, validated, and applied to each time interval (0–1 year, 1–2 years, 2–3 years, and 3–5 years). Importance scores were used to illustrate feature importance in different time intervals. In addition, a risk heat map was constructed which visually depicted the risk of recurrence in different years. A total of 7,919 patients from two centers were included, of which 3,359 and 230 patients experienced recurrence, metastasis or died during the follow-up time in the EHSH and MHH datasets, respectively. The XGBoost model achieved the best discrimination with a c-index of 0.713 in internal validation cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves succeed to stratify external validation cohort into different risk groups (p < 0.05 in all comparisons). Tumor characteristics contribute more to HCC relapse in 0 to 1 year while HBV infection and smoking affect patients’ outcome largely in 3 to 5 years. Based on machine learning prediction model, the peak of recurrence can be predicted for individual HCC patients. Therefore, clinicians can apply it to personalize the management of postoperative survival.

Prediction of Poststroke Urinary Tract Infection Risk in Immobile Patients Using Machine Learning: Observational Cohort Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Zhu ◽  
Zidu Xu ◽  
Yaowen Gu ◽  
Si Zheng ◽  
Xiangyu Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ensemble Learning ◽  
Predictive Models ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Derivation Cohort

BACKGROUND Poststroke immobility gets patients more vulnerable to stroke-relevant complications. Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of major nosocomial infections significantly affecting the outcomes of immobile stroke patients. Previous studies have identified several risk factors, but it is still challenging to accurately estimate personal UTI risk due to unclear interaction of various factors and variability of individual characteristics. This calls for more precise and trust-worthy predictive models to assist with potential UTI identification. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop predictive models for UTI risk identification for immobile stroke patients. A prospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and clinical interpretability of the models. METHODS The data used in this study were collected from the Common Complications of Bedridden Patients and the Construction of Standardized Nursing Intervention Model (CCBPC). Derivation cohort included data of 3982 immobile stroke patients collected during CCBPC-I, from November 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016; external validation cohort included data of 3837 immobile stroke patients collected during CCBPC-II, from November 1, 2016 to July 30, 2017. 6 machine learning models and an ensemble learning model were derived based on 80% of derivation cohort and its effectiveness was evaluated with the remaining 20% of derivation cohort data. We further compared the effectiveness of predictive models in external validation cohort. The performance of logistic regression without regularization was used as a reference. We used Shapley additive explanation values to determine feature importance and examine the clinical significance of prediction models. Shapely values of the factors were calculated to represent the magnitude, prevalence, and direction of their effects, and were further visualized in a summary plot. RESULTS A total of 103(2.59%) patients were diagnosed with UTI in derivation cohort(N=3982); the internal validation cohort (N=797) shared the same incidence. The external validation cohort had a UTI incidence of 1.38% (N=53). Evaluation results showed that the ensemble learning model performed the best in area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in internal validation, up to 82.2%; second best in external validation, 80.8%. In addition, the ensemble learning model performed the best sensitivity in both internal and external validation sets (80.9% and 81.1%, respectively). We also identified seven UTI risk factors (pneumonia, glucocorticoid use, female sex, mixed cerebrovascular disease, increased age, prolonged length of stay, and duration of catheterization) contributing most to the predictive model, thus demonstrating the clinical interpretability of model. CONCLUSIONS Our ensemble learning model demonstrated promising performance. Identifying UTI risk and detecting high risk factors among immobile stroke patients would allow more selective and effective use of preventive interventions, thus improving clinical outcomes. Future work should focus on developing a more concise scoring tool and prospectively examining the model in practical use.

scholarly journals Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients admitted with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: the PLANS (Platelet Lymphocyte Age Neutrophil Sex) model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiong Li ◽  
Yuntao Chen ◽  
Shujing Chen ◽  
Sihua Wang ◽  
Dingyu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Predictor Variables ◽  
Survival Curves ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Union Hospital

OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prognostic model for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients using routinely collected demographic and clinical characteristics. DESIGN Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. SETTING Jinyintan Hospital, Union Hospital, and Tongji Hosptial in Wuhan, China. PARTICIPANTS A pooled derivation cohort of 1008 COVID-19 patients from Jinyintan Hospital, Union Hospital in Wuhan and an external validation cohort of 1031 patients from Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality, treating discharged alive from hospital as the competing event. Fine-Gray models, using backward elimination for inclusion of predictor variables and allowing non-linear effects of continuous variables, were used to derive a prognostic model for predicting in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients. Internal validation was implemented to check model overfitting using bootstrap approach. External validation to a separate hospital was implemented to evaluate the generalizability of the model. RESULTS The derivation cohort was a case-mix of mild-to-severe hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n=1008, 43.6% females, median age 55). The final model (PLANS), including five predictor variables of platelet count, lymphocyte count, age, neutrophil count, and sex, had an excellent predictive performance (optimism-adjusted C-index: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.87; averaged calibration slope: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.08). Internal validation showed little overfitting. External validation using an independent cohort (n=1031, 47.8% female, median age 63) demonstrated excellent predictive performance (C-index: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.89; calibration slope: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.12). The averaged predicted survival curves were close to the observed survival curves across patients with different risk profiles. CONCLUSIONS The PLANS model based on the five routinely collected demographic and clinical characteristics (platelet count, lymphocyte count, age, neutrophil count, and sex) showed excellent discriminative and calibration accuracy in predicting in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. This prognostic model would assist clinicians in better triaging patients and allocating healthcare resources to reduce COVID-19 fatality.

scholarly journals Development and External Validation of a Prognostic Tool for COVID-19 Critical Disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Chow ◽  
Justin Glavis-Bloom ◽  
Jennifer E. Soun ◽  
Brent Weinberg ◽  
Theresa Berens Loveless ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Laboratory Values ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Care Capacity

AbstractBackgroundThe rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) revealed significant constraints in critical care capacity. In anticipation of subsequent waves, reliable prediction of disease severity is essential for critical care capacity management and may enable earlier targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to develop and externally validate a prognostic model/clinical tool for predicting COVID-19 critical disease at presentation to medical care.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of a prognostic model for the prediction of COVID-19 critical disease where critical disease was defined as ICU admission, ventilation, and/or death. The derivation cohort was used to develop a multivariable logistic regression model. Covariates included patient comorbidities, presenting vital signs, and laboratory values. Model performance was assessed on the validation cohort by concordance statistics. The model was developed with consecutive patients with COVID-19 who presented to University of California Irvine Medical Center in Orange County, California. External validation was performed with a random sample of patients with COVID-19 at Emory Healthcare in Atlanta, Georgia.ResultsOf a total 3208 patients tested in the derivation cohort, 9% (299/3028) were positive for COVID-19. Clinical data including past medical history and presenting laboratory values were available for 29% (87/299) of patients (median age, 48 years [range, 21-88 years]; 64% [36/55] male). The most common comorbidities included obesity (37%, 31/87), hypertension (37%, 32/87), and diabetes (24%, 24/87). Critical disease was present in 24% (21/87). After backward stepwise selection, the following factors were associated with greatest increased risk of critical disease: number of comorbidities, body mass index, respiratory rate, white blood cell count, % lymphocytes, serum creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, high sensitivity troponin I, ferritin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein. Of a total of 40 patients in the validation cohort (median age, 60 years [range, 27-88 years]; 55% [22/40] male), critical disease was present in 65% (26/40). Model discrimination in the validation cohort was high (concordance statistic: 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.01). A web-based tool was developed to enable clinicians to input patient data and view likelihood of critical disease.Conclusions and RelevanceWe present a model which accurately predicted COVID-19 critical disease risk using comorbidities and presenting vital signs and laboratory values, on derivation and validation cohorts from two different institutions. If further validated on additional cohorts of patients, this model/clinical tool may provide useful prognostication of critical care needs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document