scholarly journals Neonatal sepsis in Sana’a city, Yemen: a predominance of Burkholderia cepacia

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adeeb Salah ◽  
Ibrahim Al-Subol ◽  
Ahmed Hudna ◽  
Ali Alhaj ◽  
Abdulhabib R. Alqubaty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multidrug Resistance ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Burkholderia Cepacia ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Klebsiella Oxytoca ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive

Abstract Background Neonatal sepsis is a global concern with increasing morbidity and mortality. The burden of neonatal sepsis is highest in developing countries, especially in those lacking proper surveillance systems. The causative pathogens and their drug-resistance levels vary between countries with emergence of multidrug resistance organisms. Thus, accurate records on the recent trends of organisms causing neonatal sepsis will provide vital information for appropriate intervention. We aimed to investigate neonatal sepsis, identify its associated factors and causative pathogens and to assess the antibiotic susceptibility patterns in Sana’a city, Yemen. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on neonates admitted to intensive care units of six hospitals in Sana’a city, Yemen, in the period from January 15, to March 30, 2020. Natal and prenatal medical data were collected using well-structured questionnaire. Neonates were subjected to sepsis work-up including blood culture, complete blood count and C-reactive protein. Organisms were identified by Gram staining and analyzed by the VITEK II system for bacterial bio-typing and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Findings Of the 199-neonates with suspected neonatal sepsis, 154 (77.38%) had culture-proven sepsis. Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) was higher (50.25%; 100/199) than late-onset neonatal sepsis (LOS) (27.13%; 54/199). Multivariable analysis identified vaginal delivery as an independent risk factor for neonatal sepsis p = 0.005. Majority of isolated bacteria (74.39%) were gram-negative with Burkholderia cepacia (39%) and Klebsiella oxytoca (13%) being the most common pathogens of EOS and LOS. The most common gram-positive pathogens were Staphylococcus haemolyticus (9.1%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (7.1%). B. cepacia showed multidrug resistance except for cefepime. All Klebsiella species isolates (100%) and most Pantoea species (93%) were ESBL and carbapenemase positive. All Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were ESBL positive. A significant number of gram-positive bacteria showed resistance to vancomycin. Conclusion The study findings show a high proportion of neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted to hospitals in Sana’a city with antibiotic-resistant B. cepacia being the single most common pathogen causing EOS and LOS. Findings also emphasize the emerging threat of multidrug-resistant bacteria in neonatal units and will help develop evidence-based management of neonatal sepsis in Yemen.

scholarly journals Biochemical identification techniques and antibiotic susceptibility profile of lipolytic ambiental bacteria from effluents

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. F. G. Rave ◽  
A. V. Kuss ◽  
G. H. S. Peil ◽  
S. R. Ladeira ◽  
J. P. V. Villarreal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Klebsiella Oxytoca ◽  
Effluent Treatment ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Biochemical Tests ◽  
Biochemical Identification ◽  
Identification Techniques ◽  
Susceptibility Profiles ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Different methodologies have been developed throughout the years to identify environmental microorganisms to improve bioremediation techniques, determine susceptibility profiles of bacteria in contaminated environments, and reduce the impact of microorganisms in ecosystems. Two methods of bacterial biochemical identification are compared and the susceptibility profile of bacteria, isolated from residential and industrial wastewater, is determined. Twenty-four bacteria were retrieved from the bacteria bank of the Environmental Microbiology Laboratory at the Institute of Biology (IB) of the Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. Bacteria were identified by conventional biochemical tests and by the VITEK ®2 automated system. Further, the susceptibility profile to antibiotics was also determined by the automated system. Six species of bacteria (Raoutella planticola, K. pneumoniae ssp. pneumoniae , Serratia marcescens, Raoutella sp., E. cloacae and Klebsiella oxytoca) were identified by conventional biochemical tests, while three species of bacteria (K. pneumoniae ssp. pneumoniae, S. marcescens and K. oxytoca ) were identified by VITEK®2 automated system. VITEK ®2 indicated agreement in 19 (79.17%) isolates and difference in five (20.83%) isolates when compared to results from conventional biochemical tests. Further, antibiotic susceptibility profile results showed that all isolates (100%) were resistant to at least one out of the 18 antibiotics tested by VITEK®2. Thus, no multi-resistant bacteria that may be used in effluent treatment systems or in bioremediation processes have been reported. Results indicate VITEK ® 2 automated system as a potential methodology in the determination of susceptibility profile and identification of environmental bacteria.

scholarly journals Neonatal septicemia and current scenario of antibiotic sensitivity pattern – A study of blood culture isolates in a tertiary care hospital, Rajkot

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-226
Author(s):  
Madhulika Mistry ◽  
Arpita Bhattacharya ◽  
Twinkle Kumar Parmar
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Antibiotic Sensitivity ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Neonatal Septicemia ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Current Scenario

Neonatal sepsis is one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality in developing countries. Neonatal sepsis can be classified into two subtypes depending upon onset of symptoms- before 72 hours of life (early-onset neonatal sepsis—EONS) or later (late-onset neonatal sepsis—LONS). Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern in neonatal septicemia are changing time-to-time and place-to-place. This study is aimed to know the current scenario of neonatal septicemia and antibiotic susceptibility pattern for determining effective treatment, hence reducing burden of antibiotic resistance.This is a Retrospective study. Data was collected from Bacteriology lab, PDUMC Rajkot (May 2020 – May 2021). Blood cultures were performed on suspected neonates. Both BACTEC and conventional methods were used. Organisms were isolated by standard microbiological protocols and antibiotic sensitivity was performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as per CLSI- 2020/2021 guidelines. Total 1402 samples were screened. 326 were positive (23.25%). 214(65.64%) were male and 112(34.36%) were female. CONS (32.21%) was found to be the predominant pathogen followed by Klebsiella (19.63%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.10%), E. coli (15.95%), Acinetobacter (12.27%) and Enterococcus spp. (1.84%). EONS was seen in 195(59.82%) cases and LONS was seen in 131(40.18%) cases. Gram-negative bacteria are predominant in EONS (76.28%) and gram-positive bacteria is predominant in LONS (64.12%). Gram negative isolates are mostly susceptible to Meropenem, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Cefepime, Ceftazidime. Gram positive isolates mostly showed sensitivity to Vancomycin, Linezolid.Multi-drug resistant organism are emerging in neonatal septicemia. Strict antibiotic stewardship should be practiced to avoid the upcoming treatment difficulties.

scholarly journals A ten-year review of neonatal bloodstream infections in a tertiary private hospital in Kenya

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 799-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruchika Kohli-Kochhar ◽  
Geoffrey Omuse ◽  
Gunturu Revathi
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Late Onset Sepsis ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Right

Introduction: Neonatal mortality in developing countries is usually due to an infectious cause.  The gold standard of investigation in developing countries is a positive blood culture.  It is important to know the aetiology of neonatal bloodstream infections so that empiric treatment can be effective.  Methodology: We conducted a retrospective clinical audit over ten years between January 2000 until December 2009, looking at the aetiology of both early and late onset neonatal sepsis.  We analysed data from 152 (23%) patient isolates out of 662 suspected cases of neonatal sepsis.  Results: Our study revealed that Gram-positive organisms were the predominant cause of both early and late onset sepsis; the common isolates were Staphylococcus epidermidis (34%) and Staphylococcus aureus (27%).  There were no isolates of group B Streptococcus.  Candida species was isolated only in patients with late onset sepsis (6.9%).  Bacterial isolates were relatively sensitive to the commonly used first- and second-line empiric antibiotics. Conclusion: Gram-positive organisms remain the major cause of neonatal bloodstream infections in our setup.  The findings of this study will guide clinicians in prescribing the right empiric therapy in cases of suspected neonatal sepsis before the definitive culture results are obtained.

TLR2 and TLR4 expressions in late-onset neonatal sepsis: Is it a potential novel biomarker?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
R. Rohsiswatmo ◽  
M. Azharry ◽  
T.T. Sari ◽  
Y. Bahasoan ◽  
D. Wulandari
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Tlr4 Expression ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Reactive Protein

BACKGROUND: Late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) detection is problematic as no single examinations (blood culture, c-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT)) are reliable. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which detect the presence of pathogen-associated molecular patterns is a promising novel biomarker, but less studied in LONS. This study aimed to determine neutrophils and monocytes TLR2 and TLR4 expression in LONS and their diagnostic value. METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted in May and June 2017 involving 52 neonates with clinical late-onset (>72 hours of age) sepsis. We examine complete blood count, I/T ratio, CRP, PCT, as well as TLR2 and TLR4 expression to compared with blood culture as the gold standard. We classified cases into proven or unproven sepsis. RESULT: The incidence of LONS was 32.6% in the subjects. The expression of TLR2 was low in LONS, while TLR4 was high. TLR4 neutrophil expression has 88.2% sensitivity, 20% specificity, 34.9% positive predictive value (PPV), 77.8% negative predictive value (NPV), and an AUC of 0.541. TLR4 monocyte expression has 92.1% sensitivity, 11.4% specificity, 34% PPV, 80% NPV, and an AUC of 0.528. The AUC of CRP is increased from 0.608 to 0.843 after combination with TLR4, comparable with CRP + PCT (AUC 0.829). CONCLUSION: The increase in TLR4 expression has good sensitivity but low specificity. TLR4 expression, in combination with CRP, could become a reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of LONS.

scholarly journals Survival Status and Predictors of Mortality among Newborns Admitted with Neonatal Sepsis at Public Hospitals in Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Samuel Dessu ◽  
Aklilu Habte ◽  
Tamirat Melis ◽  
Mesfin Gebremedhin
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cumulative Proportion ◽  
Predictors Of Mortality ◽  
Survival Status ◽  
History Of

Background. One-fourth of neonatal death is due to neonatal sepsis and nearly 98% of these deaths are occurring at low- and middle-income countries. In Ethiopia, forty percent of under-five mortality occurs during the neonatal period, of which neonatal sepsis accounts for 30-35% of neonatal deaths next to prematurity and its complications. On the other side, among the survived neonates with neonatal sepsis, there exist as vulnerable to short and long-term neurological and developmental morbidity impacting the overall productivity of the child as adult. Methods. A longitudinal prospective cohort study was conducted among selected 289 neonates with neonatal sepsis who were admitted in the neonatal intensive care unit at public hospitals in Ethiopia from 1st March 2018 to 31st December 2019. Data were entered into Epi data version 3.02 and exported to SPSS V 25 for analysis. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve together with log-rank test was used to estimate the survival time of the neonates. Variables which had p value < 0.05 in multivariable analysis using the cox proportional hazard model were declared as statistically significant predictors of mortality. Results. The study was conducted with a total of 289 neonates admitted with neonatal sepsis. The cumulative proportion of surviving at the end of the fourth day was 99.5%, and it was 98.2% at the end of the fifth day. In addition, it was 96.6%, 93.5%, and 91.1% at the end of the sixth, seventh, and eighth day, respectively. The incidence of mortality was 8.65 per 100 neonates admitted with neonatal sepsis. Having a history of intrapartum fever (AHR: 14.5; 95% CI: 4.25, 49.5), history of chorioamnionitis (AHR: 5.7; 95% CI: 2.29, 13.98), induced labor (AHR: 7; 95% CI: 2.32, 21.08), and not initiating exclusive breastfeeding within one hour (AHR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.34, 12.63) were the independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion. The survival status of neonates among neonates admitted with neonatal sepsis was high at the early admission days and high cumulative proportion of death as the admission period increased. The risk of mortality was high among the neonates with early onset of neonatal sepsis as compared with late onset of neonatal sepsis and history of intrapartum fever, history of diagnosed chorioamnionitis, onset of labor, and EBF initiation within one hour were the independent predictors of mortality among neonates admitted with neonatal sepsis.

scholarly journals Bacteriological Study of Wound Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of the Isolates

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-150
Author(s):  
R KC ◽  
A Shrestha ◽  
VK Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Klebsiella Oxytoca ◽  
Microbiological Analysis ◽  
Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Bacteriological Study ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Staph Aureus

Wound infections result in sepsis, limb loss, long hospital stays, higher costs, and are responsible for significant human mortality and morbidity worldwide. The present study was conducted to isolate and identify the causative organisms of wound infection, to determine the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates and to study the risk factors for wound infection. The study was conducted for six months in which pus specimens collected from 244 patients were processed to investigate etiological agents using standard technique. Disc susceptibility of bacterial agents were then determined. A total of 244 pus samples were collected and 147 (60.20%) samples showed growth. A total of 150 bacterial isolates were isolated; of which 118 (78.67%) were Gram positive and 32 (21.33%) were Gram negative bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus (72.00%) was most common followed by Escherichia coli (6.67%), Citrobacter freundii (5.34%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (4.00%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.33%), Proteus mirabilis (2.00%), Enterococcus faecalis (1.33%), Acinetobacter spp. (1.33%), Klebsiella oxytoca (1.33%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (1.33%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (0.67%) and Streptococcus pyogenes (0.67%). The most effective antibiotic for Gram positive isolates was Gentamicin (77.97%). For Gram negative isolates (except Ps. aeruginosa), Amikacin (74.07%), for Ps. aeruginosa, Amikacin, Ciprofloxacin, Gentamicin and Ofloxacin each with the susceptibility of 80.00% and for Staph. aureus, Cloxacillin (79.63%) were the most effective antibiotics. Hence, the most common isolate in wound infection was Staph. aureus followed by E. coli. Therefore, routine microbiological analysis of the wound specimens and their antibiotic susceptibility testing is recommended that will guide clinician for treatment of wound infection. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njst.v14i2.10428   Nepal Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 14, No. 2 (2013) 143-150

scholarly journals Bacterial Isolates of Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Abdul Mannan ◽  
Shahed Iqbal ◽  
SM Rezaul Karim ◽  
Talim Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Md Hakimul Haque Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Late Onset Sepsis ◽  
Early Onset Sepsis ◽  
Sensitivity Pattern ◽  
Rule Out

Background: Neonatal infections are the commonest cause of neonatal mortality along with perinatal asphyxia and consequence of Prematurity and Low Birth Weight (LBW) in Bangladesh. Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis (EONS) is neonatal sepsis occurring within the first 72 hours of birth and it is much more fulminant and has a higher mortality than Late Onset Sepsis (LOS). Sepsis in neonate remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in developing countries. Changing bacterial flora and emergence of resistant strains adds to the problem. Thus, neonatal sepsis requires accurate and timely clinical and laboratory diagnosis and proper management for better outcome. The organisms responsible for Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) are different than Late Onset Sepsis (LOS). In this study an attempt has been made to know the positivity rate of EOS and profile of bacteria responsible for EOS and determine the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern that were investigated for rule out sepsis. Methods: This was a prospective observation single centre study over a period of nine months (January to September, 2017) conducted on neonates born at Ad-din Medical College Hospital (AMCH), Dhaka and subsequently admitted in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) within 72 hours of birth that were investigated for rule out sepsis. Dual blood sample for cultures from separate area along with essential investigations were sent by collecting samples under aseptic precautions. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was started according to antimicrobial guidelines in the NICU. The blood cultures test were carried out by BD BACTEC automated blood culture system and susceptibility testing was done for all blood culture isolates according to the criteria of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards by disk diffusion method. Results: A total of 700 neonates were investigated to rule out sepsis and 5.43% neonates were found with culture proven sepsis in the study. The gram positive bacteria accounted for 71% and gram negative 29% of the total isolates. Out of total 38 isolates, Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CONS) (68.4%) was the commonest followed by Acinetobacter (18.4%) and E. coli (7.9%) was common culture isolates. Among the gram positive, CONS (96.3%) was commonest isolate and in gram negative Acinetobacter (63.6%) was the most prevalent bacteria followed by E.coli (27.3%). Gram positive isolate, especially CONS (68.4%) was the major culprit for the early onset sepsis. Among the commonly used antibiotics, the susceptibilities were remarkably low to Amikacin (16%) in comparison to Ampicillin (42%) Cefotaxime (45%) and moderately high to Gentamicin (58%) for both gram positive & gram negative isolates. All (100%) gram positive isolates were resistant to Amikacin. Majority of the gram positive showed low susceptibilities to Meropenem (22%) Ciprofloxacin (41%) Ampicillin (48%) & Oxacillin (48%) in comparison to Cefotaxime (52%) Levofloxacin (55%) Gentamicin (70%), Linezolid (70%) and Vancomycin (74%). 50% of Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CONS) were resistant to Methicillin/Oxacillin. The sensitivity pattern of majority of gram negative isolates showed high level of resistance to Piperacillin+Tazobacterm (9%) and Ampicillin (27%) Gentamicin (27%) Cefotaxime (27%) less sensitive to Ciprofloxacin (45%); moderately high to Levofloxacin (54%) & Amikacin (54%) and highly sensitive to Imipenem/Meropenem (73%) & Colistin (91%). Gentamicin (58%) and Levofloxacin (55%) were showed marginal superiority compared to Ampicillin (42%) and Cefotaxime (45%) for effective coverage of both. Conclusion: Present study indicated that gram positive species especially CONS continue to be the predominant causative organism followed by Acinetobacter and E. coli in gram negative species. The antibiotic susceptibility profile suggested that for a given cohort empiric (initial) choice of Ampicillin and Gentamicin in EOS. Routine bacterial surveillance and their sensitivity patterns must be an essential component of neonatal care Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.17 (1); Jan 2018; Page 3-8

scholarly journals Neonatal Sepsis, Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern, and Treatment Outcomes among Neonates Treated in Two Tertiary Care Hospitals of Yangon, Myanmar from 2017 to 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Nan Aye Thida Oo ◽  
Jeffrey K. Edwards ◽  
Prajjwal Pyakurel ◽  
Pruthu Thekkur ◽  
Thae Maung Maung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
First Line ◽  
Suspected Sepsis ◽  
Early Onset Sepsis ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals

Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. This study aimed to assess the proportion of culture-confirmed sepsis, bacteriological pathogen profile, culture report turnaround times, antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and treatment outcomes of all with neonatal sepsis admitted in two tertiary care hospitals in Yangon, Myanmar, 2017–2019. This was a cross sectional study utilizing a standardized electronic database and paper-based records. Bacteriological profiles and associated factors were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Poisson Regression. Of those with suspected sepsis, 42% were bacteriologically confirmed and 74% of confirmed sepsis was resistant to at least first-line antibiotics. Neonates with late onset sepsis (LOS) (aPR: 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1–1.4, p = 0.008)) were more likely to have bacteriologically confirmed sepsis (45%) versus early onset sepsis (38%). Gram-negative organisms were most commonly isolated (63%), associated with multidrug-resistant organisms and with a high case-fatality rate (64%). These findings suggest that enhanced national guidance regarding infection control and prevention, antibiotic stewardship, and first-line antibiotic choices need to be provided. The link between LOS with infection and prevention protocols needs to be further explored in this context to decrease sepsis risk, neonatal mortality, and reduce further antimicrobial resistance.

scholarly journals Study of Bacteriological pathogen causing neonatal sepsis at NICU in Ad-din medical college hospital

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marium Begum ◽  
Mahmuda Hassan ◽  
ZSM Haque ◽  
N Jahan ◽  
Kona Chowdhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Male Female Ratio

Objective : To determine the common causative bacterial agents of neonatal sepsis and their antimicrobial susceptibility in NICUMethods : Newborns with clinical signs of septicemia and positive blood culture during twelve months were prospectively studied. Samples for blood cultures, complete blood count, C-reactive protein, sugar, electrolytes were obtained ; ampicillin and gentamycin were started empirically.Result : Seven hundred and three neonates were investigated to rule out of sepsis. The male, female ratio was 1.3:1 and 56(63.63%) of patients were preterm and 32(36.36%) were term neonates. There were 68 (77.27%) cases of Early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) and 20(22.64%) of Late onset neonatal sepsis (LONS). Coagulase negative staphylococcus (CONS) was the most common 37(42.04%) Gm+ve pathogen causing early onset neonatal sepsis and Acinetobacter was common Gm-ve pathogen in both early onset 16(18%) and late-onset 8 (9%) sepsis. CONS sepsis showed high degree of resistance to commonly used antibiotics; ampicillin (86.5%), oxacillin (60%),cefotaxime (67%) but comparatively low resistance to vancomycin (0%), gentamicin (25%), Levofloxacin(36%) & Imipenem (49%). Acinetobacter were highly resistant to ampicillin (100), gentamicin(75%), cefotaxime(100) and sensitive to Amikacin (58.33%), ciprofloxacin (54.16%), Levofloxacin and Imipenem (62.5%)and Colistin (95.83%).Conclusion : Neonatal sepsis in our NICU is mainly caused by grampositive organisms, which are developing resistance to commonly used antibiotics. The initial empirical choice of Ampicillin and Gentamicin appears to be unreasonable for our environment.Northern International Medical College Journal Vol.5(1) 2013: 297-300

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document